1
|
Ong AY, Kiire CA, Frise C, Bakr Y, de Silva SR. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections in pregnancy and breastfeeding: a case series and systematic review of the literature. Eye (Lond) 2024; 38:951-963. [PMID: 37980398 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02811-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents may occasionally need to be considered for sight-threatening macular pathology in pregnant and breastfeeding women. This is controversial due to the dearth of data on systemic side effects for mother and child. We aimed to expand the evidence base to inform management. METHODS Retrospective case series of pregnant and breastfeeding women treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections at Oxford Eye Hospital between January 2015 and December 2022. In addition, we conducted a systematic review and combined eligible cases in a narrative synthesis. RESULTS We treated six pregnant women with anti-VEGF for diabetic macular oedema(DMO) (n = 5) or choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) (n = 1). Four received ranibizumab whilst two (not known to be pregnant) received aflibercept. Patients known to be pregnant underwent counselling by an obstetric physician. Five pregnancies resulted in live births. Combining our cases with those previously published, treatment of 41 pregnant women (42 pregnancies) are reported. Indications for treatment included CNV (n = 28/41,68%), DMO (n = 7/41,17%) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (n = 6/41,15%). Bevacizumab (n = 22/41,54%) and ranibizumab (n = 17/41,41%) were given more frequently than aflibercept (n = 2/41,5%). Many (n = 16/41,40%) were unaware of their pregnancy when treated. Most pregnancies resulted in live births (n = 34/42,81%). First trimester miscarriages (n = 5/42,12%) and stillbirths (n = 3/42,7%) mostly occurred in women with significant risk factors. CONCLUSION Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections may not necessarily compromise obstetric outcomes, although clear associations cannot be drawn due to small numbers and confounders from high rates of first trimester miscarriages in general and inherently high-risk pregnancies. It may be worth considering routinely investigating pregnancy and breastfeeding status in women of childbearing age prior to each injection, as part of anti-VEGF treatment protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariel Yuhan Ong
- Oxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, UK
| | - Christine A Kiire
- Oxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Charlotte Frise
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Yasmin Bakr
- Oxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Samantha R de Silva
- Oxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Salvetat ML, Pellegrini F, Spadea L, Salati C, Musa M, Gagliano C, Zeppieri M. The Treatment of Diabetic Retinal Edema with Intravitreal Steroids: How and When. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1327. [PMID: 38592149 PMCID: PMC10932454 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common complication of diabetes mellitus and a leading cause of visual impairment worldwide. It is defined as the diabetes-related accumulation of fluid, proteins, and lipids, with retinal thickening, within the macular area. DME affects a significant proportion of individuals with diabetes, with the prevalence increasing with disease duration and severity. It is estimated that approximately 25-30% of diabetic patients will develop DME during their lifetime. Poor glycemic control, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes duration, and genetic predisposition are recognized as risk factors for the development and progression of DME. Although the exact pathophysiology is still not completely understood, it has been demonstrated that chronic hyperglycemia triggers a cascade of biochemical processes, including increased oxidative stress, inflammation, activation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), cellular dysfunction, and apoptosis, with breakdown of the blood-retinal barriers and fluid accumulation within the macular area. Early diagnosis and appropriate management of DME are crucial for improving visual outcomes. Although the control of systemic risk factors still remains the most important strategy in DME treatment, intravitreal pharmacotherapy with anti-VEGF molecules or steroids is currently considered the first-line approach in DME patients, whereas macular laser photocoagulation and pars plana vitrectomy may be useful in selected cases. Available intravitreal steroids, including triamcinolone acetonide injections and dexamethasone and fluocinolone acetonide implants, exert their therapeutic effect by reducing inflammation, inhibiting VEGF expression, stabilizing the blood-retinal barrier and thus reducing vascular permeability. They have been demonstrated to be effective in reducing macular edema and improving visual outcomes in DME patients but are associated with a high risk of intraocular pressure elevation and cataract development, so their use requires an accurate patient selection. This manuscript aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the pathology, epidemiology, risk factors, physiopathology, clinical features, treatment mechanisms of actions, treatment options, prognosis, and ongoing clinical studies related to the treatment of DME, with particular consideration of intravitreal steroids therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Letizia Salvetat
- Department of Ophthalmology, Azienda Sanitaria Friuli Occidentale, 33170 Pordenone, Italy; (M.L.S.)
| | - Francesco Pellegrini
- Department of Ophthalmology, Azienda Sanitaria Friuli Occidentale, 33170 Pordenone, Italy; (M.L.S.)
