Women's health 18 years after rupture of the anal sphincter during childbirth: I. Fecal incontinence

Correlation of anorectal symptoms and endoanal ultrasound findings after obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)

INTRODUCTION

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) predispose to development of anorectal symptoms that affect women's quality of life.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted for all women with singleton vaginal deliveries who had a primary OASIS repair and attended the Postpartum Perineal Clinic between July 1st 2017 and December 31st 2020. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Board. The purpose of this study was (1) to determine correlation between endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) findings and anorectal symptoms quantified by the St. Mark's Incontinence Score (SMIS), (2) to determine the incidence of residual anal sphincter defects, and (3) to determine the rate of clinical overdiagnosis of OASIS. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess correlation between anorectal symptoms and EAUS findings.

RESULTS

A total of 247 participants with clinical diagnosis of OASIS met the inclusion criteria. A 3rd-degree tear was identified in 126 (51.0%) and 4th-degree tear was identified in 30 (12.1%) participants. In participants with sonographic evidence of OASIS, there was a statistically significant weak positive correlation between the size of residual defect and SMIS for both external anal sphincter (EAS) (r = .3723, p < .0001) and internal anal sphincter (IAS) (r = .3122, p = .0180). Residual defect in the anorectal sphincter of greater than 1 hour (> 30°) in width was present in 64.3% participants with 3rd-degree tear and 86.7% participants with 4th-degree tear. The rate of overdiagnosis was 36.8%.

CONCLUSION

The size of residual defect of EAS and IAS has a weak positive correlation with anorectal symptoms, emphasizing the importance of EAUS for counselling regarding mode of subsequent delivery.

Severity and impact of accidental bowel leakage two decades after no, one, or two sphincter injuries

BACKGROUND

Information about the long-term severity and subjective impact of anal incontinence in women after 1 or 2 consecutive obstetrical anal sphincter injuries is still scarce and contradictory.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the severity and impact of anal incontinence among women with 2 previous deliveries 2 decades after birth and to analyze the relative effect of 1 vs 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries in comparison with no obstetrical anal sphincter injuries and the possible influence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury on other pelvic floor disorders.

STUDY DESIGN

We linked prospectively registered data in the Swedish Medical Birth Register with information from a postal and web-based questionnaire in 2015. Statistics Sweden identified women with 2 vaginal births from 1992 to 1998, and a simple random sample of 11,000 women was drawn from a source cohort of 64,687 women. To achieve equal-sized groups of women with 1 or 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries, the latter group was oversampled from 1987 to 2000. The final study cohorts consisted of 6760 women with no obstetrical anal sphincter injury, 357 women with 1 injury, and 324 women with 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears were grouped together for analysis. Anal incontinence was defined as either fecal or isolated gas incontinence, and fecal incontinence was defined as involuntary leakage of solid or liquid stool with or without concomitant gas. Frequencies of leakage of stool and gas were dichotomized into low frequency (less than once a month) and high frequency (several times a month or more often). Pairwise comparisons were analyzed using Fisher exact tests, Mantel-Haenszel statistics, and the Mann-Whitney U test. Trends were analyzed using Mantel-Haenszel statistics and the Spearman rank correlation test. Logistic regression models were used to obtain the age- and body-mass-index -adjusted odds ratios for outcomes. Statistical significance was set at P<.05.

RESULTS

The response rate was 65.5% in the randomly selected cohort and 70.1% among women with 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. Bothersome fecal incontinence occurred in 3.3% (212/6458) of women without obstetrical anal sphincter injury, in 10.4% (36/345) (adjusted odds ratio, 3.25; 95% confidence interval, 2.23-4.73) of those with 1 injury, and in 16.5% (52/315) (adjusted odds ratio, 5.16; 95% confidence interval, 3.69-7.22) of those with 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (trend P<.0001). Fecal incontinence was perceived as bothersome in 28.2% (212/753) of women without an obstetrical anal sphincter injury compared with in 43.9% (36/82) and 46.0% (52/113) of those with 1 or 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (trend P<.0001). Leakage of liquid stool occurred in 10.8% (724/6717) of those without injury, in 21.7% (77/355) of women with 1 injury, and 34.9% (113/324) of women with 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (trend P<.0001). Incontinence affecting daily life was reported by 8.6% (577/6672) of women without injury and by 19.7% (69/351) and 29.6% (96/324) of women with 1 and 2 sphincter injuries, respectively (trend P<.0001). The mean Jorge-Wexner score was 2.44, 3.26, and 3.88 for women with no, 1, or 2 sphincter injuries (trend P<.0001). Among women with a Jorge-Wexner score of 6, >50% had bothersome anal incontinence. The adjusted odds ratio for the overall effect of 1 vs 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries on measures of anal incontinence was 2.19 (95% confidence interval, 1.68-2.85) and 3.91 (95% confidence interval, 3.06-5.00), respectively, when compared with no obstetrical anal sphincter injury (both P<.0001). Having 1 or 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries had no significant effect on other pelvic floor disorders or on lower urinary tract symptoms (P=.73 and P=.69).

CONCLUSION

A consistent additive effect of 1 or 2 sphincter injuries on the severity and impact of anal incontinence was observed in women 2 decades after 2 vaginal births. This information is important for healthcare economics, clinical practice, and policy.

Management of Third and Fourth-Degree Perineal Tears After Vaginal Birth. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/079, December 2020)

Purpose This guideline provides recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up care of 3rd and 4th degree perineal tears which occur during vaginal birth. The aim is to improve the management of 3rd and 4th degree perineal tears and reduce the immediate and long-term damage. The guideline is intended for midwives, obstetricians and physicians involved in caring for high-grade perineal tears.

Methods A selective search of the literature was carried out. Consensus about the recommendations and statements was achieved as part of a structured process during a consensus conference with neutral moderation.

Recommendations After every vaginal birth, a careful inspection and/or palpation by the obstetrician and/or the midwife must be carried out to exclude a 3rd or 4th degree perineal tear. Vaginal and anorectal palpation is essential to assess the extent of birth trauma. The surgical team must also include a specialist physician with the appropriate expertise (preferably an obstetrician or a gynecologist or a specialist for coloproctology) who must be on call. In exceptional cases, treatment may also be delayed for up to 12 hours postpartum to ensure that a specialist is available to treat the individual layers affected by trauma. As neither the end-to-end technique nor the overlapping technique have been found to offer better results for the management of tears of the external anal sphincter, the surgeon must use the method with which he/she is most familiar. Creation of a bowel stoma during primary management of a perineal tear is not indicated. Daily cleaning of the area under running water is recommended, particularly after bowel movements. Cleaning may be carried out either by rinsing or alternate cold and warm water douches. Therapy should also include the postoperative use of laxatives over a period of at least 2 weeks. The patient must be informed about the impact of the injury on subsequent births as well as the possibility of anal incontinence.

