Nasal or Temporal Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Assisted by Sub-Perfluorocarbon Viscoelastic Injection for Macular Hole Repair

Shortfalls of free autologous internal limiting membrane transplantation for highly myopic refractory macular holes in a long term follow-up

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate long-term anatomical and functional outcomes of autologous internal limiting membrane (ILM) transplantation in refractory highly myopic macular holes (HMMHs).

METHODS

Retrospective interventional analysis of 13 eyes with refractory HMMH undergoing autologous ILM transplantation with gas tamponade. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, Snellen), optical coherence tomography and fundus photography were scheduled at baseline and every follow-up visit (1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months and the most recent). Preoperatively, we collected minimum linear diameter (MLD) and basal diameter (BD). Post-operatively, rates of external limiting membrane (ELM)/ellipsoid zone (EZ) restoration, excessive gliosis and subfoveal retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) atrophy were evaluated.

RESULTS

Average AXL was 31.45 ± 2.07 mm and mean follow-up was 47.2 ± 31.4 months. Anatomical success was reached in 7/13 eyes (54%), while 2 cases showed persisting HMMH, 2 cases had early recurrence and 2 cases late recurrence. BCVA went from 0.19 ± 0.18 to 0.22 ± 0.20 at final follow-up (p = 0.64), improving in 5/13 eyes (38%). One eye showed continuous ELM and EZ lines, while another eye showed an irregular ELM but no EZ. Post-operatively, 5 eyes (71%) developed progressive atrophy of the subfoveal RPE, while excessive gliosis was reported in 3 eyes (43%). Furthermore, one patient developed post-operative chronic macular edema-like changes in the perifoveal area.

CONCLUSION

Autologous ILM transplantation showed controversial anatomical outcomes and and poor visual results in refractory HMMH. Moreover, progressive subfoveal patchy atrophy and excessive gliosis are possible post-operative complications.

Long-Term Quantitative Analysis of Inner Retinal Dimples and Visual Function Post Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Macular Diseases

INTRODUCTION

Inner retinal dimples (IRDs) are frequently detected after internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. However, the distribution of IRDs and its effect on postoperative visual function remain unclear. We aim to quantify the distribution of IRDs after ILM peeling in different macular diseases and analyze its influence on postoperative visual function.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing vitrectomy with ILM peeling and followed up until 12 months in our center. The distribution of IRDs were quantitatively determined using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography in a different sector of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid. Visual function was evaluated by retinal sensitivity (RS) using microperimetry. Spearman correlation was performed between RS and IRDs within the same sectors. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to analyze the association between baseline characteristics and IRDs.

RESULTS

A total of 43 idiopathic macular hole (iMH) cases, 56 idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM) cases and 42 myopic foveoschisis (mFS) cases were included. IRDs increased gradually at ILM-peeled area, interrupting ganglion cell layer. Most IRDs were observed in temporal sector. A negative correlation was depicted between the increase of IRDs and the progress of RS at both perifovea and parafovea in iERM, but only at perifovea in iMH. No significant correlation between the change of IRDs and RS was found in mFS. Multivariable linear regression model showed that preoperative axial length was significantly associated with postoperative IRDs in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

IRDs distributed mostly at temporal sector after ILM peeling, interrupting ganglion cell layer. IRD progression may influence postoperative RS only in iMH and iERM. Ophthalmologists may avoid temporal sector especially in eyes with normal axial length or strong ILM-ERM adherence.

PEELING AND INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE REPOSITION (PAIR) FOR MYOPIC FOVEOSCHISIS

PURPOSE

To report the outcomes of the Peeling and Internal Limiting Membrane Reposition (PAIR) technique in myopic foveoschisis.

METHODS

A retrospective case series of eyes with myopic foveoschisis that underwent vitrectomy and PAIR. Visual acuity, fundus photographs, and optical coherence tomography measurements were obtained and analyzed. Data are presented as medians (ranges).

