From the laboratory to the clinic: molecular genetic testing in pediatric ophthalmology

Managing the apparently blind child presenting in the first year of life: A review

Severe vision impairment and blindness in childhood have a significant health burden on the child, family and society. This review article seeks to provide a structured framework for managing the apparently blind child presenting in the first year of life, starting from a comprehensive history and examination. Different investigation modalities and the increasingly important role of genetics will also be described, in addition to common causes of severe vision impairment. Crucially, a systematic approach to the blind infant is key to correct diagnoses and timely management. Incorrect diagnoses can be costly to all involved, however it is important to note that diagnoses can change with ongoing follow-up and investigations. Furthermore, the modern age of ophthalmology requires a multi-disciplinary approach and close collaboration with specialists including paediatricians, neurologists and geneticists, in addition to rehabilitation and low vision services, to ensure the best care for these vulnerable infants.

Comparing Gene Panels for Non-Retinal Indications: A Systematic Review

Importance: The options for genetic testing continue to grow for ocular conditions, including optic atrophy, anterior segment dysgenesis, cataracts, corneal dystrophy, nystagmus, and glaucoma. Gene panels can vary in content and coverage, as we and others have evaluated in inherited retinal disease (IRD). Objective: To describe gene panel testing options for inherited eye disease phenotypes and their differences. This review is important for making diagnostic decisions. Evidence review: A licensed, certified genetic counselor (RP) used Concert Genetics and the search terms optic atrophy, corneal dystrophy, cataract, glaucoma, anterior segment dysgenesis, microphthalmia/anophthalmia, and nystagmus to identify available testing options performed by CLIA-certified commercial genetic testing laboratories. Other co-authors were surveyed with respect to genetic panels used for the indications of interest. Ophthalmic panels were then compared using Concert Genetics in addition to their own websites. Findings: Panels from each clinical category were included and summarized. This comparison highlighted the differences and similarities between panels so that clinicians can make informed decisions. Conclusions: Access to genetic testing is increasing. The diagnostic yield of genetic testing is increasing. Each panel is different, so phenotyping or characterizing clinical characteristics that may help predict a specific genotype, as well as pre-test hypotheses regarding a genotype, should shape the choice of panels.

Identification of numerous novel disease-causing variants in patients with inherited retinal diseases, combining careful clinical-functional phenotyping with systematic, broad NGS panel-based genotyping

Purpose

The widespread consensus is that genotyping is essential for patients with inherited retinal disease (IRD). Given the numerous ongoing gene therapy clinical trials for IRDs, identifying the pathogenic mutation in these patients has potential important therapeutic implications. In this study, we demonstrate how we identified with a high degree of confidence numerous novel disease-causing mutations, deletions, and duplications in a large consecutive IRD case series by using a judicious combination of careful, in-depth clinical-functional phenotyping to guide and integrate our genotyping approach.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of data between November 2016 and March 2018 from the Duke Center for Retinal Degenerations and Ophthalmic Genetic Diseases IRD patient database, which encompassed 378 IRD cases that had not yet been previously genotyped. With the exception of some patients who presented with classical clinical-functional phenotypes that allowed for targeted gene testing, all other subjects systematically underwent next-generation sequencing-based broad, IRD-focused panel testing. Most cases were also tested for parental allele phase. Results were reviewed vis-à-vis the clinical-functional phenotypes for reconciliation and potential addition of supplemental testing such as deletion/duplication microarrays or copy number variant (CNV) analysis. Supplemental testing was driven by an IRD specialist-laboratory consensus, and decisions were clinically or genetically driven or both.

Results

By judiciously using this two-way approach and leveraging to its full potential the benefits of careful, in-depth clinical-functional phenotyping by an experienced IRD specialist, more than 80% of the cases in this series were successfully genotyped. We also identified with a high degree of confidence 52 novel disease-causing mutations, deletions, and duplications.

Conclusions

The combination of meticulous, expert clinical-functional phenotyping studies with systematic next-generation sequencing panel-based genotyping and microarray deletion/duplication testing or CNV analysis as applicable in accordance with the above-mentioned consensus was extremely effective at the diagnostic end, reduced costs, and saved time. IRD specialist-laboratory two-way interactions and case discussions would augment the efficacy of this approach and improve the diagnostic yield in successfully solving and genotyping IRD cases.

Access to genetic testing for rare diseases: Existing gaps in public-facing information

Genetic testing plays an increasingly important role in the diagnosis and potential treatment of inherited and rare conditions, such as aniridia-a disease that leads to abnormal eye development, as well as in health research on these conditions. As genetic testing is increasingly sought for accurate and early diagnosis of rare genetic disorders and in the context of direct-to-consumer genomics, it is critical to examine the public-facing information about access to these services and reimbursement policies. We conducted a targeted policy and public-facing resource search. Our analysis of resources available for the patient community revealed that there is very little practical guidance available about access and reimbursement for genetic testing for rare diseases. Greater clarity in public-facing resources about genetic testing would be beneficial to the patient community as it would promote informed choices about the procedure, mitigate potential harms associated with lack of information and enable patient engagement in their own health care.

Prevention of Leber congenital amaurosis through preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis can allow a family with a hereditary genetic mutation to conceive a disease-free child. We report the first published case of a child born without Leber congenital amaurosis through preimplantation genetic testing to a couple who had a son with a homozygous mutation in the GUCY2D gene.