[Acceptability and results of postpartum proctological consultation for women who have had an obstetric injury of the anal sphincter]

OBJECTIVES

Early management of perineal disorders after obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) may improve the functional prognosis. The objective was to assess the acceptability of the consultation and to report on its results.

METHODS

This unicentric retrospective study included 64 women who had LOSA 3 or 4 and who were offered a 3-month routine postpartum proctological consultation. The proposed diagnoses and recoveries were identified.

RESULTS

Of the 5,070 women who gave birth vaginally, 64 women had LOSA (1.2%). 54 came to the clinic (84.3%). At the interview, 21 women had no complaints. A diagnosis of evacuation disorders or hemorrhoidal disease in particular was made in 10 women. A specific management was proposed to 16 women and a control consultation was proposed to 3 women. Of the 33 women with at least one symptom, 31 women were diagnosed and 27 women were offered specific management. A monitoring consultation was offered to 18 women. The main diagnoses were gas incontinence, dyschesia with or without abdominopererial asynchronism and decreased sphincter tone. The main measures undertaken were the extension of laxatives, the proposal of perineal massage and abdominal-perineal rehabilitation by biofeedback.

CONCLUSION

Systematic proctological consultation was acceptable and allows for a specific management in the majority of cases. The assessment of its long-term impact remains to be defined.

Symptoms of fecal incontinence two decades after no, one, or two obstetrical anal sphincter injuries

BACKGROUND

The long-term effects of 1 or 2 consecutive obstetrical anal sphincter injuries on bowel continence are still inadequately investigated, and published results remain contradictory.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to present detailed descriptive measures of the current bowel incontinence 20 years after the first birth in women who had 2 vaginal deliveries with and without sphincter injuries.

STUDY DESIGN

Birth register data were used prospectively and linked to information from a questionnaire survey about current symptoms. Women with 2 singleton vaginal births, from 1992 to 1998, and no further births were retrieved and surveyed by the Swedish Medical Birth Register and Statistics Sweden in 2015. A simple random sample of 11,000 women was drawn from a source cohort of 64,687 women. The cumulative effect was studied in all women with a repeat sphincter injury from 1987 to 2000. Postal and web-based questionnaires were used. The study population consisted of 6760 women with no sphincter injury, 357 with 1 sphincter injury, and 324 women with 2 sphincter injuries. Women with 2 deliveries without sphincter injuries aged 40 to 60 years as reference, were compared with those of women that sustained 1 or 2 consecutive sphincter injuries. Here, third- and fourth-degree perineal tears were presented as 1 group. Fecal incontinence was defined as current involuntary leakage of solid or liquid stool, with and without concomitant leakage of gas. The Fisher exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the results of the 2 groups. The trend was analyzed using the Mantel-Haenszel statistics. Logistic regression models obtained the estimated age-related probability of fecal incontinence components.

RESULTS

The risk of sphincter injury at first delivery was 3.9%, and the risk of a repeat sphincter injury was 10.0% (odds ratio, 2.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.80-4.07). The overall prevalence of fecal incontinence in women without sphincter injuries was 11.7%, which doubled to 23.8% (odds ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-2.94) in those with 1 sphincter injury and more than tripled to 36.1% (odds ratio, 3.97; 95% confidence interval, 3.11-5.07) after 2 sphincter injuries (trend P<.0001). The proportion of women with severe fecal incontinence increased 3-fold and 5-fold from 1.8% after no obstetrical anal sphincter injury to 5.4% (95% confidence interval, 3.3-8.2) and 9.0% (95% confidence interval, 6.1-12.6) after 1 or 2 obstetrical anal sphincter injuries, respectively (trend P<.0001). In women without sphincter injuries, the estimated probability of fecal incontinence increased from 7.0% at the age of 40 years to 19.8% at the age of 60 years. In contrast, in women with 1 or 2 sphincter injuries, the estimated probability of fecal incontinence increased from 26.1% and 33.3%, respectively, at the age of 40 years to 36.8% and 48.8% at the age of 60 years. The prevalence of fecal incontinence increased after 52 years of age in women with 1 or 2 sphincter injuries. The dominant types of leakage in women with fecal incontinence were the combination of liquid stool and gas, and the triple combination consisting of solid and liquid stools and gas. The triple combination increased from 18.9% in those without sphincter injury to 28.2% in women with 2 injuries (trend P=.0204).

CONCLUSION

The risk of sustaining a repeat sphincter injury at the second delivery was almost tripled compared with the risk at the first delivery. Furthermore, 1 or 2 sphincter injuries brought severe long-term consequences for bowel continence. Accidental leakage of stool and gas increased with each sphincter injury, and the effect was proportionally cumulative. After the age of 52 years, the prevalence of fecal incontinence seemed to accelerate.

Midline and Mediolateral Episiotomy: Risk Assessment Based on Clinical Anatomy

Episiotomy is the surgical incision of the vaginal orifice and perineum to ease the passage of an infant's head while crowning during vaginal delivery. Although episiotomy remains one of the most frequently performed surgeries around the world, short- and long-term complications from the procedure are not uncommon. We performed midline and mediolateral episiotomies with the aim of correlating commonly diagnosed postepisiotomy complications with risk of injury to perineal neuromuscular and erectile structures. We performed 61 incisions on 47 female cadavers and dissected around the incision site. Dissections revealed that midline incisions did not bisect any major neuromuscular structures, although they did increase the risk of direct and indirect injury to the subcutaneous portion of the external anal sphincter. Mediolateral incisions posed greater risk of iatrogenic injury to ipsilateral nerve, muscle, erectile, and gland tissues. Clinician discretion is advised when weighing the potential risks to maternal perineal anatomy during vaginal delivery when episiotomy is indicated. If episiotomy is warranted, an understanding of perineal anatomy may benefit diagnosis of postsurgical complications.

