Optimizing the management of stage II endometrial cancer: the role of radical hysterectomy and radiation

Stage II endometrial cancer: The diagnostic power of hysteroscopic excisional biopsy and MRI in the pre-operative cervical stroma assessment

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

Stage II Endometrial cancer (EC) accounts only for 12% of cases. Recent evidences redraw the weight of radicality in this stage as it would seem to have no impact on survival outcomes claiming for radicality when free surgical margins are not ensured to be achieved by simple hysterectomy. Thus, an accurate pre-operative evaluation might be crucial. This study aims to estimate the diagnostic power of Hysteroscopic excisional biopsy (HEB) of cervical stroma alone and combined with Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to predict the stage and concealed parametrial invasion in patients with preoperative stage II EC.

METHODOLOGY

From January 2019 to November 2023, all patients evaluated at the Department of Gynaecology Oncology of Humanitas, Istituto Clinico Catanese, Catania, Italy, with a diagnosis of EC and evidence of cervical stromal diffusion on preoperative MRI and/or office hysteroscopy evaluation, considered suitable for laparoscopic modified type B hysterectomy, were consecutively included in the study. These underwent endometrial and cervical hysteroscopy excisional biopsy (HEB) for histological evaluation before definitive surgery. The data obtained were compared with the definitive histological examination (reference standard).

RESULTS

Sixteen patients met the including/excluding criteria and were considered into the study. Stage II endometrial cancer were confirmed in 3 cases (18.7%). We reported 2 (12,5%) parametrial involvement (IIIB), 4 (25%) cases of lymph nodes metastasis (IIIc), 7 (43,7%) cases of I stage. MRI had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy (95% CIs) of 71%, 44%, 50%, 66% and 56.2 % respectively. HEB showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy (95 % CI) of 85 %, 89 %, 85 %, 88 % and 87 % respectively. Comparing HEB + MRI to HEB alone, no statistical differences were noted in all fields. Considering parametrial invasion, MRI had better sensitivity but there were no statistical differences to HEB in other fields, showing both a worthy NPV.

CONCLUSION

HEB was accurate in all fields for cervical stroma assessment and had a fine NPV to exclude massive cervical involvement up to parametrial. Considering the new FIGO staging a preoperative molecular and histological evaluation of the cervical stroma may be useful. Operative hysteroscopy seems to be a feasible and accurate method for this purpose.

Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Stage II Endometrial Cancer: Selective De-intensification of Adjuvant Treatment

AIMS

Risk stratification, including nodal assessment, allows for selective de-intensification of adjuvant radiotherapy in stage II endometrial cancer. Patterns of treatment and clinical outcomes, including the use of reduced volume 'mini-pelvis' radiotherapy fields, were evaluated in a population-based study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients diagnosed with pathological stage II endometrial cancer between 2000 and 2014, and received adjuvant radiotherapy in a regional healthcare jurisdiction were reviewed. Registry data were supplemented by a comprehensive review of patient demographics, disease characteristics and treatment details. The Charlson Comorbidity Score was calculated. Survival and recurrence data were analysed.

RESULTS

In total, 264 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most patients had endometrioid histology (83%); 41% of patients had International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians grade 1 disease. Half (49%) had surgical nodal evaluation; 11% received chemotherapy. Most patients (59%) were treated with full pelvic radiotherapy fields ± brachytherapy. Seventeen per cent of patients received mini-pelvis radiotherapy ± brachytherapy, whereas 24% received brachytherapy alone. Five-year recurrence-free survival was 87% for the entire cohort, with no significant difference by adjuvant radiotherapy approach. Only one patient receiving mini-pelvis radiotherapy ± brachytherapy recurred in the pelvis but outside of the mini-pelvis field. Recorded late toxicity rates were highest for full pelvis radiotherapy + brachytherapy.

CONCLUSION

Risk stratification in a real-world setting allowed for selective de-intensification of adjuvant radiation with equivalent outcomes for stage II endometrial cancer. Mini-pelvis radiotherapy combined with brachytherapy is effective in highly selected patients, with the potential to decrease toxicity without compromising local control. Brachytherapy should be considered in low-risk stage II patients.

Does Radical Hysterectomy for Clinically Apparent Stage II Endometrial Cancer Affect Risk of Local Recurrence?

OBJECTIVE

Compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) and morbidity between radical hysterectomy (RH) and simple hysterectomy (SH) for clinically diagnosed stage II endometrial cancer.

