National survey of obstetrician attitudes about timing the subsequent pregnancy after perinatal death

Decision-making and future pregnancies after a positive fetal anomaly screen: A scoping review

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To examine and consolidate literature on the experiences and decision-making of parents following a screen positive result for a potential fetal anomaly and/or diagnosis of an actual anomaly in a previous pregnancy.

BACKGROUND

Prenatal screening consists of any diagnostic modality that is aimed at acquiring information about a fetus or an embryo; however, the entire process is highly stressful for parents, especially if there was a previous screen positive result, but no abnormality was detected in the final result.

METHODS

Eight electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest Theses and Dissertations and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched from each database's inception until February 2022. This scoping review was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework and was reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework was utilised.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies were eligible for inclusion. Two main themes (reliving the fear while maintaining hope, and bridging the past and future pregnancies) and six subthemes were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

A fetal anomaly diagnosis in pregnancy had a mixed impact on the attitudes of parents toward a future pregnancy. Some parents were fearful of reliving a traumatic experience, while others were determined to have a healthy child and grow their family. Parents generally expressed a greater preference for non-invasive over invasive prenatal testing due to the procedural risks involved.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

There is a need for healthcare professionals to provide psychosocial and emotional support to parents so that they can achieve resolution for their previous pregnancy. Healthcare professionals' ability to provide informational support also enables these parents to make informed decision and understand their reproductive outcomes. Additionally, healthcare administration and policymakers should reconsider current neonatal or pregnancy loss bereavement guidelines to improve the inclusivity of fathers.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Stillbirth and subsequent pregnancy outcome - a cohort from a large tertiary referral hospital

Objectives This study aimed to assess pregnancy and delivery outcomes in women with a history of stillbirth in a large tertiary referral hospital. Methods This was a retrospective study from Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. The cohort comprised 214 antepartum singleton stillbirths in the period 2003-2015 (case group). Of these, 154 delivered by the end of 2017. Adverse pregnancy outcomes were compared to those in singleton pregnancies of parous women in Finland from the Finnish Medical Birth Register (reference group). Results The rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes were higher among case women for preeclampsia (3.3 vs. 0.9%, P = 0.002), preterm birth (8.5 vs. 3.9%, P = 0.004), small-for-gestational-age (SGA) children (7.8 vs. 2.2%, P < 0.001) and stillbirth (2.7 vs. 0.3%, P < 0.001). There were four preterm recurrent stillbirths. Induction of labor was more common among case women than parous women in the reference group (49.4 vs. 18.3%, P < 0.001). Duration of pregnancy was shorter among case women (38.29 ± 3.20 vs. 39.27 ± 2.52, P < 0.001), and mean birth weight was lower among newborns of the case women (3274 ± 770 vs. 3491 ± 674 g, P < 0.001). Conclusion Although the rates for adverse pregnancy outcomes were higher compared to the parous background population, the overall probability of a favorable outcome was high. The risk of recurrent premature stillbirth in our cohort was higher than that for parous women in general during the study period. No recurrent term stillbirths occurred, however.

Pregnancy decisions after fetal or perinatal death: systematic review of qualitative research

OBJECTIVES

To synthesise the findings of qualitative research exploring parents' experiences, views and decisions about becoming pregnant following a perinatal death or fetal loss.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ASSIA, Embase, PUBMED, Scopus and Google Scholar.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Nine electronic databases were searched using predefined search terms. Articles published in English, in peer-reviewed journals, using qualitative methods to explore the experiences and attitudes of bereaved parents following perinatal or fetal loss, were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Qualitative data relating to first-order and second-order constructs were extracted and synthesised across studies using a thematic analysis.

RESULTS

15 studies were included. Four descriptive themes and 10 subthemes were identified. The descriptive themes were: deciding about subsequent pregnancy, diversity of reactions to the event, social network influences, and planning or timing of subsequent pregnancy. The decision to become pregnant after death is complex and varies between individuals and sometimes within couples. Decisions are often made quickly, in the immediate aftermath of a pregnancy loss, but may evolve over time. Bereaved parents may feel isolated from social networks.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an opportunity to support parents to prepare for a pregnancy after a fetal or perinatal loss, and conversations may be welcomed at an early stage. Health professionals may play an important role providing support lacking from usual social networks.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018112839.