Management and consequences of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries: Review

Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASI), formerly referred to as "complete" or "incomplete" perineal tears, are a frequent complication of childbirth. They can lead to intestinal consequences (anal incontinence, ano-genital fistula) or sexual consequences (dyspareunia, genital pain). The complexity of management of OASI lies in the multi-factorial nature of these consequences but also in the frequently lengthy interval before their appearance, often long after childbirth. Indeed, while 2.4% of women in childbirth develop OASI, up to 61% of them will present with anal incontinence15 to 25 years after childbirth. Immediate or delayed repair of the sphincter and perineum within a few hours of injury is therefore the rule, but there is no consensus on longer-term management. The patient must be educated on preventive actions (avoidance of pushing or straining, regularization of stool transit, muscle strengthening, etc.). Early detection of anal incontinence leads to prompt management, which is more effective. This review aims to synthesize the information necessary to provide clear and up-to-date patient information on OASI (risk factors and prevalence), the management of OASI, and the management of eventual complications in the setting of dedicated specialty consultations. Dedicated "post-OASI" consultations by a specialist in ano-perineal pathologies could therefore become a first step in the development of care for women, particularly by removing the "shameful" nature of the symptoms.

Outcome of anal symptoms and anorectal function following two obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)-a nested case-controlled study

Introduction and hypothesis

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a significant risk factor for developing anal incontinence. It can therefore be hypothesised that recurrent OASI in a subsequent delivery may predispose women to further anal sphincter dysfunction.

Methods

A nested case-controlled study based on data collected prospectively between 2006 and 2019. Women matched for age and ethnicity, with a history of one OASI and no sphincter damage in a subsequent delivery (control) were compared to women sustaining a second OASI. Assessment was carried out using the St Mark’s score (SMIS), anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound scan (findings quantified using the modified Starck score).

Results

Eighty-four women were included and equally distributed between the two groups, who were followed up 12 weeks postnatally. No difference in SMIS scores was found. Maximum resting pressure (MRP, mmHg) and maximum squeeze pressure (MSP, mmHg) were significantly reduced in the study group. Median (IQR) MRP in the study group was 40.0 (31.3–54.0) versus 46.0 (39.3–61.5) in the control group (p = 0.030). Median (IQR) MSP was 73.0 (58.3–93.5) in the study group versus 92.5 (70.5–110.8) (p = 0.006) in the control group. A significant difference (p = 0.002) was found in the modified Starck score between the study group (median 0.0 [IQR 0.0–6.0]) and control group (median 0.0 [IQR 0.0–0.0]).

Conclusions

We have demonstrated that women with recurrent OASI do not have significant anorectal symptoms compared to those with one OASI 12 weeks after delivery, but worse anal sphincter function and integrity. Therefore, on long-term follow-up, symptoms may possibly develop. This information will be useful when counselling women in a subsequent pregnancy.

Fecal Incontinence Symptoms and Impact in Older Versus Younger Women Seeking Care

BACKGROUND

The differential impact of aging on fecal incontinence symptom severity and condition-specific quality of life remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to characterize differences in symptom distress, quality of life, and anorectal physiology assessments in older versus younger women with fecal incontinence.

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a tertiary genitorectal disorder clinic.

PATIENTS

Women presenting for fecal incontinence evaluation between 2003 and 2016 were classified as older or younger based on age ≥65 or <65 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcomes were symptom-specific quality of life and distress measured by validated questionnaires (the Modified Manchester Health Questionnaire containing the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index); anorectal physiology and anatomy were assessed by manometry and endoanal ultrasound.

RESULTS

Of 879 subjects, 286 and 593 were classified as older and younger (mean ages, 71.4 ± 5.3 y and 51.3 ± 10.5 y). Solid stool leakage was more frequent in older women (83.2% vs 76.7%; p = 0.03), whereas liquid stool leakage (83.2% vs 82.8%; p = 0.88) and fecal urgency (76.9% vs 78.8%; p = 0.54) did not differ between groups. Mean symptom severity scores were similar between groups (28.0 ± 11.9 and 27.6 ± 13.5; p = 0.69); however, there was greater negative impact on quality of life among younger women (46.3 ± 22.0 vs 51.8 ± 21.8; p < 0.01). Multivariable linear regression controlling for pertinent covariates revealed younger age as an independent predictor for worse condition-specific quality-of-life scores (p < 0.01). Squeeze pressures were similar between groups, whereas younger women had greater resting pressures and higher rates of sphincter defects (external, 7.7% vs 20.2%; internal, 12.2% vs 26.8%; both p < 0.01).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its lack of patient obstetric history and the duration of their incontinence symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Characteristics differ between older and younger women seeking care for fecal incontinence. The differential impact and age-related phenotypes may provide useful information for patient counseling and developing management algorithms for women with fecal incontinence. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A910.

Medium- to Long-term Follow-up of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury

BACKGROUND

Obstetric anal sphincter injury is the primary modifiable risk factor for anal incontinence in women. Currently, endoanal ultrasound is most commonly used to detect residual anal sphincter defects after childbirth. Translabial ultrasound has recently been introduced as a noninvasive alternative.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine medium- to long-term outcomes in women after obstetric anal sphincter injuries diagnosed and repaired at delivery.

DESIGN

This is a cross-sectional study.

SETTINGS

This study was performed in a tertiary obstetric unit.

PATIENTS

Between 2005 and 2015, 707 women were diagnosed with obstetric anal sphincter injuries; 146 followed an invitation for follow-up.

INTERVENTIONS

Clinical examination, anal manometry, and translabial ultrasound were performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes measured were the St Mark incontinence score and the evidence of sphincter disruption on translabial ultrasound.

RESULTS

Of 372 contactable patients, 146 attended at a mean follow-up of 6.6 years (1.7-11.9), of which 75 (51%) reported symptoms of anal incontinence with a median "bother score" of 6 (interquartile range, 3-8). Median St Mark score was 3 (interquartile range, 2-5). Twenty-four (16%) had a score of ≥5. Women who had been diagnosed with a 3c/4th degree tear had more symptoms (58% vs 44%), significantly lower mean maximal resting pressure (p < 0.001), maximal squeeze pressure (p < 0.001), and more residual external (p < 0.001) and internal (p = 0.012) sphincter defects in comparison with those who had a 3a/3b tear. Women with residual external sphincter defects had lower mean maximal squeeze pressure (p = 0.02). Residual internal sphincter defects (p = 0.001) and levator avulsion (p = 0.048) are independent risk factors for anal incontinence on multivariate modeling.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by the lack of predelivery data of bowel symptoms and BMI and incomplete intrapartum documentation of tear grade.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptoms of anal incontinence were highly prevalent (51%), with a high bother score of 6. St Mark scores were associated with residual internal anal sphincter defects and levator avulsion. Women who had a higher tear grade showed a higher incidence of residual sphincter defects and lower manometry pressures. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A824.

