Impact of an Antibiotic Stewardship Program on Antibiotic Choice, Dosing, and Duration in Pediatric Urgent Cares

Evaluating pediatric antimicrobial dosing of β-lactam antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections in emergency and primary care settings

PURPOSE

Pediatric prescribing is often weight and indication specific and has been associated with high rates of error. The aim of this study was to evaluate outpatient β-lactam suspension dosing practices for pediatric upper respiratory tract infections (URIs), to characterize the rate of error and to describe common error types.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a community health system with 2 emergency departments and 20 outpatient family medicine practices. Pediatric patients treated from these settings with oral suspension formulations of amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefdinir, or cephalexin for streptococcal pharyngitis or otitis media between June 1, 2020, and May 31, 2023, were eligible for inclusion. Doses were evaluated against indication-specific best-practice guidelines and assessed for guideline concordance.

RESULTS

Of the 200 patients evaluated, 100 were treated for streptococcal pharyngitis and 100 were treated for otitis media. Of the prescribed β-lactam doses, 32% were discordant with best-practice guideline recommendations. Dosing errors were more common for pharyngitis than for otitis media (47% vs 17%; P < 0.001). Overdosing was the most frequently observed error in pharyngitis prescriptions (93.6% of errors) and most commonly occurred in patients weighing more than the 20-kg weight associated with the dosing maximum (80.9% of overdosing errors). All patients receiving an inappropriate dose for otitis media were underdosed.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient pediatric dosing errors for URI indications are common among both emergency medicine and family medicine prescribers. Patients weighing over the weight corresponding to the dosing maximum are at highest risk for error. Antimicrobial stewardship interventions targeting the point of prescribing are urgently needed to provide safe dosing practices for pediatric patients.

Dentists' Awareness of Antibiotic Stewardship and Their Willingness to Support Its Implementation: A Cross-Sectional Survey in a Dental School

OBJECTIVES

Antibiotic overuse is highly reported among dentists worldwide. An antibiotic stewardship programme has been shown to be effective for decreasing the number of unappropriated antibiotic prescriptions. The goal of this survey was to assess dentists' awareness of antibiotic stewardship and their willingness to implement changes accordingly.

METHODS

A structured questionnaire was developed and distributed to dentists at a university hospital with different levels of experience. It included questions regarding antibiotic prescription habits, antibiotic stewardship knowledge and willingness to implement changes in such a programme.

RESULTS

Overall, 256 dentists participated in the survey. Among them, 16.4% (95% confidence interval: 12.1%-21.5%) reported awareness regarding antibiotic stewardship. Awareness levels were higher among specialists (28.3%) and increased with experience. Most dentists in this study reported willingness to improve their antibiotic prescribing practices. The mean willingness score was 8.78 (standard deviation: 1.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness of antibiotic stewardship was low among dentists with different levels of experience. However, dentists were willing to change their antibiotic prescription habits if policies were implemented as part of a stewardship programme at the school.

State of the Art of Antimicrobial and Diagnostic Stewardship in Pediatric Setting

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) and diagnostic stewardship programs (DSPs) are essential strategies for effectively managing infectious diseases and tackling antimicrobial resistance (AMR). These programs can have a complementary impact, i.e., ASPs optimize antimicrobial use to prevent resistance, while DSPs enhance diagnostic accuracy to guide appropriate treatments. This review explores the current landscape of ASPs and DSPs in pediatric care, focusing on key factors, influencing their development, implementation, and evaluation across various settings. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary, involving multiple healthcare professionals to support comprehensive stewardship practices in pediatric care. No single intervention suits all settings, or even the same setting, in different countries; interventions must be tailored to each specific context, considering factors such as hospital capacity, patient complexity, and the parent-child dynamic. It is essential to educate caregivers on optimal antibiotic use through clear, concise messages adapted to their socioeconomic status and level of understanding. The cost-effectiveness of ASPs and DSPs should also be assessed, and standardized metrics should be employed to evaluate success in pediatric settings, focusing on outcomes beyond just antibiotic consumption, such as AMR rates. This manuscript further discusses emerging opportunities and challenges in ASP implementation, offering insights into future research priorities. These include large-scale studies to evaluate the long-term impact of ASPs, cost-effectiveness assessments of pediatric-specific diagnostic tools, and the integration of artificial intelligence to support clinical decision making. Addressing these areas will enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of ASPs, contributing to global efforts to combat AMR and improve pediatric health outcomes.

