Dropless Cataract Surgery: What Are the Potential Downsides?

Advances in ophthalmic drug delivery technology for postoperative management after cataract surgery

INTRODUCTION

Cataract surgery is becoming more common due to an aging world population. Intraocular lenses and surgical technique have developed remarkably recently, but the development of postoperative medication to prevent postsurgery complications has been relatively delayed. We still largely depend on eye drops for the management of post-cataract-surgery patients. Mental and physical problems that often occur in elderly cataract patients make it difficult for patients to apply eye drops by themselves. It is necessary to develop new effective drug delivery methods.

AREAS COVERED

This updated review article provides a brief review of why drug management is needed following cataract surgery and an overview of current developments in new drug delivery methods for ophthalmic treatment. In particular, various novel drug delivery methods that can be used for post-cataract-surgery management and their current development stages are extensively reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Rapidly developing technologies, such as intraocular and external ophthalmic implants, polymers, and nanotechnology, are being actively applied to develop novel drug delivery systems for safe and effective management after cataract surgery. Their goal is to achieve sufficient drug release for the desired duration with a single application. These will largely replace the inconvenience of eye drops for elderly patients in the future.

Comparative Outcomes of Standard Perioperative Eye Drops, Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide-Moxifloxacin, and Intracameral Dexamethasone-Moxifloxacin-Ketorolac in Cataract Surgery

Background

Since the advent of cataract surgery, topical eye drops have been the mainstay of postoperative prophylaxis and treatment. Due to factors such as high expenses and poor patient compliance, there has been a growing interest and acceptance of “dropless” or “less drops” alternatives. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide-moxifloxacin and intracameral dexamethasone-moxifloxacin-ketorolac to a standard eye drop regimen in controlling postoperative inflammation, corneal edema, and intraocular pressure (IOP) among cataract patients.

Methods

A retrospective longitudinal comparative study among 619 consecutive eyes receiving either a standard eye drop regimen, intraoperative triamcinolone acetonide-moxifloxacin, or dexamethasone-moxifloxacin-ketorolac was performed between October 2016 and December 2020. Primary endpoints at postoperative day one (POD1), week one (POW1), and month one (POM1) included corneal edema, anterior chamber inflammation (ACI), and IOP.

Results

Throughout the postoperative time points, there were no significant differences in corneal edema between intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide-moxifloxacin versus the standard eye drop therapy (OR [95% CI]: 1.09 [0.82, 1.45], P=0.54) and intracameral dexamethasone-moxifloxacin-ketorolac versus the standard eye drop treatment (OR [95% CI]: 1.22 [0.89, 1.67], P=0.22). The postoperative ACI severity was lower in the dexamethasone-moxifloxacin-ketorolac group than in the triamcinolone acetonide-moxifloxacin group by 35% on postoperative day 1 (P=0.01). The differences at subsequent postoperative time points were not statistically significant (P=0.27 and P=1.00 for POW1 and POM1, respectively). IOP at POM1 follow-up visit was statistically significantly higher for the triamcinolone acetonide-moxifloxacin group (mean (±SD): 15.64 (4.26)) than the dexamethasone-moxifloxacin-ketorolac (mean (±SD): 14.16 (4.02)) (P < 0.01). There was no statistical difference in rates of CME (P=0.16), and there were no cases of endophthalmitis.

Conclusions

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide-moxifloxacin and intracameral dexamethasone-moxifloxacin-ketorolac demonstrate similar levels of efficacy to a standard eye drop regimen after cataract surgery. This study reinforces them as viable alternatives to traditional postoperative drops.

Antibiotic prophylaxis of postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: results of the 2021 ASCRS member survey

In an online survey of >1200 global cataract surgeons, 66% were using intracameral (IC) antibiotic prophylaxis. This compared with 50% and 30% in the 2014 and 2007 surveys, respectively. Irrigation bottle infusion and intravitreal injection was each used by only 5% of respondents. For IC antibiotics, vancomycin was used by 6% in the United States (52% in 2014), compared with 83% for moxifloxacin (31% in 2014). Equal numbers used compounded moxifloxacin or the Vigamox bottle as the source. There was a decrease in respondents using preoperative (73% from 85%) and postoperative (86% from 97%) topical antibiotic prophylaxis; the latter was not used by 24% of surgeons injecting IC antibiotics. Reasons cited by those not using IC antibiotics include mixing/compounding risk (66%) and being unconvinced of the need (48%). However, 80% believe having a commercially approved IC antibiotic is important; if reasonably priced, this would increase adoption of IC prophylaxis to 93%.

TOXIC POSTERIOR SEGMENT SYNDROME AFTER DROPLESS CATARACT SURGERY WITH COMPOUNDED TRIAMCINOLONE-MOXIFLOXACIN

PURPOSE

To report toxic posterior segment syndrome after dropless cataract surgery using locally compounded triamcinolone-moxifloxacin.

METHODS

A retrospective case review of 7 patients presenting with a decrease in visual acuity after dropless cataract surgery.