Pubovisceral muscle and anal sphincter defects in women with fecal or urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery

BACKGROUND

Vaginal delivery is the most frequent cause of direct anal sphincter trauma as well as pelvic floor muscle defects in women with corresponding signs and symptoms. The aim of the present study was to identify anatomical and functional abnormalities of the anal canal and pelvic floor in women who had had a vaginal delivery and determine the relationship between such abnormalities and the symptoms and severity of fecal incontinence (FI).

METHODS

Consecutive female patients with symptoms of fecal and/or urinary incontinence were recruited through the colorectal and gynecological outpatient clinics at two large university hospitals and were eligible if they had had at a vaginal delivery. All women were assessed for symptoms FI by means of the Cleveland Clinic Florida Incontinence Scale (CCFIS) and for urinary incontinence symptoms, including the presence of complaints of any involuntary leakage of urine, leakage on exertion, sneezing, or coughing, and/or leaking or losing urine associated with an urge to urinate. All women underwent anorectal and endovaginal three-dimensional ultrasonography and anal manometry. The extent of the anal sphincter and PVM defects identified by ultrasound was scored from 1 to 6 based on the longitudinal involvement of the external and internal anal sphincter, the radial angle of the anterior external anal sphincter defect and the longitudinal involvement of the PVM.

RESULTS

There were 130 women and 89 (68%) had at least one defect of the anal sphincter or the pubovisceral muscle or both (42/32% had a pubovisceral muscle defect with or without sphincter defects, 47/36% women had an intact pubovisceral muscle but sphincter defect); and 41 (32%) had intact anal sphincter and pubovisceral muscles. The mean levator hiatus area at rest in women with anal sphincter and/or pubovisceral muscle defects was 18 (± 4 SD) which was significantly greater than in women with no defects (16 ± 3 SD; p = 0.01). Women with PVM defects had significantly higher ultrasound scores (median ultrasound score = 4/range 1-10 vs Intact = 2/range 2-5), indicating more extensive defects (p = 0.001). Bivariate analysis revealed a positive association (p < 0.05) between increasing FI symptom severity (CCFIS score) and women with PVM defects (ρ = 0.6913). Within the group of women with defects mean maximum anal squeeze pressure was significantly lower in women with PVM defect (mean 73 ± 34 SD mmHg vs mean 93 ± 38 SD; p = 0.04). Women with PVM defects had significantly higher median CCFIS scores (median score, 7/range 0-16) compared to women with intact PVM (4/range 0-10) (p < 0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between the CCFIS and ultrasound scores (ρ = 0.625; p < 0.001). Bivariate analysis revealed a negative correlations between the CCFIS score and the lengths of the anterior EAS (ρ = - 0.5621, p < 0.001), IAS (ρ = - 0.40, p < 0.001) and the area of the levator hiatus (ρ = 0.5211, p = 0.001). However, no significant correlations were observed between CCFIS scores and the gap measurement (ρ = 0.101; p = 0.253) or the resting (ρ = - 0.08, p = 0.54) or squeeze pressure (ρ = - 0.12; p = 0.34) values on anal manometry. The variables associated with worsening FI symptom severity (CCFIS score) that remained significant in multiple linear regression included the shorter lengths of the anterior EAS and/or the lengths of the anterior IAS and increased area of the levator hiatus.

CONCLUSIONS

The study data demonstrate that half of the women had combined defects of PVM and sphincter. There were correlations between anatomical abnormalities including the anal sphincter and/or pubovisceral muscle defects with decrease in the anal pressures and increased severity of FI.

Functional and histologic effects after implanting pluripotent stem cells in a murine model with sphincterotomy

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

Fecal incontinence is a disabling condition with devastating consequences for the patients. Medical and surgical options are not very satisfactory, reason by which regenerative medicine has been considered in this field. In the present research, we analyzed functional and histologic effects after implanting pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) in a murine model with sphincterotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Female Wistar rats were subjected to sphincterotomy and divided into three groups. Group 1 (control group) was treated with 300μL of balanced saline solution and group 2 (late treatment) and group 3 (early treatment) received 50,000 PSCs resuspended in 300μL of balanced saline solution. All animals were evaluated through high-resolution anorectal manometry 24hours before and after sphincterotomy and every month for three months. Finally, the rats were euthanized and histopathologic sections from the anal canal were obtained.

RESULTS

All groups showed a decrease in resting anal pressure and squeeze anal pressure 24hours after sphincterotomy. At the third month, higher anal pressures in the groups treated with PSCs were detected. Regarding the histologic effects, the microscopic architecture was restored and there was a significant decrease in the inflammatory response in the groups treated with PSCs.

CONCLUSION

PSCs implantation improves anal tone, as well as histologic structure, presenting better regenerative results when implanted as early treatment.

Is increased peripheral ligamentous laxity in term pregnant women associated with obstetric anal sphincter injury?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Increased ligamentous laxity is associated with pelvic floor distension in pregnant women. This considered, it may also be related to the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). Our objective was to assess the association among increased ligamentous laxity, perineal tear severity, and OASI occurrence.

METHODS

This is a prospective study. We assessed ligamentous laxity between the 36th week of pregnancy and the onset of labor, by measuring the passive extension of the nondominant index finger for a 0.26 N.m torque applied to the second metacarpophalangeal joint (MCP laxity). We collected perineal tear occurrence and classification (Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists). We investigated the MCP laxity distribution according to the stage of perineal tears, and then we looked for a predictive level of MCP laxity for OASI.

RESULTS

A total of 272 of the 300 pregnant women included had a vaginal delivery and were considered for the analysis. Mean age was 29 years, mean body mass index was 24.5 kg/m² and 39.2% of women were nulliparous. We reported 12 cases of OASI. MCP laxity significantly increased with the stage of perineal tears from 58° in stage 0 to 69° and 66° for stages 3a and 3b respectively. An MCP laxity higher than 64° was associated with OASI with sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 56%, and an area under the curve of 0.65.

