Efficacy of Vismodegib for the Treatment of Orbital and Advanced Periocular Basal Cell Carcinoma

Oral Hedgehog Inhibitor, Vismodegib, for Locally Advanced Periorbital and Orbital Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

PURPOSE

To review the efficacy and safety of oral vismodegib (Erivedge; Genentech) in the management of locally advanced orbital and periorbital basal cell carcinoma (BCC).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted last in September 2023 in the PubMed database for English language original research that evaluated the effect of oral vismodegib on orbital and periorbital BCC. Sixty articles were identified and 16 met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Most studies demonstrated high response rates, with up to 100% of patients responding to the medication in individual studies and initial complete regression occurring in up to 88% of patients. Vismodegib treatment resulted in significant reductions in tumor volume, resulting in globe preservation for most patients. However, in 12% of patients, the response was partial. Recurrences also occurred with substantial frequency, even after an initial complete response. As such, up to 79.4% of patients required surgical intervention, and up to 23% of patients still required exenteration. Use of these agents resulted in reductions in tumor volume that may delay or prevent the need for exenteration in some, but not all, patients. Importantly, molecular analysis of tissue excised after vismodegib therapy revealed persistent tumor in all patients, with frequent accumulation of mutations that may confer resistance to further hedgehog inhibitor therapy. Although most adverse events were rated as level I or II, side effects were common, with up to 100% of patients in studies experiencing at least 1 event. Muscle cramps, alopecia, weight loss, fatigue, and dysgeusia were the most common adverse events, and several patients discontinued therapy because of them. Furthermore, 1 patient died of sepsis that may have resulted from the therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although level I and II evidence are lacking, most studies indicate a benefit from the use of oral vismodegib to treat orbital and periorbital BCC tumor volume. However, patients should be cautioned about the adverse side effects of treatment and the persistence of tumor cells with mutations that may cause long-term resistance. Use of vismodegib as short-term neoadjuvant therapy may be effective in shrinking tumor volume to reduce surgical morbidity while reducing the frequency and severity of side effects.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Targeted therapy in ophthalmic oncology: The current status

There have been rapid advancements in the field of ocular oncology for the diagnosis and management of intraocular, adnexal, and orbital tumors. Targeted therapy is in the forefront of medical research in all fields including ocular oncology. Targeted therapy include drugs that target specific genetic mutations, pathways or proteins involved in the development of cancer. In contrast to traditionally used chemotherapy, drugs used in targeted therapy are highly specific for tumor cells and preserve the function of normal cells. This review aims to familiarize ophthalmologists with the drugs that are currently approved or undergoing clinical trials for use in ocular oncology. Targeted therapy is particularly useful for locally advanced or metastatic tumors, including but not limited to eyelid and periocular basal cell carcinoma, periocular cutaneous and conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma, ocular adnexal lymphoma, conjunctival melanoma, and uveal melanoma. The results are promising with improved survival outcomes and better tolerability than chemotherapeutic drugs.

Exploring vismodegib: A non-surgical breakthrough in the management of advanced periocular basal cell carcinoma

The management of periocular basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is challenging due to its proximity to the eyeball. Vismodegib, a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor, has emerged as a therapeutic option for locally advanced and metastatic BCC. To critically appraise the relevant evidence, we conducted a systematic review of observational and experimental studies assessing the efficacy and safety of vismodegib for periocular BCC. Thirty-seven trials, including 435 patients, were eligible. No randomized trials were retrieved. Complete and overall clinical response rates were 20-88 % and 68-100 %, respectively. Disease progression was observed at a maximum rate of 14 %. Recurrence rates varied between 0 % and 31 %. The most common side effects were muscle cramps, dysgeusia, weight loss and alopecia. Treatment with vismodegib improved health-related quality of life. In conclusion, vismodegib represents an important novel treatment for advanced periocular BCC, with good response rates and acceptable tolerability profile. Nevertheless, its full potential needs clarification through randomized controlled trials.

