Eliminating MRSA transmission in a tertiary neonatal unit-A quality improvement initiative

Implementation of infection prevention and control for hospitalized neonates: A narrative review

BACKGROUND

The most prevalent infections encountered in neonatal care are healthcare-associated infections. The majority of healthcare-associated infections are considered preventable with evidence-based infection prevention and control (IPC) practices. However, substantial knowledge gaps exist in IPC implementation in neonatal care. Furthermore, the knowledge of factors which facilitate or challenge the uptake and sustainment of IPC programmes in neonatal units is limited. The integration of implementation science approaches in IPC programmes in neonatal care aims to address these problems.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this narrative review was to identify determinants which have been reported to influence the implementation of IPC programmes and best practices in inpatient neonatal care settings.

SOURCES

A literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online) and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) in May 2022. Primary study reports published in English, French, German, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Danish, Swedish or Norwegian since 2000 were eligible for inclusion. Included studies focused on IPC practices in inpatient neonatal care settings and reported determinants which influenced implementation processes.

CONTENT

The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to identify and cluster reported determinants to the implementation of IPC practices and programmes in neonatal care. Most studies reported challenges and facilitators at the organizational level as particularly relevant to implementation processes. The commonly reported determinants included staffing levels, work- and caseloads, as well as aspects of organizational culture such as communication and leadership.

IMPLICATIONS

The presented knowledge about factors influencing neonatal IPC can support the design, implementation, and evaluation of IPC practices.

Risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in a level-IV neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective study

Objective

To identify risk factors associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization in neonatal patients during an MRSA outbreak to minimize future outbreaks.

Design

Retrospective case-control study.

Setting

Level-IV neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.

Patients

Neonates with either MRSA or methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA).

Methods

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-positive neonates were matched with those colonized or infected with MSSA in a 1:1 ratio. The control group was selected from clinical samples, whereas MRSA-positive neonates were identified from clinical samples or from screening. A total of 140 characteristics were investigated to identify risk factors associated with MRSA acquisition. The characteristics were categorized into three categories: patient, unit, and microbiological characteristics.

Results

Out of 1,102 neonates screened for MRSA, between December 2019 and January 2022, 33 were MRSA positive. They were all colonized with an MRSA outbreak clone (spa type t127) and were included in this study. Four patients (12%) had severe infection. Admission due to respiratory diseases, need for intubation, need for peripheral venous catheters, admission to shared rooms with shared toilets and bath facilities in the aisles, and need for readmission were all correlated with later MRSA colonization (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

We identified clinically relevant diseases, procedures, and facilities that predispose patients to potentially life-threatening MRSA infections. A specific MRSA reservoir remains unidentified; however, these findings have contributed to crucial changes in our NICU to reduce the number of MRSA infections and future outbreaks.

Reducing MRSA Infection in a New NICU During the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is prevalent in most NICUs, with a high rate of skin colonization and subsequent invasive infections among hospitalized neonates. The effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce MRSA infection in the NICU during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has not been characterized.

METHODS

Using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Model for Improvement, we implemented several process-based infection prevention strategies to reduce invasive MRSA infections at our level IV NICU over 24 months. The outcome measure of invasive MRSA infections was tracked monthly utilizing control charts. Process measures focused on environmental disinfection and hospital personnel hygiene were also tracked monthly. The COVID-19 pandemic was an unexpected variable during the implementation of our project. The pandemic led to restricted visitation and heightened staff awareness of the importance of hand hygiene and proper use of personal protective equipment, as well as supply chain shortages, which may have influenced our outcome measure.

RESULTS

Invasive MRSA infections were reduced from 0.131 to 0 per 1000 patient days during the initiative. This positive shift was sustained for 30 months, along with a delayed decrease in MRSA colonization rates. Several policy and practice changes regarding personnel hygiene and environmental cleaning likely contributed to this reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative aimed at infection prevention strategies led to a significant decrease in invasive MRSA infections in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention Interventions for Neonates in Resource-Limited Settings

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) infections are leading causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality, contributing to an extended hospital stay and increased healthcare costs. Although the burden and impact of HAI/AMR in resource-limited neonatal units are substantial, there are few HAI/AMR prevention studies in these settings. We reviewed the mechanism of action and evidence supporting HAI/AMR prevention interventions, including care bundles, for hospitalized neonates in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).

Infection prevention for extremely low birth weight infants in the NICU

Extremely preterm infants are particularly vulnerable to systemic infections secondary to their immature immune defenses, prolonged hospitalizations, delays in enteral feeding, early antibiotic exposure, and need for life-sustaining invasive interventions. There have been several evidence-based practices for infection prevention in this population, such as human milk feedings, utilization of "bundle checklists" and decolonization of pathogenic organisms. Other practices, such as the use of probiotics, human milk-derived fortifiers, and antifungal prophylaxis are more controversial and require further investigation regarding the risks and benefits of such interventions. This chapter examines the susceptibility of the preterm newborn infant to invasive infections and describes several strategies for infection prevention, along with the associated limitations of such practices. It also addresses the various gaps in our understanding of preventing infections in this population, and the need for additional large multi-center randomized controlled trials. Additionally, the role of the SARs-CoV-2 global pandemic and associated strategies for infection prevention in the NICU are discussed.

Practical recommendations for routine cleaning and disinfection procedures in healthcare institutions: a narrative review

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are the most common adverse outcomes due to delivery of medical care. HAIs increase morbidity and mortality, prolong hospital stay, and are associated with additional healthcare costs. Contaminated surfaces, particularly those that are touched frequently, act as reservoirs for pathogens and contribute towards pathogen transmission. Therefore, healthcare hygiene requires a comprehensive approach whereby different strategies may be implemented together, next to targeted, risk-based approaches, in order to reduce the risk of HAIs for patients. This approach includes hand hygiene in conjunction with environmental cleaning and disinfection of surfaces and clinical equipment. This review focuses on routine environmental cleaning and disinfection including areas with a moderate risk of contamination, such as general wards. As scientific evidence has not yet resulted in universally accepted guidelines nor led to universally accepted practical recommendations pertaining to surface cleaning and disinfection, this review provides expert guidance for healthcare workers in their daily practice. It also covers outbreak situations and suggests practical guidance for clinically relevant pathogens. Key elements of environmental cleaning and disinfection, including a fundamental clinical risk assessment, choice of appropriate disinfectants and cleaning equipment, definitions for standardized cleaning processes and the relevance of structured training, are reviewed in detail with a focus on practical topics and implementation.