CONCLUSION

Increased ligamentous laxity seems associated with OASI occurrence, which is the opposite of the initial hypothesis. This suggests that the stiffest tissues might be at a lower risk of injury.

[Anal incontinence and obstetrical anal sphincter injuries, epidemiology and prevention]

Our main objectives were to identify risk factors, methods for early diagnosis, and prevention of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs), using a literature review. The main risk factors for OASIs are nulliparity, instrumental delivery, posterior presentation, median episiotomy, prolonged second phase of labor and fetal macrosomia. Asian origin, short ano-vulvar distance, ligamentous hyperlaxity, lack of expulsion control, non-visualization of the perineum or maneuvers for shoulder dystocia also appear to be risk factors. There is a risk of under-diagnosis of OASIs in the labor ward. Experience of the accoucheur is a protective factor. Secondary prevention is based on the training of birth professionals in recognition and repair of OASIs. Primary prevention of OASIs is based on training in the maneuvers of the second phase of labor; if possible, instrumental extractions should be avoided. Mediolateral episiotomy may have a preventive role in high-risk OASIs deliveries. A robust predictive model is still lacking to allow a selective use of episiotomy.

The relationship between fecal incontinence and vaginal delivery in the postmenopausal stage

OBJECTIVE

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries are one of the most significant complications of vaginal delivery that give way to fecal incontinence, which is defined as the involuntary leakage of gas, fluid or solid stool. Although sphincter injuries are seen in 0.5-9% of all deliveries. It has been reported that 20-41% of women who had vaginal deliveries had occult anal sphincter injuries as endoanal ultrasonography began to be used by physicians. The aim of our study was to investigate the relationship between fecal incontinence, whose incidence increases dramatically during the postmenopausal stage, and occult anal sphincter injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred healthy female patients with no history of anal sphincter injury, aged between 18 and 70 years were included in the study. The participants were divided into 4 groups according to their menopausal stages and mode of delivery; premenopausal (group 1) and postmenopausal (group 2) vaginal delivery, and premenopausal (group 3) and postmenopausal (group 4) cesarean section. Wexner incontinence scores were determined. The participants' defects were assessed using endoanal ultrasound and their status of fecal incontinence using anorectal manometric measurements.

RESULTS

Anorectal manometric measurement results were found significantly lower in group 1 than in group 3 (p<0.01). The Wexner scores of groups 1 and 3 were similar. The anorectal manometric measurement results of group 2 were significantly lower than those of group 4, and the Wexner score of group 2 was significantly higher than other groups (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Anal sphincter injuries formed after vaginal delivery may be one of the reasons that increase the incidence of postmenopausal fecal incontinence and cause the formation of fecal incontinence symptoms in women.

[Predictive factors of 2-month postpartum anal incontinence among patients with an obstetrical anal sphincter injury]

OBJECTIVES

To determine prevalence of short-term postpartum anal incontinence after obstetrical anal sphincter injury and prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study including every patient with an obstetrical anal sphincter injury between January 2006 and December 2012 in one tertiary maternity unit. Patients were interviewed and examined at 2-month postpartum. Anal incontinence was defined by the presence of at least one of the following symptoms: flatus incontinence, faecal incontinence and faecal urgency.

RESULTS

Among 17,110 patients who delivered vaginally during period study, 134 (0.8%) presented an anal sphincter injury. Postpartum obstetrical data were available for 110 of them. Among those patients, 50 women (45.5%) had at least one symptom of anal incontinence at 2-month postpartum and 8 (7.3%) had faecal incontinence. Only maternal age and second stage duration were significantly associated with anal incontinence after obstetrical anal sphincter injury. The degree of sphincter damage at delivery (IIIa, b, c, IV) was not associated with the risk of anal incontinence at 2-month postpartum.

CONCLUSION

Maternal age and second stage duration were the only risk factor for anal incontinence after obstetrical anal sphincter injury in this study. High prevalence of anal incontinence at 2-month postpartum of obstetrical anal sphincter injury is observed no matter what is the degree of anal sphincter damage. Our results highlight the importance to diagnose all obstetrical anal sphincter injuries whatever the degree of damage.

[Management of third and fourth degree perineal tears: A systematic review]

This was a comprehensive literature review using Pubmed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane, whose aim was to analyse the prevalence of anal sphincter injuries, their risk factors, their management and their functional prognosis. The prevalence of 3rd and 4th degree perineal tears varies between studies from 2.95% regardless the parity to 25% in nulliparous women. Twenty-eight percent to 48% of these lacerations were clinically occult. Perineal tears were associated with (multivariate analysis) forceps (6.021 [IC 95% 1.23-19.45]), nulliparity (OR 9.8 [IC 95% 3.6-26.2]), gestational age over 42 SA (OR 2.5 [IC 95% 1-6.2]), fundal pressure (OR 4.6 [IC 95% 2.3-7.9]), midline episiotomy (OR 5.5 [IC 95% 1.4-18.7]) or fetal weight in interval of 250g (OR 1.3 [IC 95% 1.1-1.6]). There was no difference between the sphincter repair techniques. Post-partum laxative use showed less painful bowel motion and earlier postnatal discharge. Data concerning rehabilitation were contradictory. The rate of anal incontinence 6 months after vaginal delivery were 3.6% following third degree of perineal tear and 30.8% in case of fourth degree of perineal tear. Thirty years after anal sphincter disruption, the prevalence of fecal incontinence reached 6.9%.

[Severe post-obstetric perineal tears: Medium-term consequences on women's quality of life]

AIMS

To assess the prevalence of anal (AI) and urinary (UI) incontinence at medium term after 3rd and 4th degree anal sphincter tears and their impact on sexuality and women's quality of life.

MATERIAL

It is a case-control, single center study. Sixty-eight primiparous women delivered with severe anal sphincter tear (exposed group) were compared to 136 women without (control group). Questionnaires on anal and urinary incontinence, sexual function and quality of life, using validated scores, were sent between two and five years after the first delivery. Maternal and obstetric data were collected retrospectively on the medical files.