| | - Leopoldo Spadea
- Eye Clinic, Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00142 Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Salati
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Mutali Musa
- Department of Optometry, University of Benin, Benin City 300238, Edo State, Nigeria
| | - Caterina Gagliano
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna “Kore”, Piazza dell’Università, 94100 Enna, Italy
- Eye Clinic, Catania University, San Marco Hospital, Viale Carlo Azeglio Ciampi, 95121 Catania, Italy
| | - Marco Zeppieri
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Demarinis G, Tatti F, Taloni A, Giugliano AV, Panthagani J, Myerscough J, Peiretti E, Giannaccare G. Treatments for Ocular Diseases in Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: A Narrative Review. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16:1433. [PMID: 37895903 PMCID: PMC10610321 DOI: 10.3390/ph16101433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Revised: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Pregnancy is a medical condition in which the physiological changes in the maternal body and the potential impact on the developing fetus require a cautious approach in terms of drug administration. Individual treatment, a thorough assessment of the extent of the disease, and a broad knowledge of the therapeutic options and different routes of administration of ophthalmic drugs are essential to ensure the best possible results while minimizing risks. Although there are currently several routes of administration of drugs for the treatment of eye diseases, even with topical administration, there is a certain amount of systemic absorption that must be taken into account. Despite continuous developments and advances in ophthalmic drugs, no updated data are available on their safety profile in these contexts. The purpose of this review is both to summarize the current information on the safety of ophthalmic treatments during pregnancy and lactation and to provide a practical guide to the ophthalmologist for the treatment of eye diseases while minimizing harm to the developing fetus and addressing maternal health needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Demarinis
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic, University of Cagliari, Via Ospedale 48, 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (G.D.); (F.T.); (E.P.)
| | - Filippo Tatti
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic, University of Cagliari, Via Ospedale 48, 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (G.D.); (F.T.); (E.P.)
| | - Andrea Taloni
- Department of Ophthalmology, University ‘Magna Græcia’ of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy;
| | | | - Jesse Panthagani
- Department of Ophthalmology, Southend University Hospital, Southend-on-Sea SS0 0RY, UK; (J.P.); (J.M.)
| | - James Myerscough
- Department of Ophthalmology, Southend University Hospital, Southend-on-Sea SS0 0RY, UK; (J.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Enrico Peiretti
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic, University of Cagliari, Via Ospedale 48, 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (G.D.); (F.T.); (E.P.)
| | - Giuseppe Giannaccare
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic, University of Cagliari, Via Ospedale 48, 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (G.D.); (F.T.); (E.P.)
- Department of Ophthalmology, University ‘Magna Græcia’ of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pappot N, Do NC, Vestgaard M, Ásbjörnsdóttir B, Hajari JN, Lund‐Andersen H, Holmager P, Damm P, Ringholm L, Mathiesen ER. Prevalence and severity of diabetic retinopathy in pregnant women with diabetes-time to individualize photo screening frequency. Diabet Med 2022; 39:e14819. [PMID: 35188688 PMCID: PMC9303564 DOI: 10.1111/dme.14819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate the prevalence and severity of diabetic retinopathy including macular oedema in pregnant women with diabetes and to identify women in whom the frequency of retinal screening can be reduced to minimize the burden of health care visits. METHODS A cohort study of 348 women with pre-existing diabetes were routinely screened with retinal photo in early (12 weeks) and late pregnancy (27 weeks). Diabetic retinopathy was classified in five stages in accordance with National Danish Guidelines based on the eye with the highest retinopathy level. Sight-threatening retinopathy was defined as the presence of proliferative retinopathy and/or clinically significant macular oedema (CSMO). RESULTS Retinopathy was present in 52% (116/223) vs. 14% (17/125), with sight-threatening retinopathy in 16% (35/223) vs. 6% (7/125) of women with type 1 and type 2, respectively. Women without retinopathy in early and late pregnancy were characterized by shorter diabetes duration (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.008) and predominance of type 2 diabetes. Amongst the 50% (175/348) of the cohort having no retinopathy in early pregnancy and HbA1c<53 mmol/mol (7.0%), none developed sight-threatening retinopathy and 94% (165/175) remained without any retinopathy during pregnancy. Development of sight-threatening retinopathy was mainly observed in women with retinopathy in early pregnancy. Treatment for sight-threatening retinopathy was given to a minority (2.7 and 2.4%, respectively). CONCLUSION Good glycaemic control and no retinopathy was seen in a large proportion of women in early pregnancy and none of these women developed sight-threatening retinopathy. The frequency of retinal screening can probably be safely reduced during pregnancy in these women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Pappot
- Center for Pregnant Women with DiabetesRigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
- Department of Endocrinology and MetabolismRigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Nicoline Callesen Do
- Center for Pregnant Women with DiabetesRigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
