Preterm premature rupture of membranes ≥ 32 weeks' gestation: impact of revised practice guidelines

Factors affecting the rates of caesarean sections in cases with premature rupture of membranes (PROM) at term

The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the factors affecting the rates of caesarean section in cases with premature rupture of membranes (PROM) in term pregnancies. Eighty-two term PROM patients who presented to Turgut Ozal University and Erzurum Nene Hatun Hospitals between 2012 and 2014 were included. The effects of demographics, nulliparity, active-latent phase durations, presence of meconium and chorioamnionitis, requirement of oxytocin and cervical dilation at the initial examination on C/S rates were assessed. The C/S rates were changed with the duration of active period and the duration of latent period. It was found that the presence of cervical dilation at the initial examination significantly reduced the risk for progress to C/S at a rate of 87.5%. C/S rates did not change with other variables. We conclude that the factors increasing the risk for C/S in PROM at term group are not different from the non-term PROM. Impact statement The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the factors affecting the rates of caesarean section (C/S) in cases with premature rupture of membranes (PROM) in term pregnancies. The C/S rates were changed with the duration of active period and the duration of latent period. It was found that the presence of cervical dilation at the initial examination significantly reduced the risk for progress to C/S at a rate of 87.5%. We conclude that the factors increasing the risk for C/S in PROM at term group, are not different from the non-term PROM groups. Currently, the PROM is considered the start of a pathological process in both term and preterm pregnancies and also considered to increase the rates of caesarean sections. Studies on the management of PROM at term have concentrated rather on whether to intervene for accelerating the labour or spontaneous monitorisation. As found by the studies like this one in the literature, the factors having an impact on C/S rates in the cases of PROM at term are similar to those of non-PROM patients at term, may prevent clinicians from taking an invasive or aggressive approach towards the cases of PROM at term.

A new antibiotic regimen treats and prevents intra-amniotic inflammation/infection in patients with preterm PROM

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a new antibiotic regimen could reduce the frequency of intra-amniotic inflammation/infection in patients with preterm PROM.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the effect of antibiotics on the frequency of intra-amniotic inflammation/infection based on the results of follow-up transabdominal amniocenteses from 89 patients diagnosed with preterm PROM who underwent serial amniocenteses. From 1993-2003, ampicillin and/or cephalosporins or a combination was used ("regimen 1"). A new regimen (ceftriaxone, clarithromycin and metronidazole) was used from 2003-2012 ("regimen 2"). Amniotic fluid was cultured and matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) concentrations were measured.

RESULTS

(1) The rates of intra-amniotic inflammation and intra-amniotic inflammation/infection in patients who received regimen 2 decreased during treatment from 68.8% to 52.1% and from 75% to 54.2%, respectively. In contrast, in patients who received regimen 1, the frequency of intra-amniotic inflammation and infection/inflammation increased during treatment (31.7% to 55% and 34.1% to 58.5%, respectively); and (2) intra-amniotic inflammation/infection was eradicated in 33.3% of patients who received regimen 2, but in none who received regimen 1.

CONCLUSION

The administration of ceftriaxone, clarithromycin and metronidazole was associated with a more successful eradication of intra-amniotic inflammation/infection and prevented secondary intra-amniotic inflammation/infection more frequently than an antibiotic regimen which included ampicillin and/or cephalosporins in patients with preterm PROM.

A new anti-microbial combination prolongs the latency period, reduces acute histologic chorioamnionitis as well as funisitis, and improves neonatal outcomes in preterm PROM

OBJECTIVE

Antibiotic administration is a standard practice in preterm premature rupture of membranes (PROM). Specific anti-microbial agents often include ampicillin and/or erythromycin. Anaerobes and genital mycoplasmas are frequently involved in preterm PROM, but are not adequately covered by antibiotics routinely used in clinical practice. Our objective was to compare outcomes of PROM treated with standard antibiotic administration versus a new combination more effective against these bacteria.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study compared perinatal outcomes in 314 patients with PROM <34 weeks receiving anti-microbial regimen 1 (ampicillin and/or cephalosporins; n = 195, 1993-2003) versus regimen 2 (ceftriaxone, clarithromycin and metronidazole; n = 119, 2003-2012). Intra-amniotic infection/inflammation was assessed by positive amniotic fluid culture and/or an elevated amniotic fluid MMP-8 concentration (>23 ng/mL).