RESULTS

The answer rate was 22.5% (46/204) of which 30.9% (21/68) in the exposed group and 18.4% (25/136) in the unexposed group. In case of severe anal sphincter tear, 57.1% of women reported an AI vs 48% in the control group (P=0.76). The rate of AI for liquid stool was significantly higher in the exposed group (P=0.05). Patients with severe perineal tears reported a greater impact of symptoms on their quality of life but the difference with the control group was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of symptoms related to anal sphincter tears is common and underestimated. Preventive measures must be improved in order to maintain women's quality of life.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

DO CHANGES IN ANAL SPHINCTER ANATOMY CORRELATE WITH ANAL FUNCTION IN WOMEN WITH A HISTORY OF VAGINAL DELIVERY?

Objectives To evaluate anal sphincter anatomy using three-dimensional ultrasonography (3-DAUS) in incontinent women with vaginal delivery, correlate anatomical findings with symptoms of fecal incontinence and determine the effect of vaginal delivery on anal canal anatomy and function. Methods Female with fecal incontinence and vaginal delivery were assessed with Wexner’s score, manometry, and 3DAUS. A control group comprising asymptomatic nulliparous was included. Anal pressure, the angle of the defect and length of the external anal sphincter (EAS), the anterior and posterior internal anal sphincter (IAS), the EAS + puborectal and the gap were measured and correlated with score. Results Of the 62, 49 had fecal incontinence and 13 were asymptomatic. Twenty five had EAS defects, 8 had combined EAS+IAS defects, 16 had intact sphincters and continence scores were similar. Subjects with sphincter defects had a shorter anterior EAS, IAS and longer gap than women without defects. Those with a vaginal delivery and intact sphincters had a shorter anterior EAS and longer gap than nulliparous. We found correlations between resting pressure and anterior EAS and IAS length in patients with defects. Conclusions Avaliar a anatomia do esfíncter anal usando ultra-sonografia tridimensional (3D-US) em mulheres incontinentes com parto vaginal, correlacionar os achados anatômicos com sintomas de incontinência fecal e, determinar o efeito do parto vaginal sobre a anatomia e função do canal anal.

Anal incontinence in women with recurrent obstetric anal sphincter rupture: a case control study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the risk of recurrent anal sphincter rupture (ASR), and compare the risk of anal incontinence (AI) after recurrent ASR, with that seen in women with previous ASR who deliver by caesarean section or vaginally without sustaining a recurrent ASR.

METHODS

Women with recurrent ASR between January 2000 and June 2011 were identified at two delivery wards in Copenhagen. The women answered a questionnaire with a validated scoring system for AI (St. Mark`s score), and the results were compared with those obtained in two control groups: women with subsequent uncomplicated vaginal delivery or caesarean section.

RESULTS

There were 93 437 vaginal deliveries. ASR occurred in 5.5% (n = 2851) of the nulliparous and 1.5% (n = 608) of the multiparous women. Recurrent ASR occurred in 8% (n = 49) of whom 50% reported symptoms of AI. We found no difference in the occurrence of AI between women with recurrent ASR, and those who delivered vaginally without repeat ASR (p = 0.37; OR = 2.0) or by caesarean section (p = 0.77; OR = 1.3).

CONCLUSION

Women with a past history of ASR have an 8% risk of recurrence. AI affects half of the women with recurrent ASR. Larger studies are required to confirm our findings.

Complete obstetric anal sphincter tear and risk of long-term fecal incontinence: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Women with anal sphincter injuries have an increased risk of developing fecal incontinence despite surgical intervention.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term risk of fecal incontinence after primary anal sphincter reconstruction and its impact on quality of life.

DESIGN

This was a cohort study.

SETTINGS

This study was performed at Aarhus University Hospital.

PATIENTS

Women with complete anal sphincter rupture (exposed) from 1976 to 1991 and a control group of parous women (nonexposed) were included.

MAIN OUTCOME

The primary outcomes measured were fecal incontinence, Wexner score, St Mark incontinence score, and quality of life.

RESULTS

A total of 363 women were included (125 exposed and 238 nonexposed). The mean age was 50.4 years (95%CI: 49.8-51.0), with 22.2 years (95% CI: 21.7-22.6) of follow-up. At the time of follow-up, 49% of exposed women and 74% of nonexposed women were continent. Complete anal sphincter tear increases the risk of fecal incontinence twofold (relative risk = 2.00; 95%CI: 1.52-2.63). No other risk factors were identified. The mean Wexner score was 1.7 (95%CI: 1.3-2.1) vs 1.1 (95%CI: 0.7-1.4) (p = 0.02), and the mean St Mark score was 2.8 (95% CI: 2.1-3.4) vs 1.4 (95%CI: 1.0-1.9) (p < 0.001) in the exposed and nonexposed groups. Severity of fecal incontinence had a significant impact on the quality of life independent of exposure.

LIMITATION

The cohort is relatively young; a short postmenopausal period limits the assessment of hormonal status and the effect of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy.

CONCLUSION

Complete obstetric anal sphincter tear increases the long-term risk of fecal incontinence twofold. When present, the severity of the incontinence symptoms is minor and the risk of incontinence for solid stool is not increased in comparison with the general population. Anal sphincter rupture is the only independent risk factor for fecal incontinence. The severity of fecal incontinence had the same impact on quality of life in both groups.

Guidelines for the management of third and fourth degree perineal tears after vaginal birth from the Austrian Urogynecology Working Group

The purpose of this guideline is to provide a decision aid for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with major perineal tears and thus minimize the risk of persistent symptoms. In 2007, the "Guideline for the management of third and fourth degree perineal tears after vaginal birth" was established by members of the Austrian Urogynecologic Working Group (AUB). The guideline was updated in 2011, including literature published up to 30 November 2011. The DELPHI method was used to reach consensus. Evidence-based and consensus-based statements were defined for epidemiology, risk factors, classification, diagnosis, surgery, and follow-up of major perineal lacerations at vaginal birth.

Obstetrical anal sphincter laceration and anal incontinence 5-10 years after childbirth

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term impact of anal sphincter laceration on anal incontinence.

STUDY DESIGN

Five to 10 years after first delivery, anal incontinence and other bowel symptoms were measured with the Epidemiology of Prolapse and Incontinence Questionnaire and the short form of the Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire. Obstetric exposures were assessed with review of hospital records. Symptoms and quality-of-life impact were compared among 90 women with at least 1 anal sphincter laceration, 320 women who delivered vaginally without sphincter laceration, and 527 women who delivered by cesarean delivery.

RESULTS

Women who sustained an anal sphincter laceration were most likely to report anal incontinence (odds ratio, 2.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-4.26) and reported the greatest negative impact on quality of life. Anal incontinence and quality-of-life scores were similar between women who delivered by cesarean section and those who delivered vaginally without sphincter laceration.