Evaluating an urgent care antibiotic stewardship intervention: a multi-network collaborative effort

OBJECTIVE

Urgent care centers (UCCs) have reported high rates of antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections. Prior UCC studies have generally been limited to single networks. Broadly generalizable stewardship efforts targeting common diagnoses are needed. This study examines the effectiveness of an antibiotic stewardship intervention in reducing inappropriate prescribing for bronchitis and viral upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) in UCCs.

DESIGN

A quality improvement study comparing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing rates in UCCs after the introduction of an antibiotic stewardship intervention.

SETTING

Forty-nine UCCs in 27 different networks from 18 states, including 1 telemedicine site.

PARTICIPANTS

Urgent care clinicians from a national collaborative of UCCs, all members of the Urgent Care Association.

METHODS

The intervention included signing a commitment statement and selecting from 5 different intervention options during 3 plan-do-study-act cycles. The primary outcome was the percentage of urgent care encounters for viral URTIs or bronchitis with inappropriate prescribing, stratified by clinician engagement and diagnosis. A 3-month baseline and 9-month intervention period were compared using a regression model using a generalized estimating equation.

RESULTS

Among 15,385 encounters, the intervention was associated with decreases in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for bronchitis (48% relative decrease, aOR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.83) and viral URTIs (33%, aOR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.82) among actively engaged clinicians compared to baseline. The intervention did not result in significant changes for clinicians not actively engaged.

CONCLUSIONS

This intervention was associated with reductions in inappropriate prescribing among actively engaged clinicians. Implementing stewardship interventions in UCCs may reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for common diagnoses; however, active clinician engagement may be necessary.

Principles and practices of antimicrobial stewardship programs in Korea

This review addresses the escalating challenge posed by antibiotic resistance, highlighting its profound impact on global public health, including increased mortality rates and healthcare expenditures. The review focuses on the need to adopt the One Health approach to effectively manage antibiotic usage across human, animal, and environmental domains. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are considered as comprehensive strategies that encompass both core and supplementary initiatives aimed at enhancing prudent antibiotic use. The 2021 "Guidelines on Implementing ASP in Korea" introduced such strategies, with a strong emphasis on fostering multidisciplinary and collaborative efforts. Furthermore, the "Core Elements for Implementing ASPs in Korean General Hospitals," established in 2022, provide a structured framework for ASPs, delineating leadership responsibilities, the composition of interdisciplinary ASP teams, a range of interventions, and continuous monitoring and reporting mechanisms. In addition, this review examines patient-centric campaigns such as "Speak Up, Get Smart" and emphasizes the pivotal role of a multidisciplinary approach and international cooperation in addressing the multifaceted challenges associated with antibiotic resistance.

Next Steps in Ambulatory Stewardship

Most antibiotics are prescribed in ambulatory setting and at least 30% to 50% of these prescriptions are unnecessary. The use of antibiotics when not needed promotes the development of antibiotic resistant organisms and harms patients by placing them at risk for adverse drug events and Clostridioides difficile infections. National guidelines recommend that health systems implement antibiotic stewardship programs in ambulatory settings. However, uptake of stewardship in ambulatory setting has remained low. This review discusses the current state of ambulatory stewardship in the United States, best practices for the successful implementation of effective ambulatory stewardship programs, and future directions to improve antibiotic use in ambulatory settings.

Socioeconomic differences in antibiotic use for common infections in pediatric urgent-care centers-A quasi-experimental study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate differences in the rate of firstline antibiotic prescribing for common pediatric infections in relation to different socioeconomic statuses and the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) in pediatric urgent-care clinics (PUCs).

DESIGN

Quasi-experimental.

SETTING

Three PUCs within a Midwestern pediatric academic center.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged >60 days and <18 years with acute otitis media, group A streptococcal pharyngitis, community-acquired pneumonia, urinary tract infection, or skin and soft-tissue infections who received systemic antibiotics between July 2017 and December 2020. We excluded patients who were transferred, admitted, or had a concomitant diagnosis requiring systemic antibiotics.