RESULTS

A total of seven eyes underwent PAIR and were followed up for 339 days (188-436 days). No intraoperative complications were noted. One eye exhibited postoperative macular hole formation, but the hole was healed through fluid-gas exchange. At the last follow-up, the visual acuity had improved from 20/66 (20/332-20/40) to 20/40 (20/100-20/25), and the central foveal thickness had decreased from 576 µ m to 269 µ m. A repositioned internal limiting membrane (ILM) was observed in six of the eyes, and inner retinal dimples were noted in only two eyes. However, retinal wrinkles under the repositioned or perifoveal ILM were noted in five eyes.

CONCLUSION

The PAIR technique relieved traction, restored the ILM, and achieved functional and morphological improvement in eyes with myopic foveoschisis. Limited occurrence of inner retinal dimples and retinal thinning was noted, but retinal wrinkles occurred, likely due to ILM contracture.

Dissociated Optic Nerve Fiber Layer Appearance after Macular Hole Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Temporal Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique with Conventional Peeling

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of the temporal inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique compared with that of conventional ILM peeling on the extent of the dissociated optic nerve fiber layer (DONFL) and retinal sensitivity in patients undergoing macular hole (MH) surgery.

DESIGN

Single-center, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients requiring vitrectomy for MHs sized > 250 μm.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to 1 of the following 2 groups: (1) the control group undergoing standard ILM peeling and (2) the experimental group (flap group) undergoing the temporal inverted ILM flap technique.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the total DONFL score at 3 months after surgery. Important secondary outcomes were microperimetry results, primary MH closure rate, external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) recovery rates, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were recruited between February 2018 and July 2020; primary outcome data were available for 60 patients. The median DONFL score was 7.0 (3.0-12.5) in the control group and 5.0 (1.5-8.5) in the flap group at 3 months after surgery (P = 0.145). The focal depressions characteristic of the DONFL were limited to the temporal side of the fovea in the flap group, whereas they were found all around the fovea in the control group on spectral-domain OCT images. The MH closure rate (P = 1), EZ and ELM recovery rates (P = 0.252), and BCVA (P = 0.450) were similar between the 2 groups. The 3-month overall median retinal sensitivity (MRS) (P = 0.142) and MRS improvement (P = 0.916) in the control group were comparable with those observed in the flap group. In addition, there was no significant difference between the 2 techniques when considering the temporal area (P = 0.105) or the nasal area (P = 0.468).

CONCLUSIONS

The temporal inverted ILM flap technique reduced the extent of the DONFL by preserving the nasal part of the fovea. However, the overall DONFL score was similar between the 2 techniques. In addition, the MRS and BCVA did not differ from those obtained after complete ILM peeling.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

CONVENTIONAL INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING VERSUS INVERTED FLAP FOR SMALL-TO-MEDIUM IDIOPATHIC MACULAR HOLE: A Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

To compare conventional internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling versus inverted flap technique in small-to-medium idiopathic macular hole.

METHODS

Eyes with ≤400 μ m idiopathic macular holes were randomized into the conventional ILM peeling group (25 eyes) and inverted flap group (25 eyes). A 12-month follow-up was considered. Macular sensitivity (MS) change detected with MP-1 microperimetry was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity change, closure rate, anatomical findings on optical coherence tomography such as U-shape foveal contour, restoration of external limiting membrane, and ellipsoid zone.

RESULTS

In both groups, MS improved throughout the follow-up. Final MS was greater in the conventional ILM peeling group compared with the inverted flap group, being 16.6 ± 2.3 dB versus 14.9 ± 2.9 dB, respectively ( P = 0.026). In both groups best-corrected visual acuity improved throughout the follow-up, with a final best-corrected visual acuity of 0.19 ± 0.14 logMar (20/31 Snellen) in the conventional ILM group and 0.22 ± 0.11 logMar (20/33 Snellen) in the inverted flap group ( P = 0.398). Anatomical hole closure was achieved in all cases. No difference in optical coherence tomography findings was shown between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

A better final MS was found in eyes undergoing conventional ILM peeling. Inverted flap technique has disadvantages compared with conventional peeling for the treatment of small-to-medium idiopathic macular holes.