CONCLUSION

Anal sphincter laceration is associated with anal incontinence 5-10 years after delivery.

Pelvic floor dysfunction 6 years post-anal sphincter tear at the time of vaginal delivery

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

This study aims to estimate fecal, urinary incontinence, and sexual function 6 years after an obstetrical anal sphincter tear.

METHODS

Among 13,213 women who had a vaginal delivery of a cephalic singleton at term, 196 women sustained an anal sphincter tear. They were matched to 588 controls. Validated questionnaires grading fecal and urinary incontinence, and sexual dysfunction were completed by the participants.

RESULTS

Severe fecal incontinence was more frequently reported by women who had sustained an anal sphincter tear compared to the controls. Women with an anal sphincter tear had no increased risk of urinary incontinence, but reported significantly more pain, difficulty with vaginal lubrication, and difficulty achieving orgasm compared to the controls. A fetal occiput posterior position during childbirth was an independent risk factor for both severe urinary incontinence and severe sexual dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Fecal incontinence is strongly associated with an anal sphincter tear. A fetal occiput posterior position represents a risk factor for urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction.

Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography of external anal sphincter defects in patients with faecal incontinence: correlation with symptoms and manometry

AIM

Anal sphincter anatomy on two-dimensional endoanal -ultrasonography (EUS) does not always correlate with the clinical data. The purpose of this study was to determine whether three-dimensional (3D) measurements yield a better correlation.

METHOD

The study group included consecutive patients who underwent 3D EUS for faecal incontinence over a 2-year period. The medical charts were reviewed for Cleveland Clinic Foundation Fecal Incontinence (CCF-FI) score and manometric pressures. Endoanal ultrasonographic images were reviewed for the presence of an external anal sphincter (EAS) defect and its extent, as determined by the radial angle, length in the sagittal plane and percentage volume deficit. Correlational analyses were performed between the clinical and imaging data.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients of median age 53 years (range 15-82) were evaluated. Thirty-two patients had either a complete (17) or partial (15) EAS defect, and 29 patients had an intact sphincter. The CCF-FI scores were similar in patients with and without an EAS defect (12.5 ± 5.6 and 11.4 ± 5.5, respectively). The intact-sphincter group had a significantly greater EAS length (3 ± 0.4 vs 2 ± 0.62 cm, P = 0.02) and higher mean maximal squeeze pressure (MMSP; 99.7 ± 52.6 vs 66.9 ± 52.9 mmHg, P = 0.009). There were no statistically significant correlations between MMSP, CCF-FI score and EAS status on 3D EUS. Mean percentage volume of the defect was similar in patients with complete and partial tears (14.5 ± 5.5 and 17.5 ± 7.2%, P = 0.25) and showed no correlation with physiological tests or symptom scores.

CONCLUSION

Improvements in external anal sphincter imaging have not yielded a better association with the clinical findings. The lack of clinical differences between patients with different EAS tears may reflect their similar volumetric defects.

Complete rupture of anal sphincter in primiparas: long-term effects and subsequent delivery

OBJECTIVE

To study long-term effects with respect to anal incontinence, pain, attitude to and mode of second delivery following complete rupture of the anal sphincter.

DESIGN

Case-control study. Settings. Södersjukhuset, a university hospital in Stockholm.

POPULATION

A case group of 136 primiparas who had experienced a complete rupture of the anal sphincter. Two matched control groups of primiparas, one of whom had cesarean section and the other a normal vaginal delivery.

METHODS

The case women were examined and asked for symptoms of anal incontinence 3-6 months after delivery; 3-8 years later they and two matched control groups answered a postal questionnaire. Response rate was 89%.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction and, as secondary end-point, the attitude to and mode of second delivery.

RESULTS

Anal incontinence after delivery was reported by 31% in the case group, and at long-term follow-up by 54% in the case group, 21% in the cesarean section and 23% in the normal delivery group (p < 0.0001). A wish to postpone or abandon further childbirth was significantly more common in the case women (33 and 18%) than in the other groups, but about 60% delivered again in all groups. In the case group, the next delivery was by cesarean section in 49%.

CONCLUSION

At long-term follow-up after a complete rupture of the anal sphincter, anal incontinence was common and many women wished to postpone or avoid further delivery.

A questionnaire on pelvic floor dysfunction postpartum

Introduction and hypothesis

The incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries is used in Sweden as a measurement of quality of care and this might influence the reporting. However, the correlation between reported diagnosis of pelvic floor injury at delivery and pelvic floor symptoms a year later is unknown. A questionnaire could identify such symptoms and provide beneficial feedback to obstetrical practices.

Methods

We made a cross-sectional study by sending out a questionnaire about pelvic floor dysfunction to 599 women depending on reported injury at delivery. The answers provided by the groups were then compared.

Results

The questionnaire identified women with pelvic floor dysfunction. Anal incontinence was most common among women with obstetric anal sphincter injuries but also occurred among women delivered vaginally without known tears.

Conclusion

We suggest that a questionnaire is used 12–18 months after delivery to establish the short-time outcome in terms of pelvic floor dysfunction.

Defects on endoanal ultrasound and anal incontinence after primary repair of fourth-degree anal sphincter rupture: a study of the anal sphincter complex and puborectal muscle

OBJECTIVES

To perform three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) after primary repair of fourth-degree anal sphincter rupture (ASR) and correlate the sonographic defects with anal incontinence (AI); to measure the axial and sagittal thickness and angle of the puborectal muscle (PRM) as well as the length of the anal canal, and then correlate these measures with AI; and to assess the interobserver measurement agreement between an inexperienced and an experienced sonologist.

METHODS

EAUS was offered to 84 consecutive women, who were asked to answer a validated questionnaire after fourth-degree ASR. AI was graded according to the Wexner score and EAUS defects were graded according to the Starck score.

RESULTS

Sixty-one women (73%) answered the questionnaire. The median (range) follow-up time was 5.1 (1.3-8.7) years. Thirty-three (54%) of these women underwent EAUS and were included in the study. There was no difference in the incontinence scores between women who underwent EAUS and those who did not. Eleven of the women who underwent EAUS (33%) were continent, 22 women (67%) had flatus incontinence at least once a month, of whom 12 also had incontinence for liquid stool and two had incontinence for solid stool. The median Wexner score was 2 (range, 0-12). Five of the patients (15%) had no ultrasound defects. All of the patients with Wexner scores > or = 4 had a Starck score of > or = 10. No association between ultrasound defects and AI was demonstrated, however, the angle of the PRM and parity were associated with Starck score. No clear association between the measurements of the PRM and AI was shown. The experienced observer detected more of the small defects than did the inexperienced observer.

