Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Preliminary Results of a Donor Insertion Pull-through Technique Using a Donor Mat Device

Endothelial Keratoplasty Following Glaucoma Filtration Surgery: A UK Tertiary Eye Care Referral Centre Experience

Purpose: To compare the postoperative complications and clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in eyes with previous glaucoma filtering surgery. Methods: In this retrospective comparative case series, we analysed postoperative visual acuity and intraocular pressure, graft survival, rate of graft detachment and/or dislocation, number of rebubbling and/or graft repositioning procedures, and graft rejection or failure (primary and secondary). Results: Sixteen eyes with DMEK and 80 eyes with DSAEK with previous glaucoma surgery were studied. The results were recorded at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. No statistically significant differences in postoperative visual acuity were found between the two groups at any stage of the follow-up. Intraocular pressure was lower in the DMEK group at the follow-up stage of 3 (p = 0.0022) and 12 months (p = 0.0480). Visually significant graft detachment was recorded in 31.3% and 22.5% of DMEK and DSAEK cases, respectively (p = 0.4541). All DMEK detachments (n = 5) were managed with slit-lamp rebubbling. Out of 18 graft detachments in the DSAEK group, 2 grafts were observed due to small graft detachment, 6 large graft detachments underwent rebubbling performed in the operating theatre, and 10 eyes needed primary graft repositioning for graft dislocation. Conclusions: DMEK is a feasible option to treat endothelial failure in complex eyes with previous glaucoma surgery. In the DMEK group, visual acuity outcomes and possibly postoperative intraocular pressure control were better compared with the DSAEK group.

Outcomes and Early Complications Using an Endothelium-in Pull-Through Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Technique With Preloaded Versus Surgeon-Loaded Donor Tissue in Fuchs Patients

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare outcomes and early complications using an endothelium-in pull-through Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) technique with preloaded versus surgeon-loaded donor tissue.

METHODS

Data from 163 eyes of 125 patients at the Wilmer Eye Institute diagnosed with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy who underwent DMEK with or without cataract extraction using surgeon-loaded tissue (n = 83) or preloaded tissue (n = 80) were reviewed. Best-corrected visual acuity and early postoperative complications including small graft detachment (less than one third of the graft area), large graft detachment (more than one third), graft failure, and rebubbling were compared.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics including age, sex, and visual acuity were not statistically different between the groups. Small graft detachment was observed in 18.1% of the surgeon-loaded and 22.5% of the preloaded group ( P = 0.48), whereas large detachment occurred in 12.0% and 5.0%, respectively ( P = 0.11). Among these, rebubbling was performed in 18 (21.7%) in the surgeon-loaded compared with 12 (15.0%) in the preloaded group ( P = 0.27). The rebubbling rate of the combined procedure (cataract surgery and DMEK) was 21.8% and of DMEK alone was 7.7% ( P = 0.048). Primary graft failure occurred in 2 surgeon-loaded cases (2.4%) and 1 preloaded case (1.3%) ( P = 0.58). There was no difference in postoperative best-corrected visual acuity at 1 year (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution 0.21 ± 0.25 for the surgeon-loaded vs. 0.16 ± 0.16 for the preloaded group, P = 0.23).

CONCLUSIONS

DMEK surgery using preloaded endothelium-in tissue has comparable outcomes with surgeon-loaded endothelium-in tissue. However, there was a trend toward the lower rebubbling rate in DMEK alone compared with combined procedures.

Double trouble in DMEK surgery: Learning experience and review of the literature

PURPOSE

To report a challenging Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) case, complicated by intraoperative aqueous misdirection and spontaneous anterior chamber fibrin reaction.

METHODS

A 70-year-old female affected by corneal edema due to Fuchs endothelial dystrophy underwent a triple procedure (cataract extraction - IOL implantation - DMEK surgery) in her left eye. This report illustrates the management of the intraoperative complications of aqueous misdirection syndrome and anterior chamber fibrin reaction.

RESULTS

Despite the optimal management of the posterior pressure and the thorough removal of the fibrinous reaction during the case, the DMEK graft was not completely unfolded and centred at the end of the surgical procedure. Nonetheless, the patient showed good long-term anatomical and functional recovery: at the last follow-up (2 years after surgery), central corneal thickness was 526 µm with a best corrected visual acuity of 20/25 and an endothelial cell density of 1112 cell/mm2.

CONCLUSION

Early recognition and prompt management of intraoperative aqueous misdirection syndrome and anterior chamber fibrin reaction during DMEK surgery is essential to ensure good functional and anatomical outcomes.

DMEK surgical training: An instructional guide on various wet-lab methods

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a partial-thickness corneal transplantation procedure that involves selective transplantation of the Descemet membrane and endothelium. DMEK offers significant advantages over other keratoplasty techniques, such as faster visual rehabilitation, better final visual acuity due to minimal optical interface effects, lower risk of allograft rejection, and less long-term dependence on topical steroids. Despite all its advantages, DMEK has been found to be more challenging than other corneal transplantation techniques, and its steep learning curve appears to be an obstacle to its widespread use and adoption by corneal surgeons worldwide. DMEK surgical training laboratories (wet labs) provide a window of opportunity for surgeons to learn, prepare, manipulate, and deliver these grafts in a risk-free environment. Wet labs are a significant learning tool, especially for those institutions that have limited tissue availability in their local centers. We provide a step-by-step guide for preparing DMEK grafts using different techniques on human and nonhuman models with instructional videos. This article should eventually help the trainees and the educators understand the requirements for performing DMEK and conducting a DMEK wet lab and develop their skills and interests from a wide variety of available techniques.

Posterior Segment Air Injection-Assisted Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Pseudophakic and Vitrectomized Eyes

PURPOSE

This study aimed to present a novel technique for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in pseudophakic and vitrectomized eyes.

METHODS

The sterile air was injected into the posterior eye segment (anterior vitreous cavity) as a barrier to prevent the fluid of the vitreous cavity flowing into the anterior chamber, levitating the iris-lens diaphragm to flatten the anterior chamber during the surgery. This approach assists in the unfolding of the donor endothelial graft, helping to perform DMEK surgery on patients with a posterior intraocular lens (IOL) and vitrectomy.

RESULTS

Four cases presented with corneal endothelial decompensation (pseudophakic bullous keratopathy) with previous IOL implantation and vitrectomy underwent DMEK with this technique. The Descemet endothelial graft unfolding time after air injection was 68.75 ± 8.96 seconds. No graft displacement occurred during the surgery. The uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities were improved in 3 of 4 patients. The corneas were transparent, and there was no graft detachment observed postoperatively in all 4 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The posterior eye segment air injection can reduce the difficulty of unfolding the DMEK graft in patients after IOL implantation and vitrectomy and the potential intraoperative and postoperative complications, allowing for easy performance of DMEK surgery on pseudophakic and vitrectomized eyes for corneal endothelial dysfunction.