- Department of Endocrinology and MetabolismRigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
- Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | | | | | - Javad Nouri Hajari
- Department of OphthalmologyRigshospitalet‐Glostrup HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
| | | | - Pernille Holmager
- Center for Pregnant Women with DiabetesRigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
- Department of Endocrinology and MetabolismRigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Peter Damm
- Center for Pregnant Women with DiabetesRigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
- Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
- Department of ObstetricsRigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Lene Ringholm
- Center for Pregnant Women with DiabetesRigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
- Department of Endocrinology and MetabolismRigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Elisabeth Reinhardt Mathiesen
- Center for Pregnant Women with DiabetesRigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
- Department of Endocrinology and MetabolismRigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
- Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Becker D, Larsen M, Lund-Andersen H, Hamann S. Diabetic papillopathy in patients with optic disc drusen: Description of two different phenotypes. Eur J Ophthalmol 2022:11206721221100901. [PMID: 35570569 DOI: 10.1177/11206721221100901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe two cases of severe acute bilateral optic disc edema that occurred in patients with diabetes mellitus shortly after the initiation of intensified antihyperglycemic therapy. METHODS Retrospective observational case report. CASE DESCRIPTION Two patients with type 1 diabetes presented for routine retinopathy screening with asymptomatic optic disc edema. One case was bilateral, the other unilateral. Neither patient had visual complaints. Both patients' glycemia history was characterized by a recent bout of poor regulation and both had optic disc edema consistent with diabetic papillopathy in combination with prominent Optic disc drusen (ODD). The swelling that appeared to constitute the edematous diabetes-related component of the disease resolved within 10-12 weeks during which diabetes therapy was optimized. Visual field deficits were seen early on in both patients and had resolved to some extent in one patient after 9 months but persisted in the one affected eye in the other patient up to at least 30 months. CONCLUSION Two cases of ODD-associated diabetic papillopathy were observed: One with classic, bilateral disc edema and minor visual field defects, the other with unilateral disc edema, severe visual field defects and a phenotype that resembled non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. The cases suggest that ODD may increase the risk of diabetic papillopathy, a condition that is associated with rapid glycemia reduction and crowded optic discs, which may combine to produce nerve fiber swelling and hypoperfusion with venous congestion in a compartment with limited room for expansion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Becker
- Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Michael Larsen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, 70590University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henrik Lund-Andersen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, 70590University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Steffen Hamann
- Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, 70590University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chandrasekaran PR, Madanagopalan VG, Narayanan R. Diabetic retinopathy in pregnancy - A review. Indian J Ophthalmol 2021; 69:3015-3025. [PMID: 34708737 PMCID: PMC8725079 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.ijo_1377_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Diabetes and gestational diabetes (GD) are areas of concern worldwide. GD can eventually lead to serious development of diabetic retinopathy (DR) during pregnancy or worsening of an already existing DR. GD confers future risk of diabetes, both in the mother and fetus, further complicating their lives. DR in pregnant women has been intriguing in terms of understanding the prevalence, assessing risk factors causing pathogenesis, and problems associated with treating them. Pregnancy itself is a risk factor for progression of DR. Physiological changes such as metabolic, vascular, immunologic, and hormonal changes that occur during pregnancy can cause development as well as worsening of DR. This can eventually lead to permanent visual loss if not addressed on time. Timing of laser, choice of treatment for diabetic macular edema with laser, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents (VEGF), and intravitreal steroids pose a serious challenge in managing these patients without causing damage to the mother and fetus. This review article showcases the prevalence, risk factors, and pathogenesis, outlines the management of DR in pregnancy, and recommends guidelines based on the available evidence. PubMed and MEDLINE searches were performed pertaining to the prevalence of GD in India, DR in pregnancy, risk factors for progression of DR, role of vasoactive mediators in DR, role of angiopoietic factors in DR, hormonal influence of DR, role of growth factors in DR, use of fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography, retinal lasers, anti-VEGF agents, intravitreal steroids, anesthesia, and retinal surgery, all pertaining to pregnancy and guidelines and recommendations for managing DR in pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - V G Madanagopalan
- Cataract and Vitreoretinal Services, JB Eye Hospital, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Raja Narayanan
