Comparison of blood flow between two mechanical compression devices using ultrasound: Animal trial

Use of Mechanical Chest Compression for Resuscitation in Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest-Device Matters: A Propensity-Score-Based Match Analysis

BACKGROUND

Devices for mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are recommended when high quality CPR cannot be provided. Different devices are available, but the literature is poor in direct comparison studies. Our aim was to assess whether the type of mechanical chest compressor could affect the probability of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and 30-day survival in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) patients as compared to manual standard CPR.

METHODS

We considered all OHCAs that occurred from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2022 in seven provinces of the Lombardy region equipped with three different types of mechanical compressor: Autopulse^®(ZOLL Medical, MA), LUCAS^® (Stryker, MI), and Easy Pulse^® (Schiller, Switzerland).

RESULTS

Two groups, 2146 patients each (manual and mechanical CPR), were identified by propensity-score-based random matching. The rates of ROSC (15% vs. 23%, p < 0.001) and 30-day survival (6% vs. 14%, p < 0.001) were lower in the mechanical CPR group. After correction for confounders, Autopulse^® [OR 2.1, 95%CI (1.6-2.8), p < 0.001] and LUCAS^® [OR 2.5, 95%CI (1.7-3.6), p < 0.001] significantly increased the probability of ROSC, and Autopulse^® significantly increased the probability of 30-day survival compared to manual CPR [HR 0.9, 95%CI (0.8-0.9), p = 0.005].

CONCLUSION

Mechanical chest compressors could increase the rate of ROSC, especially in case of prolonged resuscitation. The devices were dissimilar, and their different performances could significantly influence patient outcomes. The load-distributing-band device was the only mechanical chest able to favorably affect 30-day survival.

Femoral Arterial Doppler Use During Active Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

STUDY OBJECTIVE

This study explored femoral arterial Doppler during active cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to identify and characterize the resumptions of cardiac activity without stopping CPR.

METHODS

This was a proof-of-concept study exploring arterial Doppler during cardiac arrest. Patients in cardiac arrest undergoing active CPR were prospectively enrolled. Arterial Doppler of the common femoral artery was recorded during CPR and during pauses in CPR. CPR-induced arterial tracings and native cardiac-induced tracings were analyzed for rate and peak systolic velocity. Cardiac activity on echocardiogram during pause in CPR was classified as "absent," "disorganized," or "organized." Descriptive data and survival are presented as mean and 95% confidence intervals (CI), as well as sensitivity and specificity of Doppler during active CPR in detecting native cardiac pulsations.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients with 48 paired Doppler recordings during active CPR, pause in CPR, and associated echocardiogram were enrolled. Native cardiac-induced tracings were visible during 39.6% of pauses in CPR (19 of 48) and during 18.8% of the periods of active CPR (9 of 48). Arterial pulsations were more frequently visualized with organized contractions by echocardiogram (10 of 14, 71%) than disorganized contractions (9 of 22, 41%). Arterial Doppler was 100% specific and 50% sensitive in detecting organized cardiac activity during active CPR. Patients with visible native cardiac pulsations during active CPR demonstrated 0% mortality compared with 67% mortality without visible arterial pulsations.

CONCLUSION

Arterial Doppler tracings may identify the resumption of native cardiac activity during active CPR; however, more research is needed.