Comparison of the Modified Jones Tube Technique and the DMEK EndoGlide Technique With and Without Viscoelastic Material for DMEK Tissue Preparation

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare endothelial cell loss for DMEK (Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty) tissue preparation techniques using the modified Jones tube and the DMEK EndoGlide with and without viscoelastic material to protect the endothelium.

METHODS

This ex vivo study included 10 DMEK grafts prepared using each of the 3 abovementioned techniques. After tissue preparation, transport conditions were simulated for a minimum of 45 hours before deployment of the DMEK tissue and quantification of endothelial cell loss. Comparisons between preparation technique groups were made using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

RESULTS

The Jones tube group had a mean endothelial cell loss of 11.0 ± 4.8% compared with the EndoGlide group with 12.9 ± 6.7% and the EndoGlide with viscoelastic group with 25.7 ± 15.0%. The differences between the EndoGlide with viscoelastic group and the other 2 were statistically significant both before (P < 0.01 and P = 0.01) and after (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02) adjusting for baseline characteristics. The difference between the EndoGlide and Jones tube groups was not significant (P = 0.73 and P = 0.53 after adjustment). Microscopy revealed endothelial cell loss in the area of viscoelastic use for the EndoGlide with viscoelastic group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the Jones tube and DMEK EndoGlide resulted in similar low rates of endothelial cell loss after tissue preparation, transport, and deployment. However, use of viscoelastic material to protect the endothelium using the DMEK technique actually resulted in increased cell loss in the area of its application resulting in overall higher rates of cell loss across the DMEK tissue.

DMEK graft: One size does not fit all

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a popular procedure for the treatment of corneal endothelial diseases mainly targeting Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK). Although DMEK has multiple advantages, it is challenging in terms of graft preparation and delivery. One of the crucial factors of DMEK graft preparation is determining the size of the graft. Evaluating risks and benefits of transplanting larger or smaller grafts compared with the descemetorhexis performed following a standard DMEK procedure thus becomes important. Advanced techniques like pre-loaded DMEK requires pre-selection of graft diameter without physical examination of the eye making it more challenging. Therefore, recognizing the benefits of graft size and the number of transplanted endothelial cells becomes essential. Smaller DMEK grafts have been preferred and accepted for grafting. Larger diameter grafts have advantages but can be challenging due to higher detachment rates. We thus aim to review the challenges of preparing and delivering DMEK tissues with small or large diameter based on selected descemetorhexis area, discuss the outcomes based on different graft sizes, highlight related complications and suggest which cases may benefit from adopting smaller or larger graft size.

Keratoplasty Registries: Lessons Learned

ABSTRACT

Clinical registries have been developed for decades in the field of ophthalmology, and they are especially well-suited to the study of keratoplasty practices. A comprehensive donor/recipient registry system can provide insight into donor, recipient, and surgical factors associated with immediate and long-term outcomes and adverse reactions. Furthermore, linkage with demographic databases can elucidate relationships with social determinants of health and potentially shape public policy. The vast sample size and multicenter nature of registries enable researchers to conduct sophisticated multivariate or multilayered analyses. In this review, we aim to emphasize the importance of registry data for keratoplasty practice and 1) summarize the structure of current keratoplasty registries; 2) examine the features and scientific contributions of the registries from Australia, the United Kingdom, Singapore, the Netherlands, Sweden, Eye Bank Association of America, and European Cornea and Cell Transplant registries; 3) compare registry-based studies with large single-site clinical studies; 4) compare registry-based studies with randomized control studies; and 5) make recommendations for future development of keratoplasty registries. Keratoplasty registries have increased our knowledge of corneal transplant practices and their outcomes. Future keratoplasty registry-based studies may be further strengthened by record linkage, data sharing, and international collaboration.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: Update on preoperative considerations, surgical techniques, and outcomes

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is the closest to the physiological replacement of endothelial cells. In the initial years, the technique was surgically challenging. Over the years, with better understanding and modifications in the surgical steps, the technique has evolved as an alternative to more popular procedure Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. The article highlights the various preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative nuances of DMEK. Additionally, it summarizes the various comparative and noncomparative studies on DMEK outcomes.

Graft Size and Double Scroll Formation Rate in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of intentional double scroll formation of donor Descemet membrane (DM) inside a glass tube inserter (the Fogla technique) in DM endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for controlled insertion and unfolding of grafts.

METHODS

Eleven consecutive patients who underwent DMEK were included in this study. We sought to specify graft characteristics in which double scroll configuration was successfully formed using the Fogla technique. We compared donor age, graft size, surgical time, unfolding time, and visual outcomes between patients with and without double scroll configuration. The ability to form double scroll formation of DM grafts of various diameters and unfolding time of DM grafts was evaluated using total seven eye-bank eyes in ex vivo experiments.

RESULTS

A double scroll configuration inside a glass tube was successfully obtained in six DMEK grafts (54.5%). When comparing clinical features between those with and without double scroll configuration, only graft size was significantly larger in those with double scroll configuration (7.9 ± 0.2 mm) than in those without (7.4 ± 0.4, P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in other features and clinical outcomes, although unfolding-time was shorter in eyes with double scroll configuration (4.6 ± 2.0 min) compared to those without (8.6 ± 8.1, P = 0.21). Ex vivo experiments showed that unfolding time was significantly shorter in double scroll configuration (2.71 ± 0.49 min) than in single scroll (5.02 ± 0.79, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A double scroll configuration within a glass tube can be obtained more frequently in larger DMEK grafts (8.0 mm in diameter), which may result in easier and faster DMEK procedures.

Clinical outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) with imported donor corneas in eyes of Asian patients; endothelium-in versus endothelium-out method

Objective

We investigated whether (1) imported pre-cut tissue is feasible for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in eyes of Asian patients, (2) the clinical outcome is comparable between the endothelium‐in and endothelium‐out methods, and (3) the corneal edema-induced anterior curvature changes may have an effect on the refractive error.

Methods

The medical records of 32 DMEK patients who underwent either the endothelium-out or endothelium-in method using imported pre-cut grafts with a 3-day pre-cut-to-use time were retrospectively analyzed. Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy (37.5%) and bullous keratopathy (62.5%) cases were included. The main clinical outcome measures were graft survival, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), corneal thickness (CT), and complications. Correlation of the anterior curvature changes with refractive error was analyzed in the DMEK with cataract surgery group.

Results

The overall survival rate was 71.9%. Final graft failures were caused by rejection, glaucoma, and infection. Visual acuities improved by 89.3%. BCVA better than 20/40 and 20/20 was found in 75% and 28.6% of patients, respectively. The ECDs at 3 months and 1 year were 1400 and 1083 cells/mm², respectively. The mean survival time, ECD, BCVA, CT, and complication rates were not different between the endothelium-in and endothelium-out methods. A hyperopic shift by +0.42 D was not related to the anterior curvature changes.