- Director-The Retina Institute and Suven Clinical Research Centre, Consultant Ophthalmologist, Vitreo Retinal Diseases, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Belkin A, Chen T, DeOliveria AR, Johnson SM, Ramulu PY, Buys YM. A Practical Guide to the Pregnant and Breastfeeding Patient with Glaucoma. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 2021; 3:79-89. [PMID: 32672600 DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2019.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Revised: 12/04/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Avner Belkin
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Teresa Chen
- Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Pradeep Y Ramulu
- Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Yvonne M Buys
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema pathways and management: UK Consensus Working Group. Eye (Lond) 2021; 34:1-51. [PMID: 32504038 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-020-0961-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of diabetic retinopathy (DR) has evolved considerably over the past decade, with the availability of new technologies (diagnostic and therapeutic). As such, the existing Royal College of Ophthalmologists DR Guidelines (2013) are outdated, and to the best of our knowledge are not under revision at present. Furthermore, there are no other UK guidelines covering all available treatments, and there seems to be significant variation around the UK in the management of diabetic macular oedema (DMO). This manuscript provides a summary of reviews the pathogenesis of DR and DMO, including role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and non-VEGF cytokines, clinical grading/classification of DMO vis a vis current terminology (of centre-involving [CI-DMO], or non-centre involving [nCI-DMO], systemic risks and their management). The excellent UK DR Screening (DRS) service has continued to evolve and remains world-leading. However, challenges remain, as there are significant variations in equipment used, and reproducible standards of DMO screening nationally. The interphase between DRS and the hospital eye service can only be strengthened with further improvements. The role of modern technology including optical coherence tomography (OCT) and wide-field imaging, and working practices including virtual clinics and their potential in increasing clinic capacity and improving patient experiences and outcomes are discussed. Similarly, potential roles of home monitoring in diabetic eyes in the future are explored. The role of pharmacological (intravitreal injections [IVT] of anti-VEGFs and steroids) and laser therapies are summarised. Generally, IVT anti-VEGF are offered as first line pharmacologic therapy. As requirements of diabetic patients in particular patient groups may vary, including pregnant women, children, and persons with learning difficulties, it is important that DR management is personalised in such particular patient groups. First choice therapy needs to be individualised in these cases and may be intravitreal steroids rather than the standard choice of anti-VEGF agents. Some of these, but not all, are discussed in this document.
Collapse
|
9
|
Role of Oral Antioxidant Supplementation in the Current Management of Diabetic Retinopathy. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22084020. [PMID: 33924714 PMCID: PMC8069935 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22084020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Oxidative stress has been postulated as an underlying pathophysiologic mechanism of diabetic retinopathy (DR), the main cause of avoidable blindness in working-aged people. This review addressed the current daily clinical practice of DR and the role of antioxidants in this practice. A systematic review of the studies on antioxidant supplementation in DR patients was presented. Fifteen studies accomplished the inclusion criteria. The analysis of these studies concluded that antioxidant supplementation has a IIB level of recommendation in adult Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects without retinopathy or mild-to-moderate nonproliferative DR without diabetic macular oedema as a complementary therapy together with standard medical care.
Collapse
|
10
|
Iovino C, Mastropasqua R, Lupidi M, Bacherini D, Pellegrini M, Bernabei F, Borrelli E, Sacconi R, Carnevali A, D’Aloisio R, Cerquaglia A, Finocchio L, Govetto A, Erba S, Triolo G, Di Zazzo A, Forlini M, Vagge A, Giannaccare G. Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant as a Sustained Release Drug Delivery Device for the Treatment of Ocular Diseases: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Pharmaceutics 2020; 12:pharmaceutics12080703. [PMID: 32722556 PMCID: PMC7466091 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12080703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Drug delivery into the vitreous chamber remains a great challenge in the pharmaceutical industry due to the complex anatomy and physiology of the eye. Intravitreal injection is the mainstream route of drug administration to the posterior segment of the eye. The purpose of this review is to assess the current literature about the widening use of the intravitreal 0.7 mg dexamethasone (Dex) implant, and to provide a comprehensive collection of all the ocular disorders that benefit from Dex administration. Although anti-vascular endothelial growth-factors (VEGFs) have been largely indicated as a first-choice level, the Dex implant represents an important treatment option, especially in selected cases, such as vitrectomized eyes or patients in whom anti-VEGF failed or are contraindicated. In this article, the safety profile as well as the list of the possible complications related to intravitreal Dex injection are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Iovino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-070-609-2319
| | - Rodolfo Mastropasqua
- Institute of Ophthalmology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy;
| | - Marco Lupidi
- Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Section of Ophthalmology, University of Perugia, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, 06129 Perugia, Italy; (M.L.); (A.C.)
