Effect of enteral erythropoietin on feeding-related complications in preterm newborns: A pilot randomized controlled study

Enteral administration of a simulated amniotic fluid in preventing feeding intolerance in very low birthweight neonates: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Feeding intolerance (FI) is a common finding in preterm neonates. Enteral administration of different forms of amniotic fluid (AF) has been tried for treating FI in high-risk neonates. Simulated amniotic fluid (SAF) is a solution with a similar electrolyte composition to human AF. The aim of this study was to examine whether enteral administration of SAF would improve feeding tolerance in very low birthweight (VLBW) neonates.

METHODS

Forty VLBW neonates were randomized to either SAF or placebo (total daily dose 20 mL/kg/d^-1 divided every 3 h) to their milk for a maximum of 7 d. Neonates with major congenital anomalies, those in whom early feeding was contraindicated, and those treated with parental erythropoietin and/or human granulocyte stimulating factor were excluded. The primary outcome was the total amount of enteral feeds reached by day 7. Secondary outcomes were incidence of FI and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Study intervention was stopped on completing 7 d, reaching enteral feeds of 100 mL/kg/d^-1, or the appearance of any sign of FI or NEC.

RESULTS

All neonates tolerated the test solution well. The SAF group reached significantly larger volume and higher calories on days 3 and 7 (P < 0.05 for all). No statistical differences were seen between the two groups in incidence of FI (P = 0.311), NEC (P = 0.429), mortality (P = 0.632), length of stay (P = 0.744), or weight gain on day 10 (P = 0.389). Baseline hematologic parameters showed no statistical differences before or after enteral administration (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Results of the present study demonstrated that SAF solution might improve feeding tolerance in VLBW babies without evidence of its systemic absorption. Larger multicenter randomized studies are recommended.

Early erythropoietin for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm neonates - an updated meta-analysis

Previous systematic reviews suggest reduction in necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) among preterm infants supplemented with erythropoietin (EPO). We aimed to update our 2018 systematic review in this field considering the evidence accumulated over the last 3 years. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the effect of early EPO supplementation vs placebo/no EPO supplementation on any stage NEC in preterm infants were included. Fixed effect model was used for meta-analysis. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted to verify the effects of EPO on NEC after accounting for repeated significance testing. A total of 22 RCTs (n = 5359) were included, of which six were new (n = 2541 additional preterm infants) in comparison to our previous systematic review. EPO significantly decreased the risk of any stage NEC (232/2669 (8.7%) vs 313/2690 (11.6%); RR: 0·76; TSA adjusted 95% CI (0·64, 0·90); p = 0·0008, number needed to treat (NNT) = 34). The risk of definite NEC (≥ Stage II) was also significantly reduced by EPO administration (105/2219 (4.7%) vs 141/2246 (6.3%); RR: 0.77; 95% CI (0.61, 0.98); p = 0.03, NNT: 62). However, the results for definite NEC were no longer significant on sensitivity analyses that included (a) only double-blind RCTs and (b) only prospectively registered trials. The quality of evidence was deemed moderate-to-low for the reported outcomes.

CONCLUSION

There is moderate to low-quality evidence that early prophylactic EPO reduces any stage and ≥ Stage II NEC in preterm neonates. Prospectively registered, adequately powered, double-blind RCTs are required to confirm these findings.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Experimental studies have shown that erythropoietin (EPO) has gastrointestinal trophic effects. • Systematic reviews have shown that early treatment with EPO may decrease the risk of gut injury in preterm or low birth weight infants.

WHAT IS NEW

• Early EPO supplementation significantly reduced the incidence of any stage NEC and definite NEC in preterm infants < 34 weeks of gestation. • EPO had no significant effect on definite NEC in the analyses that included only double-blinded and prospectively registered RCTs. How might it impact clinical practice in the foreseeable future? • Early prophylactic EPO can be recommended for NEC prevention if its benefits are consistently demonstrated in adequately powered randomized trials with a low risk of bias.

Application of Touching Combined with Intelligent Interaction of Voice and Rhythm in Nursing Care of Newborns with Feeding Intolerance and Its Influence on Quality of Life

Objective

To explore the application of touching combined with intelligent interaction of voice and rhythm in the nursing of neonatal feeding intolerance and its effect on the quality of life.

Methods

A total of 140 newborns with feeding intolerance treated in our hospital from April 2019 to April 2021 were selected. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: the control group and the study group. The control group received touch nursing and the study group received touch combined with intelligent interactive nursing mode of voice, music, and rhythm. The general data, feeding performance, feeding process, growth and development, feeding intolerance, total intestinal feeding, jaundice duration, hospital stay, and quality of life scores were compared between the two groups.