Conclusion

Imported pre-cut tissues with a ≤ 3-day pre-cut-to-use time are feasible for DMEK in the treatment of corneal endothelial edema in eyes of Asian patients, and both endothelium-in and endothelium-out methods appear to be comparatively effective. Edema-induced anterior curvature change may not affect the refractive shift.

“Endothelium-Out” and “Endothelium-In” Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Graft Insertion Techniques: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

Background

We evaluated the visual outcomes and complications of “endothelium-out” and “endothelium-in” Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft insertion techniques.

Materials and Methods

Electronic searches were conducted in CENTRAL, Cochrane databases, PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov. Study designs included clinical trials, comparative observational studies, and large case series (≥25 eyes). PRISMA guidelines were used for abstracting data and synthesis. Random-effects models were employed for meta-analyses.

Results

21,323 eyes (95 studies) were included. Eighty-six studies reported on “endothelium-out” techniques; eight studies reported on “endothelium-in” techniques. One study compared “endothelium-out” to “endothelium-in” techniques. Eighteen “endothelium-out” studies reported that 42.5–85% of eyes achieved best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥20/25 at 6 months; pooled proportion of eyes achieving BCVA ≥20/25 at 6 months was 58.7% (95% CI 49.4–67.7%,15 studies). Three “endothelium-in” studies reported that 44.7–87.5% of eyes achieved BCVA of ≥20/25 at 6 months; pooled proportion of eyes achieving BCVA ≥20/25 at 6 months was 62.4% (95% CI 33.9–86.9%). Pooled mean endothelial cell loss was lower in the “endothelium-in” studies (28.1 ± 1.3%, 7 studies) compared to “endothelium-out” studies (36.3 ± 6.9%,10 studies) at 6 months (p = 0.018). Graft re-bubbling rates were higher in the “endothelium-out” studies (26.2%, 95% CI 21.9–30.9%, 74 studies) compared to “endothelium-in” studies (16.5%, 95% CI 8.5–26.4%, 6 studies), although statistical significance was not reached (p = 0.440). Primary graft failure rates were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.552). Quality of evidence was considered low and significant heterogeneity existed amongst the studies.

Conclusion

Reported rates of endothelial cell loss were lower in “endothelium-in” DMEK studies at 6 months compared to “endothelium-out” studies. Outcomes of “endothelium-in” techniques were otherwise comparable to those reported in “endothelium-out” studies. Given the technical challenges encountered in “endothelium-out” procedures, surgeons may consider “endothelium-in” techniques designed for easier intra-operative DMEK graft unfolding. “Endothelium-in” studies evaluating outcomes at longer time points are required before conclusive comparisons between the two techniques can be drawn.

Evaluation of corneal nerves and dendritic cells by in vivo confocal microscopy after Descemet's membrane keratoplasty for bullous keratopathy

This study evaluated changes in corneal nerves and the number of dendritic cells (DCs) in corneal basal epithelium following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery for bullous keratopathy (BK). Twenty-three eyes from 16 consecutive patients that underwent DMEK for BK were included. Eyes of age-matched patients that underwent pre-cataract surgery (12 eyes) were used as controls. In vivo confocal microscopy was performed pre- and postoperatively at 6, 12, and 24 months. Corneal nerve length, corneal nerve trunks, number of branches, and the number of DCs were determined. The total corneal nerve length of 1634.7 ± 1389.1 μm/mm² before surgery was significantly increased in a time-dependent manner to 4485.8 ± 1403.7 μm/mm², 6949.5 ± 1477.1 μm/mm², and 9389.2 ± 2302.2 μm/mm² at 6, 12, and 24 months after DMEK surgery, respectively. The DC density in BK cornea pre- and postoperatively at 6 months was significantly higher than in the controls, and decreased postoperatively at 12 and 24 months and was significantly lower than that at 6 months postoperatively. Thus, our results suggest that DMEK can repair and normalize the corneal environment.

Effects of Combined Cataract Surgery on Outcomes of Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

A systematic review and meta-analysis of literature-to-date regarding the effects of combined cataract surgery on outcomes of DMEK.

Methods

Multiple electronic databases were searched, including Cochrane Library databases, PubMed, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The final search was updated on 10th February 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized studies and large case series (≥25 eyes) of DMEK (pseudophakic/phakic) and “triple DMEK”. A total of 36 studies were included in this study. Meta-analyses were done with risk differences (RD) computed for dichotomous data and the mean difference (MD) for continuous data via random-effects model. Primary outcome measure: postoperative re-bubbling rate; secondary outcome measures: complete/partial graft detachment rate, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell loss (ECL), primary graft failure, and cystoid macular edema (CMO).

Results

A total of 11,401 eyes were included in this review. Based on non-randomized studies, triple DMEK demonstrated a better BCVA at 1-month postoperative than DMEK alone (MD 0.10 logMAR; 95% CI: 0.07–0.13; p < 0.001), though not statistically significant at 3–6 months postoperative (MD 0.07 logMAR; 95% CI: −0.01 to 0.15; p = 0.08). There was no significant difference in rebubbling, ECL, graft failures, and CMO postoperatively between the two groups (p = 0.07, p = 0.40, 0.06, and 0.54 respectively).

Conclusion

Our review suggests that DMEK has a similar post-operative complication risk compared to “triple DMEK” (low-quality evidence), with comparable visual outcome and graft survival rate at 6 months postoperative. High-quality RCTs specifically studying the outcomes of combined vs. staged DMEK are still warranted.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020173760, identifier: CRD42020173760.

Delivering Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts: Modern Day Transplant Devices

PURPOSE

To summarize the graft loading, transporting and delivery devices used for endothelial keratoplasty (EK).

METHODS

A literature search of electronic databases was performed.

RESULTS

New techniques and devices have been introduced and implemented to prepare, load, transport and transplant the grafts for EK. The advantages are not only limited to the surgical theatre but also widely spread across the eye banking field. Investigation of advanced materials and designs have been rapidly growing with continuous evolution in the field of eye banking and corneal transplantation. Innovative techniques and modern devices have been evaluated to reduce the endothelial cell loss and increase the precision of the transplant in order to benefit both surgeons and the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

It is extremely important to reduce any potential wastage and optimize the use of every available donor cornea due to the limited availability of healthy cadaveric donor corneas required for transplants. As a result, the use of pre-cut and pre-loaded grafts supplied by the eye banks in calibrated devices have been gaining momentum. Innovation in the field of bioengineering for the development of new devices that facilitate excellent clinical outcomes along with reduction in learning curve has shown promising results.