METHODS

A multicentre, retrospective study, from 2000 to 2015, involving patients with endometrial cancer with cervical involvement preoperatively and stromal invasion on final pathology. Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Fisher exact test, Kaplan-Meier survival functions, and Cox proportional hazards models were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Ninety of 1613 patients had clinical stage II endometrial cancer; 57 underwent RH and 33 underwent SH, with no difference in adjuvant treatment or morbidity. About half of patients (51%) had pathologic stage III-IV disease. Mean follow-up was 3.3 and 3.8 years for SH and RH, respectively. Thirty-three percent of patients with RH and SH experienced a recurrence. Most recurrences were distant: 90% with SH and 79% with RH. There was no difference in RFS between groups (2-year: SH 65% vs. RH 75%; 5-year: SH 54% vs. RH 63%; P = 0.72). Controlling for stage, adjuvant treatment, and margin status, RH was not associated with RFS (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.28-1.35). Among 44 patients with pathologic stage II disease, 7 had a recurrence (4 SH and 3 RH); 6 of 7 had distant recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

Fifty-one percent of patients with clinical stage II endometrial cancer had advanced disease on final pathology, highlighting the importance of surgical staging. RH was not associated with RFS or reduced morbidity. Most recurrences were distant. Although RH could be performed to achieve negative surgical margins, SH may be sufficient for central, small tumours given the high risk of advanced disease and distant recurrence. Research efforts should further elucidate the ideal management of these patients.

Trends and survival outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery for stage II uterine cancer

INTRODUCTION

A recent randomized clinical trial showed that minimally invasive surgery led to poorer survival compared with open surgery in early stage cervical cancer. We determined the trends in adoption of minimally invasive surgery and 5-year overall survival outcomes after open, laparoscopic-assisted, and robotic-assisted hysterectomy for stage II uterine cancer with cervical stromal involvement.

METHODS

Data for patients with stage II uterine cancer were acquired from the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2015. χ² testing, Kaplan-Meier methods, and Cox models were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Of 2949 patients, 44.3% underwent open hysterectomy, 13.9% underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy, and 41.8% underwent robotic hysterectomy. The proportion of robotic cases increased from 26.8% in 2010 to 48.3% in 2015 (annual percent change 10.1%), with a decrease in open hysterectomy from 63.3% to 34.3% (annual percent change -12.5%). The overall 5-year survival was 77.6% in robotic, 76.8% in laparoscopic, and 72.5% in open hysterectomy (p=0.045); however, after adjusting for known prognostic factors, robotic (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.21; p=0.97) and laparoscopic hysterectomy (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.44; p=0.54) did not portend for improved survival compared with open hysterectomy. Black women (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.02; p<0.001) and individuals with co-morbidities (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.75, p<0.001) had worse adjusted survival and the highest rates of open hysterectomy.

CONCLUSION

The use of minimally invasive surgery for stage II uterine cancer has increased over time, with comparable adjusted 5-year survival after robotic or laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with open hysterectomy. Black women and those with co-morbidities had lowest rates of minimally invasive surgery and the poorest adjusted survival.

Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial carcinoma involving the cervix

OBJECTIVE

Most studies evaluating the oncologic safety of minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer focus on patients with stage I disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial carcinoma involving the cervix.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2015, with clinical stage II endometrial carcinoma, who underwent hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy, were drawn from the National Cancer Database. Inclusion criteria were clinical International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO 2009) stage II, patients who underwent hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy, and known route of surgery (open or minimally invasive). Patients who received radiation therapy prior to surgery, those who had subtotal/supracervical hysterectomy, or unknown type of hysterectomy were excluded. The exposure of interest was performance of minimally invasive surgery either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted. Overall survival (primary endpoint) was assessed for patients diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2014 following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox model was constructed to control for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 2175 patients were identified and 1282 (58.9%) had minimally invasive surgery. Of these, 339 and 943 patients had laparoscopic or robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, respectively. Minimally invasive surgery was converted to open surgery in 74 (5.8%) patients. Those undergoing minimally invasive surgery had shorter hospital stay (median 1 vs 3 days, p<0.001), lower unplanned readmission rate (2.7% vs 4.7%, p=0.014), and 90-day mortality (0.8% vs 1.8%, p=0.05). Patients who had open surgery (n=796) had worse overall survival compared with those who had minimally invasive surgery (n=1048, p=0.003); 3-year overall survival rates were 76.8% and 83.6%, respectively. After controlling for patient age, race, type of insurance, presence of co-morbidities, performance of extensive lymphadenectomy, presence of positive lymph nodes, tumor histology, presence of lymphovascular space invasion, tumor size, and administration of radiotherapy, performance of minimally invasive surgery was not associated with worse survival (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.11).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis, minimally invasive surgery in patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma was associated with superior short-term peri-operative outcomes and improved 3-year overall survival.

Radical hysterectomy is not associated with a survival benefit for patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of radical hysterectomy in the management of patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma.

