No Light Perception Outcomes Following Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1 Surgery

[Long-term visual outcomes of Boston type I keratoprosthesis in Canada]

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

To evaluate long-term visual outcomes of Boston type I keratoprosthesis (KPro) surgery and identify risk factors for visual failure.

METHODS

Single surgeon retrospective cohort study including 85 eyes of 74 patients who underwent KPro implantation to treat severe ocular surface disease, including limbal stem cell deficiency, postinfectious keratitis, aniridia and chemical burns. Procedures were performed at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal from October 2008 to May 2012. All patients with at least 5 years of follow-up were included in the analysis, including eyes with repeated KPro. Main outcome measures were visual acuity (VA), visual failure, defined as a sustained VA worse than the preoperative VA, postoperative complications, and device retention.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 7.2±1.3 years (±SD). Mean VA was 2.1±0.7 (logarithm of minimal angle resolution) preoperatively and 1.9±1.2 at last follow-up. In total, 2.4% of patients had VA better than 20/200 preoperatively vs. 36.5% at last follow-up. Maintenance of improved postoperative VA was seen in 61.8% of eyes at 7 years. Preoperative factors associated with visual failure were known history of glaucoma (HR=2.7 [1.2 to 5.9], P=0.02) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (HR=7.3 [2.5 to 21.4], P<0.01). Cumulative 8-year complication rates were 38.8% retroprosthetic membrane formation, 25.9% hypotony, 23.5% new onset glaucoma, 17.6% retinal detachment, 8.2% device extrusion and 5.9% endophthalmitis. The majority (91.8%) of eyes retained the device 8 years after implantation.

CONCLUSION

Nearly two-thirds of patients exhibited improved VA 7 years after KPro implantation. Preoperative risk factors for visual failure were known glaucoma and Stevens-Johnson syndrome.

The Boston Keratoprosthesis-The First 50 Years: Some Reminiscences

Millions of people worldwide are bilaterally blind due to corneal diseases including infectious etiologies, trauma, and chemical injuries. While corneal transplantation can successfully restore sight in many, corneal graft survival decreases in eyes with chronic inflammation and corneal vascularization. Additionally, the availability of donor cornea material can be limited, especially in underdeveloped countries where corneal blindness may also be highly prevalent. Development of methods to create and implant an artificial cornea (keratoprosthesis)may be the only option for patients whose eye disease is not suitable for corneal transplantation or who live in regions where corneal transplantation is not possible. The Boston keratoprosthesis (B-KPro) is the most commonly implanted keratoprosthesis worldwide, having restored vision in thousands of patients. This article describes the initial design of the B-KPro and the modifications that have been made over many years. Additionally, some of the complications of surgical implantation and long-term care challenges, particularly complicating inflammation and glaucoma, are discussed. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Vision Science, Volume 8 is September 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

The treatment of end-stage corneal disease: penetrating keratoplasty compared with Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis

Penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) yields excellent results for restoring vision in end-stage corneal diseases. However, its success is limited to high-risk diseases such as aniridia, chemical burns, autoimmune corneal diseases, and herpetic eye disease. Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (BKPro) offers another option to these patients. Since 1992, improvements in perioperative management and device construction have significantly increased the use of BKPro worldwide and challenged the therapeutic role of PKP in these patients. This review aims to evaluate BKPro's place in the treatment algorithm of these high-risk patients to assist surgeons' decision-making. PKP and BKPro are compared in three outcome categories: visual acuity, graft retention and failure, and complications profile. Special attention is given to comparing secondary BKPro versus repeated PKP as well as primary BKPro versus primary PKP. We conclude that secondary BKPro bears a better prognosis than repeated PKP in most high-risk patients. Similarly, primary BKPro likely confers improved outcomes over primary PKP in most high-risk recipients. However, current evidence is based on retrospective designs, and controlled prospective randomized trials are required to validate these conclusions.

Assessment of the Role and Timing of Glaucoma Surgery in Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1 Patients

PURPOSE

To determine the role and optimal timing of glaucoma surgery in relation to Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 (KPro) implantation.

DESIGN

Retrospective, comparative, nonrandomized clinical study.