Developing evidence-based recommendations for optimal interpregnancy intervals in high-income countries: protocol for an international cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Short interpregnancy interval (IPI) has been linked to adverse pregnancy outcomes. WHO recommends waiting at least 2 years after a live birth and 6 months after miscarriage or induced termination before conception of another pregnancy. The evidence underpinning these recommendations largely relies on data from low/middle-income countries. Furthermore, recent epidemiological investigations have suggested that these studies may overestimate the effects of IPI due to residual confounding. Future investigations of IPI effects in high-income countries drawing from large, population-based data sources are needed to inform IPI recommendations. We aim to assess the impact of IPIs on maternal and child health outcomes in high-income countries.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This international longitudinal retrospective cohort study will include more than 18 million pregnancies, making it the largest study to investigate IPI in high-income countries. Population-based data from Australia, Finland, Norway and USA will be used. Birth records in each country will be used to identify consecutive pregnancies. Exact dates of birth and clinical best estimates of gestational length will be used to estimate IPI. Administrative birth and health data sources with >99% coverage in each country will be used to identify maternal sociodemographics, pregnancy complications, details of labour and delivery, birth and child health information. We will use matched and unmatched regression models to investigate the impact of IPI on maternal and infant outcomes, and conduct meta-analysis to pool results across countries.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics boards at participating sites approved this research (approval was not required in Finland). Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences, and will inform recommendations for optimal IPI in high-income countries. Findings will provide important information for women and families planning future pregnancies and for clinicians providing prenatal care and giving guidance on family planning.

Influences on birth spacing intentions and desired interventions among women who have experienced a poor obstetric outcome in Lilongwe Malawi: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Stillbirth and neonatal mortality are very high in many low-income countries, including Malawi. Use of family planning to encourage birth spacing may optimize outcomes for subsequent pregnancies. However, reproductive desires and influences on birth spacing preferences of women who have experienced a stillbirth or neonatal death in low-resource settings are not well understood.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study using 20 in-depth interviews and four focus group discussions with women who had experienced a stillborn baby or early neonatal death to explore attitudes surrounding birth spacing and potential interventions to promote family planning in this population. Qualitative data were analyzed for recurrent patterns and themes and central ideas were extracted to identify their core meanings.

RESULTS

Forty-six women participated in the study. After experiencing a stillbirth or neonatal death, most women wanted to wait to become pregnant again but women with living children wished to wait for longer periods of time than those with no living children. Most women preferred birth spacing interventions led by clinical providers and inclusion of their spouses.

CONCLUSIONS

Many influences on family size and birth spacing were noted in this population, with the most significant influencing factor being the spouse. Interventions to promote birth spacing and improve maternal and neonatal health in this population need to involve male partners and knowledgeable health care providers to be effective.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02674542 Registered February 1, 2016 (retrospectively registered).

Infant and child deaths: Parent concerns about subsequent pregnancies

PURPOSE

Examine parents' concerns about subsequent pregnancies after experiencing an infant or child death (newborn to 18 years).

DATA SOURCES

Thirty-nine semistructured parent (white, black, Hispanic) interviews 7 and 13 months post infant/child death conducted in English and/or Spanish, audio-recorded, transcribed, and content analyzed. Mothers' mean age was 31.8 years, fathers' was 39 years; 11 parents were white, 16 black, and 12 Hispanic.

CONCLUSIONS

Themes common at 7 and 13 months: wanting more children; fear, anxiety, scared; praying to God/God's will; thinking about/keeping the infant's/child's memory and at 7 months importance of becoming pregnant for family members; and at 13 months happy about a new baby. Parents who lost a child in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) commented more than those who lost a child in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Black and Hispanic parents commented more on praying to God and subsequent pregnancies being God's will than white parents.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Loss of an infant/child is a significant stressor on parents with documented negative physical and mental health outcomes. Assessing parents' subsequent pregnancy plans, recognizing the legitimacy of their fears about another pregnancy, discussing a plan should they encounter problems, and carefully monitoring the health of all parents who lost an infant/child is an essential practitioner role.