Periocular and ocular surface nonmelanoma skin cancer

Periocular and ocular surface nonmelanoma malignancies, including basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), and ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN), are rare, but their management requires special considerations. The most common periocular malignancy is BCC, which constitutes 80% to 96% of tumors, followed by SCC, which represents 5% to 10% of tumors. OSSN represents a spectrum of diseases that encompass dysplastic alteration to the squamous epithelium of the eye. OSSN ranges from squamous dysplasia to conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia/carcinoma in situ to invasive SCC, which is the most common ocular malignancy. These tumors can be staged using the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer categorization system. The standard of care for periocular malignancies is Mohs micrographic surgery, while medical management with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), interferon alfa-2b (INF), and mitomycin C (MMC) or "no touch" surgical excision are options for OSSN. Systemic therapies, including sonic hedgehog inhibitors for BCC and epidermal growth factor inhibitors and immune-checkpoint inhibitors for SCC, can be utilized for advanced disease. Recurrence rates are higher for periorbital and ocular malignancies than their respective cutaneous counterparts. These carcinomas and their respective treatments have unique side effects and considerations in an effort to preserve visual function.

Review of Targeted Therapy, Vismodegib, for the Treatment of Periocular Basal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Periocular locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (POLA-BCC) is characterized by orbital involvement and/or extensive invasion of periocular structures. Hedgehog pathway inhibitors have been used for POLA-BCC with promising outcomes.

METHODS

The authors reviewed 11 articles published in English literature from January 2012 to July 2022 and reported the outcomes of patients with POLA-BCC who were treated with vismodegib.

RESULTS

A total of 384 patients were treated with vismodegib. The mean age was 72 years, and the median treatment duration was 9 months. The overall response rate was 75% with a median follow-up time of 14.4 months. Following vismodegib treatment, the median number of patients who required adjuvant surgery was 43% with a median time to surgery of 6.5 months. The exenteration rate was 6% (overall 8 patients). In total 93.7% of patients experienced grade I adverse events, 26.7% to 37.5% grade II, 8.8% to 10% grade III-IV, and 0.8% to 4.8% grade V. Major side effects included dysgeusia (30-100%), muscle spasm (15-100%), alopecia (47-75%), weight loss (23-83%), and decreased appetite (19-42%). The median percentage of patients who discontinued treatment due to toxicity was 29% with a median interval of 5 months before the development of side effects. The median recurrence rate following discontinuation of vismodegib was 7.8% with a median recurrence duration of 20 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with POLA-BCC, vismodegib, a hedgehog pathway inhibitor, provided high rates of orbital preservation, reducing exenteration rates to 6%. Neoadjuvant therapy with vismodegib can also be suggested for patients with POLA-BCC. While extremely effective, side effects lead to temporary or permanent discontinuation of vismodegib in small numbers of patients.

Primary cemiplimab treatment for orbital squamous cell carcinoma is effective and may alleviate the need for orbital exenteration

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of cemiplimab, a Programmed-cell-death-1(PD-1) protein inhibitor, for the treatment of cutaneous periocular-locally-advanced squamous-cell-carcinoma (POLA-SCC) with orbital-invasion.

METHODS

Multicentre real-world retrospective study. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analysed for patients with biopsy-proven POLA-SCC(AJCC-T4) with orbital-invasion who were treated with cemiplimab at one of four tertiary medical centres in 2019-2022.

RESULTS

The cohort included 13 patients, 8 males and 5 females, of median age 76 years (IQR65-86). The median duration of treatment was 5.0months (IQR3.5-10.5) and the median follow-up time, 15.0 months (IQR10.5-30). The overall response rate was 69.2%. Complete response was documented in seven patients (53.8%), partial response in two (15.4%), stable disease in one (7.7%), and progressive disease in two (15.4%); in one patient (7.7%), response was not evaluable. Six complete responders (46.1% of the cohort) received no further treatment and did not have a recurrence during an average follow-up of 6.14 (±6.9) months from treatment cessation. None of the patients underwent orbital-exenteration. The majority of adverse events were mild (grade-1), except for a moderate increase in creatinine level (grade-2), severe bullous dermatitis (grade-3), and myocarditis (grade-5) in one patient each. Four patients (30.7%) died during the follow-up period, all of whom had an Eastern-Cooperative-Oncology-Group score of 4 at presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the largest study to date on cemiplimab therapy for cutaneous POLA-SCC with orbital-invasion. Treatment was shown to be effective, with an overall response rate of 69.2%. Cemiplimab holds promise for the treatment of patients with tumours invading the orbit as it may alleviate the need for orbital exenteration.

Emerging therapeutic options for periorbital and orbital cutaneous basal and squamous cell carcinomas

PURPOSE

Recently, several new therapies have emerged to address locally advanced cutaneous basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas. Given the constraints of the ocular adnexa and orbit, this review was designed to discuss the role of these modalities in this region.

