Fetal RhD genotyping by maternal serum analysis: a two-year experience

A new biosensor for noninvasive determination of fetal RHD status in maternal blood of RhD negative pregnant women

Prenatal detection of the fetal RHD status can be useful in the management of RhD incompatibility to identify fetuses at risk of hemolytic disease. Hemolytic disease causes morbidity and mortality of the fetus in the neonatal period. The routine use of antenatal and postnatal anti-D prophylaxis has reduced the incidence of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. This study describe the detection of fetal RhD antigens in blood of RhD negative pregnant women using a nanopolymer coated electrochemical biosensor for medical diagnosis. Cell free fetal DNA in maternal plasma was also used to genotyping fetal RHD status using multiplex real-time PCR. Twenty-six RhD negative pregnant women in different gestational ages were included in the study. RhD positive fetal antibodies detected with a developed biosensor in maternal blood of RhD negative mothers. The electrochemical measurements were performed on a PalmSens potentiostat, and corundum ceramic based screen printed gold electrode combined with the reference Ag/AgCl electrode, and the auxiliary Au/Pd (98/2%) electrode. Fetal RHD genotyping performed using fluorescence-based multiplex real-time PCR exons 5 and 7 of the RHD gene. The fetal RHD status of 26 RhD negative cases were detected 21 as RhD positive and 5 as RhD negative with electrochemical biosensor. Fetal RHD status confirmed with extracted fetal DNA in maternal plasma using multiplex real-time PCR RHD genotyping and by serological test after delivery. The new method for fetal RhD detection in early pregnancy is useful and can be carry out rapidly in clinical diagnosis. Using automated biosensors are reproducible, quick and results can be generated within a few minutes compared to noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping from maternal plasma with real-time PCR-based techniques. We suggest the biosensor techniques could become an alternative part of fetal RHD genotyping from maternal plasma as a prenatal screening in the management of RhD incompatibility.

Diagnostic accuracy of fetal rhesus D genotyping using cell-free fetal DNA during the first trimester of pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Rhesus D genotyping with cell-free fetal DNA currently is used throughout the world. Although this technique has spread rapidly, its optimal use is still a matter of debate. This screening test has been introduced mainly for the treatment of RhD-negative pregnant women during the third trimester of pregnancy, thereby avoiding systematic anti-D prophylaxis, yet such a strategy has proved cost-ineffective. Publications reporting on fetal RHD genotyping with cell-free DNA in maternal plasma, specifically during the first trimester of pregnancy, are scarce in the scientific literature.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to assess the performance of noninvasive fetal Rhesus D genotyping in the first trimester of pregnancy with a single-exon real-time polymerase chain reaction assay.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective observational multicenter study. Cell-free fetal DNA was extracted from maternal blood of both nonimmunized and immunized women at 10-14 weeks of gestation. RHD sequence was determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, with amplification of exon 10. Results were compared with RhD phenotype data that were obtained by cord blood sampling of neonates.

RESULTS

In total, 416 serum samples from RhD-negative pregnant women were collected during the first trimester of pregnancy. The test's overall sensitivity and specificity were 100% (95% confidence interval, 96.9-100.0) and 95.2% (95% confidence interval, 90.5-97.6), respectively. The negative and positive predictive values were 99.8% (95% confidence interval, 94.9-100.0) and 97.1% (95% confidence interval, 94.2-98.6), respectively. Fetal RHD status was inconclusive in 9 cases (2.2%).

CONCLUSION

Noninvasive fetal RHD determination by single-exon quantitative polymerase chain reaction during the first trimester of pregnancy exhibits high accuracy.

Fetal RHD Genotyping Using Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis of Cell-Free Fetal DNA in Pregnancy of RhD Negative Women in South of Iran

BACKGROUND

Maternal-fetal RhD antigen incompatibility causes approximately 50% of clinically significant alloimmunization cases. The routine use of prophylactic anti-D immunoglobulin has dramatically reduced hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Recently, fetal RHD genotyping in RhD negative pregnant women has been suggested for appropriate use of anti-D immunoglobulin antenatal prophylaxis and decrease unnecessary prenatal interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, in order to develop a reliable and non-invasive method for fetal RHD genotyping, cell free fetal DNA (cffD- NA) was extracted from maternal plasma. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for detection of RHD exons 7, 5, 10 and intron 4 was performed and the results were compared to the serological results of cord blood cells as the gold standard method. SRY gene and hypermethylated Ras-association domain family member 1 (RASSF1A) gene were used to confirm the presence of fetal DNA in male and female fetuses, respectively.

