Comparison between mixed and laminar airflow systems in operating rooms and the influence of human factors: experiences from a Swedish orthopedic center

Splash Basins in the Operating Room: Clean or Contaminated? A Study on Bacterial Contamination in Splash Basins Used to Rinse Surgical Instruments During Surgery

Background: Preventing postoperative infection and promoting patient safety are essential responsibilities of the operating room nurse. In some hospitals, splash basins are used to rinse instruments during surgery, although previous studies emphasise the risk of bacterial contamination. A recent systematic review calls for further investigation into surgical teams' use of splash basins. Objectives: Our objective was to investigate bacterial contamination in splash basins and to identify the variables that may have an influence on this contamination. Methods: This prospective observational pilot study involved collecting, cultivating, and analysing water samples obtained from splash basins during operations performed in the thoracic and neurosurgical departments. The ventilation systems, length of surgery, number of instruments in the splash basin, number of persons present in the operating room, frequency of door openings during surgery, and type of bacteria were observed. Results: Bacterial growth was found in 44% of the final water samples: 41% from the thoracic surgical department, which had laminar airflow ventilation systems/unidirectional airflow ventilation, and 47% from the neurosurgical department, which had conventional ventilation systems/turbulent mixing ventilation. However, the binary logistic regression analysis revealed no significant correlation between bacterial growth and the ventilation systems, length of surgery, number of instruments in the splash basin, number of people in the operating room, or frequency of door openings. The most common types of bacteria found were coagulase-negative staphylococci and Micrococcus luteus. Conclusions: Splash basins become contaminated with bacteria during surgery. Therefore, using splash basins with sterile water is not recommended. Further research is needed to determine the best evidence-based practice for rinsing instruments perioperatively.

Critically ill patients will benefit from single isolated laminar-air-flow wards by improving the environmental microbial composition

BACKGROUND

Hospital-associated infection (HAI) is an important issue in intensive care units (ICUs). We still lack direct evidence on whether the ICU patients and/or the medical system can benefit from single isolated laminar-air-flow (LAF) wards.

METHODS

High-touched-surface (HTS) swabs from 5 sites in two kinds of wards with different ventilation systems were longitudinally collected for 16 S rRNA sequencing and Type IIB restriction site-associated DNA sequencing for Microbiome (2bRAD-M). Samples were collected for 3 months. The clinical data of patients admitted to different wards during the sampling time and the whole year were collected and compared.

RESULTS

The α-diversity of single wards with isolated LAF was significantly higher than open regions without LAF (p<0.01). β-diversity analysis showed differences between different wards and similarities among the same region. We also identified 3 genera attributed to the most difference between the two kinds of wards. 2bRAD-M analysis further revealed community divergence among different HTS sites. There was an overlap between HTS microbiome profiling and the clinically cultivated pathogens of patients with HAI. People in single wards had a better outcome than those in open regions (p<0.05), indicating that single wards had a protective effect for critically ill patients.

CONCLUSION

Overall, there was a prominent difference in the microbiome community between single wards and open regions. Single wards had more balanced communities which may lead to better outcomes for patients. For critically ill patients, single ward is recommended when arranging and constructing.

Evaluation of Surgical Site Infection Rates in Traumatic Surgical Fixation and Arthroplasty Performed in Laminar Flow Versus Non-laminar Flow Theatres During the COVID Pandemic

Introduction Laminar flow (LF) in theatres has become the standard of care in orthopaedic implant surgery. Most of the evidence for laminar flow use is based on arthroplasty surgery, with early studies showing a significant reduction in infections. We conducted a retrospective comparative study to assess surgical site infection (SSI) rates in consecutive patients undergoing surgery for trauma in LF and non-laminar flow (NLF) theatres. Methods Due to COVID-19 safety restrictions, trauma surgery was performed in non-laminar flow theatres during the pandemic. We identified consecutive patients who had trauma surgery pre- and post-pandemic from February 2019 to June 2021 to avoid selection bias. A total of 1809 patients were identified for the study, and the relevant patient details were collected through the hospital operating theatre software (Bluespier) and patient records (Welsh Clinical Portal). There were 917 in the laminar theatre group and 892 in the non-laminar theatre group. For the purpose of this study, we recorded SSI rates within the first 90 days. The two groups were statistically similar in terms of age and gender of the patients. Results Nineteen patients developed surgical site infections in non-laminar flow theatres and 25 patients in laminar flow theatres. There was no significant difference between the SSI rate in laminar flow theatres (2.72%) as compared to non-laminar flow theatres (2.13%) (p=0.399). There was no link between infections and the duration of surgery. Two patients in the laminar flow group were MRSA-positive and were excluded. Conclusion In our study, the laminar flow theatres did not show a statistically significant reduction in surgical site infections. We conclude in the practical environment of trauma theatres the theoretical advantage of laminar flow does not translate to an observable reduction of infections.

Refocusing on work-based hazards for the anaesthesiologist in a post-pandemic era

The coronavirus pandemic has raised public awareness of one of the many hazards that healthcare workers face daily: exposure to harmful pathogens. The anaesthesia workplace encompasses the operating room, interventional radiology suite, and other sites that contain many other potential occupational and environmental hazards. This review article highlights the work-based hazards that anaesthesiologists and other clinicians may encounter in the anaesthesia workplace: ergonomic design, physical, chemical, fire, biological, or psychological hazards. As the anaesthesia work environment enters a post-COVID-19 pandemic phase, anaesthesiologists will do well to review and consider these hazards. The current review includes proposed solutions to some hazards and identifies opportunities for future research.

Comparison of number of air-borne bacteria in operating rooms with turbulent mixing ventilation and unidirectional airflow when using reusable scrub suits and single-use scrub suits

INTRODUCTION

Low counts of air-borne bacteria in the operating room is a mean to prevent surgical site infection.

AIM

To investigate levels of air-borne bacteria during surgical procedures in two operating rooms with turbulent mixing ventilation (TMV) and unidirectional airflow (UDAF), both with an air supply of 2600 L/s, when staff used either reusable scrub suits made from a mixed material (dry penetration ≤ 300 CFU) or single-use scrub suits made from polypropylene (dry penetration ≤ 100 CFU).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the TMV-room colony forming units (CFU) per m³ air was measured during eight procedures with staff wearing reusable scrub suits and seven procedures with single-use scrub. In the UDAF-room CFU/m³ air was measured during seven procedures with staff wearing reusable scrub suits.

FINDINGS

Mean values of CFU/m³ air were 1.3 to 10.8 in the TMV-room with staff dressed in reusable scrub suits and 0.8 to 4.0 with staff dressed in single-use scrub suits (p < 0.01). Mean values of CFU/m³ air were 0.2 to 4.5 in the UDAF-room with staff dressed in reusable scrub suits. The difference obtained with reusable scrub suits in the two rooms was significant (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The mode of ventilation affects the CFU-levels when staff is dressed in less occlusive scrub suits despite a high air supply. It is possible to decrease the CFU-levels in a TMV-room by using scrub suits made from a tight material thus reaching the same levels that are achieved by less protective scrub suits in a UDAF-room.