MATERIALS

Patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2015, with stage II (based on the revised FIGO staging) endometrial carcinoma who had hysterectomy and regional lymph node surgery were identified in the National Cancer Database. Those who had radical or modified radical (RH), or total hysterectomy (TH) were selected. Overall survival (OS) was assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox model was constructed to evaluate survival after controlling for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 7552 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified. Rate of RH was 10.5%. Those who underwent RH had longer hospital stay (median 3 vs 2 days, p < 0.001) and a higher 90-day (1.6% vs 0.8%, p = 0.05) mortality. There was no difference in OS between patients who had RH (n = 712) and SH (n = 5955) (p = 0.62); 5-year survival rates were 77.4% and 76.9%, respectively. After controlling for patient age (<65, ≥65 years), race (white, black, other/unknown), insurance status, presence of comorbidities, tumor size (<5, ≥5 cm, unknown), histology (endometrioid, non-endometrioid), performance of adequate lymphadenectomy, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy, performance of radical hysterectomy was not associated with better survival (HR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.85, 1.21).

CONCLUSIONS

Radical hysterectomy was not associated with a survival benefit in a cohort of patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma.

Survival and recurrence in stage II endometrial cancers in relation to uterine risk stratification after introduction of lymph node resection and omission of postoperative radiotherapy: a Danish Gynecological Cancer Group Study

Objective

To evaluate survival and recurrence in stage II endometrial cancer in relation to uterine risk stratification. Outcome for stage II was compared before and after the introduction of lymph node (LN) resection and omission of all postoperative radiotherapy.

Methods

The cohort consisted of 4,380 endometrial carcinoma patients radically operated (no visual tumor, all distant metastasis removed) (2005–2012) including 461 stage II. Adjusted Cox regression was used to compare survival and actuarial recurrence rates.

Results

Uterine risk factors (low-, intermediate-, and high-) were the strongest predictors of survival and recurrence in stage II. Stage II low-risk having a prognosis comparable to low-risk stage I (grade 1–2, <50% myometrial invasion), whereas cervical invasion significantly increased the risk of recurrence and decreased cancer-specific survival in intermediate- and high-risk compared to the corresponding stage I risk groups. In 355 cases of 708 with cervical stromal invasion, LN-resection showed 27.9% with LN metastasis and upstaged 18.1% from stage II to IIIC resulting in longer survival and lower recurrence in LN-resected compared to non-LN resected stage II. Radical as compared to simple hysterectomy did not alter survival. Treatment with external beam radiotherapy decreased local recurrence without affecting survival.

Conclusion

Uterine risk groups are the strongest predictors for survival and recurrence in stage II patients and should be considered when advising adjuvant therapy. LN-resected stage II had increased survival and decreased recurrence. Omitting radiotherapy increase vaginal recurrence without affecting survival.

Does the extension of the type of hysterectomy contribute to the local control of endometrial cancer?

OBJECTIVE

To examine the necessity and sufficiency of different types of hysterectomy for the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer.

METHODS

This was a multicenter collaborative study conducted by 11 institutions. Among patients with stage I-III endometrial cancer who underwent surgery as the initial treatment (only chemotherapy was provided if adjuvant therapy was needed) from 2001 to 2012, we retrospectively examined the type of hysterectomy, clinicopathological factors, recurrence rate over a maximum period of 5 years, and the site of recurrence. The local recurrence rate was examined by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Among 1335 patients, 982 (73.6%) underwent simple hysterectomy (SH) and 353 (26.4%) underwent modified radical hysterectomy (mRH) and were observed for a mean duration of 51.8 months. No significant difference was observed in the rate of local recurrence between the SH and mRH groups (p = 0.928). In multivariate analysis, clinicopathological factors independently associated with localized recurrence included postmenopausal status [hazard ratio (HR) 5.036, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.506-16.841, p = 0.009], with stages II (HR 3.337, 95% CI 1.701-6.547, p < 0.001) and III (HR 2.445, 95% CI 1.280-4.668, p = 0.007), vs stage I and histological type 2 (HR 1.610, 95% CI 0.938-2.762, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For endometrial cancer patients requiring surgery, the selection of a more extensive type of hysterectomy did not reduce the rate of local recurrence. Therefore, there is little significance in performing mRH in such cases.

Comparison of survival and perioperative outcomes following simple and radical hysterectomy for stage II endometrial cancer: a single-institution, retrospective, matched-pair analysis

Objective

We aimed to compare the survival and perioperative outcomes of patients with stage II endometrial cancer (EC) undergoing simple hysterectomy (SH) or radical hysterectomy (RH), to validate the various guidelines.

Methods

A total of 155 consecutive patients diagnosed with stage II EC from 2000 to 2014 were reviewed. We identified 40 pairs of patients (40 SH and 40 RH) who were matched in terms of age, pathological type, and lymphovascular space invasion status using matched-pair analysis. Patient data were collected from medical records and outcomes were determined by telephone follow-up.

Results

Among the 80 patients in the two groups, seven died from tumor recurrence. However, cancer-related survival rates were not significantly different between the SH and RH groups. The 3-year cancer-related survival rates in the SH and RH groups were 94.97% and 92.53%, and the 5-year survival rates were 92.40% and 90.03%, respectively. Regarding perioperative outcomes, the SH group had significantly less intraoperative bleeding and a significantly shorter catheter-indwelling time than the RH group.