Single-Layer Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Versus Conventional Peel for Small- or Medium-Sized Full-Thickness Macular Holes

PURPOSE

To analyze the outcomes of using an internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap and the conventional ILM peel technique for small- or medium-sized full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) repair.

DESIGN

Retrospective, interventional case series.

METHODS

Eyes with an FTMH ≤400 µm that underwent vitrectomy with a single-layer inverted ILM flap (flap group, 55 eyes) or an ILM peel (peel group, 62 eyes) were enrolled. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements were obtained preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Primary hole closure was achieved in 54 (98%) and 60 (97%) eyes in the flap and peel groups, respectively. The preoperative and postoperative 12-month BCVA values were comparable between the groups but were significantly better in the flap than in the peel group at 1 month (mean ± SD logMAR: 0.83 ± 0.43 vs 1.14 ± 0.50; P = .001), 3 months (0.58 ± 0.33 vs 0.82 ± 0.43; P = .002), and 6 months (0.56 ± 0.32 vs. 0.72 ± 0.48; P = .028). In the flap group, foveal gliosis was less common than in the peel group at 1 month (P = .030), and restored external limiting membrane and interdigitation zone was more common at 3 months (P = .046 and P < .001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The single-layer ILM flap and conventional ILM peel techniques both closed FTMHs and improved vision. ILM flaps were associated with better visual outcomes up to 6 months postoperatively and should be considered in FTMHs ≤400 µm.

Effect of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique on small-medium size macular holes

Inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique was developed to achieve macular hole (MH) closure in large MH and refractory cases. In this study, we evaluate the effect of the technique for small-medium size MH. We recruited patients who underwent vitrectomy for small-medium size (< 400 μm) MH with either inverted ILM flap technique (flap group) or with conventional ILM peeling (peeling group). Using propensity score, 21 eyes of 21 patients in the peeling group were matched against 21 eyes of 21 patients in the flap group. We compared MH closure rate, postoperative visual acuity, and recovery of the external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ). The MH closure rate was not different between the two groups (flap vs peeling: 90% vs 100%, P = 0.49). Whereas there was no significant difference in visual acuity improvement between the two groups, the flap group showed more disruption of the ELM 3 months after surgery and of the EZ at 3 and 6 months after surgery (P = 0.02, P = 0.03, and P = 0.04, respectively). The result suggested that inverted ILM flap technique does not have additional benefits for small-medium size MHs and may delay recovery of retinal integrity.

Visual improvement and regeneration of retinal layers in eyes with small, medium, and large idiopathic full-thickness macular holes treated with the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique over a period of 12 months

PURPOSE

This study aims to compare the improvement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the reduction in defect length of external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) in small ([Formula: see text] 250 μm), medium ([Formula: see text] 250 μm), and large ([Formula: see text] 400 μm) full-thickness macular holes (FTMH) treated with inverted internal limiting membrane (I-ILM) flap technique over a follow-up period of 12 months.

METHODS

Ninety-one eyes of 87 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. BCVA and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were conducted preoperatively as well as after 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. The defect length of the ELM and the EZ was measured using the caliper tool at each follow-up time point.

RESULTS

BCVA improved significantly in the group of small, medium, and large FTMH over the time of 12 months, whereby the improvement did not depend on FTMH size over 9 months. Only after 12 months, large FTMH showed significantly higher BCVA improvement compared to small and medium FTMH. The closure rate was 100% (91/91). The defect length of ELM and EZ reduced continuously over the period of 12 months. There was a significant correlation between defect length of ELM and EZ with postoperative BCVA.