CONCLUSION

In a 1-9-year follow-up period after primary suture of fourth-degree ASR, the frequency of AI was high, at 67%. No clear association was seen between AI and sphincter defects detected on ultrasonography. There was an association between the angle of the PRM and the extent of ultrasound defects.

Potential of human umbilical cord matrix and rabbit bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in repair of surgically incised rabbit external anal sphincter

PURPOSE

Anal sphincter defects and fecal incontinence are complicated surgical problems. We investigated the ability of human umbilical cord matrix (hUCM) and rabbit bone marrow (rBM) stem cells to improve anal sphincter incontinence due to induced sphincter defects without surgical repair.

METHODS

We harvested hUCM cells from human Wharton's jelly and rBM stem cells from rabbit femurs and tibias. To induce sphincter defects, we made an incision in the external anal sphincter. Rabbits were randomly allocated to 5 groups to receive either no intervention (n = 3) or injections of 10 hUCM cells in medium (10 microL RPMI-1640), rBM cells in medium, medium only, or normal saline (n = 7 per group), 2 weeks after sphincterotomy. Transplanted cells were tracked in the injured sphincters by prelabeling with bromodeoxyuridine. Electromyography was performed before and 2 weeks after the external anal sphincterotomy, and 2 weeks after cell transplantation. We also evaluated the proliferation and differentiation of injected cells with histopathologic techniques.

RESULTS

Electromyography showed significant improvement in sphincter function 2 weeks after local injection of rBM stem cells compared with pretreatment values and controls. Moderate, nonsignificant improvement was observed with hUCM cell injection. Cells with incorporated bromodeoxyuridine were detected at the site of injury after transplantation of hUCM and rBM. Histopathologic evaluation showed normal or muscle-dominant sphincter structure in all animals receiving rBM and fibrous-dominant sphincter structure in most animals receiving hUCM.

CONCLUSIONS

Stem cell injection at the site of injury can enhance contractile function of the anal sphincter without surgical repair. Transplantation of stem cells, particularly bone marrow mesenchymal cells, may provide an effective tool for treating anal sphincter injuries in humans.

Predictive factors for faecal incontinence after third or fourth degree obstetric tears: a clinico-physiologic study

OBJECTIVE

This is a prospective study to review the natural history of anorectal dysfunction after primary repair for third or fourth degree obstetric tear and to identify the predictive factors for significant faecal incontinence.

METHOD

From January 2003 to December 2005, 121 consecutive women (mean age 29.9 +/- 4.7) who sustained third or fourth degree obstetric tears were assessed. All had primary repair by obstetricians. They were assessed using anorectal physiology testing and endoanal ultrasound. Short-term (3-month postpartum) and medium-term (mean 18.8 +/- 7.7 months) Wexner's continence scores were obtained.

RESULTS

Among the 121 women, seven were excluded because of incomplete follow-up. At short-term assessment, 25 out of 114 women were incontinent. One of them underwent another sphincter repair for significant faecal incontinence. Twenty-one and three patients respectively, had mild (Wexner's score 1-4) and moderate (Wexner's score 5-8) symptoms. At medium-term assessment, 24 patients remained incontinent; of these, 20 had mild symptoms (Wexner's score 1-4) and four had moderate incontinence (Wexner's score 5-8). The parity (P = 0.04), degree of obstetric tear (P = 0.036) and short-term Wexner's scores at 3 months postpartum (P < 0.0001) were significantly related to the change in Wexner's scores at medium-term assessment. However, the short-term Wexner's score was the only identifiable predictive factor for significant faecal incontinence.

CONCLUSION

Most women suffering from third or fourth degree obstetric tear were continent or mildly incontinent. Poor Wexner's score at short-term assessment at 3 months postpartum was predictive of faecal incontinence in the medium-term.

Impact of pregnancy and parturition on the anal sphincters and pelvic floor

Incontinence and defecatory difficulties are commonly reported among women and are often ascribed to traumas sustained during childbirth. Specifically, injuries to the anal sphincters (tears) and conformational changes in the various structures that comprise the pelvic floor (prolapse and perineal descent) have been considered as important contributors to the development of anal incontinence, or difficult defaecation (straining, incomplete evacuation), in later life. An understanding of both the effects of pregnancy and parturition on these structures and the natural history of any traumas sustained are, therefore, of key importance. Unfortunately, the literature on these issues, though vast, is far from complete. While it is evident that pregnancy, per se, imposes changes, primarily through hormonal influences, on colonic, ano-rectal and pelvic floor physiology, the long-term impact of such effects is far from clear. Risk factors for the occurrence of significant, though often occult, anal sphincter injuries during birth have been identified and the role of these tears in the etiology of post-partum incontinence has been well delineated. In contrast, the contribution of such intra-partum events to the later onset of incontinence is far from clear and may well have been over-estimated.

Randomised clinical trial of a laxative alone versus a laxative and a bulking agent after primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury

OBJECTIVE

To compare two postpartum laxative regimens in women who have undergone primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

National Maternity Hospital, Dublin.

POPULATION

A total of 147 postpartum women who had sustained anal sphincter injury at vaginal birth.

METHODS

Women were randomised to receive either lactulose alone thrice daily for the first three postpartum days followed by sufficient lactulose to maintain a soft stool over the following 10 days (lactulose group, n = 77) or the lactulose regimen combined with a sachet of ispaghula husk daily for the first 10 postpartum days (Fybogel group, n = 70). All patients kept a diary of bowel habit for the first 10 postpartum days and were invited to return for review at 3 months postpartum.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient discomfort with first postpartum bowel motion, incidence of postnatal constipation and incontinence and incontinence score in postnatal period.

RESULTS

Pain scores were similar in the two treatment groups; but incontinence in the immediate postnatal period was more frequent with the two preparations compared with lactulose alone (32.86% versus 18.18%, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

This study does not support routine prescribing of a stool-bulking agent in addition to a laxative in the immediate postnatal period for women who have sustained anal sphincter injury at vaginal delivery.