Systematic evaluation of a targeted gene capture sequencing panel for molecular diagnosis of retinitis pigmentosa

Background

Inherited eye diseases are major causes of vision loss in both children and adults. Inherited eye diseases are characterized by clinical variability and pronounced genetic heterogeneity. Genetic testing may provide an accurate diagnosis for ophthalmic genetic disorders and allow gene therapy for specific diseases.

Methods

A targeted gene capture panel was designed to capture exons of 283 inherited eye disease genes including 58 known causative retinitis pigmentosa (RP) genes. 180 samples were tested with this panel, 68 were previously tested by Sanger sequencing. Systematic evaluation of our method and comprehensive molecular diagnosis were carried on 99 RP patients.

Results

96.85% targeted regions were covered by at least 20 folds, the accuracy of variants detection was 99.994%. In 4 of the 68 samples previously tested by Sanger sequencing, mutations of other diseases not consisting with the clinical diagnosis were detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS) not Sanger. Among the 99 RP patients, 64 (64.6%) were detected with pathogenic mutations, while in 3 patients, it was inconsistent between molecular diagnosis and their initial clinical diagnosis. After revisiting, one patient’s clinical diagnosis was reclassified. In addition, 3 patients were found carrying large deletions.

Conclusions

We have systematically evaluated our method and compared it with Sanger sequencing, and have identified a large number of novel mutations in a cohort of 99 RP patients. The results showed a sufficient accuracy of our method and suggested the importance of molecular diagnosis in clinical diagnosis.

Genetic Testing in Pediatric Ophthalmology

The authors review the utility of genetic testing in ophthalmic disorders - precise diagnosis, accurate prognosis, genetic counseling, prenatal diagnosis, and entry into gene-specific therapeutic trials. The prerequisites for a successful outcome of a genetic test are an accurate clinical diagnosis, a careful family history that guides which genes to study, and genetic counseling (both pre-test and post-test). The common eye disorders for which genetic testing is commonly requested are briefly discussed - anophthalmia, microphthalmia, coloboma, anterior segment dysgenesis, corneal dystrophies, cataracts, optic atrophy, congenital glaucoma, congenital amaurosis, retinitis pigmentosa, color blindness, juvenile retinoshisis, retinoblastoma etc. A protocol for genetic testing is presented. If specific mutations in a gene are common, they should form the first tier test, as the mutations in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. If mutations in one gene are likely, sequencing of that gene should be carried out, e.g. GALT gene in galactosemia, RS1 gene in retinoshisis. Disorders with genetic heterogeneity require multi-gene panel tests, and if these show no abnormality, then deletion / duplication or microarray studies are recommended, followed in sequence by clinical exome (5000 to 6000 genes), full exome (about 20,000 genes or whole genome studies (includes all introns). It is fortunate that most genetic tests in ophthalmology are available in India, including gene panel and whole exome/genome sequencing tests.

Natural history of cone disease in the murine model of Leber congenital amaurosis due to CEP290 mutation: determining the timing and expectation of therapy

Background

Mutations in the CEP290 (cilia-centrosomal protein 290 kDa) gene in Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) cause early onset visual loss but retained cone photoreceptors in the fovea, which is the potential therapeutic target. A cone-only mouse model carrying a Cep290 gene mutation, rd16;Nrl^−/−, was engineered to mimic the human disease. In the current study, we determined the natural history of retinal structure and function in this murine model to permit design of pre-clinical proof-of-concept studies and allow progress to be made toward human therapy. Analyses of retinal structure and visual function in CEP290-LCA patients were also performed for comparison with the results in the model.

Methods

Rd16;Nrl^−/− mice were studied in the first 90 days of life with optical coherence tomography (OCT), electroretinography (ERG), retinal histopathology and immunocytochemistry. Structure and function data from a cohort of patients with CEP290-LCA (n = 15; ages 7–48) were compared with those of the model.

Results

CEP290-LCA patients retain a central island of photoreceptors with normal thickness at the fovea (despite severe visual loss); the extent of this island declined slowly with age. The rd16;Nrl^−/− model also showed a relatively slow photoreceptor layer decline in thickness with ∼80% remaining at 3 months. The number of pseudorosettes also became reduced. By comparison to single mutant Nrl^−/− mice, UV- and M-cone ERGs of rd16;Nrl^−/− were at least 1 log unit reduced at 1 month of age and declined further over the 3 months of monitoring. Expression of GNAT2 and S-opsin also decreased with age.

Conclusions

The natural history of early loss of photoreceptor function with retained cone cell nuclei is common to both CEP290-LCA patients and the rd16;Nrl^−/− murine model. Pre-clinical proof-of-concept studies for uniocular therapies would seem most appropriate to begin with intervention at P35–40 and re-study after one month by assaying interocular difference in the UV-cone ERG.

Genetic diagnostic methods for inherited eye diseases

Accurate molecular diagnosis of genetic eye diseases has proven to be of great importance because of the prognostic and therapeutic value of an accurate ascertainment of the underlying genetic mutation. Efforts continue in diagnostic laboratories to develop strategies that allow the discovery of responsible gene/mutations in the individual patient using the least number of assays and economizing on the expenses and time involved in the process. Once the ophthalmologist has made the best possible clinical diagnosis, blood samples are obtained for genetic testing. In this paper we will review the basic laboratory methods utilized to identify the chromosomal or mutational etiology of genetic diseases that affect the eye.