Interval to spontaneous delivery after elective removal of cerclage

Outcomes following Placement and Removal of Transvaginal Cerclage in at Risk Pregnancies: A Single Center Experience

Objective

The objective of this study was to estimate the time between removal of cerclage and delivery, stratified by indication for cerclage placement (elective or non-elective). Additionally, delivery within 72 hours after cerclage removal was compared between elective and non-elective cerclage placement, as well as between ultrasound-indicated and physical examination-indicated cerclage placement.

Design

A single-center retrospective cohort study. Participants/Materials, Setting, and Methods. Clinical information of 72 pregnant women who underwent transvaginal cerclage over a 4-year period was obtained. Comparisons were made between elective (history-indicated) and non-elective (ultrasound or physical examination-indicated) cerclage placement. Comparisons were also made between physical examination-indicated and ultrasound-indicated cerclage.

Results

Compared to those who had a non-elective cerclage, women undergoing elective cerclage were more likely to have history of cervical treatment (44% vs. 15%, p = 0.02), and spontaneous preterm delivery (92% vs. 61%, p = 0.003). There was no difference in the rate of delivery ≤72 hours following cerclage removal between women who had elective cerclage and those who had non-elective cerclage (46% vs. 58%, p = 0.47). Women who had an elective cerclage were more likely to have elective cerclage removal ≥36 weeks (71.8% vs. 39.4%, p = 0.01), compared to those who had undergone non-elective cerclage. The rate of delivery ≤72 hours following removal of cerclage was greater in women who had a physical examination-indicated cerclage compared to women who had ultrasound-indicated cerclage (80% vs. 39%, p = 0.04). Among women who had an elective cerclage, there was no difference in the rate of delivery at ≤72 hours between those who had elective cerclage removal at 36 weeks compared to those electively removed at 37 weeks (31% vs. 58%, p = 0.30). No complications such as fetal demise, iatrogenic amniotic membrane rupture, hemorrhage, or cervical laceration were reported within this cohort.

Conclusion

Cerclage indication should be considered prior to scheduling elective cerclage removal. Women who had an elective cerclage are most likely to get it electively removed at 36 weeks compared to their counterparts who had a non-elective cerclage. Furthermore, women who had a physical examination-indicated cerclage are most likely to deliver within 72 hours of cerclage removal.

The Short Cervix: A Critical Analysis of Diagnosis and Treatment

A short cervix in the second trimester is a significant risk factor for spontaneous preterm birth, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, and subsequent adverse perinatal outcome. The pathophysiology is complex and multifactorial with inflammatory and/or infectious processes often involved. Biomarkers have been developed in an effort to predict preterm birth with varying degrees of success. The treatment options of cerclage, progesterone, pessary, and combination therapy are reviewed. Evidence-based protocols are summarized for singleton and multiple gestation.

A ten year review of time interval between elective cervical cerclage removal at term and spontaneous onset of labour in Enugu, South-East Nigeria

Cervical insufficiency is a recognised cause of third trimester miscarriage and spontaneous preterm births. It is one of the leading causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Miscarriage and preterm deliveries due to cervical insufficiency can be prevented by cervical cerclage insertion. The study aimed to determine the time interval between elective cervical cerclage removal at term and spontaneous onset of labour in Enugu, south-east Nigeria. A ten year retrospective review of all women who had cervical cerclage inserted for suspected cervical insufficiency at the two tertiary health institutions in Enugu state was done. Their case files were retrieved and relevant data extracted. The mean time interval from cerclage removal at term to spontaneous onset of labour was 12 days. The majority of patients (45.6%) had spontaneous onset of labour at the 2^nd week of cerclage removal. There was no significant difference in the mean time interval from cerclage removal to spontaneous onset of labour between ultrasound indicated group and history indicated group. These findings hopefully may assist in proper counselling and management of women who had cervical cerclage removed at term.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Cervical insufficiency is a known cause of mid trimester pregnancy loss and preterm delivery. Preterm babies are at risk of several complications, with high neonatal morbidity and mortality especially in developing world. Cervical cerclage insertion is a recognised surgical treatment for cervical incompetence aimed at preventing preterm births.What do the results of this study add? The study shows that removal of cervical cerclage at term does not result in immediate onset of spontaneous labour in women diagnosed to have cervical insufficiency. Notably, a majority of the women had spontaneous onset of labour at the 2^nd weeks of cerclage removal. Only 5.3% of them had spontaneous onset of labour within 48 hours of cerclage removal. This is contrary to the general belief in the region that once cervical cerclage is removed, spontaneous onset of labour results.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This finding suggests that there is no compelling need for admission into hospital after removal of cerclage as very few of them will have spontaneous onset of labour within 48 hours of cervical cerclage removal.