RESULTS

Out of 48 fetuses between 8 and 32 weeks (wks) of gestational age (GA), we correctly diagnosed 45 cases (93.75%) of RHD positive fetuses and 2 cases (4.16%) of the RHD negative one. Exon 7 was amplified in one sample, while three other RHD gene sequences were not detected; the sample was classified as inconclusive, and the RhD serology result after birth showed that the fetus was RhD-negative.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed high accuracy of the qPCR method using cffDNA for fetal RHD genotyping and implicate on the efficiency of this technique to predict the competence of anti-D immunoglobulin administration.

The Glass Slide Extraction System Snap Card Improves Non-Invasive Prenatal Genotyping in Pregnancies with Antibodies

BACKGROUND

Determination of fetal blood groups in maternal plasma samples critically depends on adequate pre-analytical steps for optimal amplification of fetal DNA. We compared the extraction of cell-free DNA by binding on a glass surface (BCSI SNAP™ Card) with an automated system based on bead technology (MagnaPure compact™).

METHODS

Maternal blood samples from 281 pregnancies (7th-39th week of gestation) with known antibodies were evaluated in this study. Both the SNAP card and the MagnaPure method were applied to isolate DNA in order to directly compare the amplification in a single base extension assay and/or real-time PCR.

RESULTS

The mean concentration of total DNA obtained by the SNAP card (33.8 ng/µl) exceeded more than twofold that of MagnaPure extraction (15.7 ng/µl). SNAP card-extracted samples allowed to detect 3.7 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) versus 2.5 SNPs in MagnaPure extracts to control for traces of fetal DNA. This difference is highest for samples from 7th-13th week of gestation.

CONCLUSION

The SNAP card system improves DNA extraction efficacy for prenatal diagnosis in maternal blood samples and provides an at least eightfold higher total amount of DNA for the ensuing analysis. Its advantage is most evident for samples from early stages of pregnancy and thus especially valuable for pregnancies with antibodies.

Considerations of red blood cell molecular testing in transfusion medicine

The field of transfusion medicine is on the threshold of a paradigm shift, as the technology for genotyping of red blood cell antigens, including US FDA-approved arrays, is now moving into standard practice. Access to cost-efficient, high-resolution genotyping has the potential to increase the quality of care by decreasing the risk for alloimmunization and incompatible transfusions in individuals on long-term blood transfusion protocols, including patient groups with hemoglobinopathies and other chronic diseases. Current and future applications of molecular methods in transfusion medicine and blood banking are discussed, with emphasis on indications for genotyping in various clinical scenarios. Furthermore, limitations of the current gold standard methodology and serology, as well as of contemporary molecular methodology, are examined.

Fetal Sex and RHD Genotyping with Digital PCR Demonstrates Greater Sensitivity than Real-time PCR

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive genotyping of fetal RHD (Rh blood group, D antigen) can prevent the unnecessary administration of prophylactic anti-D to women carrying RHD-negative fetuses. We evaluated laboratory methods for such genotyping.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected in EDTA tubes and Streck® Cell-Free DNA™ blood collection tubes (Streck BCTs) from RHD-negative women (n = 46). Using Y-specific and RHD-specific targets, we investigated variation in the cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) fraction and determined the sensitivity achieved for optimal and suboptimal samples with a novel Droplet Digital™ PCR (ddPCR) platform compared with real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR).

RESULTS

The cffDNA fraction was significantly larger for samples collected in Streck BCTs compared with samples collected in EDTA tubes (P < 0.001). In samples expressing optimal cffDNA fractions (≥4%), both qPCR and digital PCR (dPCR) showed 100% sensitivity for the TSPY1 (testis-specific protein, Y-linked 1) and RHD7 (RHD exon 7) assays. Although dPCR also had 100% sensitivity for RHD5 (RHD exon 5), qPCR had reduced sensitivity (83%) for this target. For samples expressing suboptimal cffDNA fractions (<2%), dPCR achieved 100% sensitivity for all assays, whereas qPCR achieved 100% sensitivity only for the TSPY1 (multicopy target) assay.