Conclusions

SH provides similar survival outcomes and a superior perioperative quality of life compared with RH in patients with stage II EC.

Current recommendations and recent progress in endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in the United States, and its incidence is rising. Although there have been significant recent advances in our understanding of endometrial cancer biology, many aspects of treatment remain mired in controversy, including the role of surgical lymph node assessment and the selection of patients for adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy. For the subset of women with microsatellite-instable, metastatic disease, anti- programmed cell death protein 1 immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) is now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, and numerous trials are attempting to build on this early success.

Treatment outcomes of patients with stage II pure endometrioid-type endometrial cancer: a Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (TGOG-2006) retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Choice of hysterectomy and adjuvant treatment for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage II endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) is still controversial. Aims of this study were to evaluate survival benefits and adverse effects of different hysterectomies with or without adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), and to identify prognostic factors.

METHODS

The patients at 14 member hospitals of the Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group from 1992 to 2013 were retrospectively investigated. Patients were divided into simple hysterectomy (SH) alone, SH with RT, radical hysterectomy (RH) alone, and RH with RT groups. Endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), adverse effects and prognostic factors for survival.

RESULTS

Total of 246 patients were enrolled. The 5-year RFS, OS, DSS and recurrence rates for the entire cohort were 89.5%, 94.3%, 96.2% and 10.2%, respectively. Patients receiving RH had more adverse effects including blood loss (p<0.001), recurrent urinary tract infections (p=0.013), and leg lymphedema (p=0.038). Age over 50-year (HR=9.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.2-70.9) and grade 3 histology (HR=7.28; 95% CI=1.45-36.6) were independent predictors of OS. Grade 3 histology was an independent predictor of RFS (HR=5.13; 95% CI=1.38-19.1) and DSS (HR=5.97; 95% CI=1.06-58.7). Patients receiving adjuvant RT had lower locoregional recurrence (p=0.046), but no impact on survival.

CONCLUSION

Different treatment modalities yield similar survival outcomes. Patients receiving SH with RT had lower locoregional recurrent with acceptable morbidity. Age and tumor grading remained significant predictors for survival among patients with FIGO 2009 stage II EEC.

Oncologic Outcomes After Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Stage II Endometrial Carcinoma: A Korean Radiation Oncology Group Study (KROG 14-10)

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the survival, patterns of failure, and prognostic factors in patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma treated with adjuvant radiotherapy.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic lymph node dissection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy in 10 participating hospitals of the Korean Radiation Oncology Group. Most patients received adjuvant external beam radiation therapy, with a median dose of 50.4 Gy; approximately 50% of these patients received an additional brachytherapy boost, with a median dose of 18 Gy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 19 patients.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients were examined. Over a median follow-up period of 62.7 months (range, 1.9-158.8 months), the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival rates were found to be 91.1% and 85.1%, respectively. Recurrence was observed in 14 patients (11.5%), including 3 with local recurrence and 11 with distant metastases as the first site of recurrence. Univariate analysis indicated that lymphovascular invasion was related to an unfavorable OS. An age of 60 years or above, histologic grade 3, and lymphovascular invasion were identified as risk factors for OS. Because there were several risk factors related to OS, we assigned patients to a high-risk group (defined as cases with ≥1 risk factors) and a low-risk group. The 5-year OS rate of the high-risk group was significantly inferior to that of the low-risk group (82.9% vs 100%, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The high-risk group had a significantly poorer survival rate than the low-risk group, and distant metastasis was the main pattern of recurrence, thus indicating that further adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in high-risk patients.

Racial disparities in young women with endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

Although racial disparities in treatment and outcome for endometrial cancer are well recognized, little work has explored disparities in young women. We performed a population-based analysis to compare survival between black and white women with endometrial cancer at <50years of age.

METHODS

We used the National Cancer Data Base to identify women <50years of age with endometrial cancer from 1998 to 2012. Clinical and demographic characteristics were compared between black and white women and survival by race analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 35,850 women <50years of age including 31,947 (89.1%) white and 3903 (10.9%) black patients. Black women were more likely to have advanced stage, poorly differentiated, and non-endometrioid histology neoplasms (P<0.05 for all). In a multivariable model, survival was 19% worse for black patients than white patients (HR=1.19; 95% CI, 1.08-1.32). A similar effect was seen when limited to women with early-stage tumors (HR=1.24; 95% CI, 1.04-1.49), while among patients with advanced stage tumors, no association between race and survival was seen (HR=1.12; 95% CI, 0.89-1.41). Five-year survival rates were 90.6% (95% CI, 88.6-92.3%) for white and 81.5% (95% CI, 73.0-87.5%) for black women with stage IB tumors, and 75.1% (95% CI, 72.5-77.5%) and 63.3% (95% CI, 54.1-71.2%) for white and black women with stage III tumors, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Young black women are more likely to present with pathologically aggressive, advanced stage tumors. Even after adjusting for these pathologic differences, young black women with endometrial cancer have higher mortality than white women.