Results

First of all, we compared the general data of the two groups. There was no significant difference in gestational age, sex, mode of delivery, birth weight, head circumference, body length, Apgar score, and other general data between the two groups. Second, we compared the feeding performance of the two groups. Before nursing, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). After nursing, the feeding rate, milk intake ratio, and proficiency of the two groups increased, and the comparison between the two groups. The feeding rate, milk intake ratio, and proficiency of the study group were better than those of the control group. In terms of the feeding process of the two groups, the days of oral feeding, complete import feeding, feeding conversion, and indwelling gastric tube in the study group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). In terms of the growth and development of the two groups, the recovery time of birth weight in the study group was lower than that in the control group, and the growth of body weight, length, and head circumference at 14 days in the study group was higher than those in the control group. The feeding intolerance, the duration of jaundice, and the days of hospitalization in the study group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the feeding intolerance, the duration of jaundice, and the days of hospitalization in the study group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Finally, we compared the scores of qualities of life between the two groups. The physiological function, psychological function, and social function of the study group were lower than those of the control group (P < 0.05). The physiological function, psychological function, and social function of the study group were lower than those of the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The application of touching combined with phonetic rhythm intelligent interaction technology in the nursing of neonatal feeding intolerance can promote the faster development and maturity of neonatal gastrointestinal function, improve gastrointestinal motility, shorten the time of parenteral nutrition in newborns, achieve total enteral feeding faster, and promote neonatal growth and development, so as to shorten the duration of hospitalization, improve the tolerance of neonatal gastrointestinal feeding, and improve the quality of life.

Clinical efficacy of probiotics on feeding intolerance in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The physiological organ system of premature infants is still very immature, so it is easy to result feeding intolerance. Therefore, effective probiotic supplementation plays a very important role and clinical research significance in promoting the growth and development of preterm infants, improving the quality of life and improving the occurrence of feeding intolerance. To explore the clinical effect of probiotics on feeding intolerance (FI) in preterm infants by meta-analysis.

METHODS

The PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and MEDLINE literature databases were searched for relevant literature. The literature related to the clinical effect of probiotics on FI in preterm infants was published from January 2002 to January 2021. RevMan 5.3 was used to calculate the reinforcement mean difference (MD) and evaluate the publication bias.

RESULTS

Nine articles were included, involving a total of 1,244 preterm infants with FI. Through the sensitivity analysis of each excluded study, the results showed no significant differences. Compared with patients in the control group, the probiotics group had significant improvements (P<0.1) in the total intestinal feeding time (MD =-2.54, 95% CI: -3.57, -1.52, P<0.00001), weight gain (MD =23.81, 95% CI: 19.75, 27.81, P<0.00001), maximum enteral feeding (MD =6.41, 95% CI: 1.94, 10.88, P=0.005), hospital stay (MD =-5.18, 95% CI: -5.63, -4.74, P<0.00001), incidence of FI [odds rate (OR) =0.38, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.55, P<0.00001] and improvement in the gastrointestinal tract (OR =2.34, 95% CI: 1.07, 5.14, P=0.03).

DISCUSSION

Our study shows that the use of probiotics can promote the early growth of preterm infants and effectively improve the occurrence of FI in preterm infants.

Enteral Feeding Interventions in the Prevention of Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Systematic Review of Experimental and Clinical Studies

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), which is characterized by severe intestinal inflammation and in advanced stages necrosis, is a gastrointestinal emergency in the neonate with high mortality and morbidity. Despite advancing medical care, effective prevention strategies remain sparse. Factors contributing to the complex pathogenesis of NEC include immaturity of the intestinal immune defense, barrier function, motility and local circulatory regulation and abnormal microbial colonization. Interestingly, enteral feeding is regarded as an important modifiable factor influencing NEC pathogenesis. Moreover, breast milk, which forms the currently most effective prevention strategy, contains many bioactive components that are known to support neonatal immune development and promote healthy gut colonization. This systematic review describes the effect of different enteral feeding interventions on the prevention of NEC incidence and severity and the effect on pathophysiological mechanisms of NEC, in both experimental NEC models and clinical NEC. Besides, pathophysiological mechanisms involved in human NEC development are briefly described to give context for the findings of altered pathophysiological mechanisms of NEC by enteral feeding interventions.

[Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of feeding intolerance in preterm infants (2020)]

Feeding intolerance (FI) is one of the most common clinical problems in preterm infant and often leads to the delay in reaching total enteral nutrition and prolonged hospital stay. The prevention and treatment of FI are of great significance in improving the survival rate of preterm infants. With reference to current evidence in China and overseas, the clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of FI in preterm infants were developed based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), so as to help neonatal pediatricians, nursing staff, and nutritionists with early identification and standard management of FI in preterm infants.

Enteral Bioactive Factor Supplementation in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review

Feeding preterm infants with mother’s own milk is associated with a reduction in postnatal complications and an improved neurocognitive outcome. Therefore, the bioactive factor composition of human milk has been used as a tool for the development of nutritional supplements with a potential prophylactic or therapeutic effect. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview on bioactive factors which have been studied as supplement to enteral nutrition in randomized controlled trials, and to provide an overview of ongoing trials. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and clinical trial registers were searched. Studies on the antimicrobial protein lactoferrin were excluded as these were summarized very recently in three separate systematic reviews. Studies on vitamins D, K and iron were also excluded as they are already incorporated in most international guidelines. We identified 17 different bioactive factors, which were investigated in 26 studies. Despite the encouraging potential effects of several bioactive factors, more high-quality studies with a sufficient number of preterm infants are required before a certain factor may be implemented into clinical practice. Three large trials (n > 500) that investigate the effects of either enteral insulin or vitamin A are currently ongoing and could provide more definite answers on these specific supplements.