METHODS

A PubMed search was carried out to analyze the utility of United States Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies to address these malignancies. The data presented in the identified investigations were analyzed and abstracted.

RESULTS

Multiple novel interventions may be useful in the management of periocular cutaneous basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas, including imiquimod, hedgehog inhibitors, and immunotherapy. While many of these treatments have not been specifically explored in the orbit and ocular adnexa, the literature generally shows favorable response rates. However, adverse events were common in these studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Several novel treatments may address periorbital cutaneous malignancies, and these therapies may be particularly useful in patients with unresectable disease and those who are poor surgical candidates.

The initial rate of tumour response to vismodegib treatment, can predict a complete response outcome for periocular LA-BCC

PURPOSE

To establish a model to predict treatment outcome of periocular locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (POLA BCC) based on initial response to treatment with vismodegib (ErivedgeTM), a sonic hedgehog inhibitor.

DESIGN

Subgroup analysis of data from the STEVIE study database.

METHODS

Analysis of medical history, treatment protocol, and treatment outcome of POLA BCC tumours in a STEVIE study population of 244 POLA BCC patients treated with ≥1 dose of vismodegib.

RESULTS

A predictive model for complete response (CR) was established based on the initial treatment response. A cutoff value of 20% reduction in tumour size at 3 months of treatment identified the patients with a high probability (82.76%) to achieve CR. A second cutoff value of 67.7% reduction in tumour size at 6 months of treatment improved the prediction to a 95.42% probability of a CR outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

A treatment model was constructed based on the prediction of a CR outcome and the initial response to vismodegib treatment at 3 and 6 months. The study result provide significant new insights can facilitate decision-making on treatment management according to tumour response in patients with POLA BCC.

Analysis of residual disease in periocular basal cell carcinoma following hedgehog pathway inhibition: Follow up to the VISORB trial

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is a common skin cancer caused by deregulated hedgehog signaling. BCC is often curable surgically; however, for orbital and periocular BCCs (opBCC), surgical excision may put visual function at risk. Our recent clinical trial highlighted the utility of vismodegib for preserving visual organs in opBCC patients: 67% of patients displayed a complete response histologically. However, further analysis of excision samples uncovered keratin positive, hedgehog active (Gli1 positive), proliferative micro-tumors. Sequencing of pre-treatment tumors revealed resistance conferring mutations present at low frequency. In addition, one patient with a low-frequency SMO W535L mutation recurred two years post study despite no clinical evidence of residual disease. Sequencing of this recurrent tumor revealed an enrichment for the SMO W535L mutation, revealing that vismodegib treatment enriched for resistant cells undetectable by traditional histology. In the age of targeted therapies, linking molecular genetic analysis to prospective clinical trials may be necessary to provide mechanistic understanding of clinical outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02436408.

The Role of Surgery After Remission of Nonsystemic Extensive Periorbital Basal Cell Carcinoma Treated by Vismodegib: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Eyelid basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is usually cured by surgery. However, for a minority of patients, extensive disease progression and recurrence contraindicate surgery or radiotherapy because of severe ocular morbidity. The hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitor vismodegib is becoming the key treatment for this specific form.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to define the role of surgery after vismodegib treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Embase databases was conducted for all articles published up to March 2021 to identify studies that examined treatment of BCC of the eyelid by vismodegib.

RESULTS

Level 1 evidence was found for the use of vismodegib as neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced eyelid BCC contraindicated to surgery and/or radiotherapy with a rather good tolerance of treatment. Level 3 evidence was found for the role of surgical excision of residual clinically suspicious lesions as for the indication of eyelid reconstruction after mapping or during residual tumoral resection if frozen sections or Mohs surgery were performed.

CONCLUSION

Vismodegib is a well-tolerated treatment for advanced periorbital BCC. The hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitor vismodegib is a potential treatment option in patients with these challenging tumors.

Non-surgical Management of Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Upper Extremity With Vismodegib

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is a common skin malignancy that can present reconstructive challenges in patients with locally advanced diseases of the extremities. This article highlights three cases of locally advanced BCC of the extremities managed with vismodegib (Erivedge, Genentech). Vismodegib is a sonic hedgehog pathway (Shh) inhibitor approved by the FDA for use in metastatic or recurrent BCC. All three patients in our case series demonstrated significant clinical responses with reductions in tumor size which obviated the need for complex reconstructive surgery or amputation.