Oncological Outcomes of Stage II Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of 250 Cases

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different surgical approaches, adjuvant therapy, and pathological characteristics on oncological outcomes in patients with 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage II endometrial cancer (EC).

Methods

A multicenter, retrospective department database review was performed to identify patients with FIGO 2009 stage II EC who underwent surgical staging between 2002 and 2015 at 5 gynecologic oncology centers in Turkey.

Results

Original pathology reports of 4867 patients who underwent surgical treatment for EC were analyzed. The study group consisted of 250 FIGO stage II patients. Of these patients, 203 (81.2%) had endometrioid and 47 (18.8%) had nonendometrioid histologic subtype of EC. Whereas 199 patients (79.6%) underwent type I hysterectomy, the remaining 51 patients (20.4%) underwent radical hysterectomy. Of the 250 patients, 208 patients (83.2%) had adjuvant therapy including radiotherapy (pelvic external beam radiotherapy and/or vaginal brachytherapy [VBT]) and/or platinum-based chemotherapy. Disease recurred in 29 patients (11.6%). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort were 82% and 85%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that only adjuvant treatment (P = 0.001; hazard ratio, 4.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.72–9.36) was significantly associated with DFS. According to multivariate analysis, only age older than 60 years (P = 0.01; hazard ratio, 3.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.3–7.04) was identified as an independent risk factor for OS. However, there were no differences in OS when evaluated by grade, histology, tumor size, type of hysterectomy, or adjuvant treatment.

Conclusions

In stage II EC, adjuvant external beam radiotherapy ± VBT were associated with increased DFS but not OS. However, the benefit of VBT alone on DFS could not be demonstrated. Only age was an independent risk factor for OS. Type of hysterectomy and histologic subtype of the tumor for patients with uterus-confined disease improved neither DFS nor OS in our study group.

Outcomes of stage II endometrial cancer: The UPMC Hillman Cancer Center experience

PURPOSE

Previous studies of stage II endometrial cancer have included cancers with cervical glandular involvement, a factor no longer associated with risk of recurrence. In order to better assess relapse patterns and the impact of adjuvant therapy, a retrospective analysis was conducted for patients with modern stage II endometrial cancer, defined as cervical stromal invasion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with surgically staged FIGO stage II endometrial cancer at the UPMC Hillman Cancer Center from 1990-2013 were reviewed. Factors associated with rates of locoregional control (LRC), distant metastasis (DM), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the log rank test.

RESULTS

110 patients with FIGO stage II disease were identified. Most (84.5%) received EBRT±BT, with 13.6% receiving BT alone. With a median follow-up of 64.6months, the 5-year actuarial rates of LRC, DM, DFS, and OS were 94.9%, 85.1%, 67.9%, and 75.0%, respectively. With 5 locoregional failures, the only factor predictive of LRC was pelvic lymph node dissection. Characteristics associated with DM included age, LVSI, depth of myometrial invasion, and receipt of chemotherapy. Factors predictive of both DFS and OS were age, grade, adverse histology, LVSI, depth of myometrial invasion, and receipt of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This represents the largest single-institution study for modern stage II endometrial cancer, confirming high rates of pelvic disease control after surgery and adjuvant therapy. With most patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy, the predominant mode of failure, albeit low in absolute number, remains distant metastases.

Vaginal cuff brachytherapy in endometrial cancer - a technically easy treatment?

Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common gynecological cancers among women in the developed countries. Vaginal cuff is the main location of relapses after a curative surgical procedure and postoperative radiation therapy have proven to diminish it. Nevertheless, these results have not translated into better survival results. The preeminent place of vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VCB) in the postoperative treatment of high- to intermediate-risk EC was given by the PORTEC-2 trial, which demonstrated a similar reduction in relapses with VCB than with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), but VCB induced less late toxicity. As a result of this trial, the use of VCB has increased in clinical practice at the expense of EBRT. A majority of the clinical reviews of VCB usually address the risk categories and patient selection but pay little attention to technical aspects of the VCB procedure. Our review aimed to address both aspects. First of all, we described the risk groups, which guide patient selection for VCB in clinical practice. Then, we depicted several technical aspects that might influence dose deposition and toxicity. Bladder distension and rectal distension as well as applicator position or patient position are some of those variables that we reviewed.

BGCS uterine cancer guidelines: Recommendations for practice

The British Gynaecological Cancer Society has issued the first Endometrial (Uterine) Cancer guidelines as recommendation for practice for the UK.

Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2015

In 2015, fourteen topics were selected as major research advances in gynecologic oncology. For ovarian cancer, high-level evidence for annual screening with multimodal strategy which could reduce ovarian cancer deaths was reported. The best preventive strategies with current status of evidence level were also summarized. Final report of chemotherapy or upfront surgery (CHORUS) trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced stage ovarian cancer and individualized therapy based on gene characteristics followed. There was no sign of abating in great interest in immunotherapy as well as targeted therapies in various gynecologic cancers. The fifth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference which was held in November 7-9 in Tokyo was briefly introduced. For cervical cancer, update of human papillomavirus vaccines regarding two-dose regimen, 9-valent vaccine, and therapeutic vaccine was reviewed. For corpus cancer, the safety concern of power morcellation in presumed fibroids was explored again with regard to age and prevalence of corpus malignancy. Hormone therapy and endometrial cancer risk, trabectedin as an option for leiomyosarcoma, endometrial cancer and Lynch syndrome, and the radiation therapy guidelines were also discussed. In addition, adjuvant therapy in vulvar cancer and the updated of targeted therapy in gynecologic cancer were addressed. For breast cancer, palbociclib in hormone-receptor-positive advanced disease, oncotype DX Recurrence Score in low-risk patients, regional nodal irradiation to internal mammary, supraclavicular, and axillary lymph nodes, and cavity shave margins were summarized as the last topics covered in this review.

ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up

The first joint European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) consensus conference on endometrial cancer was held on 11-13 December 2014 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of endometrial cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel prepared three clinically-relevant questions about endometrial cancer relating to the following four areas: prevention and screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment and advanced and recurrent disease. All relevant scientific literature, as identified by the experts, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. Results of this consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation, are detailed in this article. All participants have approved this final article.

ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

The first joint European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) consensus conference on endometrial cancer was held on 11-13 December 2014 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of endometrial cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel prepared three clinically relevant questions about endometrial cancer relating to the following four areas: prevention and screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment and advanced and recurrent disease. All relevant scientific literature, as identified by the experts, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. Results of this consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation, are detailed in this article. All participants have approved this final article.

Surgery for endometrial cancers with suspected cervical involvement: is radical hysterectomy needed (a GOTIC study)?

Background:

Radical hysterectomy is recommended for endometrial adenocarcinoma patients with suspected gross cervical involvement. However, the efficacy of operative procedure has not been confirmed.

Methods:

The patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma who had suspected gross cervical involvement and underwent hysterectomy between 1995 and 2009 at seven institutions were retrospectively analysed (Gynecologic Oncology Trial and Investigation Consortium of North Kanto: GOTIC-005). Primary endpoint was overall survival, and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and adverse effects.

Results:

A total of 300 patients who underwent primary surgery were identified: 74 cases with radical hysterectomy (RH), 112 patients with modified radical hysterectomy (mRH), and 114 cases with simple hysterectomy (SH). Median age was 47 years, and median duration of follow-up was 47 months. There were no significant differences of age, performance status, body mass index, stage distribution, and adjuvant therapy among three groups. Multi-regression analysis revealed that age, grade, peritoneal cytology status, and lymph node involvement were identified as prognostic factors for OS; however, type of hysterectomy was not selected as independent prognostic factor for local recurrence-free survival, PFS, and OS. Additionally, patients treated with RH had longer operative time, higher rates of blood transfusion and severe urinary tract dysfunction.

Conclusion:

Type of hysterectomy was not identified as a prognostic factor in endometrial cancer patients with suspected gross cervical involvement. Perioperative and late adverse events were more frequent in patients treated with RH. The present study could not find any survival benefit from RH for endometrial cancer patients with suspected gross cervical involvement. Surgical treatment in these patients should be further evaluated in prospective clinical studies.

Endocervical involvement in endometrial adenocarcinoma is not prognostically significant and the pathologic assessment of the pattern of involvement is not reproducible

OBJECTIVES

Since 1988, cervical gland involvement and stromal invasion defined stage IIA and stage IIB endometrial carcinoma. In 2009, FIGO changed the criteria for stage II disease to include only those with cervical stromal invasion. We wished to: 1) assess the reproducibility of pathologists to distinguish patterns of cervical spread, and 2) determine the prognostic significance of cervical involvement.

METHODS

Slides from 46 women with cervical involvement by endometrial adenocarcinoma were scored for 5 patterns of involvement by 6 experienced pathologists to determine reproducibility. To assess prognostic significance, 206 patients with FIGO 1988 stage II adenocarcinoma formed the study population with matched FIGO stage I controls.

RESULTS

At least 5 of the 6 pathologists agreed that the cervix was involved in the 46 cases. The reproducibility for cervical gland involvement and endocervical stromal invasion was slight (kappas of 0.15 and 0.28). The survival with any type of cervical involvement was not significantly different from that of matched stage I controls (p=0.18). The 5year recurrence-free survival rates were 84% for FIGO 1988 stage I, 73% for stage IIA, and 82% for stage IIB (FIGO 2009 stage II).

