Factors associated with avoidable interhospital transfers for children with a minor head injury

Pediatric TBI: Direct admissions vs. secondary referrals to a hospital: A single‑center, retrospective study

The present retrospective study was conducted in an aim to examine the differences between pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) cases referred to and those admitted directly to the hospital. For this purpose, pediatric patients who presented to a main trauma center with TBI between January, 2015 and December, 2019 were reviewed retrospectively, emphasizing whether they were admitted directly or referred from another center. Data collected included the demographic characteristics of the patients, as well as their presenting complaints and the cause of TBI. A total of 981 cases of pediatric TBI were admitted over the 5-year period. The average age of the patients was 58.1 months for the referred cases and almost 50 months for the patients directly admitted. The male sex accounted for 63.6% of all cases. The most common cause of injury was falling (63.5%). Nausea and vomiting were the most typical presenting symptoms, occurring more among the directly admitted cases (P-value ≤0.05). Mild TBI accounted for 85.3% of the cases, and the most common radiological diagnosis was skull fracture (37.4%) (P-value ≤0.004). The referred patients had a more extended hospital stay (P-value ≤0.001). On the whole, the present study identified 981 cases; the majority of these were direct admissions, and the majority of the severe cases were referred from other healthcare facilities. Further research is required on this topic as only a single hospital was covered herein, and patients were not followed-up after discharge. A multi-center analysis would cover a greater number of patients and would thus provide more substantial data on the topic.

A pediatric teletrauma program pilot project: Improves access to pediatric trauma care and timely assessment of pediatric traumas

BACKGROUND

Geographic location is a barrier to providing specialized care to pediatric traumas. In 2019, we instituted a pediatric teletrauma program in collaboration with the Statewide Pediatric Trauma Network at our level 1 pediatric trauma center (PTC). Triage guidelines were provided to partnering hospitals (PHs) to aid in evaluation of pediatric traumas. Our pediatric trauma team was available for phone/video trauma consultation to provide recommendations on disposition and management. We hypothesized that this program would improve access and timely assessment of pediatric traumas while limiting patient transfers to our PTC.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the PTC between January 2019 and May 2023. All pediatric trauma patients younger than 18 years who had teletrauma consults were included. We also evaluated all avoidable transfers without teletrauma consults defined as admission for less than 36 hours without an intervention or imaging as a comparison group.

RESULTS

A total of 151 teletrauma consults were identified: 62% male and median age of 8 years (interquartile range [IQR], 4-12 years). Teletrauma consults increased from 12 in 2019 to 100 in 2022 to 2023, and the number of PHs increased from 2 to 32. Partnering hospitals were 15 to 554 miles from the PTC, with a median distance of 34 miles (IQR, 28-119 miles). Following consultation, we recommended discharge (34%), admission (29%), or transfer to PTC (35%). Of those who were not transferred, 3% (3 of 97) required subsequent treatment at the PTC. Nontransferred teletrauma consults had a higher percentage of TBI (61% vs. 31%, p < 0.001) and were from farther distances (40 miles [IQR, 28-150 miles] vs. 30 miles [IQR, 28-50 miles], p < 0.001) compared with avoidable transferred patients without a teletrauma consult.

CONCLUSION

Teletrauma consult is a safe and viable addition to a pediatric trauma program faced with providing care to a large geographical catchment area. The pediatric teletrauma program provided management recommendations to 32 PHs and avoided transfer in approximately 63% of cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Outcome of interhospital pediatric foreign body transfers

BACKGROUND

Children with foreign bodies are often transferred from general emergency departments (EDs) to children's hospitals for optimal management. Our objective was to describe the outcomes of interhospital pediatric foreign body transfers and examine factors associated with potentially avoidable transfers (PATs) in this cohort.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children aged <18 years transferred to our hospital for the primary complaint of foreign body from January 1, 2020, to September 30, 2022. Data collected included demographics, diagnostic studies and interventions performed, and disposition. A transfer was considered a PAT if the patient was either discharged from the pediatric emergency department (PED), or from inpatient care within 24 h, did not require procedural sedation and any procedural intervention by a pediatric sub-specialist (other than a pediatric ED physician). Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with PATs.

