Comparison Over Time of Vault in Chinese Eyes Receiving Implantable Contact Lenses With or Without a Central Hole

Development and Validation of Data-Level Innovation Data-Balancing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Optimal Implantable Collamer Lens Size and Postoperative Vault

INTRODUCTION

There are only four sizes of implantable collamer lens (ICL) available for selection, which cannot completely fit all patients as a result of the discontinuity of ICL sizes. Sizing an optimal ICL and predicting postoperative vault are still unresolved problems. This study aimed to develop and validate innovative data-level data-balancing machine learning-based models for predicting ICL size and postoperative vault.

METHODS

The patients were randomly assigned to training and internal validation sets in a 4:1 ratio. Feature selection was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal-Wallis feature importance methods. Traditional linear regression model and machine learning-based models were used. The accuracy of models was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) and confusion matrix.

RESULTS

A total of 564 patients (1127 eyes) were eligible for this study, consisting of 808 eyes in the training set, 202 eyes in the internal validation set, and 117 eyes in the external validation set. Compared with the traditional linear regression method, the machine learning model bagging tree showed the best performance for ICL size selection, with an accuracy of 84.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 83.2-85.8%), and the AUC ranged from 0.88 to 0.99; the prediction accuracy of 12.1 mm and 13.7 mm ICL sizes was improved by 49% and 59%, respectively. The bagging tree model achieved the best accuracy [90.2%, (95% CI 88.9-91.5%)] for predicting the postoperative vault, and the AUC ranged from 0.90 to 0.94. The prediction accuracies of internal and external validation dataset for ICL sizing were 82.2% (95% CI 81.1-83.3%) and 82.1% (95% CI 81.1-83.1%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The innovative data-level data balancing-based machine learning model can be used to predict ICL size and postoperative vault more accurately, which can assist surgeons in choosing optimal ICL size, thus reducing risks of postoperative complications and secondary surgery.

EVO/EVO+ Visian Implantable Collamer Lenses for the correction of myopia and myopia with astigmatism

INTRODUCTION

Intraocular lens implantation in phakic eyes for the correction of refractive error is currently a widespread procedure. The EVO and EVO+ Visian Implantable Collamer Lenses (ICL) are two of the most prevalent lenses implanted. They incorporate a central orifice to avoid the need for iridotomy. The main difference between both ICL is the higher optical diameter zone provided by the EVO+, allowing a better quality of vision at night. This review aims to provide an overview of the current ICL models available for correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism.

AREAS COVERED

During the last decade, more than 100 scientific papers analyzing the performance of EVO and EVO+ lenses have been published. This review describes the objective visual performance achieved with the implantation of central hole ICL lenses and the subjective perception of the patients implanted with these lenses. In addition, the safety and the potential complications associated with undergoing an EVO and EVO+ ICL implantation have been addressed.

EXPERT OPINION

Refractive surgeons and candidates to undergo ICL implantation should be aware of the excellent safety and visual outcomes provided by the implantation of central hole ICL lenses. However, future research could address minor issues currently not resolved.

Posterior-Chamber Phakic Implantable Collamer Lenses with and without a Central Hole: A Comparative Study

Purpose

 This study aimed to compare the short-term outcome of implanting the Visian implantable collamer lens V4 ICL versus the Visian V4c ICL in patients with moderate and high myopia.

Patients and Methods

 This is a retrospective that was conducted on patients with moderate or high myopia who were scheduled for ICL implantation at our institution, Patients who underwent V4 ICL implantation with peripheral iridectomy were assigned to group A, and those who underwent V4c ICL implantation without peripheral iridectomy were assigned to group B. In group A, a preoperative peripheral iridectomy was performed. In group B, the patients received cycloplegic and dilating agents. The patients underwent a complete ocular examination preoperatively and during the follow-up visits that were conducted at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

Results

This study included 214 eyes from 107 patients; group A included 110 eyes, and group B included 104 eyes. Postoperatively, the UCVA and BCVA showed statistically significant improvement across the follow-up time points (p<0.001), with no significant difference between the two groups. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in the mean achieved correction or the residual refraction. Both groups showed a strong correlation between the target and the achieved correction, with R2 = 0.99 in the two groups. No significant difference was found between the two groups in the IOP across all time measures. However, the intraocular pressure showed a statistically significant postoperative increase in group A (p=0.004), and no significant change in group B (p=0.817). There was a downward slope in the vaults of both groups across time, with significant variation in the last follow-up measure compared to the 3-month measure in the two groups (p<0.001). No significant difference was found between the two groups across all time measures.

Conclusion

The current study adds new evidence concerning the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of ICL V4c implantation for the treatment of moderate and high myopia, with safer postoperative IOP.

