Entecavir 1mg versus combined lamivudine/adefovir dipivoxil in chronic HBV Egyptian patients resistant to LAM monotherapy, non-randomised controlled study

Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of antiviral regimens for entecavir-resistant hepatitis B: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who had exposed to lamivudine (LAM) and telbivudine (LdT) had high risk of developing entecavir (ETV)-resistance after long-term treatment. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and a network meta-analysis on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness on antiviral regimens in CHB patients with ETV-resistance.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science for studies on nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) treatment [including tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based rescue therapies, adefovir (ADV)-based rescue therapies and double-dose ETV therapy] in CHB patients with ETV-resistance. The network meta-analysis was conducted for 1-year complete virological response (CVR) and biological response (BR) rates using GeMTC and ADDIS. A cost-effective analysis was conducted to select an economic and effective treatment regimen based on the 1-year CVR rate.

RESULTS

A total of 6 studies were finally included in this analysis. The antiviral efficacy was estimated. On network meta-analysis, the 1-year CVR rate in ETV-TDF [odds ratio (OR)  = 22.30; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 2.78-241.93], LAM-TDF (OR  = 70.67; 95 % CI: 5.16-1307.45) and TDF (OR  = 16.90; 95 % CI: 2.28-186.30) groups were significantly higher than that in the ETV double-dose group; the 1-year CVR rate in the LAM-TDF group (OR  = 14.82; 95 % CI: 1.03-220.31) was significantly higher than that in the LAM/LdT-ADV group. The 1-year BR rate of ETV-TDF (OR = 28.68; 95 % CI: 1.70-1505.08) and TDF (OR = 21.79; 95 % CI: 1.43-1070.09) therapies were significantly higher than that of ETV double-dose therapy. TDF-based therapies had the highest possibility to achieve the CVR and BR at 1 year, in which LAM-TDF combined therapy was the most effective regimen. The ratio of cost/effectiveness for 1-year treatment was 8 526, 17 649, 20 651 Yuan in the TDF group, TDF-ETV group, and ETV-ADV group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

TDF-based combined therapies such as ETV-TDF and LAM-TDF therapies were the first-line treatment if financial condition is allowed.

A different inhibitor is required for overcoming entecavir resistance: a comparison of four rescue therapies in a retrospective study

AIMS

Little clinical data are available regarding re-establishing the effective inhibition of entecavir (ETV)-resistant mutants. In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare the efficacies of four treatment regimens as rescue therapy for those chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with ETV resistance.

METHODS

A total of 65 patients with ETV resistance were assigned either with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) monotherapy (n = 21), ETV (0.5 mg) plus adefovir (ADV) combination therapy (n = 19), ETV (1.0 mg) monotherapy (n = 11) or ETV (0.5 mg) plus TDF combination therapy (n = 14). The efficacy and safety of four treatment regimens were compared.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences among the four study groups in baseline characteristics, including HBV DNA levels (χ²  = 0.749, P = 0.862) and hepatitis B e antigen-positivity (χ²  = 0.099, P = 0.992). The median reduction in serum HBV DNA level from baseline at week 48 was -2.37 ± 1.07 log₁₀ IU ml^-1 , -2.16 ± 0.81 log₁₀ IU ml^-1 , -1.17 ± 1.23 log₁₀ IU ml^-1 and -2.49 ± 1.10 log₁₀ IU ml^-1 , respectively (F = 4.078, P = 0.011). The TDF group and ETV (0.5 mg) + TDF group have the highest undetectable HBV DNA rate (76.19% vs. 78.57%) compared to the ETV (0.5 mg) + ADV group and the ETV (1.0 mg) group (63.16% vs. 18.18%, respectively). Two patients in the ETV (1.0 mg) group experienced virological breakthrough at week 48 and was attributed to poor drug adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

TDF monotherapy appeared to deliver the highest undetectable HBV DNA rate in patients with ETV resistance, and ADV plus ETV combination therapy could be another choice for patients with financial restraint.

Octreotide acetate combined with propranolol hydrochloride for treatment of digestive tract hemorrhage: Efficacy and influence on quality of life

AIM

To observe the efficacy of octreotide acetate combined with propranolol hydrochloride in the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal bleeding and its impact on quality of life (QOL).

METHODS

One hundred patients with gastrointestinal bleeding treated from January 2015 to July 2016 at our hospital were divided into either a control group (n = 50) or an observation group (n = 50). The control group was treated with octreotide acetate injection alone, and the observation group was treated with octreotide acetate injection combined with propranolol hydrochloride. QOL was assessed using the QOL scale. Clinical efficacy and QOL were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

After treatment, central venous pressure was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05); time to hemostasis, heart rate, blood transfusion, portal vein blood flow, splenic vein blood flow, serum alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase levels were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05); physical function, role function, cognitive function, emotional function, social function, and the overall QOL score were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Octreotide acetate combined with propranolol hydrochloride for patients with gastrointestinal bleeding has better clinical efficacy and can improve QOL compared with octreotide acetate alone.

Antiviral Therapy in Lamivudine-Resistant Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

The relative efficacy of different strategies for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with lamivudine resistance (LAM-R) has not yet been systematically studied. Clinical trials were searched in PUBMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CNKI databases up to February 15, 2016. Nine trials including 764 patients met the entry criteria. In direct meta-analysis, TDF showed a stronger antiviral effect than any one of ETV, LAM/ADV, and ADV against LAM-R hepatitis B virus. LAM/ADV therapy was superior to ADV in suppressing viral replication. ETV achieved similar rate of HBV DNA undetectable compared to ADV or LAM/ADV. In network meta-analysis, TDF had higher rates of HBV DNA undetectable compared to ETV (OR, 24.69; 95% CrI: 5.36–113.66), ADV (OR, 37.28; 95% CrI: 9.73–142.92), or LAM/ADV (OR, 21.05; 95% CrI: 5.70–77.80). However, among ETV, ADV, and LAM/ADV, no drug was clearly superior to others in HBV DNA undetectable rate. Moreover, no significant difference in the rate of ALT normalization or HBeAg loss was observed compared the four rescue strategies with each other. TDF appears to be a more effective rescue therapy than LAM/ADV, ETV, or ADV. LAM plus ADV therapy was a better treatment option than ETV or ADV alone for patients with LAM-R.