Sterile Setup Table in the Operating Room Is Not So Sterile

BACKGROUND

One of the important factors for surgical site infection prevention is the implementation of an ultraclean operating room. This study was designed to evaluate back-table sterility during total joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

This prospective study includes 52 patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty between November 2021 and January 2022. A total of 4 swabs (2 air swabs and 2 table swabs) were obtained for each case, at the conclusion of surgery and prior to the takedown of drapes. One swab from each set was sent for culture, and the other was sent for next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis.

RESULTS

Among 104 back-table swabs, a total of 13 (12.5%) organisms were isolated. Of these, 7 organisms were isolated by culture and 6 by NGS. No microorganisms were isolated by both culture and NGS from back-table swabs. Among 104 air swabs, a total of 11 (10.6%) organisms were isolated. Of these, 6 microorganisms were isolated by culture and 5 by NGS. In 4 of the 104 swabs, both culture- and NGS-isolated organisms were from air swabs. Of the 104 (12.5%) back-table and air swabs, 13 were culture positive. While more than 1 pathogen was identified in 2 air swabs, all back-table swabs were monomicrobial by culture. Pathogens were identified from 11 of 104 (10.6%) swabs by NGS, while more than 1 pathogen was identified in 4 swabs (2 air and 2 back table).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study raise an important issue that the surgical field including the sterile table setup for instruments is not "sterile" and can harbor pathogens.

Better Operating Room Ventilation as Determined by a Novel Ventilation Index is Associated With Lower Rates of Surgical Site Infections

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to assess the impact of operating room (OR) ventilation quality on surgical site infections (SSIs) using a novel ventilation index.

BACKGROUND

Previous studies compared laminar air flow with conventional ventilation, thereby ignoring many parameters that influence air flow properties.

METHODS

In this cohort study, we surveyed hospitals participating in the Swiss SSI surveillance and calculated a ventilation index for their ORs, with higher values reflecting less turbulent air displacement. For procedures captured between January 2017 and December 2019, we studied the association between ventilation index and SSI rates using linear regression (hospital-level analysis) and with the individual SSI risk using generalized linear mixed-effects models (patient-level analysis).

RESULTS

We included 47 hospitals (182 ORs). Among the 163,740 included procedures, 6791 SSIs were identified. In hospital-level analyses, a 5-unit increase in the ventilation index was associated with lower SSI rates for knee and hip arthroplasty (-0.41 infections per 100 procedures, 95% confidence interval: -0.69 to -0.13), cardiac (-0.89, -1.91 to 0.12), and spine surgeries (-1.15, -2.56 to 0.26). Similarly, patient-level analyses showed a lower SSI risk with each 5-unit increase in ventilation index (adjusted odds ratio 0.71, confidence interval: 0.58-0.87 for knee and hip; 0.72, 0.49-1.06 for spine; 0.82, 0.69-0.98 for cardiac surgery). Higher index values were mainly associated with a lower risk for superficial and deep incisional SSIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Better ventilation properties, assessed with our ventilation index, are associated with lower rates of superficial and deep incisional SSIs in orthopedic and cardiac procedures. OR ventilation quality appeared to be less relevant for other surgery types.

The carbon footprint of the operating room related to infection prevention measures: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Infection prevention measures are widely used in operating rooms (ORs). However, the extent to which they are at odds with ambitions to reduce the health sector's carbon footprint remains unclear.

AIM

To synthesize the evidence base for the carbon footprint of commonly used infection prevention measures in the OR, namely medical devices and instruments, surgical attire and air treatment systems.

METHODS

A scoping review of the international scientific literature was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The search was performed in PubMed and Google Scholar. Articles published between 2010 and June 2021 on infection prevention measures, their impact on the health sector's carbon footprint, and risk for surgical site infections (SSIs) were included.

FINDINGS

Although hospitals strive to reduce their carbon footprint, many infection prevention measures result in increased emissions. Evidence suggests that the use of disposable items instead of reusable items generally increases the carbon footprint, depending on sources of electricity. Controversy exists regarding the correlation between air treatment systems, contamination and the incidence of SSIs. The literature indicates that new air treatment systems consume more energy and do not necessarily reduce SSIs compared with conventional systems.

CONCLUSION

Infection prevention measures in ORs can be at odds with sustainability. The use of new air treatment systems and disposable items generally leads to significant greenhouse gas emissions, and does not necessarily reduce the incidence of SSIs. Alternative infection prevention measures with less environmental impact are available. Implementation could be facilitated by embracing environmental impact as an additional dimension of quality of care, which should change current risk-based approaches for the prevention of SSIs.

Current Status and Factors Associated with Clean Operating Rooms: A Survey of Hospitals in China

Background

Indoor air quality is controlled in the clean operating room (OR) to reduce the risk of surgical-site infections (SSIs). The aim of this study is to assess the usage and management of clean ORs in China and to identify factors associated with the risk of SSIs.

Methods

An online survey was distributed to hospitals in China from August 5 to September 5, 2018 via the WeChat account of the Shanghai International Forum for Infection Control and Prevention. The questionnaire consisted of two parts: basic information (hospital type, level, and number of beds) and usage and management (number of ORs, usage time, maintenance mode, test frequency, compliance with current standards, and comfort of healthcare workers). The significance of factors associated with the cleanliness and maintenance of clean ORs was assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

Results

Among 1,308 responding hospitals, 25.7% failed to comply with current standards. “Maintenance mode” had a significant effect on compliance with current standards for clean ORs (p < 0.0001) and “professional” maintenance was superior to “outsource or no” maintenance (odds ratio = 0.511, 95% confidence interval = 0.367–0.711). There was a significant difference in the comfort of healthcare workers in clean ORs that complied with current standards vs. those that did not (39.92% [388/972] vs. 64.28% [216/336], respectively, p < 0.0001). Humidity was the chief complaint among healthcare workers.

Conclusion

Maintenance of clean ORs was significantly associated with the compliance of current standards. Noncompliance with current standards was associated with greater risks of SSIs. Maintenance of ORs for prevention of SSIs should consider the costs and benefits.

Instrument tables equipped with local unidirectional airflow units reduce bacterial contamination during orthopedic implant surgery in an operating room with a displacement ventilation system

Background

Airborne bacteria present in the operating room may be a cause of surgical site infection, either contaminating the surgical wound directly, or indirectly via e.g. surgical instruments. The aim of this study was to evaluate if instrument and assistant tables equipped with local unidirectional airflow reduce bacterial contamination of the instrument area to ultra clean levels, during orthopedic implant surgery in an operating room with displacement ventilation.

Methods

Local airflow units of instrument and assistant tables were either active or inactive. Colony forming units were sampled intraoperatively from the air above the instruments and from instrument dummies. A minimum of three air samples and two-three samples from instrument dummies were taken during each surgery. Samples were incubated on agar for total aerobic bacterial count. The mean air and instrument contamination during each surgery was calculated and used to analyze the difference in contamination depending on use of local airflow or not. All procedures were performed in the same OR.

Results

188 air and 124 instrument samples were collected during 48 orthopedic implant procedures. Analysis showed that local unidirectional airflow above the surgical instruments significantly reduced the bacterial count in the air above assistant table (P<0.001) and instrument table (P=0.002), as well as on the instrument dummies from the assistant table (P=0.001).