CONCLUSION

The I-ILM flap technique has very good morphological and functional outcomes in small, medium, and large FTMH over a long-time period, indicating that it can be considered as a treatment option in small and medium FTMH. The defect length of ELM and EZ is directly connected to postoperative BCVA.

Update on surgical management of complex macular holes: a review

Modern surgical interventions effectively treat macular holes (MHs) more than 90%. Current surgical treatment for MHs is pars plana vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane, internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, gas endotamponade, and prone posturing postoperatively. However, a small subset of MHs imposes challenges to surgeons and frustrations on patients. A narrative review was performed on the surgical treatment of challenging MHs including large and extra-large MHs, myopic MHs with or without retinal detachment, and chronic and refractory MHs. There are robust data supporting inverted ILM flap as the first-line treatment for large idiopathic MHs and certain secondary MHs including myopic MHs. In addition, several studies had shown that ILM flap manipulations in combination with surgical adjuncts increase surgical success, especially in difficult MHs. Even in eyes with limited ILM, surgical options included autologous retinal graft, human amniotic membrane, and creation of a distal ILM flap that can assist in MH closure even though the functional outcome may be affected by the MH chronicity. Despite relative success anatomically and visually after each technique, most techniques require a long-term study to analyze their safety profile and to establish any morphological changes of the MH plug in the closed MHs.

Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique: Is It the Best Option for Macular Holes?

Surgical treatment is generally necessary to repair full-thickness macular holes (FTMH). Although vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling remains the standard surgical technique, the inverted ILM flap procedure has increasingly assumed a role in the primary surgical repair of FTMHs. Some vitreoretinal surgeons reserve this technique to treat large or myopic holes, whereas others use it routinely in all cases. This paper is a comprehensive review of the current scientific evidence on the anatomical and functional outcomes of the inverted ILM flap technique in the repair of macular holes, following the International Vitreomacular Traction Study (IVTS) group classification.

Foveal Displacement following Temporal Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Technique for Full Thickness Macular Holes: 12 Months Results

Purpose: To compare conventional 360° internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and temporal inverted ILM flap technique with regard to postoperative foveal displacement.Methods: Patients who underwent 23 G vitrectomy with either 360° ILM peeling (Group 1) or temporal inverted ILM technique (Group 2) for idiopathic macular hole with a minimum follow up of 12 months were included. The metamorphopsia rates and distances between fovea and 3 retinal landmarks: the first retinal vascular bifurcation or crossover located superonasal and inferonasal to the fovea and ciliary vessel at the temporal margin of the disc, were compared on MultiColor SLO and near-infrared reflectance images. In addition, papillofoveal distance was measured on B-scan optical coherence tomography (OCT).Results: A total of 57 eyes were recruited (Group 1, n = 25; Group 2, n = 32). The visual acuity at month-1 was significantly higher in Group 2 than Group 1 (p = .007). A significant postoperative foveal displacement towards the disc was observed in Group 1 and Group 2 (p < .001 and p = .002 respectively). Shortening of the papillofoveal distance was greater in Group 1 than Group 2 at all postoperative visits (p < .05 for all). Furthermore, significant changes in papillofoveal distance continued until 6 months in Group 1 (p < .05 for all), whereas no significant changes occurred in Group 2 after month-1 (p > .05 for all). The complaints of metamorphopsia was significantly higher in Group 1 (n = 18/25) compared with Group 2 (n = 10/32) (p = .002).Conclusion: Temporal inverted ILM flap appear to be superior to 360° ILM peeling with regard to faster visual rehabilitation, lower rates of subjective metamorphopsia and less foveal displacement.

Viscoelastic-assisted inverted cover and free ILM flap techniques

statement: Surgical technique: an innovative way of using cohesive viscoelastic to stabilize the ILM flap during the cover inverted-flap and free-flap procedures.Summary statement: Surgical technique: an innovative way of using cohesive viscoelastic to stabilize the ILM flap during the covering step in the inverted-flap and free-flap procedures.