Multimodal imaging of macular subretinal deposits following intravitreal ocriplasmin injection

Subretinal autofluorescent deposits: A review and proposal for clinical classification

Subretinal autofluorescent deposits (SADs) may be found in the posterior pole, associated with very various conditions. These disorders usually present a typical pattern of autofluorescent lesions seen on short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence. We describe SADs according to their putative pathophysiological origin and also according to their clinical pattern, i.e., number, shape, and usual location. Five main putative pathophysiological origins of SADs were identified in disorders associated with an intrinsic impairment of phagocytosis and protein transportation, with excess of retinal pigment epithelium phagocytic capacity, with direct or indirect retinal pigment epithelium injury, and/or disorders associated with long-standing serous retinal detachment with mechanical separation between the retinal pigment epithelium and the photoreceptor outer segments. Clinically, however, they could be classified into eight subclasses of SADs, as observed on fundus autofluorescence as follows: single vitelliform macular lesion, multiple roundish or vitelliform lesions, multiple peripapillary lesions, flecked lesions, leopard-spot lesions, macular patterned lesions, patterned lesions located in the same area as the causal disorder, or nonpatterned lesions. Thus, if multimodal imaging may be required to diagnose the cause of SADs, the proposed classification based on noninvasive, widely available short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence could guide clinicians in making their diagnosis decision tree before considering the use of more invasive tools.

Morphological Reconstitution and Persistent Changes After Intravitreal Ocriplasmin for Vitreomacular Traction and Macular Hole

Purpose: To assess the long-term anatomical and functional findings in patients with symptomatic vitreomacular traction (VMT), with or without full thickness macular hole (FTMH), after eye treatment with intravitreal ocriplasmin injection (IOI). Methods: This longitudinal case series includes 51 eyes from 51 symptomatic patients with VMT (<800 μm) who received a single IOI (Jetrea^® 0.125 mg); 21 cases with an FTMH (<400 μm) were included. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography findings were recorded before IOI, and 1 day to 24 months thereafter. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Results: Mean adhesion size before injection was 345 ± 146 μm. In 34 eyes (67%), complete release of VMT was observed; whereas VMT persisted in 17 eyes (33%). The latter included 15 of the 21 eyes (71%) with FTMH, 15 of which underwent pars plana vitrectomy and inner limiting membrane peeling. BCVA improved from (logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [logMAR]) 0.41 ± 0.03 before injection to 0.32 ± 0.03 after 1 month and 0.23 ± 0.05 after 6 months and remained stable thereafter (0.24 ± 0.06 after 24 months of follow-up). Forty-five percent of the eyes presented submacular deposits soon after IOI that were not functionally relevant; 61% completely resolved by 12 months. Except floaters that disappeared within 48 h, no other adverse events were reported during follow-up. Conclusions: Treatment with ocriplasmin in a real-life setting showed an overall efficacy of 67% in patients with symptomatic VMT, with better results evident in the absence of an FTMH (70% vs. 62% VMT release) and a visual gain for over 2 years.

Pharmacotherapy for Choroidal Neovascularization Due to Uncommon Causes

BACKGROUND

Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in adults is most commonly associated with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and pathologic myopia. Though less common, CNV can also develop from other conditions such as uveitis, central serous chorioretinopathy, angioid streaks, intraocular tumors, hereditary chorioretinal dystrophies, or can be idiopathic in origin. If left untreated, CNV may cause visual loss because of exudation of intraretinal or subretinal fluid, retinal or subretinal hemorrhage, or fibrosis involving the macula. It is well known that one of the main drivers of angiogenesis in CNV development is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and therefore inhibitors of VEGF might be an effective treatment for CNV.

METHODS

The goal of this review is to provide an overview and summary in the use of pharmacotherapy especially anti-VEGF therapy, in the treatment of CNV due to uncommon causes.

RESULTS

Results from uncontrolled case series and controlled clinical trials have reported good efficacy and safety in using anti-VEGF agents including bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept and ziv-aflibercept in the treatment of CNV due to uncommon causes. Anti-VEGF has also been used in combination with verteporfin PDT and anti-inflammatory agents for treating CNV of various causes.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacotherapy with anti-VEGF agents is an effective treatment option for CNV due to uncommon etiologies.