Anterior chamber fibrin reaction during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

Purpose

To report a series of five cases of intraoperative spontaneous anterior chamber fibrin reaction during Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK).

Methods

We retrospectively collected demographic data and data for ocular disease history for each patient. Donor age, preoperative graft endothelial density, surgical complications on surgery and intraoperative OCT videos, intraoperative management and outcome were assessed. The same standardized DMEK technique was used for all patients.

Results

We report intraoperative fibrin formation in five eyes subjected to DMEK. Three pseudophakic eyes underwent single DMEK, and the other two underwent combined DMEK and cataract surgery. In one case, a fibrin filament was observed before graft insertion, with multiplication during surgery, whereas, in the other four cases, strands of fibrin from the iris appeared after graft insertion. This complication resulted in graft failure in four cases (80%). No recipient- or donor-related risk factor was identified.

Conclusions and importance

The anterior chamber fibrin reaction is a very uncommon complication of DMEK. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms remain unknown, but analyses of surgical videos and intraoperative OCT suggest iris involvement. This phenomenon may be induced by chronic subclinical anterior chamber inflammation, due to a blood-aqueous barrier breakdown associated with acute iris trauma during surgery. Thus, intraoperative microtraumatism of the iris should be avoided.

Aqueous humour cytokine profiles after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty

The aim of this study was to compare aqueous humour (AqH) cytokine profiles before and after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in eyes with bullous keratopathy (BK) and age-matched normal eyes. A total of 49 participants (mean age 75.0 ± 13.5 years) were divided into three groups: (1) BK patients scheduled for DMEK (BK group); (2) patients after DMEK (DMEK group; average postoperative time 1,018 ± 460 days); and (3) control participants without corneal endothelial disease scheduled for cataract surgery (control group). AqH (0.2 mL) was collected from all participants, and the levels of various AqH cytokines were simultaneously measured using a multiplex bead immunoassay. The DMEK group exhibited significantly lower concentrations of several pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-8, and granulocyte colony stimulating factor than the BK group. In addition, the levels of IL-1β and IL-5 were significantly lower in the DMEK group than in the control group. The AqH levels of several pro-inflammatory cytokines were significantly reduced after DMEK, indicating that regeneration of the endothelial pump owing to the transplantation of a healthy endothelium might have a positive effect on anterior chamber inflammation.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Asian Eyes: Intraoperative and Postoperative Complications

PURPOSE

To describe intraoperative and postoperative complications of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in Asian eyes.

METHODS

A: prospective comparative study of consecutive cases of DMEK cases between January 2016 and January 2018. A subgroup of consecutive patients were optimized with preoperative topical eye drops and modification of donor insertion. Main outcome measures were intraoperative complications and total surgical time. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative complications and endothelial cell loss (ECL) at the 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

We included 50 consecutive patients in this study; mean age of 66 ± 9 years old with 70% women. The indications for DMEK were Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (82%) and bullous keratopathy (18%). When compared with the standard group (n = 24 eyes), the optimized DMEK group (n = 26 eyes) was associated with a significantly reduced surgical time (33.9 ± 12.7 vs. 26.9 ± 7.6 minutes; P = 0.041), lower ECL at 6 months (27.2 ± 17.1% vs. 13.7 ± 9.7%; P = 0.012) and lower risk of high vitreous pressure causing iris prolapse (16.7% vs. 0%; P = 0.046). Multivariate analysis revealed a shorter surgical time (Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.924; 95% confidence interval: 0.858-0.995; P = 0.036) and reduced ECL (OR: 0.907; 95% confidence interval: 0.843-0.977; P = 0.01) in the optimized group.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed intraoperative challenges such as difficulty with donor insertion with increased vitreous pressure in Asian eyes by performing DMEK surgery, which may be reduced with anticipated preoperative and postoperative measures.

Effects of uncomplicated Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty on the central retinal thickness

Purpose

To determine retinal thickness (RT) changes and the incidence of macular edema after uncomplicated Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK-ME) in patients without ME risk factors.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 107 pseudophakic eyes of 74 patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) (79.4%) or bullous keratopathy (BK) (20.6%) underwent DMEK surgery between 2016 and 2019 at the Department of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen University. Patients with intra- or postoperative complications as well as pre-existing risk factors for ME were excluded. Macular spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) measurements were performed before, 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery. Retinal thickness (RT) was analyzed in the central foveal 1 mm (CSF), parafoveal 3 mm and 6 mm subfield.

Results

Eight eyes (7.5%) developed DMEK-ME 1 month after surgery. Six DMEK-ME eyes (75%) were rebubbled, compared with 31.3% (31 of 99; P = 0.02) of the non DMEK-ME eyes. DMEK-ME eyes had a significantly thicker CSF 1 month after surgery (432.0 ± 97.6 μm) compared with non-DMEK-ME eyes (283.7 ± 22.2 μm; P = 0.01). The other subfields and time points showed no significant RT changes. DMEK-ME significantly impaired BSCVA (0.38 ± 0.92 logMAR) only 1 month after surgery in comparison to the non DMEK-ME eyes (0.23 ± 0.87 logMAR, P = 0.015).

Conclusion

Excluding systemic and surgery-related risk factors, rebubbling increases the risk of DMEK-ME. Performing a CSF scan 1 month after surgery, particularly in rebubbled eyes, efficiently detects DMEK-ME and allows the prompt initiation of treatment, e.g., topical corticosteroid and non-steroidal (NSAID) eye drops.

Evolution of therapies for the corneal endothelium: past, present and future approaches

Corneal endothelial diseases are leading indications for corneal transplantations. With significant advancement in medical science and surgical techniques, corneal transplant surgeries are now increasingly effective at restoring vision in patients with corneal diseases. In the last 15 years, the introduction of endothelial keratoplasty (EK) procedures, where diseased corneal endothelium (CE) are selectively replaced, has significantly transformed the field of corneal transplantation. Compared to traditional penetrating keratoplasty, EK procedures, namely Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), offer faster visual recovery, lower immunological rejection rates, and improved graft survival. Although these modern techniques can achieve high success, there are fundamental impediments to conventional transplantations. A lack of suitable donor corneas worldwide restricts the number of transplants that can be performed. Other barriers include the need for specialized expertise, high cost, and risks of graft rejection or failure. Research is underway to develop alternative treatments for corneal endothelial diseases, which are less dependent on the availability of allogeneic tissues - regenerative medicine and cell-based therapies. In this review, an overview of past and present transplantation procedures used to treat corneal endothelial diseases are described. Potential novel therapies that may be translated into clinical practice will also be presented.

Anterior segment reconstruction with artificial iris and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a staged surgical approach

PURPOSE

To describe a surgical approach that involves anterior segment reconstruction with CustomFlex Artificial Iris (CAI; HumanOptics, Erlangen, Germany) followed by Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in complex eyes with corneal decompensation.