CONCLUSIONS

qPCR was not found to be an effective tool for RHD genotyping in suboptimal samples (<2% cffDNA). However, when testing the same suboptimal samples on the same day by dPCR, 100% sensitivity was achieved for both fetal sex determination and RHD genotyping. Use of dPCR for identification of fetal specific markers can reduce the occurrence of false-negative and inconclusive results, particularly when samples express high levels of background maternal cell-free DNA.

The Most Favourable Procedure for the Isolation of Cell-Free DNA from the Plasma of Iso-Immunized RHD-Negative Pregnant Women

BACKGROUND

The ability to achieve quality recovery of cell-free foetal DNA is important for making non-invasive prenatal diagnoses. In this study, we performed quantitative and qualitative analyses of isolated DNA from maternal plasma, using different DNA-isolation methods.

METHOD

DNA was isolated from 30 iso-immunized women via the QIAamp column-based method, using four different elution volumes and two conventionally based methods. Real-time polymerase chain-reaction quantification of RHD and β-globin genes was performed in order to determine foetal-specific sequences and total genome equivalents, respectively.

RESULTS

The column-based method at a 3 μl elution volume yielded the highest quality and quantity of total DNA (67.0±0.6 ng/μL). At a 3 μl elution volume, the β-globin and RHD-gene sequences were estimated to be the highest among all isolation procedures, with 2778.13±1.5 and 66.9±0.6 GEq/mL, respectively, and a 100% sensitivity for RHD-gene sequence detection. Among the two conventional manual methods, the boiling lysis method yielded a higher DNA concentration (53.8±0.8 ng/μL) and purity (1.73±0.05). In addition, the method's sensitivity for foetal-detection sequences was only 80%, whereas the salting-out method's sensitivity was just 70%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the theory that the QIAamp method is a specific and sensitive approach for purifying and quantifying plasma DNA, when used in the minimum elution volume.

Non-Invasive Prenatal RHD Genotyping Using Cell-Free Fetal DNA from Maternal Plasma: An Italian Experience

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of a non-invasive approach to fetal RHD genotyping using cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma and a combination of methodological strategies.

METHODS

Real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed on 216 RhD-negative women between weeks 10+0 and 14+6 of gestation (1st qPCR). qPCR was repeated (2nd qPCR) to increase the amount of each sample for analysis, on 95 plasma aliquots that were available from first trimester blood collection (group 1) and on 13 samples that were collected between weeks 18+0 and 25+6 of gestation (group 2). qPCR was specific for exons 5 and 7 of the RHD gene (RHD5 and RHD7). The results were interpreted according to the number of positive replicates of both exons.

RESULTS

1st qPCR: diagnostic accuracy was of 93.3%. Diagnostic accuracy increased from 90.5% (1st qPCR) to 93.7% (2nd qPCR) in group 1 and from 84.6% (1st qPCR) to 92.3% (2nd qPCR) in group 2. These increments were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Our approach to RHD genotyping in early pregnancy yielded high diagnostic accuracy. Increasing the amount of DNA analyzed in each sample did not improve significantly the diagnostic accuracy of the test.

Determination of fetal chromosome aberrations from fetal DNA in maternal blood: has the challenge finally been met?

The analysis of cell-free fetal nucleic acids in maternal blood for prenatal diagnosis has been transformed by several recent profound technology developments. The most noteworthy of these are 'digital PCR' and 'next-generation sequencing' (NGS), which might finally deliver the long-sought goal of noninvasive detection of fetal aneuploidy. Recent data, however, indicate that NGS might even be able to offer a much more detailed appraisal of the fetal genome, including paternal and maternal inheritance of point mutations for mendelian disorders such as β-thalassaemia. Although these developments are very exciting, in their current form they are still too complex and costly, and will need to be simplified considerably for their optimal translation to the clinic. In this regard, targeted NGS does appear to be a step in the right direction, although this should be seen in the context of ongoing progress with the isolation of fetal cells and with proteomic screening markers.

Sharpening the Tools: A summary of a National Institutes of Health workshop on new technologies for detection of fetal cells in maternal blood for early prenatal diagnosis

In 2003 the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) sponsored a workshop entitled "Sharpening the Tools", which was designed to explore the then current state of prenatal diagnosis and screening using fetal cells in maternal blood. The goals of the workshop were to: review the then current state of the field and assess present capabilities, identify future research needs and challenges in this area, identify promising new and innovative approaches for future exploration, and provide a written summary of the conference for public distribution. The workshop featured brief presentations by experts from a wide range of scientific fields and by innovative bioengineering and technology leaders from academic centers and private industry. The workshop was divided into presentations on target cells, target approaches for separation, genetic and protein analysis, and "out of the box" (bioengineering) approaches. The passage of time since the workshop has allowed an objective assessment of where the research has progressed. A 2006 update on the field is included at the end of the summary.