Outcomes of adjunctive therapies post hedgehog inhibitors in the management of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and pooled analysis

Management of patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC) with traditional strategies has yielded suboptimal outcomes. Targeted treatments including hedgehog inhibitor therapy (HHIT) present limitations when utilized as monotherapy. Herein, we report evidence-based outcomes from available literature on multimodality treatments adjuvant to HHIT in laBCC management. Utilizing a systematic search strategy in PubMed, we identified studies published from inception to April 15, 2020, screened for definitive inclusion/exclusion criteria, and performed individual study quality assessment and pooled analysis to assess impact of adjunctive treatment-based responses post-HHIT on clinical response and recurrence outcomes. Twenty-nine studies (n = 103) were included. Primary findings include a complete response (CR) rate of 90.5%, the median follow-up of 12 months post-HHIT completion. The recurrence rate was 10.8% with 12-month median time to recurrence. Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) had 100% CR post-HHIT, while no difference was observed between surgery and radiation therapy (RT). MMS and surgery had comparable 2-year recurrence free rates (RFR) at 87% and 86% respectively, while RT had the lower 2-year RFR at 67%. Male gender portended a more advanced stage at diagnosis and worse outcomes. In a subset analysis, periorbital laBCCs with orbital involvement had a CR rate of 81.8% versus 100% in those without orbital involvement, with similar rates of recurrence. Limited available quantitative data and possible publication bias were limitations. Pooled analysis of observational data supports use of adjunctive therapies post-HHIT to improve treatment response in patients with laBCC. Longer-term follow-up is needed to study recurrence rates after combination therapy.

Neoadjuvant vismodegib in the management of locally advanced periocular basal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Vismodegib, a hedgehog pathway inhibitor, has been used in the management of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC) not suitable for surgery or radiation therapy. We report our experience using neoadjuvant vismodegib for locally advanced periocular BCC, followed by surgical excision. Our aim was to assess the effect on the extent of surgical excision and histological response.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

A retrospective case series of patients treated with neoadjuvant vismodegib, for the management of locally advanced periocular BCC prior to surgical excision, with intraoperative margin control. Patients were treated until a maximum clinical response was seen. The difference between the estimated surgical margins prior to vismodegib and the eventual margins used was compared. Fine (1 mm) vertical sections through the excised tumour were performed to assess the histological response and look for a multifocal tumour.

RESULTS

Eight Caucasian patients had neoadjuvant treatment with vismodegib for a median duration of 6 months. Some clinical response was seen in all cases but was only partial in 6/8 patients. Histological evaluation of the excised specimen showed residual BCC in 6/8 cases and thus 2/8 showed complete histological regression. Two cases showed squamous differentiation. Side effects occurred in 7/8 patients all which resolved on cessation of therapy. The mean follow-up was 13.4 ± 5.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant treatment of periocular BCC showed a mixed clinical and histological response. Final surgical excision achieved clear margins in all patients with no recurrence at 13 months and a reduction in predicted defect size, but possible squamous differentiation in two cases.

RECURRENT PERIOCULAR BASAL CELL CARCINOMA. CASE REPORT

AIM

We present the management of a severe case of recurrent periocular basal cell carcinoma, orbital invasion and exenteration.

CASE REPORT

The present case is of a recurrent basal cell carcinoma in a 84-year-old male presenting with non-healing lesion above right eyelid. A tumor excision was performed in May 2014. Histopathology revealed a basal cell carcinoma (dg. C44.1 ICD-10-CM) with positive margins. The re-excision of the lesion was performed. After two years, there was a local recurrence and orbital invasion. Indication for external curative radiation therapy. Plastic surgery of the upper eyelid. Orbital exenteration was indicated in January 2018. After another year, a recurrence of the tumor was once again noted. Histopathology revealed a basal cell carcinoma (dg. C44.1 (TNM 7, pMx, pNx, pTx)). The patient was indicated for external radiotherapy. There were no indications for biological treatment. After another year, a progression of the local finding was noted.

CONCLUSION

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common non-melanoma skin cancer of the periocular region. Primary treatment of basal cell carcinoma is surgical. Advanced lesions require extensive surgical interventions and other available treatment modalities. In some cases, mutilating surgery - exenteration of the orbit is inevitable. Despite a relatively small percentage of invasive diseases today, advanced stages may still occur; either as a result of the patient's late presentation, inadequate initial therapy aimed at maintaining critical periorbital structures, or due to high tumor aggression. The case report highlights necessity of radical resection of primary tumor with histological examination.