Inter-eye and postoperative prediction of vault after implantation of EVO + Visian phakic implantable collamer lens

PURPOSE

To assess whether the postoperative outcomes of the implantation of an EVO + implantable collamer lens (ICL) in one eye can be used as a predictor of the vault of the fellow eye, and to evaluate the vault changes of the implantation in both eyes during the postoperative period.

METHODS

A prospective study including 40 eyes of 20 patients with a bilateral EVO + ICL implantation was performed. Subjects were evaluated before the surgery and 1 day, 1 week and 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Central vault was assessed using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. The inter-eye and follow-up analyses were performed using lineal models and the Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

The vault of the first implanted eye at the 1-day visit highly predicts the vault of the second eye (R² = .87; P < .001); the mean inter-eye difference was - 0.95 μm, and the superior and inferior limits of agreement were -50.27 μm and 148.37 μm, respectively. This relationship was maintained during the medium-term follow-up, not finding differences in the slopes among visits (P ≥ .09). A progressive decrease of vault was found during the follow-up (P < .001). Larger vault change 6 months after the surgery was associated with higher vault 1 day after the ICL implantation (R² = .19;P = .005).

CONCLUSION

One-day postoperative vault in the first eye can help to predict the optimal ICL sizing in the second eye. Vault tends to decrease during the first 6 months after EVO + ICL implantation. Eyes with higher initial vaults will also show larger reductions during the medium-term follow-up.

Factors leading to realignment or exchange after implantable collamer lens implantation in 10 258 eyes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence, causes, and outcomes of implantable collamer lens (ICL) realignment or exchange after implantation of the EVO-ICL.

SETTING

Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, China.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

The study included 10 258 consecutive eyes after ICL implantation. Preoperative refractive and biometric measurements were compared between eyes with and without realignment or exchange. For eyes with ICL realignment or exchange, visual and biometric outcomes were also compared before and after ICL realignment or exchange.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of ICL realignment or exchange was 0.21% 22 eyes. 12 eyes (0.12%) underwent ICL realignment by axis rotation (10 eyes) or ICL exchange (2 eyes) due to toric ICL (TICL) misalignment. After realignment, uncorrected distance visual acuity improved, and residual cylinder decreased from -1.75 ± 0.48 diopters (D) to -0.87 ± 0.59 D ( P = .01). 10 eyes (0.10%) underwent vertical rotation of ICL (3 eyes) or ICL exchange (7 eyes) due to excessive vault. After either vertical rotation or ICL exchange, vault decreased significantly ( P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ICL realignment or exchange after ICL implantation is low. TICL misalignment and excessive vault are 2 main causes. Implant exchange may be performed for excessive vault or misalignment with an insufficient vault. In addition, vertical rotation of an ICL may be a less invasive method to treat excessive vault in certain cases.

Safety and anterior chamber structure of evolution implantable Collamer lens implantation with short white-to-white corneal diameters

Introduction

To evaluate the safety and anterior chamber structure of implantation of the Evolution (EVO) implantable Collamer lens (EVO-ICL) in patients with short white-to-white (WTW) corneal diameters.

Materials and methods

The study population was divided into two groups: the experimental group (34 eyes of 34 patients) with WTW corneal diameters of ≤10.6 mm and the control group (59 eyes of 59 patients) with WTW corneal diameters of >10.6 mm. The outcome measures included uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, refractive power, intraocular pressure (IOP), anterior chamber angle, depth, volume, and vault.

Results

The safety indices of the experimental and control groups were 1.17 ± 0.30 and 1.12 ± 0.14, respectively (P > 0.05); the effectiveness indices were 1.16 ± 0.31 and 1.07 ± 0.17, respectively (P > 0.05). The simulation curves of the expected and actual corrections in the experimental and control groups were y = 0.9876x – 0.0927 and y = 0.9799x + 0.0343, respectively. There were no significant differences between the IOPs and anterior chamber structures of the two groups (P > 0.05). The average vaults of the experimental and control groups were 395.76 ± 155.32 and 389.49 ± 135.01 μm, respectively (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

EVO-ICL implantation in patients with short WTW corneal diameters (≤ 10.6 mm) was determined to be a safe, effective, and predictable method for correcting myopia. The changes in the anterior chamber structure were still within normal limits after the surgery, the IOP remained stable, and the ideal vault was achieved after the surgery.