Conclusions

Instrumentation tables equipped with local unidirectional airflow protect the surgical instruments from bacterial contamination during orthopedic implant surgery and may therefore reduce the risk of indirect wound contamination.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of indoor bioaerosols in hospitals: The influence of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate (1) the relationship between heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems and bioaerosol concentrations in hospital rooms, and (2) the effectiveness of laminar air flow (LAF) and high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) according to the indoor bioaerosol concentrations.

METHODS

Databases of Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched from 1st January 2000 to 31st December 2020. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the studies. The samples obtained from different areas of hospitals were grouped and described statistically. Furthermore, the meta-analysis of LAF and HEPA were performed using random-effects models. The methodological quality of the studies included in the meta-analysis was assessed using the checklist recommended by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

RESULTS

The mean CFU/m3 of the conventional HVAC rooms and enhanced HVAC rooms was lower than that of rooms without HVAC systems. Furthermore, the use of the HEPA filter reduced bacteria by 113.13 (95% CI: -197.89, -28.38) CFU/m3 and fungi by 6.53 (95% CI: -10.50, -2.55) CFU/m3. Meanwhile, the indoor bacterial concentration of LAF systems decreased by 40.05 (95% CI: -55.52, -24.58) CFU/m3 compared to that of conventional HVAC systems.

CONCLUSIONS

The HVAC systems in hospitals can effectively remove bioaerosols. Further, the use of HEPA filters is an effective option for areas that are under-ventilated and require additional protection. However, other components of the LAF system other than the HEPA filter are not conducive to removing airborne bacteria and fungi.

LIMITATION OF STUDY

Although our study analysed the overall trend of indoor bioaerosols, the conclusions cannot be extrapolated to rare, hard-to-culture, and highly pathogenic species, as well as species complexes. These species require specific culture conditions or different sampling requirements. Investigating the effects of HVAC systems on these species via conventional culture counting methods is challenging and further analysis that includes combining molecular identification methods is necessary.

STRENGTH OF THE STUDY

Our study was the first meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of HVAC systems on indoor bioaerosols through microbial incubation count. Our study demonstrated that HVAC systems could effectively reduce overall bioaerosol concentrations to maintain better indoor air quality. Moreover, our study provided further evidence that other components of the LAF system other than the HEPA filter are not conducive to removing airborne bacteria and fungi.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATION

Our research showed that HEPA filters are more effective at removing bioaerosols in HVAC systems than the current LAF system. Therefore, instead of opting for the more costly LAF system, a filter with a higher filtration rate would be a better choice for indoor environments that require higher air quality; this is valuable for operating room construction and maintenance budget allocation.

Can clothing systems and human activities in operating rooms with mixing ventilation systems help achieve 10 CFU/m3 level during orthopaedic surgeries?

The level of airborne microbial contamination in operating rooms (ORs) is an important indicator of indoor air quality and ensures a clean surgical environment. It is necessary to research how different factors affect the colony forming unit (CFU) level during surgery in a mixing ventilation (MV) operating room (OR) to fulfil an ultra-clean air requirement. The main objective of this study is to clarify the possibility of achieving the requirement for an ultraclean operating room (≤ 10 CFU/m³) with mixing ventilation from two factors of clothing and human activities. The experiment results verified that the average CFU/m³ of three of five mock-up surgeries was 8.5 which was below or equal to the ultra-clean requirement, while the other two mock-up surgeries did not meet the ultra-clean requirement. Surgical activities together with clothing level of surgical staff in ORs seem to be the most significant reason for the high CFU level during surgery. It is possible to achieve the ultraclean air requirement (≤ 10 CFU/m³) during a surgical process with proper clothing and low surgical activities in ORs. This study clarifies the effect of clothing and human activities on the CFU level in the surgical microenvironment in ORs and contributes to developing new code of products for the surgical team.

Development of hydrofluoric acid-cleaned silicon nitride implants for periprosthetic infection eradication and bone regeneration enhancement

Orthopedic implant is commonly associated with occurrence or relapse of osteomyelitis. This study developed a hydrofluoric acid (HF) cleaned silicon nitride (Si₃N₄) implant Si₃N₄_AC for osteomyelitis control and established a rat tibial osteomyelitis model to evaluate its efficacy on eradicating periprosthetic infection and enhancing bone regeneration. In vitro studies revealed Si₃N₄_AC had improved biocompatibility and inhibited Staphylococcus aureus adhesion. A custom-made Si₃N₄_AC implant was prepared and inserted into the rat tibia longitudinal cavity inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus. The in vivo bacteriostatic and osteogenic efficacies of Si₃N₄_AC implant were evaluated by histological, microbiological and Micro-CT analyses and compared with implants of pure Ti and Si₃N₄ . Si₃N₄_AC implant group revealed 99.5% inhibition of periprosthetic Staphylococcus aureus compared to the osteomyelitis group after 14 days post-operation. Implant-adhering bacteria density of Si₃N₄_AC was also much lower than pure Ti and Si₃N₄. In addition, micro-CT evaluation of peri-implant bone formation under the condition of periprosthetic osteomyelitis after 30 days post-surgery confirmed the osteogenic ability of Si₃N₄_AC. Taken together, Si₃N₄_AC can be an effective orthopedic biomaterial to eradicate periprosthetic infection and enhance bone regeneration.

Laminar airflow decreases microbial air contamination compared with turbulent ventilated operating theatres during live total joint arthroplasty: a nationwide survey

BACKGROUND

Preventing surgical site infections and prosthetic joint infections is crucial for patient safety after total joint arthroplasty. Microbial air contamination has been suggested as a risk factor. Therefore, the ventilation system that will reduce air contamination most effectively in operating theatres (OTs) has been discussed.

AIM

To determine whether laminar airflow (LAF) ventilation is superior to turbulent airflow (TAF) ventilation by looking at the colony forming units (cfu) count during live total hip and knee arthroplasties. Furthermore, to explore whether the number of OT personnel, door and cabinet lock openings and technical parameters of the ventilation systems have an impact on the number of cfu.

METHODS

Active air sampling and passive sedimented bacterial load were performed in 17 OTs, equipped with either LAF or TAF ventilation, during 51 live surgeries while observations were noted.

FINDINGS

LAF OTs reduced cfu counts compared with TAF OTs during live surgery (P<0.001). All LAF OTs provided ultraclean air whereas TAF had nine procedures exceeding the threshold of 10 cfu/m³. Door and cabinet lock openings and number of personnel did not influence the cfu count, while it decreased with increasing volume and total air change per hour (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

All LAF OTs had cfu counts within recommendations and provided lower cfu counts compared with TAF OTs. The number of OT personnel and total openings did not have an influence on cfu counts. Increased volume of the OT and total air change per hour showed a decrease in active cfu counts.

