De novo variants implicate chromatin modification, transcriptional regulation, and retinoic acid signaling in syndromic craniosynostosis

AXIN1 mutations in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis

OBJECTIVE

Occurring once in every 2000 live births, craniosynostosis (CS) is the most frequent cranial birth defect. Although the genetic etiologies of syndromic CS cases are well defined, the genetic cause of most nonsyndromic cases remains unknown.

METHODS

The authors analyzed exome or RNA sequencing data from 876 children with nonsyndromic CS, including 291 case-parent trios and 585 additional probands. The authors also utilized the GeneMatcher platform and the Gabriella Miller Kids First genome sequencing project to identify additional CS patients with AXIN1 mutations.

RESULTS

The authors describe 11 patients with nonsyndromic CS harboring rare, damaging mutations in AXIN1, an inhibitor of Wnt signaling. AXIN1 regulates signaling upstream of key mediators of osteoblast differentiation. Three of the 6 mutations identified in trios occurred de novo in the proband, while 3 were transmitted from unaffected parents. Patients with nonsyndromic CS were highly enriched for mutations in AXIN1 compared to both expectation (p = 0.0008) and exome sequencing data from > 76,000 healthy controls (p = 2.3 × 10-6), surpassing the thresholds for genome-wide significance.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings describe the first phenotype associated with mutations in AXIN1, with mutations identified in approximately 1% of nonsyndromic CS cases. The results strengthen the existing link between Wnt signaling and maintenance of cranial suture patency and have implications for genetic testing in families with CS.

RNA Polymerase II Activity Control of Gene Expression and Involvement in Disease

Gene expression is dependent on RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) activity in eukaryotes. In addition to determining the rate of RNA synthesis for all protein coding genes, Pol II serves as a platform for the recruitment of factors and regulation of co-transcriptional events, from RNA processing to chromatin modification and remodeling. The transcriptome can be shaped by changes in Pol II kinetics affecting RNA synthesis itself or because of alterations to co-transcriptional events that are responsive to or coupled with transcription. Genetic, biochemical, and structural approaches to Pol II in model organisms have revealed critical insights into how Pol II works and the types of factors that regulate it. The complexity of Pol II regulation generally increases with organismal complexity. In this review, we describe fundamental aspects of how Pol II activity can shape gene expression, discuss recent advances in how Pol II elongation is regulated on genes, and how altered Pol II function is linked to human disease and aging.

A. Epigenetic regulation of craniofacial development and disease

BACKGROUND

The formation of the craniofacial complex relies on proper neural crest development. The gene regulatory networks (GRNs) and signaling pathways orchestrating this process have been extensively studied. These GRNs and signaling cascades are tightly regulated as alterations to any stage of neural crest development can lead to common congenital birth defects, including multiple syndromes affecting facial morphology as well as nonsyndromic facial defects, such as cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Epigenetic factors add a hierarchy to the regulation of transcriptional networks and influence the spatiotemporal activation or repression of specific gene regulatory cascades; however less is known about their exact mechanisms in controlling precise gene regulation.

AIMS

In this review, we discuss the role of epigenetic factors during neural crest development, specifically during craniofacial development and how compromised activities of these regulators contribute to congenital defects that affect the craniofacial complex.

Concurrent impact of de novo mutations on cranial and cortical development in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis

OBJECTIVE

Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (nsCS), characterized by premature cranial suture fusion, is considered a primary skull disorder in which impact on neurodevelopment, if present, results from the mechanical hindrance of brain growth. Despite surgical repair of the cranial defect, neurocognitive deficits persist in nearly half of affected children. Therefore, the authors performed a functional genomics analysis of nsCS to determine when, where, and in what cell types nsCS-associated genes converge during development.

METHODS

The authors integrated whole-exome sequencing data from 291 nsCS proband-parent trios with 29,803 single-cell transcriptomes of the prenatal and postnatal neurocranial complex to inform when, where, and in what cell types nsCS-mutated genes might exert their pathophysiological effects.

RESULTS

The authors found that nsCS-mutated genes converged in cranial osteoprogenitors and pial fibroblasts and their transcriptional networks that regulate both skull ossification and cerebral neurogenesis. Nonsyndromic CS-mutated genes also converged in inhibitory neurons and gene coexpression modules that overlapped with autism and other developmental disorders. Ligand-receptor cell-cell communication analysis uncovered crosstalk between suture osteoblasts and neurons via the nsCS-associated BMP, FGF, and noncanonical WNT signaling pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

These data implicate a concurrent impact of nsCS-associated de novo mutations on cranial morphogenesis and cortical development via cell- and non-cell-autonomous mechanisms in a developmental nexus of fetal osteoblasts, pial fibroblasts, and neurons. These results suggest that neurodevelopmental outcomes in nsCS patients may be driven more by mutational status than surgical technique.

NAP (Davunetide): The Neuroprotective ADNP Drug Candidate Penetrates Cell Nuclei Explaining Pleiotropic Mechanisms

(1) Background: Recently, we showed aberrant nuclear/cytoplasmic boundaries/activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP) distribution in ADNP-mutated cells. This malformation was corrected upon neuronal differentiation by the ADNP-derived fragment drug candidate NAP (davunetide). Here, we investigated the mechanism of NAP nuclear protection. (2) Methods: CRISPR/Cas9 DNA-editing established N1E-115 neuroblastoma cell lines that express two different green fluorescent proteins (GFPs)-labeled mutated ADNP variants (p.Tyr718* and p.Ser403*). Cells were exposed to NAP conjugated to Cy5, followed by live imaging. Cells were further characterized using quantitative morphology/immunocytochemistry/RNA and protein quantifications. (3) Results: NAP rapidly distributed in the cytoplasm and was also seen in the nucleus. Furthermore, reduced microtubule content was observed in the ADNP-mutated cell lines. In parallel, disrupting microtubules by zinc or nocodazole intoxication mimicked ADNP mutation phenotypes and resulted in aberrant nuclear-cytoplasmic boundaries, which were rapidly corrected by NAP treatment. No NAP effects were noted on ADNP levels. Ketamine, used as a control, was ineffective, but both NAP and ketamine exhibited direct interactions with ADNP, as observed via in silico docking. (4) Conclusions: Through a microtubule-linked mechanism, NAP rapidly localized to the cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments, ameliorating mutated ADNP-related deficiencies. These novel findings explain previously published gene expression results and broaden NAP (davunetide) utilization in research and clinical development.