Cervical lacerations in planned versus labor cerclage removal: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of cervical lacerations with cerclage removal planned before labor compared to after the onset of labor by a systematic review of published studies.

STUDY DESIGN

Searches were performed in electronic databases from inception of each database to November 2014. We identified all studies reporting the rate of cervical lacerations and the timing of cerclage removal (either before or after the onset of labor). The primary outcome was the incidence of spontaneous and clinically significant intrapartum cervical lacerations (i.e. lacerations requiring suturing).

RESULTS

Six studies, which met the inclusion criteria, were included in the analysis. The overall incidence of cervical lacerations was 8.9% (32/359). There were 23/280 (6.4%) cervical lacerations in the planned removal group, and 9/79 (11.4%) in the removal after labor group (odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.31-1.57).

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, planned removal of cerclage before labor was not shown to be associated with statistically significant reduction in the incidence of cervical lacerations. However, since that our data probably did not reach statistical significance because of a type II error, further studies are needed.

Use and misuse of the term "elective" in obstetrics

The term "elective" is commonly used in obstetrics. We performed an electronic search of MEDLINE database using the terms "elective" and "obstetrics," which provided 2,208 publications. We found "elective" was more often used in relation to surgical interventions (eg, cesarean delivery, cerclage) and medical procedures (labor induction) rather than diagnostic procedures. Our review indicates the term lacks the necessary scientific specificity when used to modify procedures such as cerclage, cesarean delivery, timing of delivery, episiotomy, hysterectomy, labor induction, preterm delivery, termination of pregnancy, and ultrasonography. The lack of specificity of the term suggests the most reasonable and prudent course of action is to not use it, but rather to document the specific indication (whether medical or non-medical) for the intervention or procedure (eg, "cesarean delivery on maternal request," "history-indicated cerclage," "induction for preeclampsia"). We propose that the term "elective" should be eliminated from the vocabulary of obstetric practice.

Elective removal of cervical cerclage and onset of spontaneous labor

OBJECTIVE

To determine the time interval between elective removal of cervical cerclage and onset of spontaneous labor.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 2005 and December 2012 at a tertiary care hospital in Lisbon, Portugal. All singleton pregnancies with a McDonald or Shirodkar cerclage electively removed at 36-37 weeks were evaluated for the time interval between cerclage removal and spontaneous labor. Delivery within 72 hours after cerclage removal was compared between patients with elective cerclage and those with non-elective cerclage. In the non-elective group, a sub-analysis of the results for ultrasound- and physical examination-indicated cerclage was performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight women were included. The time interval between cerclage removal and spontaneous labor did not differ significantly between the elective and the non-elective group (15.6±7.6 vs 10.9±7.4 days; P=0.063). A higher incidence of delivery 72 hours after cerclage removal was seen in the non-elective group but this was not significant (P=0.061). There were no differences regarding the time interval from elective removal of cervical cerclage to onset of spontaneous labor between ultrasound-indicated and physical examination-indicated cerclage.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of the indication for cervical cerclage, the probability of delivery soon after elective cerclage removal is low.