1
|
Peterson JS, Christensen MR, Cooper C, Mamalis C, Bernhisel AA, Zaugg B, Barlow WR, Ungricht E, Olson RJ, Pettey JH. Optimization of Phacoemulsification Tip Gauge on the Oertli CataRhex3 in an in vitro Setting. Clin Ophthalmol 2022; 16:1091-1097. [PMID: 35422610 PMCID: PMC9005135 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s355094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the effect of each of the tip sizes available for the Oertli CataRhex3® phacoemulsification machine on efficiency. Methods Porcine lenses were fixed in formalin for 2 hours, then cut into 3.0 mm cubes. We studied three Oertli tips, all of which had a 30-degree bevel: easyTip 2.2 mm (20G), easyTip 2.8 mm (19G), and CO-MICS (21G). For the 19G and 20G tips, vacuum was set at 600 mmHg, irrigation rate at 50 mL/min, continuous power 70%, and bottle height 85 cm. For the 21G tip, vacuum was set at 450 mmHg; irrigation and power settings were identical to those used for the easyTip tips. We measured time to removal and chatter events to determine efficiency. Results Results from 20 trials for each tip showed that the larger the gauge size, the more quickly lens fragments were removed. Chatter events demonstrated an increasing trend with smaller tip gauge. The 19G tip used an average time to fragment removal of 2.8 seconds; the 20G, 3.2 seconds; and the 21G, 4.6 seconds. Increasing tip diameter from 21G to 20G decreased emulsification time by 33% (P = 0.02). Increasing the diameter from 21G to 19G further decreased time to emulsification by 42% (P = 0.003). The 21G tip had a mean 1.4 events/cube; 20G, 0.35 events; and 19G, 0.1 events. Differences in mean chatter events for each tip were each statistically significant. Conclusion These data suggest that when evaluated by chatter events and emulsification time, the 2.8 mm (19G) easyTip proves to have greatest efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John S Peterson
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Michael R Christensen
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
- Medical College of Virginia/Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA
| | - Caitlynn Cooper
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Christina Mamalis
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Ashlie A Bernhisel
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Brian Zaugg
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - William R Barlow
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Emilie Ungricht
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Randall J Olson
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Jeff H Pettey
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
- Correspondence: Jeff H Pettey, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, 65 Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA, Tel +1 801 581 2352, Fax +1 801 581 3357, Email
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bernhisel AA, Cahoon JM, Sella R, Zaugg B, Barlow WR, Stagg BC, Afshari NA, Olson RJ, Pettey JH. Optimum on-time and off-time combinations for micropulse phacoemulsification in venturi vacuum mode. J Cataract Refract Surg 2019; 45:1797-1800. [PMID: 31856992 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2019] [Revised: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To measure the time to fragment removal and number of chatter events using various combinations of micropulse on times and off times (measured in milliseconds) of longitudinal ultrasound (US) using a venturi-based phacoemulsification system. SETTING John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA. DESIGN Experimental study. METHODS Pig lenses were hardened with formalin and cut into 2.0 mm cubes. The time to fragment removal (efficiency) and frequency of fragments bouncing off the tip (chatter) were measured with the venturi-based system. Micropulse longitudinal US was tested. Parameters were combinations of 5, 6, and 7 milliseconds on, with 5, 6, and 7 milliseconds off. Twenty runs each of 9 combinations were completed. RESULTS There was a statistically significant difference between on/off duty cycle combinations. The 6 on/7 off group had higher efficiency than the 5 on/6 off and 7 on/7 off groups. Six on/5 off was more efficient than 5 on/6 off. When data were pooled and on times alone were used, 6 milliseconds on time was more efficient than 5 or 7 milliseconds. No efficiency differences in off times were found. No significant chatter differences were observed. CONCLUSIONS Using micropulse longitudinal US in venturi vacuum mode, 6 milliseconds on was the most efficient on time. Five, 6, and 7 milliseconds off times had similar efficiency. These data suggest that the most efficient setting with lowest US energy use is 6 milliseconds on and 7 milliseconds off.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashlie A Bernhisel
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Shiley Eye Institute at University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, USA
| | - Judd M Cahoon
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA; Stein Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles, USA
| | - Ruti Sella
- Department of Ophthalmology, Shiley Eye Institute at University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, USA
| | - Brian Zaugg
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - William R Barlow
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Brian C Stagg
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA; Duke Eye Center and Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Natalie A Afshari
- Department of Ophthalmology, Shiley Eye Institute at University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, USA
| | - Randall J Olson
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Jeff H Pettey
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boulter T, Bernhisel A, Mamalis C, Zaugg B, Barlow WR, Olson RJ, Pettey JH. Phacoemulsification in review: Optimization of cataract removal in an in vitro setting. Surv Ophthalmol 2019; 64:868-875. [PMID: 31276738 DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Phacoemulsification, initially used in the late 1960s, continues to be the standard of care for cataract removal. An animal model was developed so that, in a controlled research setting, all the various machines, handpieces, tips, and settings could be investigated. As a general rule, the higher power, vacuum, and aspiration settings lead to optimally efficient phacoemulsification. In addition, both new phacoemulsification platforms and newly developed devices have been shown to improve efficiency. As a result, we recommend that the integration of these recent developments should be considered in future investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Boulter
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Ashlie Bernhisel
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Shiley Eye Institute at University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Christina Mamalis