Ventilation design conditions associated with airborne bacteria levels within the wound area during surgical procedures: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Without confirmation of the ventilation design conditions (typology and airflow rate), the common practice of identifying unidirectional airflow (UDAF) systems as equivalent to ultra-clean air ventilation systems may be misleading, but also any claims about the ineffectiveness of UDAF systems should be doubted. The aim of this review was to assess and compare ventilation system design conditions for which ultra-clean air (mean <10 cfu/m³) within 50 cm from the wound has been reported. Six medical databases were systematically searched to identify and select studies reporting intraoperative airborne levels expressed as cfu/m³ close to the wound site, and ventilation system design conditions. Available data on confounding factors such as the number of persons present in the operating room, number of door openings, and clothing material were also included. Predictors for achieving mean airborne bacteria levels within <10 cfu/m³ were identified using a penalized multivariate logistic regression model. Twelve studies met the eligibility criteria and were included for analysis. UDAF systems considered had significantly higher air volume flows compared with turbulent ventilation (TV) systems considered. Ultra-clean environments were reported in all UDAF-ventilated (N = 7) rooms compared with four of 11 operating rooms equipped with TV. On multivariate analysis, the total number of air exchange rates (P=0.019; odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.96) and type of clothing material (P=0.031; OR 95% CI: 0.01-0.71) were significantly associated with achieving mean levels of airborne bacteria <10 cfu/m³. High-volume UDAF systems complying with DIN 1946-4:2008 standards for the airflow rate and ceiling diffuser size unconditionally achieve ultra-clean air close to the wound site. In conclusion, the studied articles demonstrate that high-volume UDAF systems perform as ultra-clean air systems and are superior to TV systems in reducing airborne bacteria levels close to the wound site.

Does the Laminar Airflow System Affect the Development of Perioperative Hypothermia? A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare tympanic membrane temperature changes and the incidence of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia (IPH) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia in laminar airflow systems (LAS-OR) and conventional turbulent airflow systems (CAS-OR).

BACKGROUND

Different heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems are used in the operating room (OR), such as LAS and CAS. Laminar airflow is directed directly to the patient in LAS-OR. Does laminar airflow in ORs cause faster heat loss by convection?

METHODS

This is a prospective, randomized study. We divided 200 patients with simple randomization (1:1), as group LAS and group CAS, and took the patients into the LAS-OR or CAS-OR for the operation. Clinical trial number: IRCT20180324039145N3. The tympanic membrane temperatures of patients were measured (°C) before anesthesia induction (T ₀) and then every 15 min during surgery (T_n). Changes (Δ_n) between T ₀ and T_n were measured.

RESULTS

In the first 30 min, there was a temperature decrease of approximately 0.8 °C (1.44 °F) in both groups. Temperature decreases at 45 min were higher in group LAS than in group CAS but not statistically significant, Δ₄₅, respectively, 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] [0.77, 1.02]) versus 0.77 (95% CI [0.69, 0.84]; p = .09). IPH occurred in a total of 60.9% (112 of 184) of patients in the entire surgical evaluation period in group LAS and group CAS (58.9% vs. 62.8%, p = . 59).

CONCLUSIONS

IPH is seen frequently in both HVAC systems. Clinically, the advantage of HVAC systems relative to each other has not been demonstrated during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Laminar air flow reduces particle load in TKA-even outside the LAF panel: a prospective, randomized cohort study

PURPOSE

Released particles are a major risk of airborne contamination during surgery. The present prospective study investigated the quantitative and qualitative particle load in the operating room (OR) depending on location, time of surgery and use of laminar air flow (LAF) system.

METHODS

The particle load/m³ was measured during the implantation of 12 total knee arthroplasties (6 × LAF, 6 × Non-LAF) by using the Met One HHPC 6 + device (Beckmann Coulter GmbH, Germany). Measurement was based on the absorption and scattering of (laser) light by particles and was performed at three different time-points [empty OR, setting up, ongoing operation) at 3 fixed measurement points [OR table (central LAF area), anaesthesia tower (marginal LAF area), surgical image amplifier (outside LAF area)].

RESULTS

Independent of time and location, all measurements showed a significantly higher particle load in the Non-LAF group (p < 0.01). With ongoing surgical procedure both groups showed increasing particle load. While there was a major increase of fine particles (size < 1 µm) with advancing activity in the LAF group, the Non-LAF group showed higher particle gain with increasing particle size. The lowest particle load in the LAF group was measured at the operating column, increasing with greater distance from the operating table. The Non-LAF group presented a significantly higher particle load than the LAF group at all locations.

CONCLUSION

The use of a LAF system significantly reduces the particle load and therefore potential bacterial contamination regardless of the time or place of measurement and therefore seems to be a useful tool for infection prevention. As LAF leads to a significant decrease of respirable particles, it appears to be a protective factor for the health of the surgical team regardless of its use in infection prevention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Operating Theatre Ventilation Systems and Their Performance in Contamination Control: "At Rest" and "In Operation" Particle and Microbial Measurements Made in an Italian Large and Multi-Year Inspection Campaign

In Operating Theatres (OT), the ventilation system plays an important role in controlling airborne contamination and reducing the risks of Surgical Site Infections (SSIs). The air cleanliness is really crucial in this field and different measurements are used in order to characterize the situation in terms of both airborne microbiological pollutants and particle size and concentration. Although the ventilation systems and airborne contamination are strictly linked, different air diffusion schemes (in particular, the Partial Unidirectional Airflow, P-UDAF, and the Mixing Airflow, MAF) and various design parameters are used, and there is still no consensus on real performance and optimum solutions. This study presents measurements procedures and results obtained during Inspection and Periodic Performance Testing (1228 observations) in a large sample of Italian OTs (175 OTs in 31 Italian hospitals) in their operative life (period from 2010 to 2018). The inspections were made after a cleaning procedure, both in “at-rest” conditions and “in operation” state. Inert and microbial contamination data (in air and on surfaces) are analyzed and commented according to four relevant air diffusion schemes and design classes. Related data on Recovery Time (RT) and personnel presence were picked up and are commented. The results confirm that the ventilation systems are able to maintain the targeted performance levels in the OT operative life. However, they attest that significant differences in real OT contamination control capabilities do exist and could be ascribed to various design choices and to different operation and maintenance practices. The study shows and confirms that the air diffusion scheme and the design airflow rate are critical factors. Beside large variations in measurements, the performance values, in terms of control of airborne particle and microbial contamination (in air and on surfaces), for P-UDAF systems are better than those that were assessed for the MAF air diffusion solution. The average performances do increase with increasing airflows, and the results offer a better insight on this relationship leading to some possible optimization.

Association of Laminar Airflow During Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty With Periprosthetic Joint Infection

IMPORTANCE

Whether laminar airflow (LAF) in the operating room is effective for decreasing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty remains a clinically important yet controversial issue.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between operating room LAF ventilation systems and the risk of PJI in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 6972 consecutive patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty at 2 surgical facilities within a single institution from January 1, 2013, to September 15, 2017, with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. All procedures were performed by 5 board-certified arthroplasty surgeons. Statistical analysis was performed from January 1, 2014, to September 15, 2018.

EXPOSURE

Patients underwent total joint arthroplasty in operating rooms equipped with either LAF or turbulent airflow.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Patient characteristics were extracted from clinical records. Periprosthetic joint infection was defined according to Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria within 1 year of the index arthroplasty. A multivariable logistic regression model was performed to explore the potential association between LAF and risk of PJI at 1 year, and then a sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching was performed to further validate the findings.