METHODS

Single-center study of a total of 100 eyes (100 patients) implanted with a KPro between 2008 and 2017, and diagnosed with glaucoma before or after KPro. Patients were separated into 2 groups: those with preexisting glaucoma and those who developed de novo glaucoma after KPro. Groups were then divided based on whether patients were medically or surgically managed. Glaucoma surgery included glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation, trabeculectomy, and cyclophotocoagulation (CPC). Primary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), glaucoma progression, and complications. Differences in outcomes were compared using parametric and nonparametric tests, as well as log-rank test to compare time-to-outcome events.

RESULTS

Among 72 eyes with preexisting glaucoma, 27 (38%) had glaucoma surgery before KPro (18 GDD), whereas 45 (62%) were medically managed only. Among the latter, 19 (42%) needed glaucoma surgery post-KPro (16 GDD). Among 28 eyes with de novo glaucoma, 12 (43%) had glaucoma surgery post-KPro (9 GDD). For eyes with preexisting glaucoma, glaucoma progression was greater with glaucoma surgery performed post-KPro (100%) compared with pre-KPro (74%, P = .016) and to medical management (54%, P = .002). No increase in complications were observed with glaucoma surgery compared to medications only (P > .05), whereas fewer eyes maintained a BCVA of 20/200 or better over time with medical management (P = .013). Eyes with de novo glaucoma had similar progression, BCVA, and complications between medical and surgical care (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Glaucoma surgery should be performed before or at the same time as KPro implantation in eyes with preexisting glaucoma. Complication rates are not increased when glaucoma surgery is performed in KPro eyes with either preexisting or de novo glaucoma. To ensure optimal glaucoma control, glaucoma surgery should be performed as early as possible in KPro eyes with good visual potential.

Reliability of Several Glaucoma Tests in Patients With Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis

PURPOSE

Managing glaucoma after Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro) surgery remains challenging. We herein assessed the fitness of commonly used clinical tests to evaluate glaucoma in KPro eyes versus eyes with penetrating keratoplasty (PK) as controls.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with KPro and 14 patients with PK tested in an identical manner. After the 10-2 visual field with size V stimulus, intraocular pressure (IOP) was estimated with palpation by the first observer. Then, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness analysis was performed twice using optical coherence tomography by an ophthalmic photographer, before and after a short break. After the second observer estimated the IOP, the visual field was repeated. Finally, color photographs of the optic disk were captured by an ophthalmic photographer. The cup-to-disk ratio was assessed by 2 masked observers, at 2 different time points, in a random manner. Agreements between and within observers and reliability of repeated measurements were evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

Inter-rater agreement of palpation IOP estimate was moderate for eyes with KPro (ICC = 0.47) and fair for eyes with PK (ICC = 0.27). Visual field and RNFL thickness showed high test-retest reliability in both KPro and PK eyes (ICC > 0.80 for both). Inter-rater agreement of cup-to-disk ratio assessments was substantial in eyes with both KPro (ICC = 0.62) and PK (ICC = 0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

The 10-2 visual field and RNFL thickness seem sufficiently repeatable and might allow the detection of glaucoma progression in KPro eyes. Such testing is important, given limited inter-rater agreement regarding the palpation IOP estimate.

Aniridia and the ocular surface: Medical and surgical problems and solutions

Congenital aniridia is a multisystemic genetic disease due to a mutation in PAX6 gene which severely affects the development and functionality of the human eyes. In patients affected by the mutation, aside from the absence or defects of iris tissue formation, abnormalities in position or opacities of the crystalline lens, macular hypoplasia, ocular surface disease is the main cause of visual loss and the deterioration of the quality of life of most patients. Limbal stem cell deficiency combined with tear film instability and secondary dry eye cause aniridic keratopathy which, in advanced stages, ends up in corneal opacification. In this paper, the actual knowledge about congenital aniridia keratopathy physiopathology and medical and surgical treatment options and their efficacy are discussed. Indications and results of topical treatments with artificial tears and blood-derivatives in its initial stages, and different surgical techniques as limbal stem cell transplantation, keratoplasty and keratoprostheses are reviewed. Finally, recent advances and results in regenerative medicine techniques with ex vivo stem cell cultivation or other types of cultivated cells are presented.