Long-term efficacy and safety of imiquimod 5% and fluorouracil 1% creams in medical monotherapy of complex eyelid basal cell carcinomas

PURPOSE

To study the long-term efficacy and safety of local application of imiquimod 5% and fluorouracil 1% creams in complex eyelid basal cell carcinomas (BCCs).

METHODS

A retrospective, non-comparative study in biopsy-proven, complex (involving canthi or >50% of eyelid length) eyelid BCC patients who were medically unfit for surgical procedures. All patients were medically treated with either of the creams using fixed-dose regimens for a minimum of 3 months. All received oral vitamin C 500 mg QID for 3 months as an adjunct for collagen healing. A minimum of "post-treatment" follow-up of 12 months was observed.

RESULTS

Of total 30 patients, imiquimod 5% and fluorouracil 1% were used in 16 and 14 patients, respectively. The mean age of our patients was 70.5 years. The co-morbidities included - severe coronary artery disease using blood-thinners (n = 19), poorly controlled diabetes (n = 12), poorly controlled hypertension (n = 6), on nebulization (n = 3), and tuberculosis with pulmonary fibrosis (n = 2). Complete clinical tumor resolution was noted in 10 and 8 patients over 12 and 16.5 weeks, respectively, in imiquimod and fluorouracil groups. Periocular skin erythema, chemical conjunctivitis, and skin depigmentation were seen in all the patients of imiquimod group. On the other hand, the local side-effect profile in fluorouracil patients was limited.

CONCLUSION

The medical treatment of complex eyelid BCC is a useful alternative to surgery in the elderly with significant co-morbidities. It provides a promising long-term relief with a tolerable side-effect profile. A prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial would provide stronger evidence for the efficacy of these drugs.

New Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapies for Locally Advanced Periocular Malignant Tumours: Towards a New 'Eye-Sparing' Paradigm?

The management of periocular skin malignant tumours is challenging. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for localised eyelid cancers. For more locally advanced cancers, especially those invading the orbit, orbital exenteration has long been considered the gold standard; however, it is a highly disfiguring and traumatic surgery. The last two decades have been marked by the emergence of a new paradigm shift towards the use of 'eye-sparing' strategies. In the early 2000s, the first step consisted of performing wide conservative eyelid and orbital excisions. Multiple flaps and grafts were needed, as well as adjuvant radiotherapy in selected cases. Although being incredibly attractive, several limitations such as the inability to treat the more posteriorly located orbital lesions, as well as unbearable diplopia, eye pain and even secondary eye loss were identified. Therefore, surgeons should distinguish 'eye-sparing' from 'sight-sparing' strategies. The second step emerged over the last decade and was based on the development of targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Their advantages include their potential ability to treat almost all tumours, regardless of their locations, without performing complex surgeries. However, several limitations have been reported, including their side effects, the appearance of primary or secondary resistances, their price and the lack of consensus on treatment regimen and exact duration. The aim of this article was to review the evolution of the management of locally advanced periocular malignant tumours over the last three decades and highlight the new paradigm shift towards the use of 'eye-sparing' strategies.

Vismodegib for Preservation of Visual Function in Patients with Advanced Periocular Basal Cell Carcinoma: The VISORB Trial

Background

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is a common skin cancer often curable by excision; however, for patients with BCC around the eye, excision places visual organs and function at risk. In this article, we test the hypothesis that use of the hedgehog inhibitor vismodegib will improve vision‐related outcomes in patients with orbital and extensive periocular BCC (opBCC).

Materials and Methods

In this open‐label, nonrandomized phase IV trial, we enrolled patients with globe‐ and lacrimal drainage system–threatening opBCC. To assess visual function in the context of invasive periorbital and lacrimal disease, we used a novel Visual Assessment Weighted Score (VAWS) in addition to standard ophthalmic exams. Primary endpoint was VAWS with a score of 21/50 (or greater) considered successful, signifying globe preservation. Tumor response was evaluated using RECIST v1.1. Surgical specimens were examined histologically by dermatopathologists.