METHODS

Restrospective case series of eyes that underwent anterior segment restoration involving (1) synechiolysis of peripheral anterior synechiae and excision of iris remnants, (2) securing a well-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lens and (3) suture-fixated or capsular bag placement of CAI. All eyes then underwent DMEK using a pull-through technique with the DMEK EndoGlide (Network Medical Products, Ripon, UK). Main outcomes were successful anterior segment restoration and corneal clarity with central corneal thickness (CCT).

RESULTS

Five eyes of five patients (median age 61 years, range 27-69 years; 60% female) underwent anterior segment reconstruction with CAI implantation (4 suture-fixated), followed by successful DMEK surgery (median 2 months later, range 1-5 months). There were no major intraoperative complications or primary graft failure, with one peripheral graft detachment that underwent a successful re-bubble at 1 week. All eyes had stable CAI implants and DMEK grafts remained clear at last follow-up with reduction in mean central corneal thickness (preoperative: 658±86 µm vs postoperative: 470±33 µm, p=0.005).

CONCLUSION

This pilot study highlights a feasible approach of initial anterior segment reconstruction with CAI implantation, prior to DMEK, in eyes with significant anterior segment abnormalities such as iris damage or extensive peripheral anterior synechiae and corneal decompensation.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty With a Pull-Through Insertion Device: Surgical Technique, Endothelial Cell Loss, and Early Clinical Results

PURPOSE

To describe a surgical technique for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) using a pull-through, endothelium-in insertion device, the DMEK EndoGlide. We evaluated the endothelial cell loss (ECL) associated with the EndoGlide-DMEK (E-DMEK) technique in both ex vivo and prospective clinical studies.

METHODS

The ex vivo study involved calcein acetoxymethyl staining and preparation of DMEK grafts, which were trifolded endothelium-in, loaded into the EndoGlide, pulled through, and unfolded in imaging dishes. Inverted fluorescent microscopy was performed, and ECL was quantified using trainable segmentation software. The prospective clinical series describes the outcomes of consecutive surgeries using the E-DMEK technique. Grafts were pulled through the EndoGlide with forceps and unfolded in the anterior chamber endothelium-down. Our main outcome measure was ECL in both studies.

RESULTS

In the ex vivo study with 9 human donor corneas, mean ECL was 15.2% ± 5.4% (n = 9). In our clinical series of 69 eyes, leading indications for surgery were pseudophakic/aphakic bullous keratopathy (47.8%), previous failed grafts (23.2%), and Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (18.8%). Rebubbling and primary graft failure rates related to E-DMEK were 11.6% and 1.5%, respectively. Among eyes with at least 6 months of follow-up, mean preoperative endothelial cell density was 2772 (range 2457-3448) cells/mm, and postoperative endothelial cell density was 1830 (range 541-2545) cells/mm. Mean ECL was 33.6% (range 7.5-80.4; n = 32) at the 7.1 (range 6-11) months follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The ex vivo and pilot clinical studies suggest that E-DMEK shows acceptable rates of ECL, with safe and promising early clinical outcomes.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Using a Pull-Through Technique With Novel Infusion Forceps

PURPOSE

To describe a surgical technique of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) using an endothelium-in pull-through technique with novel infusion forceps and report 6-month clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series of 33 cases with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy who underwent either DMEK alone (n = 5), DMEK combined with phacoemulsification (n = 27), or DMEK combined with intraocular lens exchange (n = 1) performed by surgeons at the beginning of the DMEK learning curve. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), manifest refraction, central corneal thickness, endothelial cell density, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and need for additional surgeries including rebubbling were evaluated through 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Preoperative BCVA was 0.37 ± 0.34 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution and improved to 0.09 ± 0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution at 6 months (P < 0.001). Eighty-two percent of eyes obtained a BCVA of 20/25 or better. Central corneal thickness decreased significantly at 6 months (P < 0.001). Endothelial cell loss was 29.1% at 6 months (available for 20 of 33 eyes). All surgeries were uneventful. Six eyes required rebubbling for graft detachments. There were no primary or secondary graft failures at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

DMEK with infusion microforceps is efficacious and safe in eyes with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy and could offer a more controlled surgery, making it suitable for both novice and experienced DMEK surgeons.

Corneal transplantation after failed grafts: Options and outcomes

Corneal transplantation is the most commonly performed human tissue transplantation procedure worldwide. Because of the large number of transplants, corneal graft failure has become one of the most common indications for corneal transplantation. The relatively recently developed lamellar transplant techniques have brought about specific potential complications leading to graft failure that may require different approaches to repeat transplantation other than penetrating keratoplasty. On the other hand, these new lamellar techniques also provide novel ways of rescuing failed penetrating grafts, with potential advantages over successive penetrating keratoplasties, such as reduced intraoperative risks and faster visual rehabilitation. We summarize the incidence and risk factors of graft failure for penetrating and lamellar (stromal and endothelial) corneal transplants and discuss the various surgical alternatives currently available to rescue such failed grafts, with a focus on the reported outcomes and limitations.

Effect of Anticoagulant Therapy on the Outcome of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To analyze the effect of anticoagulant therapy (ACT) for systemic diseases on the outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

METHODS

Consecutive eyes with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy that underwent DMEK between August 4, 2011, and July 15, 2016, were retrospectively analyzed. Data were obtained from the Cologne DMEK database at the University of Cologne, Germany. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (logMAR), endothelial cell density (at baseline and postoperatively up to 12 months), and rebubbling rates were compared between patients receiving ACT (ACT group) and those with no anticoagulant treatment (NCT group).

RESULTS

In this study, 329 eyes of 329 patients were included (ACT group n = 97, NCT group n = 232; mean age 69.9 ± 9.1 years). Bleeding was more common in the ACT group (P < 0.001). Preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 0.59 ± 0.44 and 0.48 ± 0.35 logMAR for the ACT and NCT groups, respectively, which improved to 0.13 ± 0.08 and 0.08 ± 0.16 logMAR, respectively, at 12 months postoperatively. No significant difference in endothelial cell density loss at 12 months was found between the groups (ACT group 36.2% ± 14.7%, NCT group 38.5% ± 15.1%; P = 0.467). Rebubbling rate was 19.6% in the ACT group and 28.9% in the NCT group (P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Although ACT increases the risk for preoperative and intraoperative bleeding in DMEK, there seems to be no negative effect on DMEK outcome. Thus, it is not advisable to stop ACT for DMEK surgery.

Long-Term Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Eyes with Prior Glaucoma Surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in eyes that had previously undergone trabeculectomy and/or drainage device implantation.

DESIGN

Retrospective, noncomparative case series.