The SAFE project: towards non-invasive prenatal diagnosis

After the revolutionary detection of ffDNA (free fetal DNA) in maternal circulation by real-time PCR in 1997 and advances in molecular techniques, NIPD (non-invasive prenatal diagnosis) is now a clinical reality. Non-invasive diagnosis using ffDNA has been implemented, allowing the detection of paternally inherited alleles, sex-linked conditions and some single-gene disorders and is a viable indicator of predisposition to certain obstetric complications [e.g. PET (pre-eclampsia)]. To date, the major use of ffDNA genotyping in the clinic has been for the non-invasive detection of the pregnancies that are at risk of HDFN (haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn). This has seen numerous clinical services arising across Europe and many large-scale NIPD genotyping studies taking place using maternal plasma. Because of the interest in performing NIPD and the speed at which the research in this area was developing, the SAFE (Special Non-Invasive Advances in Fetal and Neonatal Evaluation) NoE (Network of Excellence) was founded. The SAFE project was set up to implement routine, cost-effective NIPD and neonatal screening through the creation of long-term partnerships within and beyond the European Community and has played a major role in the standardization of non-invasive RHD genotyping. Other research using ffDNA has focused on the amount of ffDNA present in the maternal circulation, with a view to pre-empting various complications of pregnancy. One of the key areas of interest in the non-invasive arena is the prenatal detection of aneuploid pregnancies, particularly Down's syndrome. Owing to the high maternal DNA background, detection of ffDNA from maternal plasma is very difficult; consequently, research in this area is now more focused on ffRNA to produce new biomarkers.

Prenatal diagnosis: update on invasive versus noninvasive fetal diagnostic testing from maternal blood

The modern obstetrics care includes noninvasive prenatal diagnosis testing such as first trimester screening performed between 11 and 14 weeks' gestation and second trimester screening performed between 15 and 20 weeks. In these screening tests, biochemical markers are measured in the maternal blood with or without ultrasound for fetal nuchal translucency with reported accuracy of up to 90%. Invasive procedures, including amniocentesis or chorionic villi sampling, are used to achieve over 99% accuracy. During these procedures direct fetal material is examined and, therefore, these tests are highly accurate with the caveat of a small risk for pregnancy loss. Much research now focuses on other noninvasive highly accurate and risk-free tests that will identify fetal material in the maternal blood. Fetal cells and fetal DNA/RNA provide fetal information but are hard to find in an overwhelming background of maternal cells and in the absence of specific fetal cell markers. The most experience has been accumulated with fetal rhesus and fetal sex determination from maternal blood, with an accuracy of up to 100% by using gene sequences that are absent from maternal blood. Although not clinically applicable yet, fetal cells, fetal DNA/RNA and fetal proteomics in combination with cutting edge technology are described to prenatally diagnose aneuploidies and single-gene disorders.

Non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping tests: a systematic review of the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy in published studies