Posterior-chamber phakic implantable collamer lenses with a central port: a review

We aimed to summarize the outcomes reported following the implantation of the V4c implantable collamer lens with a central port (ICL, STAAR Surgical Inc) for myopia correction. A literature search in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus was carried out to identify publications reporting clinical outcomes of patients who were implanted with the V4c ICL model and had a follow‐up period of at least 6 months. A total of 35 clinical studies published between 2012 and 2020 were included in the present review. A comprehensive analysis of the available data was performed, focusing on visual and refractive outcomes at different time‐points post‐surgery. In addition, adverse events and other parameters such as endothelial cell density, intraocular pressure and vault measurements—which were evaluated in some of the studies—were also compared. This review encompassed a total of 2904 eyes. The outcomes reported in this review lead us to conclude that ICL V4c implantation for myopia correction is a safe and efficient procedure, with stable visual and refractive outcomes and low adverse event rates. The patient’s anterior segment should be thoroughly characterized, and the ICL parameters should be carefully selected so as to achieve good outcomes and avoid complications.

Comparison of anterior chamber angle changes following phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole implantation for moderate to high myopic eyes

The aim of this study was to compare the anterior chamber angle changes after implantation of phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole for moderate to high myopic eyes in Chinese people.This study enrolled 106 eyes of 54 people with intraocular lens V4 implantation and 105 eyes of 53 people with intraocular lens V4c implantation. Postoperative vault, intraocular pressure, and anterior chamber angle changes were assessed using noncontract tonometer and ultrasound biomicroscope, respectively, at 1, 3, 6, and 12months after the surgery.There were no significant differences (all P > .05) between the 2 groups in the depth of the central vault, intraocular pressure, or the width of anterior chamber angle at any time point post-surgery. The anterior chamber angle width in degree had a baseline of 54.40 ± 10.51 in V4c group, and decreased to 27.80 ± 5.62, 26.95 ± 5.56, 27.32 ± 5.66, 27.04 ± 5.47 at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery, respectively. Mean preoperative value of 50.62 ± 11.77 decreased to 27.28 ± 6.53, 26.82 ± 6.03, 26.61 ± 5.80, 26.83 ± 5.76 at 1, 3, 6, 12 months, respectively, in V4 group. It had sufficient evidence (P < .001) that anterior chamber angle will narrow done after surgery, but there were no statistically significant differences within groups at any time point after surgery.The anterior chamber angle changes of the V4c group was essentially equivalent to that of conventional V4 group, although implantation of both models will lead to the decrease in anterior chamber angle width.

Influence of refractive error on pupil diameters in highly myopic eyes with implantable collamer lenses

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of refractive error on pupil diameters in highly myopic eyes with implantable collamer lenses.

SETTING

Shanghai, China.

DESIGN

A prospective consecutive observational study.

METHODS

Sixty-six eyes of 66 patients that underwent ICL V4c implantation were included. Pupil diameters before and 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery were measured using an automatic pupillometry system (MonCv3; Metrovision, Pérenchies, France) under four standardized illumination conditions: 0, 1, 10, and 100 cd/m². The correlations between changes in pupil diameter and spherical equivalent values and patient age were investigated.

RESULTS

Based on preoperative spherical equivalent values, included eyes were divided into a high-myopia group (-6.3 to -9.9 D (diopters)) and a super-high-myopia group (-10 to -20 D). Pupil sizes remained unchanged after surgery in the high-myopia group and decreased at 1 and 10 cd/m² in the super-high-myopia group. A between-group comparison showed that pupils were significantly smaller in the super-high-myopia group 1 week postoperatively under all illumination conditions and remained smaller at 1 month and 3 months under 1 and 10 cd/m² lighting conditions. Preoperative spherical equivalent values were significantly correlated with the percent decrease in pupil diameter 1 week postoperatively under 0, 1, and 10 cd/m² illumination conditions; the greater the degree of myopia, the greater the reduction in pupil diameter.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative refractive error significantly affects pupil diameter in highly myopic eyes after implantable collamer lens implantation. Pupils of super highly myopic eyes remained smaller than preoperative levels under mesopic conditions after implantable collamer lens implantation.

Visual outcomes of Visian ICL implantation for high myopia in patients with shallow anterior chamber depth

Background

High myopia with shallow anterior chamber depth (ACD less than 2.8 mm) is not rare. This observational study aims to evaluate visual outcomes after implantation of the Visian Implantable Collamer Lens with a central hole (ICL V4c) in these patients.

Methods

A prospective cohort of consecutive 51 eyes of 31 patients (20 to 42 years old) was followed for at least 12 months (average 15.35 ± 4.90 months, rangers from 12 to 25 months). The preoperative ACD was 2.74 ± 0.04 mm (2.65 to 2.79 mm). Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), manifest refraction, vault, and endothelial cell density (ECD) were measured during the follow-ups after surgery.

