Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of occupational health physicians in the promotion of vaccinations recommended for health care workers: An Italian study

Two years of on-site influenza vaccination strategy in an Italian university hospital: main results and lessons learned

Although the vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) is considered essential for preventing influenza circulation in the hospital setting, vaccination coverage (VC) in this group remains low. Among the reasons cited by HCWs is a lack of time to attend the vaccination clinic. For the 2018/2019 influenza season, active (on-site) influenza vaccination was offered directly in 44 operative units (OUs) of the Bari Policlinico hospital (50 OUs, 3,397 HCWs). At the same time, the hospital granted the HCW access to the vaccination clinic during October and December 2018. VC achieved among HCWs of Bari Policlinico during the 2018/2019 influenza season was then analyzed, and the results compared with those of the 2017/18 season. During the 2018/19 season, VC was 20.4% (n = 798) and thus higher than the 14.2% of the 2017/18 season (+6.2%). The highest VC was among physicians (33.4%), followed by other HCWs (23.8%), auxiliary staff (8.6%), and nurses (7.2%). Overall, 284 (36.5%) HCWs were vaccinated at on-site sessions. Multivariate analysis showed that vaccination uptake was associated with male gender and with work in OU where vaccination was actively offered. On the other hand, being a nurse or auxiliary staff member and working in the surgical area were deterrents. Although VC remained unsatisfactory, active on-site vaccination proved to be an important strategy to improve vaccination compliance, increasing 44% compared to the previous season. Nonetheless, mandatory vaccination directed by public health institutions may be the only way to reach a minimum level of coverage.

Healthcare Workers' Preparedness: An Exploratory Study for Measles Control in a Middle-Income Country

Background

Healthcare workers (HCWs) should have an active role in measles control.

Objective

This study aimed to assess the HCWs’ measles immune status and its influencing factors; to measure their knowledge, attitude, and practice toward measles infection/vaccination; and to identify factors predicting their vaccination status.

Methods

Data were collected using a semi-tailored questionnaire. Immunoglobulin G against measles was measured. Regression analysis for measles vaccination was performed.

Results

Approximately 97 HCWs (93.3%) were seropositive, 79 (76.0%) were vaccinated, 18 (17.3%) were previously infected, and 9 (8.7%) were both vaccinated and previously infected. One previously vaccinated participant was seronegative. The immune status was associated with marital status, residence, work duration, infection control training, and wearing personal protective equipment. Positive attitudes and practices were reported. Marital status and infection control training were predictors for measles vaccination.

Conclusion

HCWs showed readiness to control the spread of measles. National policies for compulsory HCWs’ vaccination and immune status check before training and employment are required.

Influenza vaccination in health-care workers: an evaluation of an on-site vaccination strategy to increase vaccination uptake in HCWs of a South Italy Hospital

Despite the international recommendation and specific programs, and although the vaccination of health-care workers (HCWs) is considered the main measure to prevent nosocomial influenza, vaccination coverage (VC) among HCWs remains low. One of the most important barriers to vaccination uptake is the time required to attend a vaccination clinic. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends on-site influenza vaccination as a proven and cost-effective strategy that increases productivity, reduces overall absenteeism and prevents direct health-care costs. In order to increase vaccine compliance in the HCWs, the Hygiene and the Occupational Medicine departments of Bari Policlinico General University-Hospital, in the 2017/18 influenza season, promoted an on-site vaccination program in eight Operative Units (OUs). We investigated the influenza VC among HCWs of Bari Policlinico (n = 3,397), comparing VC after implementation of the on-site strategy by the Hygiene department during the 2017/18 influenza season to VC in 2016/17 season. For 2017/18 season, we also compared VC in OUs target of on-site strategy with data from in eight "control" Units (choose by simple random sampling) not included in the on-site offer. In the 2016/17 influenza season, 295/3,397 HCWs were vaccinated (VC: 8.7%) while in the 2017/18 season 482 HCWs (VC: 14.2%) received the vaccination. In OUs target of on-site vaccination, 71 HCWs (VC: 10.0%) were vaccinated in the 2016/17 season and 126 (18.0%) in the 2017/18 season, of which 101/126 (80.2%) were vaccinated in an on-site clinic. VC in OUs target of on-site vaccination increased between 2016/17 and 2017/18 seasons of 16.8 ± 10.4% (range: 5.5-37.1), while the coverage in OUs of the control group increased of 1.6 ± 2.2% (range: -1.7-4.5), with a significant difference (p < .05). Our study suggests that the offer of on-site vaccination during the 2017/18 season led to an increase of VC in HCWs compared to the classical vaccination clinic approach. The determinants of adhesion and not-adhesion must be analyzed in dept, to experiment, in the future, new good clinical practices to increase the vaccination coverage in HCWs.