RESULTS

A total of 6972 patients (2797 who underwent total knee arthroplasty and 4175 who underwent total hip arthroplasty; 3690 women [52.9%]; mean [SD] age, 63.9 [10.7] years) were included. The incidence of PJI within 1 year for patients from the facility without LAF was similar to that of patients from the facility with LAF (0.4% [12 of 3027] vs 0.5% [21 of 3945]). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, after all confounding factors were taken into account, the use of LAF was not associated with a reduction of the risk of PJI (adjusted odds ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.40-2.19; P = .89). After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in the incidence of PJI within 1 year for patients who underwent total joint arthroplasty at these 2 sites.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study suggests that the use of LAF in the operating room was not associated with a reduced incidence of PJI after primary total joint arthroplasty. With an appropriate perioperative protocol for infection prevention, LAF does not seem to play a protective role in PJI prevention.

Implant contamination as a cause of surgical site infection in spinal surgery: are single-use implants a reasonable solution? - a systematic review

Background

In spine surgery, surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the main perioperative complications and is associated with a higher patient morbidity and longer patient hospitalization. Most factors associated with SSI are connected with asepsis during the surgical procedure and thus with contamination of implants and instruments used which can be caused by pre- and intraoperative factors. In this systematic review we evaluate the current literature on these causes and discuss possible solutions to avoid implant and instrument contamination.

Methods

A systematic literature search of PubMed addressing implant, instrument and tray contamination in orthopaedic and spinal surgery from 2001 to 2019 was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. All studies regarding implant and instrument contamination in orthopaedic surgery published in English language were included.

Results

Thirty-five studies were eligible for inclusion and were divided into pre- and intraoperative causes for implant and instrument contamination. Multiple studies showed that reprocessing of medical devices for surgery may be insufficient and lead to surgical site contamination. Regarding intraoperative causes, contamination of gloves and gowns as well as contamination via air are the most striking factors contributing to microbial contamination.

Conclusions

Our systematic literature review shows that multiple factors can lead to instrument or implant contamination. Intraoperative causes of contamination can be avoided by implementing behavior such as changing gloves right before handling an implant and reducing the instruments’ intraoperative exposure to air. In avoidance of preoperative contamination, there still is a lack of convincing evidence for the use of single-use implants in orthopaedic surgery.

Intraoperative and Postoperative Infection Prevention

Implementation of strategies for prevention of surgical site infection and periprosthetic joint infection is gaining further attention. We provide an overview of the pertinent evidence-based guidelines for infection prevention from the World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the second International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection. Future work is needed to ascertain clinical efficacy, optimal combinations, and the cost-effectiveness of certain measures.

The Influence of Surgical Staff Behavior on Air Quality in a Conventionally Ventilated Operating Theatre during a Simulated Arthroplasty: A Case Study at the University Hospital of Parma

Surgical staff behavior in operating theatres is one of the factors associated with indoor air quality and surgical site infection risk. The aim of this study was to apply an approach including microbiological, particle, and microclimate parameters during two simulated surgical hip arthroplasties to evaluate the influence of staff behavior on indoor air quality. During the first hip arthroplasty, the surgical team behaved correctly, but in the second operation, behavioral recommendations were not respected. Microbiological contamination was evaluated by active and passive methods. The air velocity, humidity, temperature, and CO2 concentration were also monitored. The highest levels of microbial and particle contamination, as well as the highest variation in the microclimate parameter, were recorded during the surgical operation where the surgical team behaved "incorrectly". Turbulent air flow ventilation systems appeared more efficient than in the past and very low air microbial contamination was reached when behavior was correct. Therefore, adherence to behavioral recommendations in operating theatres is essential to not undermine the effectiveness of the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems and employed resources.

Air quality in the operating room: Surgical site infections, HVAC systems and discipline - position paper of the German Society of Hospital Hygiene (DGKH)

In recent years, there has been an ongoing discussion about the value of laminar airflow (LAF=low turbulence displacement ventilation) in the operating room for prevention of surgical site infections (SSI). Some publications, e.g., from the WHO, issued the demand to no longer build LAF ceilings in operating rooms. The present statement deals critically with this position and justifies the use of LAF ceilings in different ways: Many of the papers cited by the WHO and others for the case against LAF do not provide reliable data.The remaining studies which might be used for answering the question give quite different results, also in favor of LAF.The size of the LAF ceiling in many studies is not given or mostly too small in comparison to actual technical requirements.LAF in different countries can mean quite different techniques (e.g., the US in comparison to Germany) so that the results of studies that do not take this into account may not be comparable.LAF has positive effects in terms of reducing particulate and bacterial load, associated with increased airflow in the surgical working area. A reduction of carcinogenic substances in the air may also be assumed, which would increase workers' safety. Thus, this paper recommends building LAF ceilings in the future as well, depending on the operations intended. Further, this paper gives an overview of possible reasons for surgical site infections and highlights the importance of discipline in the operating theatre.

Ambient air pollution in gastrointestinal endoscopy unit

BACKGROUND

The gastrointestinal endoscopy unit is frequently exposed to gastrointestinal gas expelled from patients and electrocoagulated tissue through carbonation. This can be potentially harmful to the health of not only the healthcare personnel but also patients who undergo endoscopy. This study aimed to measure the air quality in the endoscopy unit.

METHODS

We measured indoor air quality indices (CO₂, total volatile organic compounds (VOCs), PM_2.5, NO₂, CO, and ozone) using portable passive air quality monitoring sensors in the procedural area, recovery area, and cleansing-of-equipment area, at 1-min intervals for 1 week, and the type and number of endoscopic procedures were recorded.

RESULTS

CO₂, PM_2.5, NO₂, and ozone levels were the highest in the cleansing area, followed by the procedural and recovery areas, and VOC level was highest in the procedural area. The proportion of poor-quality level of CO₂ and VOCs was highest in the procedural area and that of NO₂ was highest in the cleansing area. The proportion of tolerable to poor-quality (exceeding acceptable level) level of CO₂ and total VOCs in the procedural area was 26% and 19.2% in all measurement times, respectively. The proportion of tolerable to poor-quality level of NO₂ in the cleansing area of the endoscopy unit was 32.1% in all measurement times. Multivariate analyses revealed that tolerable to poor-quality (exceeding acceptable level) level of VOCs was associated with the number of endoscopic procedures (odds ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-2.27) and PM_2.5 level (1.27, 1.12-1.44). Moreover, tolerable to poor-quality level of CO₂ was associated with the number of colonoscopy (5.35, 1.19-24.02), especially with electrocoagulation procedures (24.31, 1.31-452.44) in the procedural area.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare personnel and patients who undergo endoscopy are frequently exposed to ambient air pollution. Health-related protective strategies for ambient air pollution in the endoscopy unit are warranted. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03724565.

Laminar airflow and mixing ventilation: Which is better for operating room airflow distribution near an orthopedic surgical patient?

BACKGROUND

There has been little research on the performance of laminar airflow (LAF) and mixing ventilation (MV) systems regarding clean airflow distribution near a surgical patient in operating rooms (ORs). The objective of this study was to examine the performance of LAF and MV systems in ORs at St Olavs Hospital in Norway.

METHODS

Experimental measurements were conducted in 2 ORs equipped with LAF and MV systems.

