Recommendations for change in infection prevention programs and practice

How effective are monthly departmental tracer surveys? A 5-year retrospective study of 138 surveys in 96 departments

BACKGROUND

Repeat department-wide surveys are commonly employed for infection control. There remains debate concerning their cost-effectivess. The aim of the study was to measure the impact of repeat department-wide surveys in major in-patient departments (IPDs) and ambulatory facilities (AFs) in a tertiary care hospital. This was a retrospective study of 138 surveys condcuted in 96 departments over a 5-year period.

METHODS

Two itemized questionnaires were designed to assess the most frequently inadequately adhered to infection control measures: one for IPD (with 21 items) and the other for AF (with 17 items).

RESULTS

A total of 72 surveys were conducted in 49 IPDs, of which 39 (54%) were repeat surveys, and 66 surveys in 47 AFs, of which 33 (50%) were repeat surveys. The baseline rate of adherence/department was 71% ± 14 for the IPD, with an increase from the first to the last survey to 82% ± 13 (P = .037). In 15/21 measured infection control items, adherence improved. Adherence to infection control items was lower at baseline in the AFs than in the IPDs (63 ± 27), with an increase to 76 ± 20 (non significant). Although adherence improved for 9 items, it deteriorated in another 8, producing an overall statistically unchanged outcome.

CONCLUSION

Repeat whole-department surveys contribute moderately to increased adherence to infection control guidelines. AFs demonstrate lower rates of adherence to infection control guidelines and are less receptive to educational measures.

How to protect long-term care facilities from pandemic-like events? - A systematic review on the effectiveness of non-pharmacological measures to prevent viral respiratory infections

BACKGROUND

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic underscored the need for pandemic preparedness, with respiratory-transmitted viruses considered as a substantial risk. In pandemics, long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are a high-risk setting with severe outbreaks and burden of disease. Non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) constitute the primary defence mechanism when pharmacological interventions are not available. However, evidence on the effectiveness of NPIs implemented in LTCFs remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review assessing the effectiveness of NPIs implemented in LTCFs to protect residents and staff from viral respiratory pathogens with pandemic potential. We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and two COVID-19 registries in 09/2022. Screening and data extraction was conducted independently by two experienced researchers. We included randomized controlled trials and non-randomized observational studies of intervention effects. Quality appraisal was conducted using ROBINS-I and RoB2. Primary outcomes encompassed number of outbreaks, infections, hospitalizations, and deaths. We synthesized findings narratively, focusing on the direction of effect. Certainty of evidence (CoE) was assessed using GRADE.

RESULTS

We analysed 13 observational studies and three (cluster) randomized controlled trials. All studies were conducted in high-income countries, all but three focused on SARS-CoV-2 with the rest focusing on influenza or upper-respiratory tract infections. The evidence indicates that a combination of different measures and hand hygiene interventions can be effective in protecting residents and staff from infection-related outcomes (moderate CoE). Self-confinement of staff with residents, compartmentalization of staff in the LTCF, and the routine testing of residents and/or staff in LTCFs, among others, may be effective (low CoE). Other measures, such as restricting shared spaces, serving meals in room, cohorting infected and non-infected residents may be effective (very low CoE). An evidence gap map highlights the lack of evidence on important interventions, encompassing visiting restrictions, pre-entry testing, and air filtration systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Although CoE of interventions was low or very low for most outcomes, the implementation of NPIs identified as potentially effective in this review often constitutes the sole viable option, particularly prior to the availability of vaccinations. Our evidence-gap map underscores the imperative for further research on several interventions. These gaps need to be addressed to prepare LTCFs for future pandemics.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CRD42022344149.

Infection preventionists in public health, consultant and academic roles: Results from the 2020 APIC MegaSurvey

BACKGROUND

Infection preventionists (IPs) work and practice in a variety of roles across many practice settings. While the health care-based IP role has been well studied, less is known about IPs who work in public health, consultant, and academic roles.

METHODS

Data were collected as a subset of the Association for Professionals in Infection Prevention and Control and Epidemiology 2020 MegaSurvey. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed to compare the responses of 147 IPs working in public health, consulting, or academic roles.

