Is "pain before vomiting" useful?: Diagnostic performance of the classic patient history item in acute appendicitis

The Masquerade of Myocardial Infarction as Gastroenteritis: A Diagnostic Challenge

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can present with varied symptomatology, often deviating from classic presentations, particularly in patients without the characteristic chest pain. This case report describes an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) that closely mimicked acute gastroenteritis, illustrating the challenges of differential diagnosis in atypical ACS presentations. We present the case of a 65-year-old Japanese male with a history of hypertension and dyslipidemia who arrived at the emergency department with acute abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever, symptoms suggesting viral gastroenteritis. The absence of chest pain diverted initial clinical suspicion away from cardiac causes. However, cardiovascular risk factors and a gallop rhythm prompted further cardiovascular evaluation. Subsequent blood tests and electrocardiogram findings suggested an acute myocardial infarction, later confirmed by coronary angiography as STEMI due to a 90% stenosis in the right coronary artery, which was successfully treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. The presentation of myocardial infarction can vary, with non-chest pain symptoms such as vomiting and fever occasionally leading the clinical picture, which may result in diagnostic delays and worsened prognosis. This case was particularly challenging due to the presence of all four symptoms typically associated with gastroenteritis, as well as the sequence of symptom onset being atypical for gastrointestinal diseases. This case exemplifies the need for a high degree of clinical suspicion for ACS in patients with atypical presentations, such as those mimicking gastroenteritis, to prevent misdiagnosis and ensure prompt and appropriate management, especially in patients with known cardiovascular risk factors.

Diagnostic performance of the classic symptom "abdominal pain before vomiting" for pediatric acute appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis is the most common type of acute abdomen that requires surgical intervention in children. According to general pediatric textbooks, the presence of vomiting before abdominal pain is considered a classic patient history item for excluding acute appendicitis. However, its diagnostic performance in the pediatric population has yet to be investigated.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective observational study involving 134 children who were admitted to the hospital with both abdominal pain and vomiting. The reference standard for appendicitis was defined by computed tomography scanning. The diagnostic performance of "abdominal pain before vomiting" was calculated and compared to those of the Alvarado score and pediatric appendicitis score.

RESULTS

The diagnostic performance of "abdominal pain before vomiting" was as follows: sensitivity of 75.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.7-83.6), specificity of 25.0% (95% CI, 15.5-36.7), positive likelihood ratio of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.82-1.22), negative likelihood ratio of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.54-1.79), and diagnostic odds ratio of 1.02 (95% CI, 0.46-2.25). In contrast, the Alvarado score and pediatric appendicitis score (with a threshold of 4 points) demonstrated favorable sensitivity (98.3% [95% CI, 92.4-99.6]), negative predictive value (94.6% [95% CI, 78.4-98.8]), negative likelihood ratio (0.04 [95% CI, 0.01-0.23]), and diagnostic odds ratio (49.9 [95% CI, 6.88-243.2]).

CONCLUSION

In this study, "abdominal pain before vomiting" was associated with poor diagnostic performance for ruling out acute pediatric appendicitis. Thus, the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the pediatric population should be made based on existing validated scoring systems such as the Alvarado score and pediatric appendicitis score.

Typical and Atypical Presentations of Appendicitis and Their Implications for Diagnosis and Treatment: A Literature Review

Appendicitis, an acute inflammation of the appendix, affects all demographic groups and exhibits various incidences and clinical manifestations. While acute appendicitis typically presents with colicky periumbilical abdominal pain that localizes to the right lower quadrant, atypical presentations are more common in children, geriatric, and pregnant patient populations, leading to delays in diagnosis. Clinical evaluation, clinical scoring systems, and inflammatory markers are commonly used, but their limitations have led to the increased use of diagnostic imaging in patients suspected of appendicitis. Acute appendicitis is managed by non-operative and operative management, depending on whether it is uncomplicated or complicated. Developing diagnostic pathways to improve outcomes and reduce complications is crucial. Although medical advancements have been made, diagnosing and managing appendicitis can be challenging, mainly when patients are present atypically. This literature review aims to comprehensively review typical and atypical presentations of appendicitis and their current implications for diagnosis and treatment modalities in pediatric, adult, pregnant, and geriatric patient populations.

Diagnosis and Management of Acute Appendicitis in Adults: A Review

IMPORTANCE

Acute appendicitis is the most common abdominal surgical emergency in the world, with an annual incidence of 96.5 to 100 cases per 100 000 adults.

OBSERVATIONS

The clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis is based on history and physical, laboratory evaluation, and imaging. Classic symptoms of appendicitis include vague periumbilical pain, anorexia/nausea/intermittent vomiting, migration of pain to the right lower quadrant, and low-grade fever. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis is made in approximately 90% of patients presenting with these symptoms. Laparoscopic appendectomy remains the most common treatment. However, increasing evidence suggests that broad-spectrum antibiotics, such as piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy or combination therapy with either cephalosporins or fluroquinolones with metronidazole, successfully treats uncomplicated acute appendicitis in approximately 70% of patients. Specific imaging findings on computed tomography (CT), such as appendiceal dilatation (appendiceal diameter ≥7 mm), or presence of appendicoliths, defined as the conglomeration of feces in the appendiceal lumen, identify patients for whom an antibiotics-first management strategy is more likely to fail. CT findings of appendicolith, mass effect, and a dilated appendix greater than 13 mm are associated with higher risk of treatment failure (≈40%) of an antibiotics-first approach. Therefore, surgical management should be recommended in patients with CT findings of appendicolith, mass effect, or a dilated appendix who are fit for surgery, defined as having relatively low risk of adverse outcomes or postoperative mortality and morbidity. In patients without high-risk CT findings, either appendectomy or antibiotics can be considered as first-line therapy. In unfit patients without these high-risk CT findings, the antibiotics-first approach is recommended, and surgery may be considered if antibiotic treatment fails. In unfit patients with high-risk CT findings, perioperative risk assessment as well as patient preferences should be considered.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Acute appendicitis affects 96.5 to 100 people per 100 000 adults per year worldwide. Appendectomy remains first-line therapy for acute appendicitis, but treatment with antibiotics rather than surgery is appropriate in selected patients with uncomplicated appendicitis.