RESULTS

All patients experienced significant reductions in best-corrected visual acuity of the postoperative eye ranging from 20/40 to count finger at 4 feet (average best-corrected visual acuity 20/220) immediately after surgery. The presenting symptoms included flashes, floaters, photophobia, glare, halos, visual distortions, and problems assessing colors. In three cases, foveal retinal pigment epithelium changes were noted on dilated fundus exam (DFE). Ellipsoid zone loss was noted on ocular coherence tomography in five of the seven affected eyes. Electrophysiology testing in five of the seven affected eyes demonstrated large decreases in full-field electroretinogram amplitude, oscillatory potentials, multifocal electroretinogram, and visual evoked potential, along with a negative electroretinogram. One patient was treated with a dexamethasone implant, but no improvement in visual acuity was noted.

CONCLUSION

This is the first case series of toxic posterior segment syndrome occurring secondary to intracameral compounded triamcinolone-moxifloxacin in dropless cataract surgery. The FDA has attributed the toxicity to abnormally high levels of the binding agent poloxamer 407 in the compounded medication. Clinicians should be aware of this phenomenon and exhibit caution when using compounded medications.

Safety and Comfort of an Innovative Drug Delivery Device in Healthy Subjects

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate safety and comfort of two versions of a placebo-microsphere filled ocular coil (straight and curved) in healthy subjects.

Methods

The study was a single-center intervention study. One ocular coil was placed in the inferior conjunctival fornix for the intended duration of 28 days. Forty-two healthy adult subjects were included. At baseline, 30 minutes, 8 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, and 28 days after insertion, examinations were performed, including slit lamp evaluation to score ocular redness, intraocular pressure measurement, visual acuity, tear secretion test, and questionnaires.

Results

The straight and curved ocular coils had a median retention time of 5 days and 12 days, respectively. After 48 hours, 57% and 81% subjects retained the straight and curved ocular coil, respectively. Four (19%) subjects with the straight coil and six (29%) with the curved coil completed the entire study period. Minor changes in ocular hyperemia were observed in both groups. On day 7, the straight coil was more comfortable than the curved coil with a visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 77 ± 21 compared to 94 ± 11 (P = 0.028), respectively. No other ocular adverse events were observed.

Conclusions

Comfort and safety of the straight and curved ocular coil are high. Because the retention time is too short for long-term sustained drug release, the use in the perioperative or immediate postoperative period could prove to be more valuable.

Translational Relevance

The ocular coil is a noninvasive, comfortable and safe short-term drug delivery device.

Unmasking of infectious retinitis and intraocular lymphoma in patients after uneventful dropless cataract surgery

In this case series, 3 unique cases of severe immune-mediated pathologies (primary ocular lymphoma, toxoplasmosis chorioretinitis, and syphilitic retinitis) after dropless cataract surgery with intraocular steroid injection are reported. Patient immune status and subsequent local immunosuppression after dropless cataract surgery played roles in the worsening of these pathologies. This report demonstrates the need for vigilance when administering immunosuppressive agents locally during cataract surgery.

Comparative analysis of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide-moxifloxacin versus standard perioperative eyedrops in cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness of intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide-moxifloxacin (Tri-Moxi) to a standard eyedrop regimen in controlling postoperative inflammation, corneal edema, and the rate of high intraocular pressure (IOP) among cataract patients.

SETTING

Loma Linda University Eye Institute, California, USA.

DESIGN

Retrospective longitudinal comparative study.

METHODS

The electronic medical records of patients who underwent cataract surgery using triamcinolone acetonide-moxifloxacin injection along with a postoperative nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug drop were reviewed (Group 1). Group 1 was compared with patients who received a standard eyedrop (Group 2) in terms of intraocular inflammation and corneal edema severity, and the rate of high IOP, postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 1195 consecutive eyes (Group 1 [681 eyes], Group 2 [514 eyes]) of 919 patients were included in the study. The anterior chamber cell reaction severity decreased by 34.0% and 35.7% at 1 week and 1 month, respectively, after surgery following triamcinolone acetonide-moxifloxacin injection compared with standard eyedrop therapy (P = .001 and P = .02, respectively). Group 1 was associated with increased severity of corneal edema (odds ratio, 1.48; P = .001) on postoperative day 1, with no statistically significant difference at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively (P = .25 and P = .48, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of high IOP between the two groups at different timepoints postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Triamcinolone acetonide-moxifloxacin injection is an effective method to control intraocular inflammation after cataract surgery. It is a promising substitute for standard eyedrop therapy, especially for patients who have poor compliance with eyedrop usage.

Toxic anterior segment syndrome: A review

Toxic anterior segment syndrome is a surgical complication characterized by a noninfectious anterior chamber inflammatory reaction having multiple etiologies. The clinical signs (prominent limbus-to-limbus corneal edema, anterior chamber inflammation) and symptoms (decreased visual acuity, discomfort) generally occur within the first 12-48 hours after intraocular surgery. Most patients achieve good clinical and visual outcomes when there is a prompt clinical diagnosis and adequate treatment. We review the literature on toxic anterior segment syndrome, emphasizing its etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical and surgical management, as well as prognosis and sequelae. Our goal is to reduce the frequency of toxic anterior segment syndrome by highlighting the importance of prevention, early recognition, and distinguishing toxic anterior segment syndrome from infectious endophthalmitis.