RESULTS

Under real operating conditions, airflow distribution from the LAF system was disrupted, and airflow velocity became significantly lower than that of MV above the lying patient. Airflow pattern was observed as distributed vertically downward and horizontally with LAF and MV, respectively. Turbulence intensity of supply airflow from LAF was much lower than that of MV.

CONCLUSIONS

The airflow distribution by LAF system in close proximity to a patient is greatly affected by thermal plumes generated above incisions by both patients and surgical facilities. The effect of surgical facilities on airflow distribution by using MV is not significant compared to LAF ventilation. New guidelines are needed for the design of clean airflow distribution systems in the vicinity of surgical patients in ORs.

Association between air changes and airborne microbial contamination in operating rooms

BACKGROUND

Control of airborne microbial contamination is important in operating rooms (ORs). To keep airborne contamination low, guidelines should highlight the importance of air turnover. The aims of the study were: (1) to verify the association between air turnover and airborne contamination in ORs; and (2) to identify a statistical relationship between air turnover and airborne microbial contamination.

METHODS

A cross sectional study was carried out from November 2014 to July 2017 in the teaching Hospital of Siena. Nineteen ORs (14 with turbulent and 5 with laminar flow ventilation) were surveyed a total of 59 times under operating conditions. Air samples were collected with an air sampler. Petri dishes, incubated at 36 °C for 48 h, were used to quantify colony forming units in the samples (CFU). The data was transformed to evaluate several statistically significant nonlinear associations between air turnover, quantified as air changes per hour (ACH) and CFU per cubic meter of air (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

A log-linear regression model provided the best fit between ACH and CFU for laminar (p = 0.013; R² = 0.3911) and turbulent flow systems (p = 0.002; R² = 0.3443). The corresponding model was: ln(CFU) = (a - b*ACH), where the regression parameters were estimated at a = 4.02 and b = 0.037 for laminar flow and a = 5.24 and b = 0.067 for turbulent flow.

CONCLUSIONS

Italian guidelines indicate microbial load limits of 20 and 180 CFU/m³ for operating rooms with laminar and turbulent flow ventilation, respectively. The model allowed us to evaluate the minimum number of ACHs to keep CFU within these limits. Ad hoc measurements in other environments can be used to calibrate the relationship between ACH and CFU.

Factors that may promote the learning of person-centred care: an ethnographic study of an implementation programme for healthcare professionals in a medical emergency ward in Sweden

While person-centred care has gained increasing prominence in recent decades as a goal for healthcare systems, mainstream implementation remains tentative and there is a lack of knowledge about how to develop person-centred care in practice. This study therefore aimed to explore what may be required in order for person-centred care programmes to be successful. The study used an ethnographic method of data collection. This consisted of closely following an implementation programme on a medical emergency ward in a Swedish hospital. Data consisted of participant observation and informal interviews with healthcare providers and their management leaders while they were in the process of training to use person-centred care. These interlocutors were using action learning methods under the guidance of facilitators. Our findings revealed that although the programme resulted in some of the processes that are central for person-centred care being developed, organisational factors and a lack of attention to ethics in the programme counteracted these positive effects. The study highlights the importance of facilitating mechanisms to produce desired results. These include management leaders' learning about the dynamic and collective nature of learning processes and change. They also include allowing for inter-professional dialogue to enable managers and professionals to reflect deeply on professional boundaries, disciplinary knowledge and power relations in their teams. Teamwork is essential for the development of person-centred care and documentation, in accordance with this specific implementation programme, is also indispensable. The space for inter-professional dialogue should also accommodate their various perspectives on the aims of care and organizational reality.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis With Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole Instead of Cloxacillin/Cefotaxime Increases Inguinal Surgical Site Infection Rate After Lower Extremity Revascularization

Due to the consistently high proportion of surgical site infections (SSI) after vascular surgery, a change of prophylactic antibiotic therapy from cloxacillin/cefotaxime to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) was conducted in 2016. The study included consecutive patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization due to acute or chronic lower extremity arterial disease. The antibiotic regime was changed in between the two sampling periods (2014 -2016 versus 2016 -2017). The diagnosis of SSI was based on clinical examination and microbiological results, and severity was classified according to the Szilagyi classification. One hundred and twenty-two patients in the cloxacillin/cefotaxime and 67 patients in the TMP-SMX group were included. The SSI rates were 32.0% and 40.3%, respectively (p=0.25). The proportion of women were higher in the TMP-SMX group (32.8% versus 47.8%, respectively, p=0.043). No other differences between the two groups were found regarding patient, vascular surgery procedure characteristics or severity of SSI. Groin infection rate was higher in the TMP-SMX group (15.4% versus 30.5%, respectively, p=0.022). When adjusting for gender, groin infection was more common in the TMP-SMX group (Odds Ratio 2.5, 95% CI 1.1 -5.4). The groin SSI rate was higher after elective surgery in the TMP-SMX group (13.0% versus 27.8%, respectively, p=0.027), and also after adjusting for gender (Odds Ratio 2.6, 95% CI 1.1 -6.2). The change in antibiotic prophylaxis from Cloxacillin/Cefotaxime to TMP-SMX was associated with an increased rate of inguinal SSI in patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization, despite a possible Hawthorne effect.

Influence of the Arrangement of Surgical Light Axes on the Air Environment in Operating Rooms

Purpose

Surgical lights in the operating rooms are typically installed in a single axis in the center of the room or in two axes on both sides of the operating table. In the single-axis installation, the air-conditioning outlet cannot be placed in the center of the ceiling, which may affect the air current. Therefore, we measured the air current and cleanliness in two equivalent operating rooms using a vertical laminar airflow system equipped with either single-axis or double-axis surgical lights.

Methods

Air current was measured using a three-dimensional ultrasonic anemometer. Cleanliness was evaluated by measuring the amount of dust before and after air-conditioner activation. To visualize the air current, smoke was illuminated on a sheet of laser light while the air-conditioning was stopped, and changes after air-conditioning activation were observed.

Results

In the single-axis room, an oblique fast air current flowing from the surrounding air outlet toward the center was observed, and the flow velocity fluctuated greatly. In the double-axis room, uniform downward laminar airflow was observed. The amount of dust at the center decreased significantly faster in the double-axis room; thus, the cleanliness at the center was higher in the double-axis room. Persistent stagnation of smoke was observed below the single-axis lighting, whereas smoke below the double-axis lighting was immediately dispersed and the air cleared even when surgical lights were in the position for surgery.

Conclusion

Uniform vertical laminar airflow was formed and high cleanliness was achieved in the center of the room when the surgical lights were arranged in two axes.

Motion-capture system to assess intraoperative staff movements and door openings: Impact on surrogates of the infectious risk in surgery

OBJECTIVES

We longitudinally observed and assessed the impact of the operating room (OR) staff movements and door openings on surrogates of the exogenous infectious risk using a new technology system.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This multicenter observational study included 13 ORs from 10 hospitals, performing planned cardiac and orthopedic surgery (total hip or knee replacement). Door openings during the surgical procedure were obtained from data collected by inertial sensors fixed on the doors. Intraoperative staff movements were captured by a network of 8 infrared cameras. For each surgical procedure, 3 microbiological air counts, longitudinal particles counts, and 1 bacteriological sample of the wound before skin closure were performed. Statistics were performed using a linear mixed model for longitudinal data.