- Fondazione per la Macula Onlus, DINOMGI., University Eye Clinic, 16132 Genova, Italy
- Centre de l’Odéon, 113 Boulevard St Germain, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Daniela Bacherini
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Eye Clinic, University of Florence, AOU Careggi, 50139 Florence, Italy; (D.B.); (L.F.)
| | - Marco Pellegrini
- Ophthalmology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (M.P.); (F.B.)
| | - Federico Bernabei
- Ophthalmology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (M.P.); (F.B.)
| | - Enrico Borrelli
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital San Raffaele, University Vita Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy; (E.B.); (R.S.)
| | - Riccardo Sacconi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital San Raffaele, University Vita Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy; (E.B.); (R.S.)
| | - Adriano Carnevali
- Department of Ophthalmology, University “Magna Graecia,” 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (A.C.); (G.G.)
| | - Rossella D’Aloisio
- Department of Medicine and Science of Ageing, Ophthalmology Clinic, University “G. d’Annunzio” Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy;
| | - Alessio Cerquaglia
- Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Section of Ophthalmology, University of Perugia, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, 06129 Perugia, Italy; (M.L.); (A.C.)
| | - Lucia Finocchio
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Eye Clinic, University of Florence, AOU Careggi, 50139 Florence, Italy; (D.B.); (L.F.)
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London EC1V2PD, UK
| | - Andrea Govetto
- Fatebenefratelli-Oftalmico Hospital, ASST-Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, 63631 Milan, Italy; (A.G.); (S.E.); (G.T.)
- Bristol Eye Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS12LX, UK
| | - Stefano Erba
- Fatebenefratelli-Oftalmico Hospital, ASST-Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, 63631 Milan, Italy; (A.G.); (S.E.); (G.T.)
| | - Giacinto Triolo
- Fatebenefratelli-Oftalmico Hospital, ASST-Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, 63631 Milan, Italy; (A.G.); (S.E.); (G.T.)
| | - Antonio Di Zazzo
- Ophthalmology Complex Operative Unit, Campus Bio Medico University Hospital, 00128, Rome, Italy;
| | | | - Aldo Vagge
- University Eye Clinic, DINOGMI, Polyclinic Hospital San Martino IRCCS, 16132 Genoa, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Giannaccare
- Department of Ophthalmology, University “Magna Graecia,” 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (A.C.); (G.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bandello F, Toni D, Porta M, Varano M. Diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema, and cardiovascular risk: the importance of a long-term perspective and a multidisciplinary approach to optimal intravitreal therapy. Acta Diabetol 2020; 57:513-526. [PMID: 31749046 DOI: 10.1007/s00592-019-01453-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy (DR), diabetic macular edema (DME), and cardiovascular disease (CVD) resulting from vascular damage from persistently elevated blood glucose levels are among the serious secondary pathologies associated with long-standing diabetes mellitus. The established link between DR and CVD suggests the need for appropriate and early management of patients with diabetes to minimize CV risk. This is of particular importance in patients with recent, or a history of, major CV events. Early management of DR is a complex task that requires comprehensive evaluation and a multidisciplinary approach to manage complications, risk factors, and interactions between different aspects of the disease. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents have become an important therapeutic modality in ophthalmology. However, their use is contraindicated in patients with DR and/or DME with a CV event in the previous 3 months. In patients with DME, corticosteroids target the multifaceted inflammatory pathways involved in the pathogenesis of DR, with a broader spectrum of action than anti-VEGF agents. In this context, recent guidelines suggest the use of corticosteroids, and in particular dexamethasone intravitreal implant, as a well-tolerated and efficacious first-line treatment in patients with high CV risk, such as a history of or recent major CV events. This review focuses on the subset of diabetic patients with a prior CV event, DR, and DME and discusses the need for a holistic approach in evaluating the optimal therapeutic choice for the care of the individual patient, supported by real-world clinical experience on long-term dexamethasone intravitreal implant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Bandello
- Department of Ophthalmology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Scientific Institute San Raffaele, University Vita-Salute, Via Olgettina Milano, 58, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| | - Danilo Toni
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Porta
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
DEXAMETHASONE INTRAVITREAL IMPLANT FOR CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION DURING PREGNANCY. Retin Cases Brief Rep 2020; 13:300-307. [PMID: 28492410 DOI: 10.1097/icb.0000000000000592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the management of active choroidal neovascularization (CNV) during pregnancy with the use of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DXI) (Ozurdex). METHODS Case series of active CNV treated with DXI with at least 12-month follow-up retrospectively analyzed at 2 high-volume referral centers in France. Medical records and multimodal macular imaging were evaluated. RESULTS Three eyes of 3 patients (age 30.0 ± 3.6 years) were included. One case of idiopathic CNV and two cases of CNV secondary to multifocal choroiditis were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 20.6 ± 4.0 months (range, 16-23 months). The DXI was given at second trimester of established pregnancy in all cases. Mean central retinal thickness decreased from 359 ± 53 μm to 301 ± 17 μm 1 month after DXI and remained stable up to 12 months of follow-up. Visual improvement in all cases was observed (mean 10 letters; range, 5-30 letters) 1 month after DXI and remained stable/increased up to 12-month follow-up (mean 22 letters; range, 10-30 letters). All patients had an uneventful prenatal course and delivered a healthy full-term infant. CONCLUSION In the authors' experience, a single DXI revealed safe and effective in CNV treatment during pregnancy.