Articles reporting the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive prenatal diagnostic (NIPD) tests for RHD genotyping using fetal material extracted from maternal blood have been published steadily for over a decade. Health care providers in Europe have started to use this technology for management of the small number of sensitised pregnancies (ca. 220-600 per annum in the Netherlands, Germany, France and the UK). Scientists and clinicians are also advocating widespread implementation for the far larger number of non-sensitised RhD-negative pregnancies (ca. 34,000-125,000 per annum in the same countries). Large-scale, prospective trials are only now underway. Estimates of the technical performance of these tests are currently based on results from small-scale studies, together with formal meta-analysis. The issue of early assessment of test performance is one faced by many new genetic tests. As part of a wider study we have investigated the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy in publications and produced guidelines for future studies. A systematic search of the literature identified 27 papers which met predefined inclusion criteria. All 27 papers were, first, assessed against an international quality (STARD) checklist for reporting of diagnostic accuracy and, second, against our own in-house NIPD proforma to assess the implications of the quality of reporting specifically for the RhD NIPD test. Authors were found to generally present an optimistic view of NIPD, bearing in mind weaknesses identified in reporting and conduct of their studies and the analysis of results, as evidenced by the low STARD scores. The NIPD proforma identified that specific biases were potentially introduced through selective population sampling and/or failure to report the make-up of the population tested, omission of inconclusive results, inconsistencies in the handling of repeat results on a sample, and lack of adequate controls. These factors would inevitably affect the validity of diagnostic accuracy as reported in individual publications, as well as any subsequent meta-analyses. Together, published reports to date may provide a biased picture of the actual potential of NIPD testing for fetal RHD genotyping. Generalisation of the available evidence on diagnostic accuracy, especially to large-scale implementation of NIPD testing of non-sensitised women, will also require that decision makers consider further aspects such as test reliability and cost of routine testing in clinical practice. It is recommended that all studies of diagnostic accuracy of NIPD tests adhere to the STARD quality checklist in order to improve reporting, thereby, minimising bias and increasing the comparability of studies. Researchers should also consider specific shortcomings for NIPD and avoid selective participant sampling; report population characteristics; report handling of replicate sampling as well as their failure rates; and include controls for genotypes tested in the study. Furthermore, meta-analyses should consider the quality, as well as the sample size, of NIPD studies in their analysis. Larger trials, required to produce results that are valid and meaningful for clinical practice, must also adhere to these reporting standards.

An increased risk for non allo-immunization related intrauterine fetal death in RhD-negative patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate immediate perinatal outcome of RhD-negative patients carrying RhD-positive fetuses who received antenatal Rh immunoglobulin for the prevention of RhD-mediated hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.

METHODS

A retrospective population-based analysis was conducted comparing pregnancies of all RhD-negative women who received antenatal Rh immunoglobulin prophylaxis (anti-D), to RhD-positive parturients, during the years 1988-2003. All women were RhD-negative without evidence of RhD sensitization. Patients received anti-D during the 28-30th week of pregnancy, and an additional dosage within 72 hours following delivery after confirmation of the newborn's RhD status.

RESULTS

Of 145,437 deliveries during the study period, 6.8% were of RhD-negative women (n = 9961). Perinatal mortality rate was significantly higher among the RhD-negative women who received antenatal prophylaxis rhesus immunoglobulin as compared with the controls (17/1000 vs. 12/1000, OR = 1.3, 95%CI 1.2-1.6; p < 0.001). This higher mortality rate was related to a higher rate of intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD) (10/1000 vs. 6/1000, OR = 1.5, 95%CI 1.2-1.9; p < 0.001). The association remained significant after controlling for RhD isoimmunization leading to hydrops fetalis, using the Mantel-Haenszel technique (weighted OR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.5; p = 0.001). The rate of RhD isoimmunization was 0.6% (n = 58). Using a multivariable analysis with IUFD as the outcome variable, controlling for known confounders for fetal demise, RhD-negative status was an independent risk factor for IUFD.

CONCLUSION

RhD-negative women carrying RhD-positive newborns are at an increased risk for IUFD despite Rh immunoprophylaxis.

Prenatal diagnosis in maternal plasma of a fetal mutation causing propionic acidemia

Prenatal diagnosis (PD) is available to families affected with propionic acidemia (PA), however, it entails a risk of miscarriage. Fetal DNA circulating in maternal blood could allow performing a safe prenatal diagnosis of fetal mutations. Exclusion of the paternal mutation in maternal plasma may avoid conventional PD in cases of recessive disorders such us PA. In this work, we have correctly diagnosed in maternal plasma the status of a fetus at risk of PA for the paternal mutation.

New strategy for the prenatal detection/exclusion of paternal cystic fibrosis mutations in maternal plasma

BACKGROUND

Since the presence of fetal DNA was discovered in maternal blood, different investigations have focused on non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. The analysis of fetal DNA in maternal plasma may allow the diagnosis of fetuses at risk of cystic fibrosis (CF) without any risk of fetal loss. Here, we present a new strategy for the detection of fetal mutations causing CF in maternal plasma.

METHODS

We have used a mini-sequencing based method, the SNaPshot, for fetal genotyping of the paternal mutation in maternal blood from three pregnancies at risk of CF.

RESULTS

The paternal mutation was detected in the analysis of plasma samples from cases 1 and 3 but not in case 2. Results of a posterior conventional molecular analysis of chorionic biopsies were in full agreement with those obtained from analysis of the plasma samples.

