Camouflage of a high-angle skeletal Class II open-bite malocclusion in an adult after mini-implant failure during treatment

Class II and anterior open bite malocclusion treated with mini-implants, intermaxillary elastics, speech therapy, and retained with a night-wear palatal crib wraparound

The teeth position in anterior open bite malocclusion depends on a balance of pressure between the tongue and lips and the treatment planning should include such variables. The objective of this study was to report an orthodontic case of an adult with maxillary protrusion and anterior open bite treated with skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics. The patient presented a Class II malocclusion with anterior open bite, without a history of non-nutritive habits, and mandibular missing teeth at 54 years old. Mini-implants were inserted in the maxillary molars region to produce distal movement of the maxillary dentition while controlling molar extrusion, and in the mandibular anterior region on the left side to produce mesial movement of posterior teeth. Up and down intermaxillary elastics were worn in the area of the incisors to treat the open bite together with Class II intermaxillary elastics. Cleats were bonded in the lingual surface of the anterior teeth as spurs to the tongue posture. However, the best result on the anterior open bite treatment was coincident with the speech therapy. Normal relationships between the maxillary and mandibular occlusal plane of cusps, correct anterior overbite, and adequate proximal relationships were obtained at the end of treatment. The retention modality to the maxillary arch was daily wear of a removable standard wraparound and a night-time wraparound with the palatal crib. The new technology allows for more effective treatment in adults and speech therapy was helpful to achieve balanced pressure between the tongue and lips.

Orthodontic correction of a skeletal Class II malocclusion with severe gummy smile by total intrusion of the maxillary dentition

A 22-year-old woman visited the hospital complaining of lip protrusion, crowded teeth, and a gummy smile. The clinical examination showed a convex profile with a hyperdivergent mandible and a severe gummy smile in both anterior and posterior regions. The unstable mandible position was considered during treatment planning, and a targeted mechanic system was carefully designed. Temporary skeletal anchorage devices in the posterior dental region and a transpalatal arch were introduced as anchorage for the intrusion of the entire maxillary dentition and controlled retraction of the anterior teeth. Based on effective and simple mechanisms, we successfully eliminated the severe gummy smile and improved the facial aesthetics with the aid of conventional appliances. This approach provided an alternative option to orthognathic surgery or bulky invasive miniscrews for treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion with severe gummy smile.

Total maxillary arch distalization by using headgear in an adult patient

Although headgear is rarely used in adult patients, its use in adults is mainly for anchorage control. In the current case report, a 24-year-old patient had a skeletal Class I relationship with a Class II tendency, brachyfacial pattern, significant facial asymmetry, and dental 3/4 cusp Class II molar and canine relationships on both sides. The patient declined surgery, and facial asymmetry was not his concern. The final treatment goal was to achieve a stable Class I dental relationship and normal occlusion without significantly compromising the patient's profile. The patient was compliant with the use of cervical-pull headgear after he refused the options of orthodontic-orthognathic combined treatment, maxillary premolar extraction, or temporary skeletal anchorage mini-implants. A 5-mm maxillary arch distal movement was accomplished without significant distal tipping of the molar crowns. The active treatment duration was 31 months. Proper overbite and overjet, balanced occlusion, and an acceptable facial profile were achieved. The treatment results inspire reconsideration of the possibility of using headgear in dental Class II correction in adult patients.

Alveolar cortical plate changes associated with incisor retraction and its influence on the limits of orthodontic tooth movement

OBJECTIVE

The extent to which the modelling behaviour of the anterior alveolus limits tooth movement remains unclear. Will the labial and lingual cortical plates model as incisors retract, or will they remain unchanged, therefore limiting the extent of possible tooth movement?

SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION

Pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalometric radiographs of 29 bimaxillary protrusive patients of South Korean descent were examined. Treatment consisted of two premolar extractions in one or both arches with en masse retraction of the incisors using miniscrew anchorage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pre- and post-treatment measurements of both tooth and cortical plate position were made at various increments along the length of the root and then compared using paired t tests.

RESULTS

Despite the use of miniscrew anchorage, the incisors were retracted by controlled tipping. The labial cortical plates in both arches modelled to follow tooth movement. Following retraction of the incisors in the maxilla, the incisor root approached the lingual cortical plate, which remained unchanged. In the mandible, the lingual cortical plate position was unchanged except at the level closest to the cementoenamel junction.

CONCLUSIONS

The maxillary and mandibular lingual cortical plates did not model to follow the incisor movement while the labial cortical plates did. These findings suggest that lingual cortical plates may act as limitations to planned orthodontic tooth movement.