INTERVENTION

We used national guidelines to determine the appropriateness of antibiotic choice in 2 periods: prior to (July 2017-July 2018) and following ASP implementation (August 2018-December 2020). We used multivariable regression analysis to determine the odds ratios of appropriate firstline agent by age, sex, race and ethnicity, language, and insurance type.

RESULTS

The study included 34,603 encounters. Prior to ASP implementation in August 2018, female patients, Black non-Hispanic children, those >2 years of age, and those who self-paid had higher odds of receiving recommended firstline antibiotics for all diagnoses compared to male patients, children of other races and ethnicities, other ages, and other insurance types, respectively. Although improvements in prescribing occurred after implementation of our ASP, the difference within the socioeconomic subsets persisted.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed socioeconomic differences in firstline antibiotic prescribing for common pediatric infections in the PUCs setting despite implementation of an ASP. Antimicrobial stewardship leaders should consider drivers of these differences when developing improvement initiatives.

Antibiotic Use for Common Infections in Pediatric Emergency Departments: A Narrative Review

Antibiotics are one of the most prescribed medications in pediatric emergency departments. Antimicrobial stewardship programs assist in the reduction of antibiotic use in pediatric patients. However, the establishment of antimicrobial stewardship programs in pediatric EDs remains challenging. Recent studies provide evidence that common infectious diseases treated in the pediatric ED, including acute otitis media, tonsillitis, community-acquired pneumonia, preseptal cellulitis, and urinary-tract infections, can be treated with shorter antibiotic courses. Moreover, there is still controversy regarding the actual need for antibiotic treatment and the optimal dosing scheme for each infection.

Improving Duration of Antibiotics for Skin and Soft-tissue Infections in Pediatric Urgent Cares

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

National guidelines recommend a 5- to 7-day course of antibiotics for most skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs). Our aim was to increase the percentage of pediatric patients receiving 5 to 7 days of oral antibiotics for SSTIs in our pediatric urgent care clinics (UCCs) from 60% to 75% by December 31, 2021.

METHODS

We performed cause-and-effect analysis and surveyed UCC providers to uncover reasons for hesitation with short antibiotic courses for SSTIs. Plan- Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle 1 provided an update on current guidelines for UCC providers and addressed providers' concerns. PDSA cycle 2 modified the electronic health record to display antimicrobial prescription sentences from shortest to longest duration. PDSA cycle 3 provided project outcome and balancing measure updates to UCC providers at regular intervals. We created a monthly report of patients 90 days and older in UCCs with a final diagnosis of SSTIs. We used a Shewhart control chart to identify special cause variations.

RESULTS

After completing our PDSA cycles, we found that the percentage of children receiving 5 to 7 days of oral antibiotics for SSTIs exceeded 85%. The improvement was sustained over multiple months. There was no increase in the proportion of patients returning to the UCCs with an SSTI diagnosis within 14 days.

CONCLUSIONS

By addressing primary drivers uncovered through quality improvement methodology, we shortened the antibiotic course for children seen in our UCCs with SSTIs. Outpatient antimicrobial stewardship programs may apply similar methods to other diagnoses to further improve duration of antibiotic prescriptions.

Limited Therapeutic Options in Mexico for the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections

The rise in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has complicated the management of urinary tract infections (UTIs). The objective of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Design: prospective observational study. Bacteria were classified as susceptible or resistant to ampicillin-sulbactam, amikacin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ), ertapenem, meropenem, and fosfomycin. The sensitivity to fosfomycin and chloramphenicol was evaluated by the disk diffusion method. Statistical analysis: the chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare differences between categories. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Isolates were collected from January 2019 to November 2020 from 21 hospitals and laboratories. A total of 238 isolates were received: a total of 156 E. coli isolates and 82 K. pneumoniae isolates. The majority were community-acquired infections (64.1%). Resistance was >20% for beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and TMP/SMZ. For E. coli isolates, resistance was <20% for amikacin, fosfomycin, and nitrofurantoin; for K. pneumoniae, amikacin, fosfomycin, chloramphenicol, and norfloxacin. All were susceptible to carbapenems. K. pneumoniae isolates registered a higher proportion of extensively drug-resistant bacteria in comparison with E. coli (p = 0.0004). In total, multidrug-resistant bacteria represented 61% of all isolates. Isolates demonstrated high resistance to beta-lactams, fluoro-quinolones, and TMP/SMZ.