Can 3D imaging and digital software increase the ability to predict dental arch form after orthodontic treatment?

Digital setup accuracy for moderate crowding correction with fixed orthodontic appliances: a prospective study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the accuracy of a semi-automatic 3D digital setup process in predicting the orthodontic treatment outcome achieved by labial fixed appliances.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Twenty-five adult patients (18 to 24 years old) with class I malocclusion and moderate crowding were prospectively enrolled and received treatment on both jaws through the straight-wire technique. Prior to treatment commencement, a semi-automatic digital setup simulating the predicted treatment outcome was performed for each patient through Orthoanalyzer software (3Shape®, Copenhagen, Denmark) to obtain the prediction model. This was compared to the final outcome model through 3D superimposition methods. Metric variables and inspection of color-coded distance maps were used to detect how accurately the digital setup predicts the actual treatment outcome.

RESULTS

The mean absolute distances (MAD) between the superimposed dental arches of the predicted and the final models were: 0.77 ± 0.13 mm following superimposition on the palate, 0.52 ± 0.06 mm following superimposition on the maxillary dental arch, and 0.55 ± 0.15 mm following superimposition on the mandibular dental arch. The MAD at the palatal reference area was 0.09 ± 0.04 mm. Visualization of color-coded distance maps indicated that the digital setup accurately predicted the final teeth position in a few cases. Almost half of the cases had posteriorly wider upper and lower dental arches and palatally/lingually positioned or inclined anterior teeth, whereas the rest still showed errors within 2-3 mm, distributed over the entire dental arches with no distinct pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of semi-automatic prediction of the labial fixed appliance treatment outcome in Class I cases with moderate crowding is not yet sufficient. While average measures showed deviations less than 1 mm, examination of individual color-coded distance maps revealed significant disparities between the simulated and the actual results.

Accuracy of dental arch form in customized fixed labial orthodontic appliances

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated arch form accuracy with or without premolar extraction in customized fixed labial orthodontic appliance treatment.

METHODS

Setup and posttreatment digital models of 27 samples (15 extractions and 12 nonextractions) were selected and superimposed by best-fit surface-based registration in both the maxilla and the mandible. The facial axis points were identified and converted into Cartesian coordinates. A sixth-order polynomial equation was used to fit dental arches. Arch discrepancies (the mean distance between 2 arch forms) and similarities were compared between extraction and nonextraction groups, maxilla and mandible, and anterior and posterior arches.

RESULTS

The arch discrepancy between extraction and nonextraction groups showed no statistically significant difference, but a statistically significant difference in arch similarity was found in the mandible. There were statistically significant differences between anterior and posterior arch discrepancies in the extraction (mandible) and the nonextraction (maxilla and mandible) groups. However, no statistically significant correlation was shown between anterior and posterior arch discrepancies. The arch similarities were 96.18% and 97.38% in the maxilla and 96.01% and 97.49% in the mandible between extraction and nonextraction groups. Arch form discrepancies and similarities showed a moderate correlation but no statistically significant differences between the maxilla and the mandible.

CONCLUSIONS

In customized fixed labial orthodontic appliance treatment, arch form setup can be accurately achieved with and without premolar extraction. Anterior arch form acquires fewer discrepancies than the posterior arch, and overcorrection should be added to the end of the customized archwire to reduce posterior arch discrepancies. The discrepancy of the maxillary and mandibular arches is interrelated, and adjustments should be made on both maxillary and mandibular archwires to correct single-jaw transverse malposition.