RESULTS

We included 34 orthopedic and 25 cardiac procedures. The median frequency of door openings from incision to closure was independently associated with an increased log10 0.3 µm particle (ß, 0.03; standard deviation [SD], 0.01; P = .01) and air microbial count (ß, 0.07; SD, 0.03; P = .03) but was not significantly correlated with the wound contamination before closure (r = 0.13; P = .32). The number of persons (ß, -0.08; SD, 0.03; P &lt; .01), and the cumulated movements by the surgical team (ß, 0.0004; SD, 0.0005; P &lt; .01) were associated with log10 0.3 µm particle counts.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has demonstrated a previously missing association between intraoperative staff movements and surrogates of the exogenous risk of surgical site infection. Restriction of staff movements and door openings should be considered for the control of the intraoperative exogenous infectious risk.

Comparison of operating room air distribution systems using the environmental quality indicator method of dynamic simulated surgical procedures

BACKGROUND

Ensuring aseptic airborne environments for sterile fields and back instrument tables in operating rooms (ORs) is crucial to reducing microbial and particle contamination during surgery. Configurations of in-ceiling air delivery mechanisms impact the effectiveness of the system at eliminating contamination in critical zones.

METHODS

The environmental quality indicator method was used to assess airborne environments in ORs equipped with a single large diffuser (SLD), a multidiffuser array (MDA), or a 4-way throw diffuser during dynamic, simulated surgical procedures. Environmental quality indicators measured included particles, microbes, carbon dioxide, velocity, humidity, and temperature at 26 air changes per hour.

RESULTS

SLD ORs performed better than MDA ORs and 4-way throw diffuser ORs at removing microbes and carbon dioxide from the sterile field (P < .05). SLD ORs had higher velocity and lower temperature over the sterile field than the other 2 ORs (P < .05). MDA ORs had lower total particle counts than the other ORs (P < .05). The sterile fields in all ORs were cleaner than the respective back instrument tables (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Air delivery systems that eliminate blockages to uniform airflow directly over sterile zones, such as boom mounts and access panels, and deliver unidirectional, downward flow of clean filtered air provided a cleaner airborne environment within the sterile field. Expansion of air delivery systems to include areas outside the sterile field, where other surgical aides reside, may further reduce contamination within critical zones.

Laminar Air Flow Handling Systems in the Operating Room

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection is associated with a substantial healthcare burden and remains one of the most challenging complications to treat. Airborne particles carrying contaminating micro-organisms are responsible for the majority of these infections.

METHODS

Various operating theater ventilatory systems have been developed to prevent direct airborne bacterial inoculation of the surgical wound. Laminar air flow uses positive pressure air currents through filtration units to direct air streams away from the operative field in order to create an ultraclean zone around the operative site.

DISCUSSION

Early studies reported lower infection rates with laminar air flow and therefore it became the accepted standard for implant-related surgery. However, more recent evidence has questioned its clinical importance. The purpose of this article is to review contemporary laminar air flow handling systems and the current evidence behind their use.

The effectiveness of ultra-clean air operating theatres in the prevention of deep infection in joint arthroplasty surgery

Deep infection was identified as a serious complication in the earliest days of total hip arthroplasty. It was identified that airborne contamination in conventional operating theatres was the major contributing factor. As progress was made in improving the engineering of operating theatres, airborne contamination was reduced. Detailed studies were carried out relating airborne contamination to deep infection rates.

In a trial conducted by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council (MRC), it was found that the use of ultra-clean air (UCA) operating theatres was associated with a significant reduction in deep infection rates. Deep infection rates were further reduced by the use of a body exhaust system. The MRC trial also included a detailed microbiology study, which confirmed the relationship between airborne contamination and deep infection rates.

Recent observational evidence from joint registries has shown that in contemporary practice, infection rates remain a problem, and may be getting worse. Registry observations have also called into question the value of “laminar flow” operating theatres.

Observational evidence from joint registries provides very limited evidence on the efficacy of UCA operating theatres. Although there have been some changes in surgical practice in recent years, the conclusions of the MRC trial remain valid, and the use of UCA is essential in preventing deep infection.

There is evidence that if UCA operating theatres are not used correctly, they may have poor microbiological performance. Current UCA operating theatres have limitations, and further research is required to update them and improve their microbiological performance in contemporary practice.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1264–9.

Door openings in the operating room are associated with increased environmental contamination

Door openings in the operating room (OR) have been hypothesized to increase OR environmental contamination. This study measured average colony-forming units (CFU) in the OR as a function of door openings and other potentially important variables. Bacterial settle plates were placed inside and outside of laminar airflow (LAF) by both exit doors, on the instrument table, and on the back instrument table (if applicable) for 48 orthopedic and general surgery procedures. CFU data were paired to Staphylococcus aureus colonization status, door openings, surgery duration, time of day, OR location, number of staff, use of warming devices, temperature, and humidity. The number of door openings in the OR and surgery duration were significantly associated with increased CFU in the OR overall and outside of LAF. However, under LAF conditions, only the number of OR personnel was significantly associated with increased CFU.

Traffic flow and microbial air contamination in operating rooms at a major teaching hospital in Ghana

BACKGROUND

Current literature examining the relationship between door-opening rate, number of people present, and microbial air contamination in the operating room is limited. Studies are especially needed from low- and middle-income countries, where the risk of surgical site infections is high.

AIM

To assess microbial air contamination in operating rooms at a Ghanaian teaching hospital and the association with door-openings and number of people present. Moreover, we aimed to document reasons for door-opening.

METHODS

We conducted active air-sampling using an MAS 100^® portable impactor during 124 clean or clean-contaminated elective surgical procedures. The number of people present, door-opening rate and the reasons for each door-opening were recorded by direct observation using pretested structured observation forms.

FINDINGS

During surgery, the mean number of colony-forming units (cfu) was 328 cfu/m³ air, and 429 (84%) of 510 samples exceeded a recommended level of 180 cfu/m³. Of 6717 door-openings recorded, 77% were considered unnecessary. Levels of cfu/m³ were strongly correlated with the number of people present (P = 0.001) and with the number of door-openings/h (P = 0.02). In empty operating rooms, the mean cfu count was 39 cfu/m³ after 1 h of uninterrupted ventilation and 52 (51%) of 102 samples exceeded a recommended level of 35 cfu/m³.

CONCLUSION

The study revealed high values of intraoperative airborne cfu exceeding recommended levels. Minimizing the number of door-openings and people present during surgery could be an effective strategy to reduce microbial air contamination in low- and middle-income settings.

The Association Between Operating Room Personnel and Turnover With Surgical Site Infection in More Than 12 000 Neurosurgical Cases

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) contributes significantly to postoperative morbidity and mortality and greatly increases the cost of care.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the impact of workflow and personnel-related risk factors contributing to the incidence of SSIs in a large sample of neurological surgeries.

METHODS

Data were obtained using an enterprisewide electronic health record system, operating room, and anesthesia records for neurological procedures conducted between January 1, 2009, and November 30, 2012. SSI data were obtained from prospective surveillance by infection preventionists using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions. A multivariate model was constructed and refined using backward elimination logistic regression methods.