METHODS

Medical records of 251 consecutive DMEK procedures performed by 1 surgeon (S.X.D.) from 2013 to 2017 were reviewed. Patients with ≥2 years of follow-up were divided into 3 groups: eyes with prior glaucoma surgery (ST), eyes with medically treated glaucoma (MT), and eyes without glaucoma (NG). Main outcomes measured were visual acuity, endothelial cell count (ECC), rates of secondary graft failure (SGF), and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Ninety procedures (87 eyes) met inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up period of all eyes was 38.4 ± 11.2 months (range, 24.2-64.4 months). At last follow-up, the proportion of eyes reaching a vision of ≥20/40 was higher than that before the DMEK procedure in each group (all P < .05). The rate of ECC loss was the highest in the ST group compared to that in the MT and NG groups (63.8% vs 47.6% vs 44.0%, respectively; P < .05) as well as the rate of SGF (41.6% vs 0% vs 2.4%, respectively; P < .05). The rate of SGF of repeat DMEK was higher than that of primary DMEK (P < .05). The rates of postoperative complications were similar among all groups (all P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In eyes with prior glaucoma surgery, DMEK achieved good long-term visual outcomes but experienced a higher rate of SGF than eyes without such comorbidity.

Risk factors for endothelial cell loss after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK)

This study aimed to identify the risk factors for endothelial cell density (ECD) loss after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and analyse whether donor tissues from cold versus organ culture differ in terms of ECD loss after DMEK. Consecutive DMEK cases from a prospective database for Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy were retrospectively analysed between 2011 and 2016 at the University of Cologne, and the possible risk factors for ECD loss, including patient-related factors, type of tamponade (air or 20% sulphur hexafluoride gas), type of surgery (triple DMEK or DMEK alone), re-bubbling, immune rejection, and donor-related factors were determined. Eight hundred and forty-one eyes were selected. There was no significant difference in the best-corrected visual acuity (logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution) and corneal thickness (P = 0.540 and P = 0.667) between groups. Immune reactions were more common in cold cultures (P = 0.019), but ECD loss (1 year after DMEK) was greater in organ cultures (38.3 ± 0.8%) than in cold cultures (34.7 ± 1.4%) (P = 0.022). Only re-bubbling was significantly associated with ECD loss (P < 0.001). Re-bubbling was found to be a key factor for ECD loss at 1 year after DMEK.

Hybrid Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (H-DMEK): results of a donor insertion pull-through technique using donor stroma as carrier

AIM

To evaluate the outcomes and complications of hybrid Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (H-DMEK) using a Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) pull-through donor inserter and donor stroma as carrier.

METHODS

This was a retrospective interventional case series of eyes with bullous keratopathy (BK) and Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD), which underwent H-DMEK, performed using a bimanual pull-through technique using DSAEK-prepared donor stroma as carrier and the EndoGlide Ultrathin DSAEK donor insertion device. Complex cases with tube shunts, trabeculectomy, aphakia, aniridia, previous vitrectomy, keratoplasty or combined with intraocular lens exchange, were also included. The outcome measures were intraoperative and postoperative complications, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and endothelial cell loss after surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 85 eyes from 79 patients, 43.5% (n=37) had BK, 28.2% (n=24) had FECD while 24.7% (n=21) had failed grafts. DMEK was performed in 37 complex eyes (43.5%). Four eyes (4.7%) required rebubbling for graft detachment and two cases of graft failure were observed. A BCVA of 20/25 or better was attained in 44.7% and 57.1% of eyes without pre-existing ocular pathology at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The overall endothelial cell loss was 32.2%±20.5% at 6 months, which improved from 37.2%±20.9% to 24.2%±17.5%, comparing the first 40 and last 45 cases (p=0.012).

CONCLUSION

Hybrid DMEK offers a controlled 'pull-through' technique of donor insertion in the 'endothelium-in' configuration, which may be useful especially in complicated eyes. More studies are needed to confirm the long-term endothelial cell loss and graft survival associated with this technique.

"Double-Bubble" Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Unfolding in Eyes With Deep Anterior Chambers and Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lenses

PURPOSE

To describe a standardized technique for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty unfolding in eyes with deep anterior chambers and anterior chamber intraocular lenses (ACIOLs).

METHODS

Two air bubbles are used simultaneously: the first placed on top of the graft and the second one underneath.

RESULTS

The 2 bubbles work in concert-the bubble on top props the tissue partially open, while the bubble underneath levitates the graft away from the ACIOL and provides support for subsequent unfolding maneuvers.

CONCLUSIONS

By sandwiching the graft between 2 bubbles, unfolding may proceed away from physical contact with the ACIOL, even in eyes with hyper-deep chambers.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To compare the long-term graft survival outcomes and complications of patients who underwent Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and bullous keratopathy (BK).

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative cohort study.

METHODS

Patients with FECD and BK who underwent DMEK (121 eyes), DSAEK (423 eyes), or PK (405 eyes) from the prospective cohort from the Singapore Corneal Transplant Registry were included. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted to compare the survival probabilities of the 3 groups. The main outcome measure was graft survival.

RESULTS

The DMEK group had the best overall cumulative graft survival of 97.4%, compared to DSAEK (78.4%) and PK (54.6%) (P < .001). In eyes with FECD, the DMEK group had the best graft survival of 98.7% compared to DSAEK (96.2%) and PK (73.5%) (P = .009). The graft survival in eyes with BK was poorer overall; however, the DMEK group still had the best graft survival of 94.7%, compared to DSAEK (65.1%) and PK (47.0%, P = .001). Eyes that underwent DMEK had the lowest rate of graft rejection (1.7% vs DSAEK 5.0% vs PK 14.1%, P < .001) and postoperative elevation of intraocular pressure (11.6% vs DSAEK 23.6% vs PK 22.5%, P = .015).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent DMEK for FECD and BK had better graft survival compared to DSAEK and PK. Eyes that underwent DMEK also had a significantly lower rate of graft rejection and elevated intraocular pressure compared to DSAEK and PK for the same indications.

How to Avoid an Upside-Down Orientation of the Graft during Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty?

Purpose

Incorrect anterior-posterior orientation of the Descemet endothelial complex (DEC) is one of the causes of failure of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). We evaluated a new marking technique to avoid such a misorientation.

Method

A new marking technique of the DEC was evaluated in patients requiring primary DMEK. A Braille-“R”-letter was applied dot by dot onto the stromal surface of the DEC after lifting it by injecting an air-bubble into the interface between the endothelial surface of the partially stripped graft. The positioning of the graft was intraoperatively controlled by an orientation of the Braille-“R”-letter. Laboratory tests were conducted to test the impact of the marking technique on endothelial cell count.