Collapse
|
13
|
Intravitreal Injections with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitors: A Practical Approach. Ophthalmol Ther 2020; 9:191-203. [PMID: 32034689 PMCID: PMC7054499 DOI: 10.1007/s40123-020-00230-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Intravitreal injections with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors constitute the most prevalent ophthalmic procedure in developed countries. Historically, there has been steady growth in the number of treatments performed of this kind, and projection studies estimate further growth in such treatments in the future. We provide a practical approach to intravitreal injections and discuss important aspects relating to the setting, the patient, the procedure, and the information given to the patient.
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND A good metabolic control before conception and throughout pregnancy with diabetes decreases the risk of short- and long-term adverse outcomes of the mothers and their offsprings. Insulin treatment remains the gold standard treatment recommended for any type of diabetes. New technologies including new insulins and insulin analogues, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion without and with sensors, the low-glucose predictive suspension function, and closed-loop systems that persistently and automatically self-adjust according to patients' continuous glucose monitoring readings have expanded the offer to clinicians for achieving tight glucose control. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY Unsafe effects of insulin and insulin analogues in pregnancy with diabetes could be linked with changes in insulin immunogenicity, teratogenicity, and mitogenicity. Second-generation insulin analogues need to be tested and proven. Effectiveness and safety of new insulin delivery systems in real life of diabetic women in pregnancy need further confirmations. SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, randomized controlled trials, systematic review and meta-analysis, observational prospective and retrospective studies, case series reports for the most recent insulin analogues, published in English impacted journals, and consensus statements from scientific societies I excluded 60 from 221 papers as not suitable for the purpose of the subject. RESULTS Subcutaneous insulin infusion can be safely used during pregnancy and delivery of well-trained women. Sensors are increasingly accurate tools that improve the efficacy and safety of integrated systems' functioning. Continuous glucose monitoring provides metrics ("time in range" time in "hypoglycemia" and in "hyperglycemia," glucose variability, average glucose levels in different time intervals) used as a guide to diabetes management; these new metrics are object of discussion in special populations. Randomized controlled trials have shown that sensor-augmented pump therapy improves pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes. Closed-loop insulin delivery provides better glycemic control than sensor-augmented pump therapy during pregnancy, before, and after delivery. CONCLUSION Second-generation insulin analogues and newer insulin infusion systems that automatically self-adjust according to patients continuous glucose monitor readings are important tools improving the treatment and quality of life of these women. Multi-institutional and disciplinary teams are working to develop and evaluate a pregnancy-specific artificial pancreas.
Collapse
|
15
|
Urbančič M, Gardašević Topčić I. Dexamethasone implant in the management of diabetic macular edema from clinician's perspective. Clin Ophthalmol 2019; 13:829-840. [PMID: 31190726 PMCID: PMC6526171 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s206769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this article is to provide an overview of characteristics and principles of use of dexamethasone implant in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). The condensed information about patient selection, dosing, and postinjection management is provided to make the clinician’s decisions easier in real-life practice. DME is a common complication of diabetes and the leading cause of visual loss in the working-age population. Inflammation plays an important role in the pathogenesis of DME. The breakdown of the blood–retinal barrier involves the expression of inflammatory cytokines and growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Steroids have proved to be effective in the treatment of DME by blocking the production of VEGF and other inflammatory cytokines, by inhibiting leukostasis, and by enhancing the barrier function of vascular endothelial cell tight junctions. Dexamethasone intravitreal implant has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of DME resistant to anti-VEGF therapy and in vitrectomized eyes. Data from clinical trials suggest that dexamethasone implant can be considered as first-line treatment in pseudophakic eyes. Dexamethasone implant is also the first-line therapy in patients not suited for anti-VEGF therapy, pregnant women, and patients unable to return for frequent monitoring. It has been shown that the maximum effect of dexamethasone implant on visual gain and retinal thickness occurs approximately 2 months after injection. Various treatment regimens are used in real-life situations, and reported reinjection intervals were usually <6 months. The number of retreatments needed decreased over time. Treatment algorithms should be personalized. Postinjection management and follow-up should consider potential adverse events such as intraocular pressure elevation and cataract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mojca Urbančič
