Incidence of health care-associated extended-spectrum β-lactamase-positive patients before and after discontinuation of contact precautions

Increased evidence for no benefit of contact precautions in preventing extended-spectrum β-lactamases-producing Enterobacteriaceae: Systematic scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Extended-spectrum β-lactamases-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) is a critical antimicrobial resistance pathogen, to which we need to pay the greatest attention. This study was aimed at uncovering the present evidence for the preventive effectiveness of contact precautions for patients colonized or infected with ESBL-E.

METHODS

According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews, we searched MEDLINE for articles with relevant keywords from the beginning of 2010 to October 18, 2022.

RESULTS

Of the 355 articles found, 9, including 8 observational studies and 1 randomized controlled trial, were selected. Safety of discontinuing contact precautions was evaluated mainly in acute-care and long-term care hospitals. Consistently, all authors concluded that contact precautions can be safely discontinued in patients colonized or infected with ESBL-E.

CONCLUSION

The clinical impact of discontinuing contact precautions for patients with ESBL-E is minimal and can be safely withdrawn at acute, noncritical, adult care wards. Relevant data from pediatric and geriatric wards, as well as intensive care units, were insufficient and should be investigated in future research.

Recommendations for change in infection prevention programs and practice

Fifty years of evolution in infection prevention and control programs have involved significant accomplishments related to clinical practices, methodologies, and technology. However, regulatory mandates, and resource and research limitations, coupled with emerging infection threats such as the COVID-19 pandemic, present considerable challenges for infection preventionists. This article provides guidance and recommendations in 14 key areas. These interventions should be considered for implementation by United States health care facilities in the near future.

Risk factors for fecal carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing and carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains among patients at hospital admission

AIM

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing and carbapenem-resistant (CR) Enterobacteriaceae are substantial problems in hospital-acquired infections worldwide. We analyzed the risk factors for fecal carriage of ESBL-positive and/or CR E. coli and K. pneumoniae (EcKp) strains in a hospital in Turkey, an endemic country for both resistances.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective cross-sectional study including the rectal swab samples of 168 patients, obtained at the day of admission, was conducted. ESBL-producing and CR EcKp were investigated with phenotypic tests and PCR, and the clonal relatedness of isolates was studied. Risk analysis was performed with logistic regression method.

RESULTS

A total of 67 (39.8%) and 21 (12.5%) patient samples tested positive for ESBL-producing and CR EcKp, respectively. CTX-M (n = 27) and OXA-48 (n = 12) were the dominant ESBL and carbapenemase types, and 4.5%-10.7% of the isolates were clonally-related. Among 15 potential risk factors studied, longer lengths of hospital stay and antimicrobial use, and receiving total parenteral nutrition in the last 6 months were determined as independent risk factors for fecal carriage of ESBL-producing and/or CR EcKp, while prior antimicrobial treatment was only a risk factor for ESBL producers.

CONCLUSION

Certain conditions in patients' medical backgrounds may be associated with increased likelihood of resistant bacterial colonization. Notably, questioning these situations at admission can help to identify potential carriers and proactively administer appropriate infection control measures.

Barrier Precautions in the Era of Multidrug Pathogens

Purpose of review

There is a continuing debate regarding contact precaution (CP) usage for endemic multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). In this review, we examine current recommendations for CP and highlight differences in CP use between endemic and non-endemic MDROs.

Recent findings

The discontinuation of CP had no effect on the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci. The evidence regarding CP for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae is inconclusive, highlighting the need for more research to determine best infection control strategies. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae maintains a sporadic pattern in the USA, supporting current recommendations to use CP for colonized and infected patients. MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (MDR-AB) is extremely virulent and responsible for outbreaks in healthcare settings, emphasizing the need for CP use with MDR-AB infected patients. Candida auris (C. auris) is often misdiagnosed; it is resistant to UV light and quaternary ammonium low-level disinfection. Because little is known about the transmission of C. auris, significant caution and CP use are necessitated. There is little research on vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) control strategies due to its rarity; thus, CP is strongly recommended.

Summary

Contact precautions are frequently part of a bundled infection control approach that involves meticulous hand hygiene, patient decolonization, chlorhexidine gluconate bathing, and reducing the use of invasive devices. Healthcare facilities should continue to utilize CP for non-endemic MDROs and the presence of endemic MDROs; however, CP may not add benefit to the current infection prevention bundle approach.

Cohorting for preventing the nosocomial spread of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales, in non-epidemic settings: is it mandatory?

BACKGROUND

Worldwide dissemination of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales (CPE) has led to national and international guidance recommending the implementation of cohorting in healthcare settings (HS). However, in view of recent data regarding the spread of Extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, we may wonder about the usefulness of this measure in a non-outbreak settings; here, individual contact isolation may be sufficient to control the risk of dissemination.

AIM/METHODS

We conducted a narrative review of the literature and discussed the role of cohorting.

FINDINGS

CPE are responsible for outbreaks in HS, which are considered the epicentre of spread of resistance strains. CPE are responsible for adverse effects such as increases in hospital stay and costs, less therapeutic options and thus higher risk of clinical failures and mortality. Environment and materials have also been described contaminated with CPE and can be the source of outbreak. Even if guidelines and publications have supported implementation of cohorting, there are no randomized studies demonstrating the mandatory nature of this measure. Most studies are descriptive and cohorting is usually one of several other measures to control outbreaks. Cohorting is not adapted to all HS, which requires human and material resources. Other measures must be strengthened such as compliance of hand hygiene, antibiotic stewardship and surveillance of contact patients. Individual risk factors of acquisition should also be evaluated.

CONCLUSION

Local epidemiology and resources must be assessed before implementing cohorting.