Results

We included prospectively 37 eyes of 30 patients. Four eyes were phakic and 33 pseudophakic. Five grafts (14%) presented an undifferentiated rolling tendency in the anterior chamber, and evaluation of their positioning was possible due to orientation of the mark alone. In case of an upside-down orientation, grafts were flipped immediately. A correct orientation of the graft was achieved in all cases at the end of the surgery. The endothelial cell loss due to the mark was estimated to be less than 0.3%. At 3- and 6-month follow-ups, the mean best-corrected visual acuity was 0.21 ± 0.15 and 0.15 ± 0.11 logMAR, respectively, and endothelial cell density was 1661 ± 349 and 1618 ± 396 cells/mm², respectively. Only one patient (3%) needed re-bubbling.

Conclusions

To rely on the natural rolling tendency of the graft alone does not assure its correct positioning in all cases. Creation of the mark with 4 dots punctuated on the air-lifted stromal side of the DEC is a simple and endothelial cell saving marking method to ensure correct orientation of the graft during DMEK.

Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy and corneal endothelial diseases: East meets West

Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is amongst one of the most common indications for endothelial keratoplasty worldwide. Despite being originally described among Caucasians, it is now known to be prevalent among a large number of populations, including Asians. While the FECD phenotype is classically described as that of central guttate and pigment deposits associated with corneal endothelial dysfunction, there are subtle yet important differences in how FECD and its phenocopies may present in Caucasians vs Asians. Such differences are paralled by genotypic variations and disease management preferences which appear to be geographically and ethnically delineated. This article provides a succinct review of such differences, with a focus on diagnostic and management issues which may be encountered by ophthalmologists practicing in the different geographic regions, when evaluating a patient with FECD.

Clinical Outcomes of Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts With Endothelium Tri-Folded Inwards

PURPOSE

To evaluate the initial outcomes and complications of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) using donor tissues tri-folded with the endothelium inwards, preloaded at the Eye Bank, and delivered with bimanual pull-through technique.

DESIGN

Prospective, noncomparative, interventional case series.

METHODS

Setting: Eye bank and tertiary care eye department.

PATIENT POPULATION

Forty-six consecutive eyes of 41 patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy with or without cataract operated between November 2016 and March 2017.

INTERVENTION

DMEK tissues prepared with SCUBA technique and punched to a diameter of 8.25 mm were preloaded with the endothelium tri-folded inwards in an intraocular lens (IOL) cartridge with a 2.2-mm opening filled with the same tissue culture medium contained in the vial used for shipment to the surgeon. Standardized DMEK was performed as a single procedure (n = 15) or in combination with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation (n = 31) within 48 hours from preparation using a bimanual pull-through technique.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Preparation and surgical times, intraoperative and postoperative complications, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), and graft detachment rate.

RESULTS

Preparation time averaged 26.2 ± 4.1 minutes (range 17-36 minutes), while the surgical time from opening of the stoppers to air fill of the anterior chamber never exceeded 9 minutes (range 3-9 minutes). Surgery was uneventful in all cases. Postoperative complications included graft detachment in 9 of 46 cases (19.6%), successfully managed in all cases by single rebubbling within 6 days from surgery, and glaucoma irresponsive to conservative treatment in 1 of 46 cases (2.1%). In all eyes without comorbidities (35 of 40 eyes) BSCVA was 20/25 (0.097 logMAR) or better as early as 3 months after surgery. Six months postoperatively, ECD was available in 24 of 25 eyes with an endothelial cell loss calculated as a percentage of the preoperative value determined at the eye bank (ranging from 2500 to 2800 cells/mm²) of 29.5% ± 14.8% (range 8.3%-52.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Delivering a preloaded DMEK tissue, tri-folded with the endothelium inwards, minimizes surgical time and costs without negatively affecting the outcomes of the procedure.

Measuring Endothelial Cell Loss on DMEK Grafts After Transplantation in Human Cadaveric Whole Eyes: Description of the Technique and Pilot Study

PURPOSE

To describe a novel method for analyzing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft damage after implantation into human cadaveric donor eyes and to compare results achieved by performing DMEK with a surgeon's long-established technique compared with those of an unfamiliar technique.

METHODS

Eight DMEK grafts were implanted into previously frozen human cadaveric eyes. Four grafts were implanted using a Straiko injector and tap technique familiar to the surgeon (C.S.S., 3-yr experience), and 4 grafts were implanted using the Tan EndoGlide and "donor mat device" pull-through technique new to the surgeon. After implanting a DMEK graft and attaching it to the recipient stroma with an air bubble tamponade, the corneoscleral cap was "recovered" from the cadaveric globe using standard techniques. The DMEK graft was stained with Calcein-AM. After staining, a 9.5-mm stromal "carrier button" was punched, and the carrier and graft were transferred to a microscope slide. Grafts were imaged and analyzed using FIJI trainable segmentation.

RESULTS

Donor graft characteristics were similar between both groups. Grafts implanted using the surgeon's routine technique showed an average endothelial cell loss (ECL) of 31% ± 4% (n = 3). Grafts implanted using the technique unfamiliar to the surgeon showed an average ECL of 47% ± 24%, but with a trend toward improvement (1 = 76%, 2 = 65%, 3 = 32%, 4 = 17% ECL).

CONCLUSIONS

Our proof-of-principle experiment shows that this imaging approach enables quantification of ECL caused by different instruments and surgical techniques after graft implantation. We have used this method to visualize the learning curve of 1 surgeon when learning a new surgical technique.

Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Vitrectomized Eyes with Sutured Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for vitrectomized eyes that underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and transscleral-sutured intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

Methods

In this retrospective study, DMEK cases were reviewed from medical records and divided into two groups: the eyes after PPV and transscleral-sutured IOL implantation (vitrectomized group) and the eyes with in-the-bag IOL implantation (control group) prior to DMEK. The main outcome measures included time of graft unfolding during surgery and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and endothelial cell density (ECD) at 1, 3, and 6 months after the DMEK.

Results

Twenty-three eyes (vitrectomized group, n = 8; control group, n = 15) in 23 patients were included in this study. The unfolding time was significantly longer in the vitrectomized group than in the control group (P < 0.001). Postoperative BSCVA was worse in the vitrectomized group (0.16 ± 0.15) than in the control group (−0.06 ± 0.06; P = 0.017). The improvement in BSCVA was negatively correlated with the patients' age and frequency of previous surgeries.

Conclusions

Despite the longer graft unfolding time and limited visual recovery, DMEK should be applicable to vitrectomized eyes with transscleral-sutured IOL implantation.

Rescue technique for a partially expulsed descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft

Purpose

To describe a novel surgical technique to rescue a partially expulsed DMEK graft after insertion.

