A Risk Prediction Model for Endothelial Keratoplasty After Uncomplicated Cataract Surgery in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy

Scheimpflug Tomography as a Predictor of Corneal Edema After Phacoemulsification in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy

Purpose

To determine if Scheimpflug tomography pachymetry map and posterior elevation map patterns can predict the occurrence of corneal edema following uneventful phacoemulsification surgery in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD).

Design

Observational prospective case-control study.

Participants

Fifty FECD eyes (50 patients) with visually significant cataract: 25 with subclinical corneal edema (SCE) versus 25 without SCE.

Methods

Preoperatively, FECD was clinically assessed, and only patients devoid of clinical corneal edema were enrolled. Utilizing the Mayo Clinic classification for subclinical corneal edema (SCE), eligible FECD eyes were stratified based on Scheimpflug imaging pachymetry map and posterior elevation map characteristics, including loss of regular isopachs, displacement of the cornea's thinnest point, and the presence of posterior surface depression, into two groups: Group A representing FECD with SCE, and Group B: FECD without SCE. One week postoperatively, clinical and tomographic evaluation was performed. Regression analysis was conducted to evaluate predictors of corneal edema after uneventful phacoemulsification surgery in both groups.

Results

All patients were successfully imaged before and 1 week after surgery. Visual acuity was significantly improved in both groups (P < 0.001). No postoperative clinical edema was observed in Group B, while 23 (92%) had mild edema and 2 (8%) had moderate edema in Group A. Both groups showed a significant increase in postoperative central corneal thickness (CCT) and thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) (both P < 0.001). Compared to Group B, Group A showed a significant central flattening of the anterior corneal surface (P = 0.007 and P = 0.04 for K1 and K2 respectively), and a significant increase in the postoperative posterior surface depression. Multivariate analysis showed that 94% of postoperative corneal edema could be predicted by the presence of preoperative posterior surface depression (P = 0.04, ARR = 5.8 (1.89-35.7)).

Conclusion

Scheimpflug tomography pachymetry map and posterior elevation map patterns can predict corneal edema after uneventful phacoemulsification surgery in FECD with subclinical corneal edema.

A Predictive Model for Graft Failure in Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Penetrating Keratoplasty Among Chinese Patients: A 2-Year Study

INTRODUCTION

Graft failure is a major challenge in femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty (Fs-PKP). This study focuses on the development and validation of a clinical predictive model aimed at identifying the risk of graft failure in individuals undergoing Fs-PKP in China, offering a tailored approach to improve surgical outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study at Nanjing First Hospital involved 238 patients and followed the TRIPOD statement. The cohort was divided into a training set (n = 166) and a validation set (n = 72) in a 7:3 ratio. It analyzed 23 predictor variables related to recipient, donor, and surgical factors, defining graft failure as "visually significant and irreversible corneal stromal edema, haze, or scarring." A comprehensive nomogram was created using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and assessed by concordance index (C-index), time-dependent receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

Five critical risk factors were identified: recipients' history of systemic autoimmune disorders, ocular trauma, prior penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) history, donors' diabetes history, and the endothelial cell density of the donor cornea. The nomogram showed a C-index of 0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.79) in the training group and 0.66 (95% CI 0.55-0.76) in the validation group, indicating robust predictive accuracy. Time-dependent ROC curves, calibration plots, and DCA consistently validated the model's reliability, predictive power, and clinical utility across both training and validation cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study developed and validated a model incorporating five key factors, enhancing preoperative prediction and management for Chinese patients with Fs-PKP graft failure.

Impact of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy Severity on Scheimpflug-Derived Parameters After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate how Scheimpflug-derived parameters of eyes with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) are influenced by Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) depending on FECD severity and the presence of subclinical edema.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study including 115 eyes (115 patients) that underwent DMEK for FECD and a control group of 27 eyes with nonpathological corneas was conducted. Preoperative and 6 months postoperative Scheimpflug imaging was used to analyze pachymetry, presence of tomographic features (loss of isopachs/displacement of the thinnest point/focal posterior depression), and corneal backscatter. FECD severity was based on the modified Krachmer scale and the absence/presence of subclinical edema.

RESULTS

Scheimpflug-derived pachymetry, tomographic, and corneal backscatter parameters were correlated with FECD severity, and all changed from preoperatively to postoperatively (all P < 0.05). Postoperative central corneal thickness, anterior and posterior corneal backscatter, and presence of focal posterior depression remained different from the control group (all P < 0.05). Of eyes without preoperative clinical edema (n = 75), 18.7% showed 0 or 1 tomographic feature (no edema group) and 82.4% had 2 or 3 features (subclinical edema group). Compared with the control group, postoperative best-corrected visual acuity for the "no edema" group did not differ (0.03 ± 0.12 vs. -0.02 ± 0.08 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, P = 0.150) but was worse for the subclinical edema group (0.06 ± 0.08 vs. -0.02 ± 0.08 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For eyes without preoperative edema, more parameters reversed back to 'normal' levels than for eyes with (sub)clinical edema. Although most analyzed parameters correlated with FECD severity, corneal tomography might be best suited for objective grading of disease severity to aid in surgical decision-making.