Glaucoma Risk Factors and Outcomes Following Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1 Surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate glaucoma risk factors and associated outcomes of the Boston keratoprosthesis type I (KPro).

DESIGN

Clinical case-control study.

METHODS

This is a single-center study of 140 eyes of 118 patients who underwent KPro surgery between October 2008 and March 2017 by a single surgeon. A total of 118 eyes of 118 patients with at least 6 months of follow-up were analyzed to account for intereye correlation. Patients without glaucoma were compared to those diagnosed with glaucoma, which included treatment with intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medications or glaucoma surgery. A subgroup analysis compared eyes with pre-KPro glaucoma with those with post-KPro glaucoma. Statistical analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate analyses and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Main outcome measures were glaucoma diagnosis and progression. Other outcomes included demographics, preoperative diagnosis, best-corrected visual acuity, IOP, cup-to-disc ratio progression and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The mean age at surgery was 60.7 ± 16.7 years, with a follow-up of 6.9 ± 3.2 years. De novo KPro glaucoma incidence was 24% (n = 28/118), equivalent to 3.4 cases per 100 eye-years, with onset at 2.1 ± 2.2 postoperative years. A total of 17 of 118 eyes (14%) did not have glaucoma. Multiple logistic regression showed that high preoperative IOP was a predictor of higher rates of glaucoma development (odds ratio [OR] = 1.538, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.030-2.297, P = .035) and progression (OR = 1.450, 95% CI = 1.084-1.937, P = .012). Stromal and endothelial disorders were protective preoperative diagnoses for glaucoma progression after KPro (OR = 0.002, 95% CI = 0.000-0.227, P = .010). A greater proportion of eyes with autoimmune and ocular surface diseases developed de novo glaucoma after KPro compared with other preoperative diagnoses (P < .05). A total of 45% of glaucomatous KPro eyes suffered postoperative glaucoma progression. The mean final best-corrected visual acuity of the cohort was 1.76 ± 1.0, with no difference between eyes with and without glaucoma (P > .05). The rate of serious vision-threatening complications was higher in KPro eyes without glaucoma (77%) than in those with glaucoma (41%, P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

High preoperative IOP signals a higher risk for glaucoma development and progression after KPro surgery. Autoimmune diseases and ocular surface diseases precipitate de novo glaucoma, whereas stromal and endothelial disorders protect against glaucoma progression after KPro. The minority of KPro eyes without glaucoma remain at high risk of complications that can hinder promising visual outcomes. Despite all available treatments and surgical interventions, a majority of eyes will suffer from glaucoma progression, even later during follow-up.

Time to achieve best postoperative visual acuity following Boston keratoprosthesis surgery

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To evaluate the time needed for patients with Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro) to reach their best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and all contributing factors.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 137 consecutive eyes from 118 patients, measured how long they needed to reach their BCVA and looked at factors that might affect this time duration including patient demographics, ocular comorbidities and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 5.49 years. The median time to BCVA postoperatively was 6 months, with 47% of patients achieving their BCVA by 3 months. The mean best achieved logMAR visual acuity was 0.71, representing a gain of 6 lines on the Snellen visual acuity chart. Postoperative glaucoma, retroprosthetic membrane (RPM) and endophthalmitis prolonged this duration. We found no correlation between the following factors and time to BCVA: gender, age, indication for KPro surgery, primary versus secondary KPro, number of previous penetrating keratoplasties, previous retinal surgery, intraoperative anterior vitrectomy and preoperative glaucoma.

CONCLUSION

In our retrospective cohort, the majority of subjects reached their BCVA between 3 and 6 months after KPro implantation. This duration was significantly prolonged by the development of postoperative glaucoma, RPM and endophthalmitis.

Mid-term prognosis of type I Boston keratoprosthesis reimplantation

Aim

To examine the mid-term visual and anatomical prognosis of patients who require reimplantation of a second Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 (B-KPro).

Methods

Retrospective observational case series of 122 patients (141 eyes) who received a B-KPro at a single institution were reviewed. Eyes that underwent a second B-KPro were included in the study. Primary endpoints were B-KPro retention, final visual acuity 20/200 and loss of light perception. Secondary endpoints included the occurrence of postoperative complications.