CONCLUSIONS

Pathologists reliably recognize cervical involvement by endometrial carcinoma. However, reproducibility for the determination of pattern of cervical spread by experienced pathologists is too low to be of clinical utility. Women with spread of carcinoma to the cervix do not have a significantly lower survival than matched stage I controls. Cervical spread should not be the basis for determination of stage II disease.

Prognostic Value of the 2009 FIGO Staging for Endometrial Cancer: An Illustration of the E3N Cohort

Objective

To compare the prognostic values of the 1988 and 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classifications for endometrial cancer.

Materials and Methods

From 1990 to 2008, patients undergoing surgery for endometrial cancer were extracted from the French prospective “Etude Epidémiologique auprès de femmes de l’Education Nationale” cohort study. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) an available detailed histologic report of primary surgical procedure and (2) available cause and date of death. Concordance indexes for the 1988 and 2009 FIGO classifications were compared.

Results

Three hundred ninety-seven patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The concordance index for the 2009 FIGO classification was lower than that of the 1988 FIGO classification (0.76 vs 0.77, respectively).

Conclusion

In this study, the 1988 FIGO classification for endometrial cancer is at least as accurate as the 2009 FIGO classification for predicting endometrial cancer mortality.

Controversies in the management of endometrial carcinoma: an update

Endometrial carcinoma is the commonest type of female genital tract malignancy in the developed countries. Endometrial carcinoma is usually confined to the uterus at the time of diagnosis and as such usually carries an excellent prognosis with high curability. Our understanding and management of endometrial cancer have continuously developed. Current controversies focus on screening and early detection, the extent of nodal surgery, and the changing roles of radiation therapy and chemotherapy and will be discussed in this paper.

Current therapy of patients with endometrial carcinoma. A critical review

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 18-FDG positron emission tomography ((18)FDG PET-CT), and computed tomography (CT) have demonstrated disappointing detectability of lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer. The treatment of choice in patients with endometrial cancer is hysterectomy and bilateral salpingoophorectomy. Above all, obese patients with comorbidity have benefited the most from laparoscopically assisted approaches. For inoperable patients in FIGO stage I/II, radiation remains an alternative to hysterectomy. The role of pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy is the most controversial issue in endometrial carcinoma treatment. The current spectrum of treatment ranges from no lymphadenectomy, exclusive pelvic or additional inframesentric paraaortic sampling, or complete pelvic to infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy. The sentinel concept in patients with endometrial carcinoma is far from being introduced into routine clinical practice. Without a lymphadenectomy, decision making for adjuvant therapy remains a challenge, because no information is available from lymph node status and the reliability of pathologic grading is poor. For patients after hysterectomy with a low risk of local relapse (stage I/II without additional risk factors), vaginal brachytherapy is sufficient to prevent vaginal relapses. Adjuvant external beam irradiation (EBRT) in stage I/II demonstrated improved local control which impacted overall survival only in patients with high-risk features (higher age, grading myometrial infiltration). Stage IIIC patients seem to benefit from EBRT with regard to overall survival. In patients at high risk of progression (grade 3, MI > 50%, FIGO IIIC, unfavorable histology), multimodal treatment should be considered. The optimal substances and sequences are under investigation.

Preoperative high dose rate brachytherapy for clinical stage II endometrial carcinoma

Purpose

We sought to evaluate pathological response, tolerance, and outcome after preoperative (neoadjuvant) high dose rate brachytherapy in a small series of patients with clinical stage II endometrial carcinoma, and to evaluate a dose and fractionation protocol for this treatment.

Material and methods

Twelve women diagnosed with clinical stage II endometrial carcinoma from 1999-2010 were treated with preoperative radiation therapy. Their medical charts were retrospectively analyzed for HDR treatment regimen, pathological response, and longitudinal outcomes. Radiation doses were normalized to a biologically equivalent dose of 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2).

Results

Two patients had complete pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy; five more had only microscopic residual disease at the time of surgery. At a median follow up of 37 months (1-91 months), one patient has developed recurrence at the vaginal apex six months after completing initial therapy, while another developed a lung recurrence at 28 months. Two-year disease-free and cause-specific survivals were 88% and 100%, respectively.

Conclusions

Our small study shows that the HDR fractionation schedule, as done in our series for preoperative radiation therapy for clinical stage II endometrial cancer, is well tolerated and would be an option for patients treated with neoadjuvant radiation therapy.

Comparison of the prognostic significance of uterine factors and nodal status for endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

We examined the prognostic significance of uterine risk factors (RF) compared to nodal metastases in endometrial cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Women with stage I-IIIC endometrioid cancer were stratified based on the presence of positive or negative lymph nodes. Each patient was characterized by the number of RF present: myoinvasion ≥50%, cervical stromal involvement, and grade 3 histology.