- Eye Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schaefer-Graf U, Napoli A, Nolan CJ. Diabetes in pregnancy: a new decade of challenges ahead. Diabetologia 2018; 61:1012-1021. [PMID: 29356835 PMCID: PMC6448995 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-018-4545-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Every 10 years, the Diabetic Pregnancy Study Group, a study group of the EASD, conducts an audit meeting to review the achievements of the preceding decade and to set the directions for research and clinical practice improvements for the next decade. The most recent meeting focused on the following areas: improving pregnancy outcomes for women with pregestational type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes; the influence of obesity and gestational diabetes on pregnancy outcomes; the determinants and assessment of fetal growth and development; and public health issues, including consideration of transgenerational consequences and economic burden. The audit meeting also considered the likely impact of 'omics' on research within the field and the potential of these technologies to enable precision-medicine approaches to management. Through sharing of the findings and ideas of audit meeting participants, the DPSG hopes to promote networking, research and advances in clinical care, to improve outcomes for all women and their offspring affected by diabetes and obesity in pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ute Schaefer-Graf
- Berlin Center for Diabetes in Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St Joseph's Hospital, Wüsthoffstraße 15, 12101, Berlin, Germany.
- Department of Obstetrics, Charité, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Angela Napoli
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Christopher J Nolan
- Department of Endocrinology, The Canberra Hospital, Garran, ACT, Australia
- Australian National University Medical School and John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Grzybowski A, Told R, Sacu S, Bandello F, Moisseiev E, Loewenstein A, Schmidt-Erfurth U. 2018 Update on Intravitreal Injections: Euretina Expert Consensus Recommendations. Ophthalmologica 2018; 239:181-193. [PMID: 29393226 DOI: 10.1159/000486145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 174] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Intravitreal injections (IVI) have become the most common intraocular procedure worldwide with increasing numbers every year. The article presents the most up-to-date review on IVI epidemiology and techniques. Unfortunately, important issues related to pre-, peri- and postinjection management lack randomized clinical trials for a final conclusion. Also, a great diversity of approaches exists worldwide. Therefore, expert consensus recommendations on IVI techniques are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrzej Grzybowski
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.,Institute for Research in Ophthalmology, Foundation for Ophthalmology Development, Poznan, Poland
| | - Reinhard Told
- Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefan Sacu
- Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Bandello
- Department of Ophthalmology, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Elad Moisseiev
- Department of Ophthalmology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Anat Loewenstein
- Department of Ophthalmology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Department of Ophthalmology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth
- Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lin HY, Lee CY, Huang JY, Yang SF, Chao SC. Concurrent injection of dexamethasone intravitreal implant and anti-angiogenic agent in patients with macular edema: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e8868. [PMID: 29382007 PMCID: PMC5709006 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000008868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the safety and efficiency in macular edema patients who concurrently received a single injection of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX, 0.7 mg) and ranibizumab (2.3 mg).A retrospective cohort study was conducted, and medical records from 2012 to 2016 were reviewed. Patients who received concurrent DEX and ranibizumab injections with a follow-up period of at least 3 months were enrolled in the study group. An age and gender-matched group received ranibizumab injections and was designated the control group. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) were included in the analysis. Steroid-induced ocular hypertension (SIOH) is defined as either an elevation of more than 10 mmHg from baseline or a single IOP measurement of more than 30 mmHg.A total of 26 patients were enrolled in the current study with 13 patients in each group. Both the BCVA (P = .04) and CMT (P < .01) achieved significant improvement after the follow-up period in the study group. The IOP increased after the injection but no significant elevation was observed throughout the follow-up period in the study group (P = .15). For SIOH, 1 patient in the study group had an elevated IOP of 10 mmHg (7.7%) at 2 postoperative months, and no single IOP measurement of more than 30 mmHg was obtained. Five patients (38.5%) in the study group received medical treatment that successfully retarded their IOP elevation, and no individuals required surgical management. In the control group, there were no significant fluctuations concerning BCVA, CMT, and IOP, and no ocular hypertension was observed. According to the inter-group analysis, the CMT and BCVA recovered more significantly in the study group than in the control group.Concurrent injection of DEX and ranibizumab is a preliminary method that shows effectiveness in treating ME. Furthermore, safety is also guaranteed, with moderate levels of severity and transient IOP elevation being observed. A future large-scale study is necessary to evaluate the long-term effects and safety of this combined treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hung-Yu Lin
- Department of Ophthalmology, Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua
- Institute of Medicine
- Department of Optometry, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung
- Department of Optometry, Yuanpei University of Medical Technology, Hsinchu