Results

In 34 patients with opBCC, mean VAWS was 44/50 at baseline, 46/50 at 3 months, and 47/50 at 12 months or postsurgery. In total, 100% of patients maintained successful VAWS outcome at study endpoint. Compared with baseline, 3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1–15.3) experienced major score decline (5+ points), 14.7% (95% CI, 5 to 31.1) experienced a minor decline (2–4 points), and 79.4% experienced a stable or improved score (95% CI, 62.1–91.3). A total of 56% (19) of patients demonstrated complete tumor regression by physical examination, and 47% (16) had complete regression by MRI/CT. A total of 79.4% (27) of patients underwent surgery, of which 67% (18) had no histologic evidence of disease, 22% (6) had residual disease with clear margins, and 11% (3) had residual disease extending to margins.

Conclusion

Vismodegib treatment, primary or neoadjuvant, preserves globe and visual function in patients with opBCC. Clinical trail identification number.NCT02436408.

Implications for Practice

Use of the antihedgehog inhibitor vismodegib resulted in preservation of end‐organ function, specifically with regard to preservation of the eye and lacrimal apparatus when treating extensive periocular basal cell carcinoma. Vismodegib as a neoadjuvant also maximized clinical benefit while minimizing toxic side effects. This is the first prospective clinical trial to demonstrate efficacy of neoadjuvant antihedgehog therapy for locally advanced periocular basal cell carcinoma, and the first such trial to demonstrate end‐organ preservation.

This article reports the results of a prospective clinical trial of vismodegib for patients with basal cell carcinoma occurring in the orbital and periocular regions to assess whether such treatment helps to preserve visual organs and function.

Orbital exenteration: an updated review with perspectives

Orbital exenteration is a radical and disfiguring surgery mainly performed in specialized tertiary care centers. Orbital exenteration has long been considered the treatment of choice for managing periocular tumors invading the orbit or primary orbital malignancies. Over the past decades, attention has been directed toward reducing the perioperative morbidity by developing new surgical devices and new strategies and promoting cosmetic rehabilitation by providing adequate facial prostheses. Despite these advances, several studies have questioned the role of orbital exenteration in improving overall survival. The last decade has been marked by the emergence of a new paradigm: the "eye-sparing" strategies based on conservative surgery with or without adjuvant radiotherapy and/or targeted therapies and immunotherapies. We summarize the data on orbital exenteration, including epidemiology, etiologies, use of surgical ablative and reconstructive techniques, complications, outcomes, and the related controversies.

Outcomes of Vismodegib for Periocular Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma From an Open-label Trial

Importance

The outcomes of vismodegib treatment in a relatively large cohort of study participants with periocular locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (POLA-BCC) may guide physicians when considering this treatment.

Objective

To report the outcomes of vismodegib treatment in patients with POLA-BCC in the Safety Events in Vismodegib (STEVIE) study.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This post hoc subgroup analysis from the STEVIE single-arm, multicenter, open-label cohort study screened all 1215 participants for ocular or periocular involvement and identified 244 participants with POLA-BCC or metastatic BCC. Data for the first STEVIE trial were collected from 167 treatment locations in 36 countries from June 30, 2011, to June 14, 2017. This post hoc analysis was performed from April 1 to August 31, 2019.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Response to treatment and adverse events.

Results

Ocular or periocular involvement was found in 244 of 1215 STEVIE participants (20.1%), who constituted the analytic sample. The median age of the study participants was 72.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 60.0-82.0]) years, and they included 143 men (58.6%). Locally advanced BCC was diagnosed in 238 of the 244 participants (97.5%) and metastatic BCC, in 6 (2.5%). The median duration of exposure to vismodegib was 40.0 (IQR, 20.0-78.0) weeks, specifically 39.7 (IQR, 19.9-76.0) weeks for POLA-BCC and 92.4 (IQR, 53.2-163.0) weeks for metastatic BCC. Sixty-nine participants (28.3%) sustained serious adverse events (alopecia, muscle spasms, dysgeusia, weight loss, decreased appetite, asthenia, ageusia, nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea). Two hundred thirty-two study participants (95.1%) sustained more than 1 adverse effect. The overall mean (SD) number of drug-related adverse effects per study participant by first adverse event, regardless of the severity, was 5.48 (3.84). Discontinuation of vismodegib treatment owing to an adverse event was recorded in 58 participants (23.8%). During the study, 22 participants (9.0%) died, 70 (28.7%) achieved complete response, and 94 (38.5%) achieved partial response.

Conclusions and Relevance

Vismodegib was well tolerated by the study participants with POLA-BCC. The safety of vismodegib treatment according to the STEVIE trial findings is consistent with that reported in previous studies. These data may be helpful when considering vismodegib for patients with POLA-BCC.