RESULTS

Respondents identified their primary IP role as public health (40%), consulting (39%), or academic (21%). Most were White and non-Hispanic females working in long-term care, acute care, and outpatient settings. Most had over 11 years of experience in health care before IP, with nursing being the most common. More consultants were certified in infection control (74%). While half of the respondents in public health reported being certified in infection control, and a third had 6 or more years of experience in infection prevention and control, they reported the lowest annual salary and satisfaction with total compensation.

DISCUSSION

These findings highlight the characteristics and contributions of infection prevention and control in nontraditional roles and settings. Certification and fair compensation are crucial factors for professional development and job satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

These insights can guide future education, recruitment, and retention strategies for IPs in public health, consulting, and academic roles.

Public Health Centers' Training Session Programs to Develop Programs on Infection Control Practices for Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in Hospitals in Kawaguchi City, Japan

Introduction The Kawaguchi City Public Health Center (PHC) conducted training sessions focusing on infection control practices on multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) for 19 hospitals and eight affiliated clinics (AFs) with beds in June 2022. Issues with infection control programs were identified via a survey implemented following the training sessions. These included providing feedback on infection control policies for MDROs, hand hygiene compliance programs (HHCPs), environmental cleaning (EC), and training sessions programs that hospitals or AFs with beds (hospitals) intended to implement in the future or develop (to be developed). We planned to examine whether the PHC training sessions programs have an effect on the development of hospital infection control programs designed to address these issues. The purpose of this study is to clarify the training session program provided by the Kawaguchi City PHC, which was effective in developing hospital infection control programs based on the results of the survey conducted after the training session. Methods In June 2023, a second training session that offered information on infection control practices was completed for 30 hospitals. This was followed by sending a questionnaire. We examined infection control programs to be developed and analyzed associations with the first learned information by training session (the first learned information). Results Twenty-four hospitals responded to the survey with a response rate of 80.0%. Half the respondents (12, 50.0%) had prepared for the infection control policy on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), 11 hospitals (45.8%) had provided feedback on HHC, and four (16.7%) planned to conduct feedback on HHC. HHCPs were planned to be developed by 19 hospitals (79.2%), EC by five hospitals (20.8%), training session by 12 hospitals (50.0%), and screening of MDROs upon hospital admission (AS) by nine hospitals (37.5%). The first learned information, "the prevention of healthcare-associated infections and cost savings by implementing cleaning bundles (the effects of cleaning bundles)," was identified by 10 hospitals (41.7%), and "specific programs on providing feedback effective for developing hand hygiene compliance (specific feedback)" was learned by eight hospitals (33.3%). The first learned information regarding specific feedback was significantly associated with HHCPs to be developed (p = 0.044). The first learned information on the effects of cleaning bundles was significantly associated with HHCPs and HHC feedback to be developed (p = 0.023, 0.034). The training session programs were not significantly connected to EC, training session, or AS to be developed. Conclusions Infection control programs to be developed were linked to the provision of information on numerical effects by implementing specific feedback and cleaning bundles. We suggest that the PHC should develop infection control programs for the hospitals and provide training sessions, including numerical effects.

Utilizing application scenarios to enhance a competency-based infection prevention orientation program

Infection Preventionists (IPs) are expected to be well-rounded and competent in their role, necessitating a robust orientation program. Feedback from IPs identified that orientation is task-based and lacks opportunities for meaningful application to the field. This team sought to enhance onboarding through focused interventions, including standardized resources and scenario-based applications. This department has engaged in an iterative process to refine and implement a robust orientation program, resulting in improvement in the department.

Moving Beyond Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections: Enhancement of the Prevention Process

The provision of medications and other treatments via intravenous (IV) therapy has provided millions of health care patients with extended benefits. IV therapy, however, is also associated with complications, such as associated bloodstream infections. Understanding the mechanisms of development and the factors that have contributed to the recent increases in such health care-acquired infections assists in formulating new preventive strategies that include the implementation of hospital-onset bacteremia, an innovative model that requires surveillance and prevention of bloodstream infections associated with all types of vascular access devices, expansion of vascular access service teams (VAST), and use of advanced antimicrobial dressings designed to reduce bacterial proliferation over the currently recommended time periods for maintenance of IV catheters.