Observations

We present a case of a 66-year-old woman with visually significant Fuchs endothelial dystrophy who underwent a DMEK surgery complicated by partial expulsion of the DMEK graft during insertion. To rescue the graft, MicroSurgical Technology (MST) forceps were inserted through a nasal paracentesis to grasp the DMEK graft and redirect it back into the anterior chamber. The surgical technique and postoperative outcomes are described. The partially expulsed graft was centered and attached successfully during surgery. Postoperatively, the patient required two rebubbling procedures, but achieved best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 vision 1 month after surgery.

Conclusions

and Importance: We describe an underreported complication and present a novel rescue technique for a partially expulsed DMEK graft that is effective and minimizes manipulation of the graft.

Long-term Visual Outcomes Comparing Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To compare 5-year visual acuity and refraction outcome in Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) or bullous keratopathy (BK) in Asian eyes.

DESIGN

Prospective interventional case series.

METHODS

We analyzed 828 consecutive cases of DSAEK (423) or PK (405) for FED and BK from the Singapore Cornea Transplant Registry performed from 1991 to 2011. Our main outcome measures were best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) with astigmatism (cylinder) and spherical equivalent (SE) over 5 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean age was 67.5 ± 11.5 years (50.1% male, 49.9% female) and majority was Chinese (76.6%, n = 634) in our multiracial Asian population. DSAEK eyes had significantly better BSCVA (P < .001-.037) with lower SE (P < .001-.017) and cylinder (P < .001), independent of surgical indication, compared to PK over 5 years. DSAEK was superior to PK over 5 years (P < .001-.026) in FED, but only over 3 years in BK (P < .001-.031). DSAEK in FED eyes had significantly better BSCVA compared to BK eyes (P = .006 at 4-year follow-up). DSAEKs with preoperative BSCVA < 1.3 logMAR had significantly better visual outcomes than cases with ≥ 1.3 logMAR (P < .001-.042). PKs had significantly higher postoperative refractive correction than DSAEKs, with no significant influence of the surgery indication.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study cohort, DSAEK provided significantly better long-term BSCVA and lower astigmatism than PK over 5 years of follow-up. Visual outcomes of DSAEK for FED were better than BK. In some analyses for years 1-3, analysis of covariance adjustment indicated that this DSAEK-associated better long-term BSCVA was independent of better preoperative vision in DSAEK eyes.

Techniques for Learning Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Eyes of Asian Patients With Shallow Anterior Chamber

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Purpose:

To describe several essential surgical techniques that overcome difficulties in performing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for inexperienced surgeons, especially those who perform DMEK on eyes of Asian patients.

Methods:

Nine eyes of 9 Asian patients with bullous keratopathy who underwent DMEK were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were given a diuretic such as d-mannitol or acetazolamide shortly before surgery, with retrobulbar anesthesia and a Nadbath facial nerve block. Core vitrectomy before DMEK was performed in several cases in which a high vitreous pressure during surgery was predicted. The donor graft was stained with trypan blue, and a 25-G anterior chamber maintenance cannula was used to maintain the anterior chamber depth during graft insertion in all eyes.

Results:

The cornea became clear in all eyes. The best spectacle-corrected visual acuity had improved significantly 6 months after the surgery compared with preoperative values (P = 0.026). The corneal endothelial cell density was 1371 cells per square millimeter at postoperative 6 months.

Conclusions:

Although DMEK is technically difficult, especially for inexperienced surgeons who operate on eyes of Asian patients, controlling anterior chamber pressure using various manipulations may help to prevent iatrogenic primary graft failure and lead to successful DMEK.

Use of four asymmetric marks to orient the donor graft during Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty

Introduction

Maintaining the correct orientation of the donor graft is important during Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). We describe a new method of marking the donor graft prior to DMEK.

Methods

Twelve eyes of 10 patients with bullous keratopathy who underwent DMEK were retrospectively analysed. Donor discs were created by stripping the endothelium-Descemet's membrane layer from corneoscleral buttons. Four semicircular marks, two 1.0 mm and two 1.5 mm in diameter, were created at the edge of the donor disc. The small and large marks were paired. Each donor graft was inserted into the anterior chamber, unfolded and attached to the posterior corneal stroma with an air bubble.

Results

The inserted grafts were all appropriately orientated when attached to the back surfaces of the corneas. The two pairs of asymmetric marks afforded valuable guidance. Even when the graft was partially folded or decentred, and one pair of marks was obscured, the other pair was always visible to indicate graft orientation. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity improved significantly in all patients (p<0.001). Compared with the preoperative endothelial cell density of the donor graft, that of the corneal endothelium had decreased 44.0%±10.0% by 6 months after surgery.

Conclusions

Two pairs of asymmetrical semicircular marks placed on the edge of the donor graft allowed appropriate graft orientation during DMEK.

Chandelier Illumination for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To describe a simple technique that uses posterior chandelier illumination during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in cases of severe bullous keratopathy (BK).

METHODS

Five eyes of 4 patients with advanced BK undergoing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty were retrospectively analyzed. The pupil of the host eye was not treated with mydriatic or miotic agents. The chandelier illuminator was inserted transconjunctivally into the vitreous cavity from the pars plana.

RESULTS

In all eyes, BK was secondary to laser iridotomy, which was performed for prevention or treatment of angle closure glaucoma. The implanted graft was clearly confirmed in the anterior chamber using activated chandelier illumination. The graft was immediately attached to the host cornea, with eventual healing of BK in all eyes. No complication involving insertion or removal of the 25-gauge trocar and the chandelier illuminator was observed. No vision-threatening complication was observed in any of the 5 eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

The chandelier illuminator provided good visibility of the anterior chamber and enhanced the safety of surgery by preventing formation of an inverted graft.

Use of Brilliant Blue G in Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

Vital staining of the endothelial graft is essential during Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) to ensure surgical success. DMEK surgeons worldwide commonly use trypan blue (TB) to this end. However, TB may exert toxic effects on both the cornea and retina. Recently, Brilliant Blue G (BBG) has become recognized as an alternative stain for use during vitreoretinal surgery; BBG is associated with lower levels of toxicity. We retrospectively analyzed the utility of BBG staining during DMEK. We used 0.1% (w/v) BBG to stain the DMEK grafts of 12 patients. We evaluated the best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and endothelial cell density (ECD) before and 3 and 6 months after surgery. BBG was effective in terms of graft visualization during DMEK. The BSCVA (log  MAR) improved from 0.99 ± 0.57 to 0.01 ± 0.07 (p < 0.05). The CCT decreased from 720.3 ± 58.1 μm preoperatively to 511.5 ± 50.6 μm at 6 months postoperatively (p = 0.0001). The ECD decreased from 2,754 ± 296 cells/mm² to 1,708 ± 426 cells/mm² at 6 months postoperatively (p < 0.001). The ECD loss was 37.9 ± 16.3%. The outcomes using BBG were comparable to those of earlier reports that employed TB; thus, BBG may be a viable alternative to TB.