Treatment of periocular basal cell carcinoma with neoadjuvant vismodegib

Purpose

To report a case of a locally advanced periocular basal cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant Vismodegib therapy prior to surgery.

Observations

A 63-year-old female presented to the oculoplastics clinic with biopsy-proven basal cell carcinoma of the right periorbital region causing significant cicatricial ectropion of the right lower eyelid. The medial canthal lesion involved nearly the entire right lower eyelid with extension onto the cheek, the medial half of the right upper eyelid, the palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva, as well as the right lacrimal system. CT imaging was suggestive of involvement of the extraocular muscles and other post-septal tissues. Fortunately, the patient had no metastatic disease. The extent of the tumor would have necessitated aggressive resection to achieve surgical cure. However, the patient preferred to attempt globe-sparing therapy with a goal of preserving cosmesis as much as possible. Various treatment options were discussed with the patient, including the use of Vismodegib, and the patient elected to pursue this treatment strategy. The goal of Vismodegib treatment was to reduce the tumor size enough to permit surgical resection of all tumor without significantly affecting cosmesis. After 11 months of treatment with Vismodegib, the tumor size had reduced significantly to the point where surgical intervention with minimal disfigurement could be offered. The patient underwent multidisciplinary approach with Mohs micrographic excision of the tumor paired with oculoplastic reconstructive surgery resulting in negative margins and satisfactory cosmetic results.

Conclusions and importance

Although addition study is required regarding Vismodegib as a primary or adjuvant therapeutic approach to periorbital basal cell carcinoma, this case illustrates the potential usefulness of this drug as an option in this context. This case provides information that may help the comprehensive ophthalmologist or oculoplastic specialist in counseling patients with locally advanced periorbital basal cell carcinoma.

[Alternative treatment options for periorbital basal cell carcinoma]

BACKGROUND

Latest developments as well as established procedures offer alternative treatment approaches to basal cell carcinoma (BCC) when micrographically controlled surgical removal is not a valid option.

OBJECTIVE

Alternative treatment options for periorbital BCC are presented.

METHODS

A literature search was carried out and a structured display and analysis of the results are given.

RESULTS

Micrographically controlled surgical removal represents the gold standard in treatment of BCC. When for various reasons surgical removal is not a valid option, other procedures are required. The alternative treatment options can be divided into three main groups: treatment options for locally advanced or metastasized BCC, topical approaches for small and superficial BCC and prophylactic measures. While radiotherapy and systemic therapy are suitable for locally advanced BCC and are discussed in a tumor board, small and superficial BCC can be treated by topical medication. In cases of a previous BCC history, a prophylactic treatment can be considered. Combinations of systemic treatment and also neoadjuvant or adjuvant approaches before and after surgery are promising options for a successful outcome, which can further improve the standard treatment for locally advanced BCC.

CONCLUSION

Alternative treatment options for periocular BCC are available; however, the use is only indicated when microscopically controlled excision with subsequent oculoplastic reconstruction is not possible. According to the national guidelines a prior presentation to a suitable tumor board is practically compulsory.

Vismodegib for periocular basal cell carcinoma: an international multicentre case series

INTRODUCTION

Vismodegib (Erivedge, Genentech) is a first-in-class inhibitor of the hedgehog (Hh) pathway, which is licensed for use in locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and metastatic BCC. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence withdrew recommendation for use of vismodegib secondary to a lack of data comparing vismodegib to standard supportive care. The purpose of this multicentre, international case series is to report outcomes of patients with locally advanced periocular BCC who have been treated with vismodegib.

METHODS

The medical records of all patients treated with vismodegib were retrospectively reviewed across seven institutions in the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were identified. Seven (54%) patients were male. All BCCs were ill-defined, with seven (58%) having orbital involvement at presentation. Median treatment time was 7 months (range 2-36 months). Eleven out of 13 patients developed side effects, the most common being fatigue in six patients (46%). Median follow-up was 24 months (range 12-48 months). Complete response was found in 5/13 patients (38%) and a partial response in 8/13 patients (62%). Six patients had further surgery after vismodegib, with three classed as globe-sparing operations. Three patients developed recurrence (23%). Three patients (23%) ultimately underwent exenteration.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates vismodegib to be a well-tolerated treatment which may, in some cases, facilitate globe-sparing surgery and hence avoid disfiguring operations such as exenteration. Uncertainty does remain regarding the long-term outcomes of patients treated with vismodegib.