RESULTS

The analysis included 12 528 procedures. Most cases were elective (94.5%), and the average procedure length was 4.8 hours. The average number of people present in the operating room at any time during the procedure was 10.0. The overall infection rate was 2.3%. Patient body mass index (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.04) and sex (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.07-1.72) as well as procedure length (odds ratio, 1.19 per additional hour; 95% CI, 1.15-1.23) and nursing staff turnovers (odds ratio, 1.095 per additional turnover; 95% CI, 1.02-1.21) were significantly correlated with the risk of SSI.

CONCLUSION

This study found that patient body mass index and male sex were associated with an increased risk of SSI. Operating room personnel turnover, a modifiable, work flow-related factor, was an independent variable positively correlated with SSI. This study suggests that efforts to reduce operating room turnover may be effective in preventing SSI.

ABBREVIATIONS

OR, operating roomSSI, surgical site infection.

Impact of Operating Room Environment on Postoperative Central Nervous System Infection in a Resource-Limited Neurosurgical Center in South Asia

BACKGROUND

Postoperative central nervous system infections (PCNSIs) are serious complications following neurosurgical intervention. We previously investigated the incidence and causative pathogens of PCNSIs at a resource-limited, neurosurgical center in south Asia. This follow-up study was conducted to analyze differences in PCNSIs at the same institution following only one apparent change: the operating room air filtration system.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of all neurosurgical cases performed between December 1, 2013, and March 31, 2016 at our center. Providers, patient demographic data, case types, perioperative care, rate of PCNSI, and rates of other complications were reviewed. These results were then compared with the findings of our previous study of neurosurgical cases between June 1, 2012, and June 30, 2013.

RESULTS

All 623 neurosurgical operative cases over the study period were reviewed. Four patients (0.6%) had a PCNSI, and no patients had a positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture. In the previous study, among 363 cases, 71 patients (19.6%) had a PCNSI and 7 (1.9%) had a positive CSF culture (all Gram-negative organisms). The differences in both parameters are statistically significant (P < 0.001). Between the 2 studies, there was no change in treatment providers, case types, case durations, antibiotic administration practices, and patient demographics.

CONCLUSIONS

The rates of PCNSI and positive CSF culture were significantly lower in our present cohort compared with the cohort in our previous study. The sole apparent change involves the air filtration system inside the neurosurgical operating rooms; this environmental change occurred during the 5 months between the 2 studies. This study demonstrates the impact of environmental factors in reducing infections.

Effect of laminar airflow ventilation on surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of the operating room's ventilation system in the prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs) is widely discussed, and existing guidelines do not reflect current evidence. In this context, laminar airflow ventilation was compared with conventional ventilation to assess their effectiveness in reducing the risk of SSIs.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and WHO regional medical databases from Jan 1, 1990, to Jan 31, 2014. We updated the search for MEDLINE for the period between Feb 1, 2014, and May 25, 2016. We included studies most relevant to our predefined question: is the use of laminar airflow in the operating room associated with the reduction of overall or deep SSI as outcomes in patients of any age undergoing surgical operations? We excluded studies not relevant to the study question, studies not in the selected languages, studies published before Jan 1, 1990, or after May 25, 2016, meeting or conference abstracts, and studies of which the full text was not available. Data were extracted by two independent investigators, with disagreements resolved through further discussion. Authors were contacted if the full-text article was not available, or if important data or information on the paper's content was absent. Studies were assessed for publication bias. Grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation was used to assess the quality of the identified evidence. Meta-analyses were done with RevMan (version 5.3).

FINDINGS

We identified 1947 records of which 12 observational studies were comparing laminar airflow ventilation with conventional turbulent ventilation in orthopaedic, abdominal, and vascular surgery. The meta-analysis of eight cohort studies showed no difference in risk for deep SSIs following total hip arthroplasty (330 146 procedures, odds ratio [OR] 1·29, 95% CI 0·98-1·71; p=0·07, I²=83%). For total knee arthroplasty, the meta-analysis of six cohort studies showed no difference in risk for deep SSIs (134 368 procedures, OR 1·08, 95% CI 0·77-1·52; p=0·65, I²=71%). For abdominal and open vascular surgery, the meta-analysis of three cohort studies found no difference in risk for overall SSIs (63 472 procedures, OR 0·75, 95% CI 0·43-1·33; p=0·33, I²=95%).

INTERPRETATION

The available evidence shows no benefit for laminar airflow compared with conventional turbulent ventilation of the operating room in reducing the risk of SSIs in total hip and knee arthroplasties, and abdominal surgery. Decision makers, medical and administrative, should not regard laminar airflow as a preventive measure to reduce the risk of SSIs. Consequently, this equipment should not be installed in new operating rooms.

FUNDING

None.

Electrosurgical Smoke: Ultrafine Particle Measurements and Work Environment Quality in Different Operating Theatres

Air cleanliness in operating theatres (OTs) is an important factor for preserving the health of both the patient and the medical staff. Particle contamination in OTs depends mainly on the surgery process, ventilation principle, personnel clothing systems and working routines. In many open surgical operations, electrosurgical tools (ESTs) are used for tissue cauterization. ESTs generate a significant airborne contamination, as surgical smoke. Surgical smoke is a work environment quality problem. Ordinary surgical masks and OT ventilation systems are inadequate to control this problem. This research work is based on numerous monitoring campaigns of ultrafine particle concentrations in OTs, equipped with upward displacement ventilation or with a downward unidirectional airflow system. Measurements performed during ten real surgeries highlight that the use of ESTs generates a quite sharp and relevant increase of particle concentration in the surgical area as well within the entire OT area. The measured contamination level in the OTs are linked to surgical operation, ventilation principle, and ESTs used. A better knowledge of airborne contamination is crucial for limiting the personnel’s exposure to surgical smoke. Research results highlight that downward unidirectional OTs can give better conditions for adequate ventilation and contaminant removal performances than OTs equipped with upward displacement ventilation systems.

Association of Airborne Microorganisms in the Operating Room With Implant Infections: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of airborne colony-forming units (CFU) at incision sites during implantation of prostheses with the incidence of either incisional or prosthesis-related surgical site infections.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

Primary, public institution.

PATIENTS

Three hundred patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, instrumented spinal procedures, or vascular bypass graft implantation.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group or the control group. A novel device (Air Barrier System), previously shown to reduce airborne CFU at incision sites, was utilized in the intervention group. Procedures assigned to the control group were performed without the device, under routine operating room atmospheric conditions. Patients were followed up for 12 months to determine whether airborne CFU levels at the incision sites predicted the incidence of incisional or prosthesis-related infection.

RESULTS

Data were available for 294 patients, 148 in the intervention group and 146 in the control group. CFU density at the incision site was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (P<.001). The density of airborne CFU at the incision site during the procedures was significantly related to the incidence of implant infection (P=.021). Airborne CFU densities were 4 times greater in procedures with implant infection versus no implant infection. All 4 of the observed prosthesis infections occurred in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Reduction of airborne CFU specifically at the incision site during operations may be an effective strategy to reduce prosthesis-related infections. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01610271

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;1–8