Effectiveness of an educational intervention on the suitability of indications for cesarean delivery in a Brazilian teaching hospital

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention to adjust the indications for caesarean delivery in a Brazilian teaching hospital in accordance with a specific protocol.

METHODS

The present before-and-after study was carried out in three stages. In stages 1 and 3, data were obtained for 160 cesarean deliveries that occurred between May 20 and July 10 in 2011 and 2012, respectively. For stage 2, the protocol was implemented for 12 months. The deliveries in stages 1 and 3 were classified as high or low risk, and as consistent or inconsistent clinical cases on the basis of the protocol.

RESULTS

A total of 160 (61.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 55.2-67.0) of 262 deliveries in stage 1 were by cesarean, compared with 160 (71.4%; 95% CI 65.5-77.3) of 224 in stage 3 (P=0.67). In stage 1, 125 (78.1%; 95% CI 71.7-84.5) showed indications consistent with the protocol, compared with 136 (85.0%; 95% CI 79.5-90.5) in stage 3 (P=0.11). Among the low-risk cesarean deliveries, 27 (51.9%; 95% CI 38.3-65.5) of 52 were consistent with the protocol in stage 1, compared with 49 (72.1%; 95% CI 61.4-86.1) of 68 in stage 3 (P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

The proposed intervention improved the suitability of indications for cesarean delivery among low-risk pregnancies only.

Obstetricians and the 2009-2010 H1N1 vaccination effort: implications for future pandemics

Our objective was to describe the experiences of obstetricians during the 2009–2010 H1N1 vaccination campaign in order to identify possible improvements for future pandemic situations. We conducted a cross-sectional mail survey of a national random sample of 4,000 obstetricians, fielded in Summer 2010. Survey items included availability, recommendation, and patient acceptance of H1N1 vaccine; prioritization of H1N1 vaccine when supply was limited; problems with H1N1 vaccination; and likelihood of providing vaccine during a future influenza pandemic. Response rate was 66 %. Obstetricians strongly recommended H1N1 vaccine during the second (85 %) and third (86 %) trimesters, and less often during the first trimester (71 %) or the immediate postpartum period (76 %); patient preferences followed a similar pattern. H1N1 vaccine was typically available in outpatient obstetrics clinics (80 %). Overall vaccine supply was a major problem for 30 % of obstetricians, but few rated lack of thimerosal-free vaccine as a major problem (12 %). Over half of obstetricians had no major problems with the H1N1 vaccine campaign. Based on this experience, 74 % would be “very likely” and 12 % “likely” to provide vaccine in the event of a future influenza pandemic. Most obstetricians strongly recommended H1N1 vaccine, had few logistical problems beyond limited vaccine supply, and are willing to vaccinate in a future pandemic. Addressing concerns about first-trimester vaccination, developing guidance for prioritization of vaccine in the event of severe supply constraints, and continued facilitation of the logistical aspects of vaccination should be emphasized in future influenza pandemics.

Interpregnancy interval and obstetrical complications

Obstetricians are often presented with questions regarding the optimal interpregnancy interval (IPI). Short IPI has been associated with adverse perinatal and maternal outcomes, ranging from preterm birth and low birth weight to neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality. Long IPI has in turn been associated with increased risk for preeclampsia and labor dystocia. In this review, we discuss the data regarding these associations along with recent studies revealing associations of short IPI with birth defects, schizophrenia, and autism. The optimal IPI may vary for different subgroups. We discuss the consequences of short IPI in women with a prior cesarean section, in particular the increased risk for uterine rupture and the considerations regarding a trial of labor in this subgroup. We review studies examining the interaction between short IPI and advanced maternal age and discuss the risk-benefit assessment for these women. Finally, we turn our attention to women after a stillbirth or an abortion, who often desire to conceive again with minimal delay. We discuss studies speaking in favor of a shorter IPI in this group. The accumulated data allow for the reevaluation of current IPI recommendations and management guidelines for women in general and among subpopulations with special circumstances. In particular, we suggest lowering the current minimal IPI recommendation to only 18 months (vs 24 months according to the latest World Health Organization recommendations), with even shorter recommended minimal IPI for women of advanced age and those who conceive after a spontaneous or induced abortion.