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Brian Zaugg
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - William R Barlow
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Randall J Olson
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Jeff H Pettey
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kabbara SW, Heczko J, Ta B, Bernhisel A, Barlow W, Zaugg B, Olson RJ, Pettey J. Determining optimal ultrasound percent on time with long-pulse torsional phacoemulsification. Can J Ophthalmol 2019; 54:395-398. [PMID: 31109482 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2018.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Revised: 07/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the optimum percent on time for the most efficient lens fragment removal using long-pulse torsional ultrasound (US). DESIGN In vitro laboratory study. METHODS Porcine lens nuclei were incubated in formalin for 2 hours and then cut into 2 mm cubes. Phacoemulsification was performed using the Centurion® Vision System and Infiniti OZil handpiece with the balanced tip. Vacuum was set at 500 mm Hg, aspiration rate at 50 mL/min, and intraocular pressure (IOP) at 50 mm Hg. Pulse rate was 26 pulses/second. Studied parameters were percent power: 60%, 80%, and 100%, and percent on times: 50%, 60%, 70%, and 80%. Efficiency was the total time for a cube to be emulsified. Chatter was the number of times the lens fragment bounced off the tip. RESULTS There was no significant difference in efficiency between 50%, 60%, and 70 % on-time settings (p = 0.17 and 0.08, respectively); however, there was significant increase in efficiency when the on time was increased from 70% to 80% (p = 0.03). Increasing power from 60% to 100% showed a statistically significant efficiency increase (p = 0.001). There was no significant change in chatter with increasing on time; however, there was a statistically significant increase in chatter with every power level increase. CONCLUSION Increasing on-time percent does not improve efficiency under torsional long-pulse US. There is no significant change in chatter with increasing on-time percent. Increasing power increases efficiency despite chatter increase. Long-pulse US does not appear to influence torsional action in a clinically meaningful way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joshua Heczko
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Brian Ta
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Ashlie Bernhisel
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - William Barlow
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Brian Zaugg
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Randall J Olson
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Jeff Pettey
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT..
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kabbara S, Heczko JB, Bernhisel AA, Barlow WR, Zaugg B, Pettey JH, Olson RJ. Effect of high vacuum and aspiration on phacoemulsification efficiency and chatter using a transversal ultrasound machine. J Cataract Refract Surg 2018; 44:1378-1383. [PMID: 30201130 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.05.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Revised: 03/22/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the role of high vacuum and aspiration settings on efficiency using a transversal ultrasound (US) machine. SETTING John A. Moran Eye Center Laboratory, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. DESIGN Experimental study. METHODS Porcine lens nuclei were incubated in formalin for 2 hours and then cut into 2.0 mm cubes. Phacoemulsification was performed using the Whitestar Signature machine. Settings were bottle height 50 cm, on-time 6 milliseconds, and off-time 6 milliseconds. One hundred percent power was used for all 240 runs. Tested parameters were aspiration of 50 mL/min and 60 mL/min and vacuum of 500, mm Hg, 600 mm Hg, and 650 mm Hg. RESULTS With continuous US, increasing aspiration from 50 mL/min to 60 mL/min significantly increased efficiency (23%). Increasing vacuum from 500 mm Hg to 650 mm Hg and from 600 mm Hg to 650 mm Hg significantly increased efficiency (20.2% and 13.6%, respectively). Higher vacuum and aspiration parameters did not influence the incidence of chatter events. In the micropulse US group, there was no significant efficiency increase with increasing vacuum or aspiration levels. There was a significant efficiency increase of continuous over micropulse US at an aspiration setting of 60 mL/min and vacuum settings of 600 mm Hg and 650 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS As aspiration and vacuum increased, efficiency increased under continuous transverse US. No significant efficiency improvement occurred at high aspiration and vacuum settings under micropulse US. At 60 mL/min aspiration and more than 600 mm Hg vacuum, continuous power was significantly more efficient than micropulse transverse US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sami Kabbara
- From the University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix (Kabbara), Phoenix, Arizona, and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (Heczko, Bernhisel, Barlow, Zaugg, Pettey, Olson), John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Joshua B Heczko
- From the University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix (Kabbara), Phoenix, Arizona, and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (Heczko, Bernhisel, Barlow, Zaugg, Pettey, Olson), John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Ashlie A Bernhisel
- From the University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix (Kabbara), Phoenix, Arizona, and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (Heczko, Bernhisel, Barlow, Zaugg, Pettey, Olson), John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - William R Barlow
- From the University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix (Kabbara), Phoenix, Arizona, and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (Heczko, Bernhisel, Barlow, Zaugg, Pettey, Olson), John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Brian Zaugg
- From the University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix (Kabbara), Phoenix, Arizona, and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (Heczko, Bernhisel, Barlow, Zaugg, Pettey, Olson), John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Jeff H Pettey
- From the University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix (Kabbara), Phoenix, Arizona, and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (Heczko, Bernhisel, Barlow, Zaugg, Pettey, Olson), John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Randall J Olson
- From the University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix (Kabbara), Phoenix, Arizona, and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (Heczko, Bernhisel, Barlow, Zaugg, Pettey, Olson), John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
| |
Collapse
|