RESULTS

A total of 213 patients were analyzed based on eligibility criteria. The majority of patients were male (51.2%), pre-school age (59.2%), symptomatic (55.8%), and transferred from academic EDs (61%). Coins were the most common foreign bodies (30%), with the gastrointestinal tract (63.8%) being the most common location. Half of the non-respiratory and non-gastrointestinal foreign bodies were successfully removed in the PED. Over half (57.3%) of the patients were discharged from PED. Operative intervention was required in 82 (38.5%) patients, most commonly for coins (50%). 41.8% of transfers were deemed PATs. Presence of foreign body in the esophagus or respiratory tract (OR: 0.071, 95% CI: 0.025-0.200), symptoms at presentation (OR: 0.265, 95% CI: 0.130-0.542), magnet ingestions (OR: 0.208, 95% CI: 0.049-0.886) and transfers from community EDs (OR: 0.415, 95% CI: 0.194-0.885) were less likely associated with PATs. Button battery-related transfers were more likely associated with an avoidable transfer (OR: 6.681, 95% CI: 1.15-39.91).

CONCLUSIONS

PATs are relatively common among children transferred to a children's hospital for foreign bodies. Factors associated with PATs have been identified and may represent targets for interventions to avoid low value pediatric foreign body transfers.

Neuroimaging for mild traumatic brain injury in children: cross-sectional study using national claims data

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend healthcare professionals avoid routine use of neuroimaging for diagnosing mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine current use of CT and MRI among children and young adult patients with mTBI and factors that increase likelihood of neuroimaging in this population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were analyzed using the 2019 MarketScan commercial claims and encounters database for the commercially insured population for both inpatient and outpatient claims. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models for patients  ≤24 years of age who received an ICD-10-CM code indicative of a possible mTBI were analyzed.

RESULTS

Neuroimaging was performed in 16.9% (CT; 95% CI=16.7-17.1) and 0.9% (MRI; 95% CI=0.8-0.9) of mTBI outpatient visits (including emergency department visits) among children (≤18 years old). Neuroimaging was performed in a higher percentage of outpatient visits for patients 19-24 years old (CT=47.1% [95% CI=46.5-47.6] and MRI=1.7% [95% CI=1.5-1.8]), and children aged 15-18 years old (CT=20.9% [95% CI=20.5-21.2] and MRI=1.4% [95% CI=1.3-1.5]). Outpatient visits for males were 1.22 (95% CI=1.10-1.25) times more likely to include CT compared to females, while there were no differences by sex for MRI or among inpatient stays. Urban residents, as compared to rural, were less likely to get CT in outpatient settings (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=0.55, 95% CI=0.53-0.57). Rural residents demonstrated a larger proportion of inpatient admissions that had a CT.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite recommendations to avoid routine use of neuroimaging for mTBI, neuroimaging remained common practice in 2019.

BIG Kids: Application of a modified brain injury guideline in a pediatric trauma center

BACKGROUND

Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) were developed to stratify traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) by severity to decrease unnecessary CT imaging and neurosurgical consultation in low-risk cases. This study evaluated the potential effect of a modified pediatric BIG (pBIG) algorithm would have on resource utilization.

METHODS

Isolated TBIs (<18 years) were queried from our Pediatric Trauma Registry from 2017 to 2020. Injuries were classified as mild (pBIG 1), moderate (pBIG 2), or severe (pBIG 3) based on neurologic status, skull fractures, size, and the number of bleeds. Modifications from the institutional adult algorithm were upgrading <4 mm epidural hematomas to pBIG 2 and eliminating interfacility transfer as a pBIG 2 criteria. The proposed pBIG 1 and 2 care plans do not include routine repeat CTs or neurosurgical consultation.

RESULTS

A total of 314 children with a mean age of 4.9 years were included. Skull fractures (213, 68%) and subdural hematomas (162, 52%) were the most common injuries. 89 (28%) children had repeat head CTs (2 (7%) pBIG 1, 26 (25%) pBIG 2, 61 (34%) pBIG 3). Neurosurgical consultation was obtained in 306 (98%), with 50 (16%) requiring intervention (1 (1%) pBIG 2 and 49 (27%) pBIG 3). Following the proposed pBIG would decrease neurosurgical consults to 181 (58%) and repeat CTs to 63 (20%). Following the algorithm, 91 (29%) kids would have been admitted to a higher level of care and 45 (14.3%) to a lower level.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of our pBIG algorithm would decrease neurosurgery consults (40% reduction) and repeat head CTs (29% reduction).