Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound to confirm endotracheal tube depth

Diagnostic accuracy of airway ultrasound in confirming the endotracheal tube depth in critically ill children

BACKGROUND

Chest X-ray, the established standard of confirming endotracheal tube (ETT) position, has important drawbacks including radiation exposure. Point-of-care airway ultrasound, which has been insufficiently studied in children, can overcome these problems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective cross-sectional study done on children aged 2 months to 17 years undergoing intubation with cuffed ETT in the PICU. The ETT cuff was filled with saline and three ultrasonographic techniques were used- 1) Suprasternal (SS) method 2) Cricoid (CC) metho and 3) Tracheal ring (TR) method. Position of the ETT as determined by ultrasound and X-ray were compared. The main outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve (AUC) for ultrasound-based methods vs. X-ray. For the TR method, concordance between the X-ray and ultrasound categories were taken.

RESULTS

Total 62 patients were enrolled. The sensitivity and specificity of SS method were 71% (95% CI: 57-83%) and 100% (40-100%). The CC distance method had an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.0). In the TR method, 98% of correct position on X-ray were correctly classified by USG. The agreement between X-ray and ultrasound categories with the cuff between the first and third tracheal rings, was very good [kappa (95% CI): 0.87 (0.70, 1.00), p ≤0.001)].

CONCLUSION

Bedside ultrasound is a good method to confirm ETT depth in children. The tracheal ring method had the best diagnostic accuracy and is easy to perform. The new method using cricoid cuff distance needs further validation in different ICU settings.

Emergency medicine updates: Endotracheal intubation

INTRODUCTION

Airway management including endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a key skill for emergency clinicians. Therefore, it is important for emergency clinicians to be aware of the current evidence regarding the identification and management of patients requiring ETI.

OBJECTIVE

This paper evaluates key evidence-based updates concerning ETI for the emergency clinician.

DISCUSSION

ETI is commonly performed in the emergency department (ED) setting but has many nuanced components. There are several tools that have been used to predict a difficult airway which incorporate anatomic and physiologic features. While helpful, these tools should not be used in isolation. Preoxygenation and apneic oxygenation are recommended to reduce the risk of desaturation and patient decompensation, particularly with noninvasive ventilation in critically ill patients. Induction and neuromuscular blocking medications should be tailored to the clinical scenario. Video laryngoscopy is superior to direct laryngoscopy among novice users, while both techniques are reasonable among more experienced clinicians. Recent literature suggests using a bougie during the first attempt. Point-of-care ultrasound is helpful for confirming correct placement and depth of the endotracheal tube.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of literature updates can improve the ED care of patients requiring emergent intubation.

Point-of-care ultrasound for airway management in the emergency and critical care setting

Airway management is a common procedure within emergency and critical care medicine. Traditional techniques for predicting and managing a difficult airway each have important limitations. As the field has evolved, point-of-care ultrasound has been increasingly utilized for this application. Several measures can be used to sonographically predict a difficult airway, including skin to epiglottis, hyomental distance, and tongue thickness. Ultrasound can also be used to confirm endotracheal tube intubation and assess endotracheal tube depth. Ultrasound is superior to the landmark-based approach for locating the cricothyroid membrane, particularly in patients with difficult anatomy. Finally, we provide an algorithm for using ultrasound to manage the crashing patient on mechanical ventilation. After reading this article, readers will have an enhanced understanding of the role of ultrasound in airway management.

Comparison of dynamic versus static ultrasound to confirm endotracheal tube depth

INTRODUCTION

After endotracheal intubation is performed, the location of the endotracheal tube (ETT) is confirmed followed by assessment of ETT depth. Physical examination can be unreliable and chest radiographs can lead to delayed recognition. Ultrasound may facilitate rapid determination of ETT depth at the bedside; however, the ideal technique is unknown.

METHODS

This was a randomized trial comparing the static versus dynamic technique for ETT depth assessment using a cadaver model. The ETT was randomized to correct versus deep placement. Seven physicians blinded to ETT location assessed the location using static (direct visualization of an inflated cuff) versus dynamic (active inflation of the ETT cuff) visualization. Outcomes included diagnostic accuracy, time to identification, and operator confidence with subgroup analyses by physician ultrasound experience.

RESULTS

420 total assessments were performed. The static technique was 99.1% (95% CI 94.8%-100%) sensitive and 97.1% (95% CI 91.9%-99.4%) specific. The dynamic technique was 100% (95% CI 96.7%-100%) sensitive and 100% (95% CI 96.7%-100%) specific. Time to identification was faster for the static technique (6.6 s; 95% CI 5.9-7.4 s) versus the dynamic technique (8.7 s; 95% CI 8.0-9.5 s). Operator confidence was lower for the static technique (4.4/5.0; 95% CI 4.3-4.5) versus the dynamic technique (4.7/5.0; 95% CI 4.6-4.8). There were no differences in the findings when assessed among expert or non-expert sonographers.

CONCLUSION

There was no statistically significant difference in the accuracy of ETT depth identification between the static or dynamic technique. However, utilizing the dynamic technique showed a statistically significant improvement in sonographer confidence and a concomitant increase in time to identification.

Current status of point of care ultrasonography for the perioperative care of trauma patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The incorporation of point of care ultrasound into the field of anesthesiology and perioperative medicine is growing at rapid pace. The benefits of this modality align with the acuity of patient care and decision-making in anesthetic care of a trauma patient.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cardiac ultrasound can be used to diagnose cardiac tamponade or investigate the inferior vena cava to assess volume status in patients who may suffer from hemorrhagic shock. Thoracic ultrasound may be used to rapidly identify pneumothorax or hemothorax in a patient suffering chest wall trauma. In addition, investigators are exploring the utility of ultrasonography in traumatic airway management and elevated intracranial pressure. In addition, the utility of gastric ultrasound on trauma patients is briefly discussed.

SUMMARY

Incorporation of point of care ultrasound techniques into the practice of trauma anesthesiology is important for noninvasive, mobile and expeditious assessment of trauma patients. In addition, further large-scale studies are needed to investigate how point of care ultrasound impacts outcomes in trauma patients.