CONCLUSIONS

The knowledge about the inheritance of the paternal mutation in a fetus may avoid the conventional prenatal diagnosis in some cases. The SNaPshot technique has been shown to be a sensitive and accurate method for the detection of fetal mutations in maternal plasma. Its ease handling, rapid and low cost makes it appropriate for a future routine clinical use in non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of cystic fibrosis.

Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis and determination of fetal Rh status

RhD blood group incompatibility between a pregnant woman and her fetus can result in maternal alloimmunization and consequent haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) in subsequent pregnancies. The D-negative blood group is found in 15% of whites, 3-5% of black Africans, and is rare in Asians. Recent technological advances in non-invasive prenatal determination of the fetal RHD status using cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) have opened new avenues for the management of D-negative pregnant women. In this review applications for the high risk women, as well as potential for routine screening will be discussed. The use of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis and the management of other blood incompatibilities will also be discussed.

Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping from maternal plasma. Use of a new developed Free DNA Fetal Kit RhD

Fetal RHD genotyping from maternal plasma was performed by real-time PCR amplification of exons 7 and 10 of the RHD gene and the amplified products were detected either with SYBR Green I dye according to our previously published method [Mol Diagn 8 (2004) 23-31] or with hydrolysis probes in a new Free DNA Fetal Kit RhD((R)). Plasma specimen from 300 RhD-negative pregnant women (between 10 to 34 weeks of gestation) were analysed and validation of the results was ascertained either by RHD genotyping on amniotic cells or by blood typing of the neonate at birth. We found 100% concordant results when comparing the two methods. Two false-positive but no false-negative results were found. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay was 100% and the specificity superior than 99%. These data confirm the accuracy of fetal RHD genotyping on maternal plasma using the Free DNA Fetal Kit RhD, thus allowing to propose non invasive PCR-based fetal RHD genotyping for all RhD-negative pregnant women and to restrict the use of anti-D immunoglobulins only to those bearing an RhD-positive fetus.

Foetal sex determination in maternal blood from the seventh week of gestation and its role in diagnosing haemophilia in the foetuses of female carriers

The existence of foetal DNA in maternal blood, discovered in 1997, opened new possibilities for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. This includes foetal sex assessment by the detection of specific Y chromosome sequences in maternal blood, particularly important when a foetus may be affected by an X-linked disorder such as haemophilia. This study aims to validate this sex assessment method and to test its clinical utility in the diagnosis of 15 potentially affected pregnancies in female carriers of haemophilia. In the validation study, 316 maternal blood samples from 196 pregnant women at gestations ranging from 5 weeks to 12 weeks were analysed. In the clinical study, 15 pregnancies at risk of having a haemophilic foetus were tested. All pregnancies in the validation study were correctly diagnosed. The accuracy and specificity of the methodology from the seventh week of gestation was 100%. The sex of all 15 pregnancies identified as being at risk of bearing a haemophilic foetus was correctly diagnosed. Foetal sex assessment by detecting specific Y chromosome sequences in maternal blood is now routinely used in our hospital because of its high accuracy from the seventh week of gestation. Reliable foetal gender determination from maternal blood of pregnant women carriers of haemophilia in the first trimester of gestation can avoid more conventional, invasive methods of prenatal diagnosis.

Routine fetal RHD genotyping with maternal plasma: a four-year experience in Belgium

BACKGROUND

The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic value of RHD fetal genotyping from the plasma of D- mothers as soon as 10 weeks' gestation in a routine clinical practice in Belgium.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted between November 2002 and December 2006. DNA extraction was performed in an automated closed tube system. Fetal RHD/SRY genotypes were detected in the plasma of 563 pregnant mothers by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting multiple exons 4, 5, and 10 of the RHD gene and targeting an SRY gene sequence. These were compared to the D phenotypes determined in the 581 babies they delivered.

RESULTS

By combining amplification of three exons, the concordance rate of fetal RHD genotypes in maternal plasma and newborn D phenotypes at delivery was 100 percent (99.8% including one unusual false-positive). The presence of nonfunctional RHD genes and the absence of a universal fetal marker, irrespective of fetal sex, did not influence the accuracy of fetal RhD status prediction. The RHD genotyping from 18 twin pregnancies was also assessed. Five weak D women were excluded from the RHD fetal genotyping prediction. Three discrepant results (0.5%) between predicted fetal genotype and cord blood phenotype were not confirmed by the baby phenotypes from venipuncture blood.