| | - Chia-Yi Lee
- Department of Ophthalmology, Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua
| | - Jing-Yang Huang
- Department of Medical Research, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung
| | - Shun-Fa Yang
- Institute of Medicine
- Department of Medical Research, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung
| | - Shih-Chun Chao
- Department of Ophthalmology, Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu
- Department of Optometry, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
The risk of severe eye problems has been found to increase significantly with age, particularly between the fifth and sixth decades of life. Cataracts, dry eye, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) are very common and very different age-related ocular diseases that reduce the patient's quality of life. The rationale for using corticosteroids to treat anterior and posterior ocular segment diseases is driven by inflammation. Dexamethasone, one of the most powerful corticosteroids available, is widely used for topical or intravitreal administration. Topical dexamethasone has proven efficacy for the management of postoperative inflammation in the anterior segment after cataract surgery and symptom relief in dry-eye disease. A new sustained-release 700 µg dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX) was recently approved for the treatment of macular edema following RVO, diabetic macular edema, or non-infectious uveitis, and its use is increasing, especially when other therapeutic agents have failed. The most common side effects are increased intraocular pressure and cataract formation. The potency of DEX, alone or in combination with other agents, makes DEX a promising option for treating several retinal diseases.
Collapse
|
20
|
Hodzic-Hadzibegovic D, Ba-Ali S, Valerius M, Lund-Andersen H. Quantification of fluid resorption from diabetic macular oedema with foveal serous detachment after dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex ® ) in a pregnant diabetic. Acta Ophthalmol 2017; 95:324-325. [PMID: 27778454 DOI: 10.1111/aos.13282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2016] [Accepted: 09/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To quantify the fluid resorption from the centre of the fovea in a pregnant woman with diabetic macular oedema by daily optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements after the administration of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex® ). METHODS A 36-year-old pregnant woman with type 1 diabetes for 33 years presented with diabetic macular oedema with foveal serous detachment and symptomatic vision loss at 16 gestational weeks. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in Snellen notation and central retinal volume assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT, Topcon Corporation) were measured almost on a daily basis the first five weeks after implantation and then 2-3 times per month until childbirth. RESULTS The pretreatment BCVA was 0.6/1.0, and pretreatment central retinal volume was 0.32 mm3 . Near elimination of the oedema was achieved 3 days after treatment. One week after treatment, BCVA improved to preconception level, and full regression of the oedema was achieved. The rate of fluid resorption from the centre of the fovea was highest 3 days after treatment 0.00139 μL/hr and decreasing to 0.00065 μL/hr 1 week after treatment. CONCLUSION Intravitreal dexamethasone implant Ozurdex reduces promptly central retinal volume in diabetic macular oedema involving the centre of the fovea in pregnancy with highest rate of fluid resorption 3 days after treatment initiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shakoor Ba-Ali
- Department of Ophthalmology; Rigshospitalet; University of Copenhagen; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Marianne Valerius
- Department of Ophthalmology; Rigshospitalet; University of Copenhagen; Copenhagen Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center; Gentofte Denmark
| | - Henrik Lund-Andersen
- Department of Ophthalmology; Rigshospitalet; University of Copenhagen; Copenhagen Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center; Gentofte Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Schwartz SG, Scott IU, Stewart MW, Flynn HW. Update on corticosteroids for diabetic macular edema. Clin Ophthalmol 2016; 10:1723-30. [PMID: 27660409 PMCID: PMC5019446 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s115546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Diabetic macular edema (DME) remains an important cause of visual loss. Although anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents are generally used as first-line treatments for patients with center-involving DME, there is an important role for corticosteroids as well. Corticosteroids may be especially useful in pseudophakic patients poorly responsive to anti-VEGF therapies, in patients wishing to reduce the number of required injections, and in pregnant patients. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide has been used for many years but is not approved for this indication. An extended-release bioerodable dexamethasone delivery system and an extended-release nonbioerodable fluocinolone acetonide insert have both achieved regulatory approval for the treatment of DME. All intravitreal corticosteroids are associated with risks of cataract progression, elevation of intraocular pressure, and endophthalmitis. There is no current consensus regarding the use of corticosteroids, but they are valuable for selected patients with center-involving DME.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen G Schwartz
- Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Ingrid U Scott
- Department of Ophthalmology; Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA
| | - Michael W Stewart
- Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Harry W Flynn
- Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| |
Collapse
|