Predicting Vault and Size of Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens Using Sulcus to Sulcus-Optimized Artificial Intelligence Technology

Artificial intelligence applications in cataract and refractive surgeries

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights the recent advancements in the applications of artificial intelligence within the field of cataract and refractive surgeries. Given the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence technologies, it is essential to provide an updated overview of the significant strides and emerging trends in this field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Key themes include artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostics and intraoperative support, image analysis for anterior segment surgeries, development of artificial intelligence-based diagnostic scores and calculators for early disease detection and treatment planning, and integration of generative artificial intelligence for patient education and postoperative monitoring.

SUMMARY

The impact of artificial intelligence on cataract and refractive surgeries is becoming increasingly evident through improved diagnostic accuracy, enhanced patient education, and streamlined clinical workflows. These advancements hold significant implications for clinical practice, promising more personalized patient care and facilitating early disease detection and intervention. Equally, the review also highlights the fact that only some of this work reaches the clinical stage, successful integration of which may benefit from our focus.

Clinical decision support system based on deep learning for evaluating implantable collamer lens size and vault after implantable collamer lens surgery: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To aid doctors in selecting the optimal preoperative implantable collamer lens (ICL) size and to enhance the safety and surgical outcomes of ICL procedures, a clinical decision support system (CDSS) is proposed in our study.

DESIGN

A retrospective study of patients after ICL surgery.

SETTING

China Tertiary Myopia Prevention and Control Center.

PARTICIPANTS

2772 eyes belonging to 1512 patients after ICL surgery. Data were collected between 2018 and 2022.

OUTCOME MEASURES

A CDSS is constructed and used to predict vault at 1 month postoperatively and preoperative ICL dimensions using various artificial intelligence methods. Accuracy metrics as well as area under curve (AUC) parameters are used to determine the CDSS prediction methods.

RESULTS

Among the ICL size prediction models, conventional neural networks (CNNs) achieve the best prediction accuracy at 91.37% and exhibit the highest AUC of 0.842. Regarding the prediction model for vault values 1 month after surgery, CNN surpasses the other methods with an accuracy of 85.27%, which has the uppermost AUC of 0.815. Thus, we select CNN as the prediction algorithm for the CDSS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study introduces a CDSS to assist doctors in selecting the optimal ICL size for patients while improving the safety and postoperative outcomes of ICL surgery.

AI and professional liability assessment in healthcare. A revolution in legal medicine?

The adoption of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems in healthcare is transforming the healthcare-delivery landscape. Artificial intelligence may enhance patient safety and improve healthcare outcomes, but it presents notable ethical and legal dilemmas. Moreover, as AI streamlines the analysis of the multitude of factors relevant to malpractice claims, including informed consent, adherence to standards of care, and causation, the evaluation of professional liability might also benefit from its use. Beginning with an analysis of the basic steps in assessing professional liability, this article examines the potential new medical-legal issues that an expert witness may encounter when analyzing malpractice cases and the potential integration of AI in this context. These changes related to the use of integrated AI, will necessitate efforts on the part of judges, experts, and clinicians, and may require new legislative regulations. A new expert witness will be likely necessary in the evaluation of professional liability cases. On the one hand, artificial intelligence will support the expert witness; however, on the other hand, it will introduce specific elements into the activities of healthcare workers. These elements will necessitate an expert witness with a specialized cultural background. Examining the steps of professional liability assessment indicates that the likely path for AI in legal medicine involves its role as a collaborative and integrated tool. The combination of AI with human judgment in these assessments can enhance comprehensiveness and fairness. However, it is imperative to adopt a cautious and balanced approach to prevent complete automation in this field.