Preoperative MRI of perianal fistula: Is it really indispensable? Can it be deceptive?

Comparison of MRI and Endoanal Ultrasound in Assessing Intersphincteric, Transsphincteric, and Suprasphincteric Perianal Fistula

OBJECTIVES

Perianal fistula is a common disorder characterized by an anomalous perianal track connecting two epithelialized surfaces, most commonly the anal canal and the perianal skin. Although each has its limitations, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoanal ultrasound are currently two acceptable modalities for assessing perianal fistula. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of MRI and endoanal ultrasonography in diagosing perianal fistula, considering the surgical results as the references.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study was performed on patients with symptomatic perianal fistulas. MRI results of patients reported by the radiologist were collected along with the findings of endoanal ultrasonography performed by a gastroenterologist. These results were compared with surgical findings as the reference standard.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 126 patients. Exactly 222 definitive fistulas were identified during surgery. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of ultrasound for perianal fistula were 87.38, 38.46, 92.38, 26.31, and 82.25% respectively; and for MRI were 76.12, 57.69, 93.88, 22.05, and 74.19% respectively. The accuracy of endoanal ultrasound for detecting transsphincteric and intersphincteric fistulas was higher than MRI. In contrast, the diagnostic value of MRI for detecting suprasphincteric fistulas was higher than endoanal ultrasound.

CONCLUSIONS

Using endoanal ultrasonography to diagnose perianal fistulas is a relatively accurate method. This method may be more sensitive than MRI in detecting patients with perianal fistulas and abscesses.

Best non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging sequence and role of intravenous contrast administration in evaluation of perianal fistula with surgical correlation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the best non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence and role of intravenous contrast administration in preoperative characterization and classification of perianal fistulae, keeping surgery as gold standard.

METHODS

This prospective study comprised of forty-five consecutive patients with actively draining external perianal opening. MRI was performed on a 1.5 T scanner using non-contrast and contrast enhanced sequences in multiple planes. St. James's University Hospital MRI based classification system was used to classify the fistulae into five grades. Taking surgery as gold standard, association between surgical and MRI findings was statistically analysed.

RESULTS

Of the 45 patients recruited, forty were deemed eligible for inclusion. Mean age was 39.7 ± 11.7 years with male preponderance (M: F = 8:1). Commonest type was Grade 1 (40%). The best sequences in terms of overall accuracy were axial & coronal planes of contrast enhanced fat suppressed (FS) T1W turbo spin echo (TSE) (95.7%) followed by FS T2W TSE (94.1%) while sagittal T2W TSE sequence with or without fat suppression had the lowest accuracy (90.13%). The difference in overall diagnostic accuracy of FS T2W TSE and contrast enhanced FS T1W TSE sequence for evaluating perianal fistula was not statistically significant (p = 0.52). However, contrast study had a better accuracy in detecting internal openings and secondary tract of recurrent/ post-operative cases.

CONCLUSION

Best non-contrast MRI sequence is FS T2W TSE (axial and coronal). Non-contrast MRI is equally efficient to contrast study while evaluating primary/previously unoperated cases thereby eliminating the role of contrast in such cases. However, intravenous contrast should be administered for evaluating post-operative cases with recurrence.

Perianal fistula mapping at 3 T: volumetric versus conventional MRI sequences

AIM

To evaluate volumetric contrast-enhanced three-dimensional T1-weighted (CE 3D T1) turbo spin-echo (TSE) with variable flip angle (SPACE), CE 3D T1 volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) sequences with conventional CE-two-dimensional (2D)-T1 and 2D-T2-weighted imaging (WI) sequences in assessing perianal fistulas.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-three patients with perianal fistula were included in this prospective study and underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3 T including fat-supressed CE 3D T1 SPACE, CE 3D T1 VIBE, axial and coronal 2D-T1WI together with 2D-T2WI sequences in the axial and coronal planes. Acquisition times were recorded. Performance of each sequence was evaluated in terms of image quality, presence of artefacts, lesion conspicuity, fistula type, presence of abscess, visibility of internal orifice, and number of internal orifices. Results were compared with post-surgical findings defined as the reference standard.

RESULTS

Both CE 3D T1 VIBE and CE 3D T1 SPACE were the best sequences to determine fistula type and in terms of image quality, artefacts, and determining locations of internal orifices. The number of internal orifices was detected correctly in 23 (100%) patients for CE 3D T1 SPACE and CE 3D T1 VIBE sequences, in 17 (73.9%) patients on CE-T1WI, and in seven (30.4%) patients on 2D-T2WI. Lesion conspicuity was higher for CE 3D T1 SPACE and CE 3D T1 VIBE sequences compared to the 2D sequences (p<0.05). The overall acquisition time for each 3D sequence was shorter compared to the 2D sequences combined.

CONCLUSION

CE 3D T1 SPACE and CE 3D T1 VIBE sequences may outperform conventional 2D sequences in the evaluation of perianal fistulas in terms of visibility and number of internal orifices with a shorter scanning time.

The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of anal fistulas

This study aimed to determine the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing and describing the characteristics of fistula-in-ano, and the agreement between MRI and operative findings. We conducted a retrospective study in 367 patients with fistula-in-ano who were diagnosed and had an operation at the University Medical Center between January 2016 and January 2018. MRI findings were evaluated and compared with surgical findings using the kappa coefficient (k) method. 367 patients (327 male and 40 female, mean age 39.3 ± 12.4 years). A total of 411 primary fistulas were found during surgery. There was a strong agreement between MRI and surgery for classifying primary tracts (k = 0.89) and detecting secondary tracts (k = 0.94). While the sensitivity and specificity of MRI for detecting internal openings were 99% and 85.2% respectively; these rates were 100% for abscesses. Both T2-weighted turbo spin-echo (T2W TSE) and postcontrast fat-saturated T1-weighted turbo spin-echo (FS T1W TSE) sequences showed high sensitivity (96.6% and 98.4% respectively) and specificity (92.6% and 81.5% respectively) for depicting internal openings and secondary tracts. Post-contrast FS T1W TSE sequence was very effective in detecting abscesses with an accuracy of 100%. In conclusion, MRI can be considered an accurate tool for the preoperative evaluation of fistula-in-ano, which is a major determinant of the surgical outcome. Both T2W TSE and post-contrast FS T1W TSE sequences are highly accurate in depicting the features of fistula-in-ano. If there are no contraindications, contrast administration is recommended to differentiate abscesses from active inflammation.

Comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging for evaluating perianal fistulas

PURPOSE

To compare the lesion conspicuity and diagnostic performance of three imaging data sets (T2WI, combined T2WI and DWI [combined DWI], contrast-enhanced (CE)-T1WI) in assessing perianal fistulas.

METHODS

Two radiologists with 7 and 15years of experience assessed 28 fistulas from 24 patients in each image set.

RESULTS

The lesion conspicuity was improved for only one reader after reading the combined DWI (P=0.0039) and CE-T1WI (P=0.0215). The accuracy was stationary for fistula type (reader 1, all 93%; reader 2, all 89%) or for direction of internal opening (96% for all sets; 92% for CE-T1WI).

CONCLUSION

Although combined DWI and CE-T1WI might improve fistula conspicuity, they showed comparable diagnostic performance to T2WI.