RESULTS

A total of 26,967 women were identified. In a multivariable model, uterine RF strongly influenced survival but nodal disease was a more important negative prognostic factor. Five-year overall survival was 68% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63-72%) for group 1 (node positive/no RF) vs 69% (95% CI, 66-72%) for group 5 (node negative/multiple RF). Five-year survival was lower for node-positive patients with RF (58%; 95% CI, 54-61%) than node-positive patients without RF (68%; 95% CI, 63-72%).

CONCLUSION

Uterine RF strongly influenced survival both in the presence and absence of nodal metastasis.

Limited utility of magnetic resonance imaging in determining the primary site of disease in patients with inconclusive endometrial biopsy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utility of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in determining whether primary disease site is cervical or endometrial in patients with inconclusive preoperative endometrial biopsy.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified all patients who underwent pelvic MRI and who had a preoperative diagnosis of cervical or endometrial cancer at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 1990 and 2006. The subset in which endometrial biopsy did not clarify the primary disease site was analyzed. Magnetic resonance imaging results were compared with postoperative histopathologic findings.

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients who underwent MRI who had a preoperative diagnosis of cervical or endometrial cancer were identified. Of these patients, 51 had an inconclusive endometrial biopsy. Magnetic resonance imaging suggested an endometrial primary tumor without cervical invasion in 28 patients, of whom 21 (75%) actually had such a tumor and 7 had an endometrial primary tumor with cervical invasion. Magnetic resonance imaging suggested an endometrial primary tumor with cervical invasion in 3 patients, all of whom had such a tumor. Magnetic resonance imaging suggested a cervical primary tumor in 6 patients, of whom 5 had such a tumor and 1 had an endometrial primary tumor without cervical invasion. Magnetic resonance imaging was inconclusive (did not clarify primary disease site or no lesion visualized) in 14 (27%) of 51 patients, 6 of whom had an endocervical primary tumor or an endometrial tumor with cervical involvement. Overall, preoperative MRI was either inaccurate or unhelpful in 22 (43%) of 51 patients.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative MRI in patients with inconclusive endometrial biopsy is inaccurate or unhelpful in nearly half of patients.

Comparative performance of the 2009 international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics' staging system for uterine corpus cancer

OBJECTIVE

To perform a population-based analysis comparing the performance of the 1988 and 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging systems.

METHODS

Women with endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus treated between 1988 and 2006 and recorded in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were analyzed. Women were classified based on 1988 and 2009 FIGO staging systems. Major changes in the 2009 system include: 1) classification of patients with stage IA and IB tumors as stage IA; 2) elimination of stage IIA; and 3) stratification of stage IIIC into pelvic nodes only (IIIC1) or paraaortic nodal (IIIC2) involvement. Survival and use of adjuvant therapy were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 81,902 women were identified. Based on the 1988 staging system, survival for stage IA was 90.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90-91%) compared with 88.9% (95% CI 88-89%) for IB tumors. In the 2009 system, survival was 89.6% (95% CI 89-90%) for stage IA and 77.6% (95% CI 76-79%) for stage IB. The survival for FIGO 1988 stage IIA was superior to stage IC, whereas in the 2009 system, survival for stage II was inferior to all stage I patients. The newly defined stage IIIC substages are prognostically different. Survival for stage IIIC1 was 57.0% (95% CI 54-60%) compared with 49.4% (95% CI 46-53%) for stage IIIC2.

CONCLUSION

The 2009 FIGO staging system for uterine corpus cancer is highly prognostic. The reduction in stage I substages and the separation of stage III will further clarify important prognostic features.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Controversies in the management of endometrial carcinoma

Endometrial carcinoma is the most common type of female genital tract malignancy. Although endometrial carcinoma is a low grade curable malignancy, the condition of the disease can range from excellent prognosis with high curability to aggressive disease with poor outcome. During the last 10 years many researches have provided some new valuable data of optimal treatments for endometrial carcinoma. Progression in diagnostic imaging, radiation delivery systems, and systemic therapies potentially can improve outcomes while minimizing morbidity. Firstly, total hysterectomy and bilateral salphingo-oophorectomy is the primary operative procedure. Pelvic lymhadenectomy is performed in most centers on therapeutic and prognostic grounds and to individualize adjuvant treatment. Women with endometrial carcinoma can be readily segregated intraoperatively into “low-risk” and “high-risk” groups to better identify those women who will most likely benefit from thorough lymphadenectomy. Secondly, adjuvant therapies have been proposed for women with endometrial carcinoma postoperatively. Postoperative irradiation is used to reduce pelvic and vaginal recurrences in high risk cases. Chemotherapy is emerging as an important treatment modality in advanced endometrial carcinoma. Meanwhile the availability of new hormonal and biological agents presents new opportunities for therapy.