1
|
Ruiz-Lozano RE, Colorado-Zavala MF, Ramos-Dávila EM, Quiroga-Garza ME, Azar NS, Mousa HM, Hernández-Camarena JC, Stinnett SS, Daluvoy M, Kim T, Sainz-de-la-Maza M, Hall RP, Rodriguez-Garcia A, Perez VL. Ocular Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid: The Effect of Risk Factors at Presentation on Treatment Outcomes. Ophthalmology 2024; 131:1064-1075. [PMID: 38452874 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.02.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Analyze the influence of risk factors at presentation in the long-term immunosuppressive therapy (IMT) outcomes of ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid (OMMP). DESIGN Retrospective multicenter study. PARTICIPANTS Patients with OMMP seen at the Duke Eye Center, Tecnologico de Monterrey, and Hospital Clinic of Barcelona from 1990 to 2022. METHODS Data at presentation on demographics, direct immunofluorescence, ocular findings, sites of extraocular manifestations (EOMs), and previous treatments in patients with a clinical or laboratory diagnosis of OMMP, were analyzed with multivariable analysis and Kaplan-Meier plots to identify factors associated with adverse outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES (1) Inflammatory control (no conjunctival inflammation in both eyes at 3 months on IMT); (2) relapse (new-onset inflammation after absolute control in either eye); (3) progression (≥ 1 cicatrizing stage progression in either eye); and (4) vision loss (≥ 2 Snellen lines). RESULTS A total of 117 patients (234 eyes), 61% (71/117) of whom were women, with a mean age of 66.6 (SD: 12.4) years (range: 37-97 years) and median follow-up of 34 months (interquartile range: 16-66 months; range: 3-265 months), were enrolled. Inflammatory control was achieved in 57% of patients (67/117), with high-risk EOM (HR-EOM), including esophageal, nasopharyngeal, and/or genital involvement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 12.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.61-59.99; P = 0.002) and corneal scarring (aOR: 3.06; 95% CI, 1.15-8.14; P = 0.025), as significant risk factors for persistent inflammation. Disease relapse, progression, and vision loss occurred in 20% of patients (23/117), 12% of patients (14/117), and 27% of patients (32/117), respectively. Baseline corneal scarring was a risk factor for relapse (adjusted hazard ratio: 4.14; 95% CI: 1.61-10.62; P = 0.003), progression (aOR: 11.46; 95% CI: 1.78-73.75; P = 0.010), and vision loss (aOR: 3.51; 95% CI: 1.35-9.10; P = 0.010). HR-EOM was associated with stage progression (aOR, 34.57; 95% CI, 6.57-181.89; P<0.001) and vision loss (aOR, 8.42; 95% CI, 2.50-28.42; P = 0.001). No significant differences were found between IMT regimes and relapse (P = 0.169). CONCLUSIONS Ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid presenting with HR-EOMs and corneal scarring has an increased risk of stage progression and vision loss. Corneal scarring and severe inflammation at baseline were associated with an increased risk of relapse. A disease progression staging system incorporating both the HR-EOMs and corneal involvement is required to predict the visual outcome of OMMP better. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raul E Ruiz-Lozano
- Department of Ophthalmology, Foster Center for Ocular Immunology at Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Ocular Immunology and Uveitis Service, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Maria F Colorado-Zavala
- Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Ocular Immunology and Uveitis Service, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Eugenia M Ramos-Dávila
- Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Ocular Immunology and Uveitis Service, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Manuel E Quiroga-Garza
- Department of Ophthalmology, Foster Center for Ocular Immunology at Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Nadim S Azar
- Department of Ophthalmology, Foster Center for Ocular Immunology at Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Hazem M Mousa
- Department of Ophthalmology, Foster Center for Ocular Immunology at Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Julio C Hernández-Camarena
- Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Ocular Immunology and Uveitis Service, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Sandra S Stinnett
- Associate Professor of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Melissa Daluvoy
- Department of Ophthalmology, Cornea and External Disease Service at Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Terry Kim
- Department of Ophthalmology, Cornea and External Disease Service at Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Maite Sainz-de-la-Maza
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Russell P Hall
- Department of Dermatology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Alejandro Rodriguez-Garcia
- Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Ocular Immunology and Uveitis Service, Monterrey, Mexico.
| | - Victor L Perez
- Department of Ophthalmology, Foster Center for Ocular Immunology at Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Johnson KB, Rosenbaum JT, Yarter JT, Broadbent T, Michels KS. A 10-Year Review of the Management of Ocular Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid: A Private Practice Experience. Cornea 2023; 42:565-571. [PMID: 37000702 DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000003071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid (OcMMP) is a rare and potentially blinding condition for which consensus treatment guidelines do not exist. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of various immunomodulatory agents in the treatment of OcMMP in a private practice setting. METHODS We conducted a 10-year retrospective chart review of patients managed with OcMMP (n = 22). The median age at diagnosis was 73 (range: 35-91) years, and 59% (13/22) of patients were female. Visual acuity, Foster stage, and adverse effects (AEs) were documented. Treatment outcomes for each treatment episode were qualified at 3 months as complete response (CR), response (R), or failure (F). After 3 months, CR was then further subqualified as sustained CR, reactivation after initial CR, or AE after initial CR. The Fisher exact test P values were calculated for each outcome in comparison with mycophenolate. RESULTS Twenty patients were treated with an immunomodulatory agent for a total of 55 treatment episodes. In comparison to dapsone, mycophenolate was more likely to achieve sustained CR (50% vs. 0%, P = 0.022) and R (100% vs. 50%, P = 0.007), and less likely to fail (0% vs. 50%, P = 0.007). Dapsone was also more likely to be discontinued because of AEs than mycophenolate (40% vs. 6%, P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS Mycophenolate is a superior first-line agent to dapsone in the treatment of OcMMP. Although not statistically significant, mycophenolate trends toward superiority over methotrexate as well. Mycophenolate is very effective when used in combination with rituximab. Azathioprine remains a reasonable second-line agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasey B Johnson
- Washington State University, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Spokane, WA
| | - James T Rosenbaum
- Oregon Health and Science University, Casey Eye Institute, School of Medicine, Portland, OR
- Legacy Health System, Devers Eye Institute, Portland, OR
| | - Jason T Yarter
- University of Washington, School of Medicine, Spokane, WA; and
| | | | - Kevin S Michels
- Washington State University, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Spokane, WA
- Northwest Eyelid and Orbital Specialists, Spokane, WA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid: novel treatment strategies. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2021; 21:486-492. [PMID: 34269741 DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To describe current treatments of ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid (OMMP), including conventional systemic immunosuppression (CIST) and novel biologic agents. RECENT FINDINGS CIST remains the main stay therapy for the management of OMMP. The choice of agents is tailored to disease severity - mild disease is treated with dapsone, whereas moderately severe cases are often treated with mycophenolate mofetil or sulfa-based drugs and severe cases are treated with cyclophosphamide. In recalcitrant disease newer biologics such as Rituximab, intravenous immunoglobins and tumour necrosis alpha antagonists have proven to be effective in disease control. Control of inflammation with topical therapy and halting conjunctival fibrosis remain as areas of unmet clinical needs. SUMMARY OMMP is largely treated with CIST. The recent introduction of new biologic agents could shape the way the disease is treated in the near future.
Collapse
|