Results

All surgeries were performed safely and no complication was observed during the follow-ups. At the last follow-up, the safety index (postoperative CDVA / preoperative CDVA) was 1.33 ± 0.60 and the efficacy index (postoperative UDVA / preoperative CDVA) was 1.14 ± 0.54. After the surgery, no eye had decreased CDVA and 59% (30 eyes) of the eyes gained at least one line. Forty-seven eyes (92%) were within ±1.0 D and 35 eyes (69%) were within ±0.5 D of the attempted refraction. The mean postoperative vault was 380.00 ± 152.84 μm (90 to 700 μm). The ECD was reduced by 8.38 ± 0.06% as compared to the preoperative value (p < 0.001). No significant change was observed in IOP (p = 0.061) at the last follow-up. Ultrasound Biomicroscopy (UBM) showed none of the eyes had trabecular-iris angle closed.

Conclusions

In this prospective observational study, ICL V4c implantation in patients with high myopia and shallow ACD achieved satisfying and stable visual outcomes. Its long-term safety and stability require further investigation.

Trial registration

This trial was retrospectively registered on 05/08/2018 under the number (ChiCTR1800017594).

The effect of mydriasis on moderate-to-high myopic eyes with implantable collamer lenses V4 and V4c

PURPOSE

To evaluate the vault change and anterior segment movement induced by mydriasis in moderate-to-high myopic eyes with implantable collamer lenses (ICL).

SETTING

Shanghai, China.

DESIGN

A prospective consecutive observational study.

METHODS

A total of 45 eyes of 24 patients with ICL V4 implantation and 128 eyes of 65 patients with ICL V4c implantation were included and analyzed. Anterior chamber depth, posterior corneal endothelium-to-ICL distance, and vault before and after mydriasis were measured by Pentacam (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Significant vault increases and anterior chamber depth increases induced by mydriasis were noted in both ICL V4 and V4c groups at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. The corneal endothelium-ICL distance increased significantly in eyes with implanted ICL V4c after mydriasis at 3 and 6 months. Moreover, mydriasis-induced vault increases were greater in the ICL V4 group than in the ICL V4c group at 3 and 6 months. In eyes with implanted ICL V4c, mydriasis-induced vault increases were significantly greater at 1 month than at 3 and 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Mydriasis results in a general vault increase in eyes with implanted ICLs. The adjustment of the pressure equilibrium via the central hole of the ICL V4c has an important role in vault change. The mydriasis-induced vault increases tend toward stability after 3 months postoperatively. Mydriasis is relatively safe in eyes with ICL implantation.

The Implantable Collamer Lens with a central port: review of the literature

The purpose of this review is to summarize preclinical and clinical data from publications appearing in the peer-reviewed scientific literature relevant to the safety and effectiveness of the EVO Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) posterior chamber phakic refractive lens with a central port (V4c Visian ICL with KS Aquaport, STAAR Surgical, Inc.). A literature search was conducted using PubMed.gov to identify all articles relating to the EVO ICL. Articles were examined for their relevance, and the references cited in each article were also searched for additional relevant publications. On the basis of a total of 67 preclinical studies and clinical reports, including effectiveness data on 1,905 eyes with average weighted follow-up of 12.5 months and safety data on 4,196 eyes with weighted average follow up of 14.0 months, the EVO ICL is safe and effective for the correction of a broad range of refractive errors. High levels of postoperative uncorrected visual acuity, refractive predictability, and stability demonstrate the effectiveness of the EVO ICL. Safety data suggest reduced rates of anterior subcapsular cataract and pupillary block compared with earlier models. Improved safety and proven effectiveness make EVO an attractive option for surgeons and patients.

Buffering zone of implantable Collamer lens sizing in V4c

Background

The purpose of this study was to identify factors related to the unexpected vault in V4c implantable collamer lens (ICL; STAAR Surgical) implantation.

Methods

V4c ICLs were implanted in 43 eyes of 43 patients for the correction of myopia. The implanted V4c ICL sizes were determined individually with our previous V4 ICL sizing nomogram based on the sulcus-to-sulcus diameter (STS), and the V4 ICL sizes were then converted to V4c ICL sizes with a size-converting table. We defined the “normal-sizing group” as having a pre-converted ICL size larger than the STS, and the “under-sizing group” as having a pre-converted ICL size smaller than the STS. Refractive outcomes, safety and parameters related to postoperative vault were compared between the two groups.

Results

The value of “actual ICL size – STS” differed significantly between the normal-sizing and under-sizing groups (p < 0.001), but postoperative vault did not differ significantly (p = 0.442). The demographics, implanted ICL characteristics, effectiveness indexes, safety indexes, and parameters related to postoperative vault did not differ significantly between the two groups (p > 0.05). Two patients in the normal-sizing group exhibited over-vaulting; these patients had shallow anterior chambers and were implanted with high-dioptric-power ICLs.

Conclusions

The achievement of acceptable vault in both normal-sizing and under-sizing groups indicates the existence of a buffering zone in V4c ICL sizing. The smaller size of V4c ICLs should be considered in patients susceptible to over-vaulting, such as those with shallow anterior chambers and high-dioptric-power ICLs.