Results

Seventeen eyes (12%) required a B-KPro reimplantation. Corneal melt was the most common indication for replacement (88%). Mean follow-up time after the second B-KPro was 4.4±2.1 years. The Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated the second B-KPro retention rate at 79% over 8 years. Retroprosthetic membrane (RPM, 53%) was the most common complication. Forty-one per cent of the eyes suffered from corneal melt following their second B-KPro. One year after the second B-KPro, 47% of the patients retained a vision 20/200. Seven eyes (41.2%) lost light perception, which was secondary to an inoperable retinal detachment in five cases. Four eyes (24%) developed phthisis following inoperable retinal detachment (n=3) or endophthalmitis (n=1).

Conclusion

B-KPro reimplantation is a potentially sight- and globe-saving procedure for eyes with B-KPro failure, but the prognosis is guarded. B-KPro reimplantation can salvage ambulatory vision in a third of patients while another third of patients progress to loss of light perception. RPM and retinal detachment were important obstacles to visual rehabilitation while recurrent corneal melt was responsible for most cases of anatomical failure.

Glaucoma Management in Patients With Aniridia and Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis

PURPOSE

To assess outcomes and glaucoma management in eyes with aniridia following Boston type 1 Keratoprosthesis (KPro) implantation.

DESIGN

Retrospective, interventional comparative case series.

METHODS

The population included patients with aniridia and patients with other preoperative diagnoses (excluding Stevens-Johnson syndrome, mucous membrane pemphigoid, and congenital disorders) who underwent KPro implantation at Massachusetts Eye and Ear with at least 2 years of follow-up. One eye per patient was selected based on the longer follow-up time. The main outcome was intermediate and long-term outcomes related to glaucoma.

RESULTS

The aniridia (n = 22) and comparison (n = 61) groups had similar preoperative visual acuity (VA, mean ± standard deviation, 1.86 ± 0.52 logMAR, P = .33) and follow-up time (65.6 ± 26.3 months, P = .25). Before KPro implantation, eyes with aniridia had more glaucoma (76.2%) and glaucoma surgery (57.1%) than comparison eyes (51.8%, P = .053; 23.2%, P = .005, respectively). More Ahmed valves were co-implanted with KPro in aniridia (47.6%) vs comparison eyes (17.9%, P = .008). At final follow-up, more aniridia eyes had glaucoma (90.5%) than comparison eyes (64.3%, P = .02), but the 2 groups had similar percentages of eyes with cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) >0.8 (23.8% vs. 30.4%, P = .57) or CDR progression of ≥0.2 (42.9% vs 44.6%, P = .89, respectively). None of the eyes with prophylactic tube implantation developed glaucoma. Eyes with and without aniridia did not differ in post-KPro VA improvement (72.7%, 72.1%, P = .96), and final VA (1.28 ± 0.79 logMAR, 1.23 ± 0.98 logMAR, P = .51).

CONCLUSION

Despite a higher glaucoma prevalence, eyes with aniridia achieved similar VA as comparison eyes with more than 5 years of mean follow-up time. Boston KPro offers satisfactory visual rehabilitation in aniridia when glaucoma is managed aggressively.

[Boston keratoprosthesis type 1]

Penetrating keratoplasty is the most commonly performed tissue transplant in the world. However, its success depends on the health of the ocular surface and the intact immune privilege of the eye. In the absence of these two conditions, corneal transplants have an increased failure rate and result in corneal blindness. For more than two hundred years, researchers have been trying to find the best design of the artificial cornea in order to address these cases of severe corneal blindness. Despite previous difficulties, interest in the field has recently been revived, and considerable progress has been made over the last 20 years, to the point where the keratoprosthesis is now considered a primary procedure for some indications and is no longer always a surgery of last resort. In this review, we describe the global and personal experience with Boston keratoprosthesis type 1. It is a relatively new treatment for severe corneal blindness in the context of multiple failed corneal transplants and high-risk conditions. In the last decade, changes in the design, surgical technique, and postoperative management have increased the success rate and popularity of the Boston keratoprosthesis and decreased its complications substantially, making it a safe and effective alternative for certain corneal pathologies. However, some complications persist and require management to improve the visual prognosis of patients with corneal blindness.