CONCLUSION

Prenatal prediction of fetal RHD by targeting multiple exons from the maternal plasma with real-time PCR is highly sensitive and accurate. Over 4 years, this experience has highly modified our management of D- pregnant women.

Circulating nucleic acids in plasma/serum

Since the discovery of circulating nucleic acids in plasma in 1948, many diagnostic applications have emerged. For example, diagnostic and prognostic potentials of circulating tumour-derived DNA have been demonstrated for many types of cancer. The parallel development of fetal-derived DNA detection in maternal plasma has opened up the possibility of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis and monitoring of many pregnancy-associated disorders. In this regard, non-invasive fetal rhesus blood group genotyping has already been translated to clinical practice. Other applications of circulating DNA in traumatology and transplant monitoring have also been reported. The more recent discoveries of circulating tumour-derived RNA and fetal-derived RNA have proven to be equally important as their DNA counterparts. Successful prenatal diagnosis of Down's syndrome by fetal RNA analysis has recently been reported. However, the definite origin and release mechanisms of circulating nucleic acids have remained incompletely understood, with cell death being suggested to be associated with such nucleic acid release. Pre-analytical standardisation will become increasingly relevant when comparing data from different laboratories. In conclusion, studies of circulating nucleic acids have promised exciting developments in molecular diagnostics in the years to come.

Fetal blood group genotyping

Blood group genotyping using DNA extracted from fetal tissue is useful to identify fetuses at risk for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) due to maternal red cell alloantibodies. Four considerations are important for fetal blood group genotyping. First, paternal heterozygosity must be established, including tests that evaluate RHD hemizygosity. Second, the source of fetal tissue for DNA extraction requires certain considerations. Third, because the fetal genotype is used to predict the expressed phenotype, a thorough knowledge of blood group genetics is required. Moreover, the test algorithm should include the evaluation of the parental phenotypes and genotypes to help identify variant alleles. Fourth, the blood group antigen expression at birth should be evaluated to confirm the inheritance. The identification of an antigen-negative fetus on the basis of the blood group genotype provides significant advantages in managing the pregnancy at risk for HDFN. In the near future, fetal DNA in maternal plasma will likely replace fetal blood group genotyping for RHD. Significant challenges remain to detect other clinically significant blood group antigens using maternal plasma DNA.

Improvement in fetal DNA extraction from maternal plasma. Evaluation of the NucliSens Magnetic Extraction system and the QIAamp DSP Virus Kit in comparison with the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit

OBJECTIVE

Prenatal diagnostic assays have been developed using free fetal DNA circulating in the maternal blood of pregnant women. Efficient DNA extraction is crucial for a robust analysis. To improve fetal DNA yield, we tested two manual extraction methods--the NucliSens Magnetic Extraction (NMAG) system and the QIAamp DSP Virus Kit (QDSP)--against our current standard method, the widely used QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (QDNA).

METHODS

The fetal DNA yield of the two extraction systems was evaluated using the RHD exon 7 as target in DNA extracts of 75 plasma samples from pregnant RhD-negative women, known to have given birth to RhD-positive infanto. The total DNA yield was evaluated in 23 samples, targeting GAPDH.

RESULTS

The fetal DNA yield was improved by a mean factor of 1.7 using the NMAG system, and improved by a mean factor of 1.5 using the QDSP. The total DNA yield was improved by a mean factor of 2.3 using the NMAG system, and by a mean factor of 1.3 using the QDSP.

CONCLUSION

Both extraction systems tested were superior to our standard with regard to DNA yield. This improvement may have a great impact on the success of genotyping in early pregnancy.

MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for quantitative, specific, and sensitive analysis of DNA and RNA

Cell-free fetal DNA and RNA released into the maternal circulation offer new opportunities to study fetal and pregnancy-associated abnormalities. Similarly, tumor cells can release cell-free DNA and RNA into the peripheral circulation, and these cell-free DNA and RNA can be used for cancer diagnosis, monitoring, and prognosis. However, these DNA and RNA often exist at very low concentrations (for fetal DNA, approximately 20 genome-equivalents (G.E.)/mL of plasma in the first trimester). The analysis is further complicated by the predominant amount of blood cell-derived DNA and RNA. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry can provide quantitative, specific, and sensitive analysis of DNA and RNA, and thus may be a useful technology for the field.