Clinical Outcomes of Toric Intraocular Lenses in Patients with Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy

INTRODUCTION

Implantation of toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is still considered relatively contraindicated, without sufficient clinical evidence. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the results of toric IOL implantation in patients with FECD.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study of 28 eyes of FECD patients and 84 eyes of healthy control patients who received toric IOLs during routine cataract surgery was performed. The outcome measures were uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, spherical equivalent, and refractive residual astigmatism.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity in the FECD eyes compared to the control eyes were 0.15 ± 0.14 vs. 0.13 ± 0.17, respectively (P = 0.32), and 0.05 ± 0.08 vs. 0.06 ± 0.10, respectively (P = 0.95). The spherical equivalent in the FECD eyes compared to the control eyes was - 0.29 ± 0.43 vs. - 0.21 ± 0.50, respectively (P = 0.19). The preoperative corneal centroid astigmatism in the FECD eyes compared to the control eyes was 0.85 D@93° ± 2.42° vs. 0.23 D@68° ± 2.50°, respectively (P = 0.43), and the mean preoperative corneal astigmatism magnitude was 2.26 ± 1.1 D vs. 2.28 ± 1.03 D, respectively (P = 0.82). A trend toward higher postoperative refractive centroid astigmatism was found in the FECD eyes compared with the control eyes: 0.24 D@28° ± 0.57° vs. 0.03 D@127° ± 0.53°, respectively (P = 0.09). However, the mean refractive astigmatism magnitude was similar in FECD eyes and the healthy control eyes: 0.52 ± 0.31 D vs. 0.42 ± 0.31 D, respectively (P = 0.44) (D diopters).

CONCLUSION

The postoperative refractive astigmatism (both centroid astigmatism and mean magnitude astigmatism) was no higher than 0.52 D in both groups. Therefore, FECD patients without corneal edema can be considered for toric IOLs.

Fuchs Dystrophy and Cataract: Diagnosis, Evaluation and Treatment

Corneal endothelium plays an important role in maintaining hydration homeostasis and clarity of the cornea. Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) affects the corneal endothelium resulting in edema and characteristic excrescences on the Descemet's membrane known as corneal guttae. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has evolved to become the standard of care for patients with FECD with excellent visual acuity outcomes. Patients with FECD may have coexisting cataracts and therefore may require a cataract surgery, which increases the risk of corneal decompensation. The presence of FECD may not only influence the choice of intraocular lens but vision outcomes can also be affected by the corneal condition. The ability to combine the surgeries further raises important considerations regarding the timing and sequence of DMEK and cataract extraction for patients with FECD. This review provides a guide for corneal surgeons in choosing between endothelial keratoplasty and cataract surgery-alone, in combination or sequential-in their management of patients with FECD.

Kataraktoperation beim Vorliegen einer Fuchs-Endotheldystrophie

Bei Betroffenen mit einer Fuchs-Endotheldystrophie beginnen die Probleme mit den Augen häufig in einem Alter, in dem sich auch schon erste Anzeichen einer Katarakt zeigen. Und umgekehrt findet man in der augenärztlichen Praxis immer wieder Patient*innen mit einer deutlichen Katarakt und einer Cornea guttata als Nebenbefund. In beiden Situationen stellt sich dann die Frage, ob zunächst nur eine posteriore lamelläre Keratoplastik (in Deutschland meist als DMEK) bzw. nur eine Kataraktoperation erfolgen oder ob gleich ein kombiniertes Vorgehen (sog. Triple-Operation) angestrebt werden sollte. Nur bei jungen Betroffenen mit einer fortgeschrittenen Fuchs-Endotheldystrophie ohne jeglichen Hinweis auf eine Katarakt und gut erhaltener Akkommodation kann, je nach individuellen Gegebenheiten, eine alleinige DMEK sinnvoll sein, in allen anderen Fällen erscheint eine Triple-Operation geeigneter. Dabei erscheint ein sequenzielles Vorgehen in diesen Situationen weniger angebracht, da sich in zahlreichen Studien zeigte, dass der Verlauf und die Ergebnisse nach einer Triple-Operation mit denen nach einem sequenziellen Vorgehen vergleichbar sind. Beim Vorliegen einer signifikanten Katarakt und einer Cornea guttata fällt die Entscheidung im Hinblick auf das operative Vorgehen deutlich schwerer. Hierbei gibt es unterschiedliche Aspekte in der Anamnese sowie den ophthalmologischen Untersuchungen (z. B. zentrale Hornhautdicke, Endothelzelldichte), die einem bei der Entscheidung helfen können. Soll dann zunächst nur eine Kataraktoperation erfolgen, sollten geeignete Maßnahmen ergriffen werden, um ein möglichst optimales Ergebnis trotz Vorliegen der Cornea guttata zu erreichen. Im folgenden Beitrag soll auf die wichtigsten prä-, peri- und postoperativen Aspekte im Hinblick auf die bestmögliche operative Versorgung von Betroffenen mit Fuchs-Endotheldystrophie und Katarakt eingegangen werden.