Changes of maxillary central incisor and alveolar bone in Class II Division 2 nonextraction treatment with a fixed appliance or clear aligner: A pilot cone-beam computed tomography study

Root resorption in clear aligner treatment detected by CBCT: a Systematic review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of external apical root resorption in patients who had undergone orthodontic treatment with clear aligners evaluated using cone beam computed tomography.

METHODS

Studies that evaluated external apical root resorption before and after comprehensive orthodontic treatment with clear aligners were assessed by performing an electronic search from 5 databases comprising PubMed, SCOPUS, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, and LILACS and manual searches in the relevant journals and the reference lists of the included studies. Database search, elimination of duplicate studies, and data extraction were performed independently by 2 authors. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies-of Interventions and the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool. Studies that reported the tooth length or volume were used for quantitative analyses.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall root length after clear aligner treatment was significantly decreased compared with the pre-treatment length using cone beam computed tomography (mean differences = -0.56 mm, 95% confidence interval [-0.73, -0.38], P < .00001). However, only the maxillary central incisors, maxillary lateral incisors, and mandibular central incisors had significant reduction in root length. The meta-analysis from 3 studies also indicated that the root volume of the upper incisors also significantly decreased (mean differences = -13.34 mm3, 95% confidence interval [-16.57, -10.10], P < .00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that clear aligners can cause minimal root resorption. The highest amount of root resorption was observed in the maxillary central incisors.

Evaluation of Mandibular Projection in Class II Division 2 Subjects Following Orthodontic Treatment Using Clear Aligners

AIM

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mandibular growth and/or projection following maxillary incisor proclination, overbite correction, and maxillary dentoalveolar expansion without the use of any class II mechanics, in growing class II division 2 patients treated with clear aligners.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Before and after treatment cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) generated lateral and posteroanterior cephalograms of thirty-two patients with skeletal class II division 2, 16 in the treatment group and 16 in the untreated group, were reviewed to evaluate treatment-related changes. Upper incisors were proclined and protruded, as well as upper arch expansion and overbite correction were performed as part of their regular treatment. Cephalometric analysis was performed to evaluate skeletal and dental changes. Unpaired statistical t-tests were performed to determine if significant skeletal class II correction was achieved in the treatment group.

RESULTS

In the treatment group, after treatment, the upper incisors became more proclined and protruded, and the inter-molar width increased while the overbite was reduced compared to the control group. An increase in skeletal mandibular growth and forward projection was also observed, thus contributing to an improvement of the sagittal skeletal relationship as evidenced by ANB and Wits values compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

A combination of upper incisor proclination, correction of deep overbite, and maxillary dentoalveolar expansion using clear aligners appears to contribute to an improvement of the skeletal class II relationship in growing patients with class II division 2.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study shows that unlocking the mandible by correcting a deep overbite, proclining upper incisors, and expanding the upper arch in growing class II division 2 patients can improve skeletal class II using clear aligners. How to cite this article: Mirzasoleiman P, El-Bialy T, Wiltshire WA, et al. Evaluation of Mandibular Projection in Class II Division 2 Subjects Following Orthodontic Treatment Using Clear Aligners. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(4):295-302.

Treatment effects after maxillary expansion using tooth-borne vs tissue-borne miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion appliance

INTRODUCTION

The study investigated the skeletal effects and root resorption in young adults with maxillary transverse deficiency after tissue-borne or tooth-borne mini-implant anchorage maxillary expansion.

METHODS

Ninety-one young adults with maxillary transverse deficiency, aged 16-25 years, were divided into 3 groups according to the treatment method: group A (n = 29) comprising patients treated with tissue-borne miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE), the group B (n = 32) comprising patients treated with tooth-borne MARPE, and the control group (n = 30) comprising patients only treated with fixed orthodontic therapies. Pretreatment and posttreatment cone-beam computed tomography images were used to assess the change of maxillary width, nasal width, first molar torque and root volume by paired t test in the 3 groups, respectively. Analysis of variance and Tukey least significant difference analysis were used to detect the changes of all descriptions among the 3 groups P <0.05.

RESULTS

In the 2 experimental groups, we observed significant increases in the width of the maxilla, nasal, and arch width, as well as the molar torque. In addition, the height of the alveolar bone and the root volume decreased significantly. There were no significant differences in the maxilla, nasal, and arch width change between the 2 groups. Group B displayed more increases in buccal tipping, alveolar bone loss, and root volume loss than group A (P <0.05). Compared with groups A and B, the control group showed negligible tooth volume loss, with no expansion effect in both skeletal and dental descriptions.

CONCLUSIONS

Tissue-borne MARPE produced the same expansion efficiency as tooth-borne MARPE. However, tooth-borne MARPE causes more dentoalveolar side effects in buccal tipping, root resorption and alveolar bone loss.

Asymmetric Extraction Treatment in a Middle-Aged Patient with Dental Crowding and Protrusion using Clear Aligners

Frequently, orthodontic treatment involves symmetrically extracting premolars to correct severe crowding or protrusion. Nevertheless, in some cases, a more reasonable alternative may be to remove teeth with poor prognoses to improve protrusion and relieve crowding. A middle-aged woman sought treatment for dental protrusion and crowding. Her mandibular right first molar had been treated with root canal therapy due to pulpitis, but she still felt uncomfortable. In addition, her maxillary left second premolar had become carious. Extractions of the maxillary right first premolar and left second premolar, as well as mandibular right first molar and left first premolar were chosen to resolve the occlusion problems. The patient opted for clear aligners on the demands of esthetics as well as comfort. Following orthodontic treatment, the patient attained properly aligned teeth, a pleasing smile, and a facial profile that exhibited greater harmony. This case report demonstrates that, under proper planning, clear aligners are capable of handling challenging cases, including those involving middle-aged individuals and molar extractions.

[Comparison of the outcome of orthodontic dental movement using aligners versus fixed orthodontics: a review]

Introduction

The aligners have become a preferred alternative in terms of orthodontic treatment, surpassing the choice of conventional brackets, due to the comfort and aesthetics that the aligners represent, however, the final result with this system continues to be a controversial issue. The objective of this review was to verify the effectiveness of the treatment completed with aligners versus conventional brackets.

Materials and methods

An exhaustive search was carried out in the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Embase databases up to the date of January 5, 2023, including comparative studies that evaluated the final result and treatment time of the aligners compared to conventional braces. Two researchers carefully selected the articles evaluated and analyzed different key topics on the subject.

Results

In this study, 8 articles were included, according to the studies, the vast majority did not find significant differences in completion between the compared groups. In addition to this, the treatment time in 3 articles was faster with aligners, in 3 articles it was faster with conventional brackets, and in one article no significant difference was found, so it is not yet established whether a system is faster than the other.

Conclusions

Both aligners and conventional fixed orthodontics had good results at the end of orthodontic treatment and presented a similar treatment time, however, the majority of treated cases belonged to malocclusions of medium to low complexity, so these cannot be generalized. findings to all malocclusions.