RESULTS

(1) Patients treated with regimen 2 had a longer median antibiotic-to-delivery interval than those with regimen 1 [median (interquartile range) 23 d (10-51 d) versus 12 d (5-52 d), p < 0.01]; (2) patients who received regimen 2 had lower rates of acute histologic chorioamnionitis (50.5% versus 66.7%, p < 0.05) and funisitis (13.9% versus 42.9%, p < 0.001) than those who had received regimen 1; (3) the rates of intra-ventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and cerebral palsy (CP) were significantly lower in patients allocated to regimen 2 than regimen 1 (IVH: 2.1% versus 19.0%, p < 0.001 and CP: 0% versus 5.7%, p < 0.05); and (4) subgroup analysis showed that regimen 2 improved perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation, but not in those without intra-amniotic infection/inflammation (after adjusting for gestational age and antenatal corticosteroid administration).

CONCLUSION

A new antibiotic combination consisting of ceftriaxone, clarithromycin, and metronidazole prolonged the latency period, reduced acute histologic chorioamnionitis/funisitis, and improved neonatal outcomes in patients with preterm PROM. These findings suggest that the combination of anti-microbial agents (ceftriaxone, clarithromycin, and metronidazole) may improve perinatal outcome in preterm PROM.

[Preterm rupture of membranes: Is home care a safe management?]

OBJECTIVE

Compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM), which were managed either at home (HAD) or hospital (HC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study in two level III maternities during 2 years. Inclusion criteria in HAD were: singleton pregnancy, PPROM between 24 and 35 weeks of gestation, absence of chorioamnionitis, clinical stability at D7 of the rupture, cervical dilatation <3 cm, patient residing in the geographic area.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were included in the HAD group and 24 in the HC group. Our populations were similar in the 2 groups. The duration of latency was longer in the HAD group than in the HC group (27.5 d [20-37] versus 16.5 d [12.5 to 29.5]; P=0.026). Patients in the HAD group received fewer antibiotics with a similar rate of chorioamnionitis. No difference in terms of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes was observed. Number of days in neonatal resuscitation was lower in the HAD group than in the HC group (12.5 d [10-22] versus 43 d [20-52]; P=0.003).

CONCLUSION

HAD seems to be an alternative to continuous hospitalization for patients followed for PPROM between 24 and 35 weeks. A randomized study with a larger number of patients, including other data such as maternal satisfaction and cost analysis, would be interesting to confirm those preliminary results.

Assessment of fetal inflammatory syndrome by "classical" markers in the management of preterm labor: a possible lesson from metabolomics and system biology

There exists a huge gap between protocols issued by scientific bodies and evidence derived by system biology studies on the multifactorial origin of threatened preterm delivery and their different associations with neonatal outcome. The objective of this prospective study was the analysis obstetrical and neonatal outcome in a cohort of pregnant patients treated for the risk of preterm delivery according to maternal and fetal assessment determined by amniotic fluid samples. Methods. Threatened preterm delivery and premature rupture of membranes between 24 + 1 and 32 + 6 weeks of gestation were treated by prolonged tocolytic regimens and if necessary by antibiotics for maternal infections when intra-amniotic inflammation (IAI) was excluded on the basis of negative white blood cell count in the amniotic fluid, or opposite, by delivery after a course of betamethasone and 48 hours maintenance tocolysis. Twenty-three cases were compared with 22 historical controls treated by the same teams according to the 48 hours treat and wait criteria. In addition to this, cases with normal and abnormal amniotic fluid white blood cell were compared. Results. Maternal and fetal conditions at admission were not significantly different between the study and control cohort for all maternal and fetal variables. Clinical indices were significantly improved as regard to latency from admission to delivery, number of newborns admitted to neonatal intensive care unit and length of stay in neonatal intensive care unit. Not any perinatal death or sepsis occurred in the study cohort. Overall, improved neonatal outcomes were observed in the study cohort. Composite major neonatal eventful outcomes occurred in 26% of cases vs. 50% in controls. The limited number of cases was not powered enough to reach a statistical significance for these variables. Continued tocolysis on demand and full regimen of mono or combined antibiotic regimen for maternal infection achieved significantly longer delay between admission to delivery with improved in neonatal outcome in cases negative for IAI: only 2 of 14 newborns suffered of major neonatal complications vs. 4 of 9 newborns delivered for IAI. Conclusions. Fetuses without IAI can be treated conservatively and their stay in utero prolonged without harm. However, we confirmed that when IAI is already active in utero a worse neonatal outcome is already partly predetermined. These positive findings must be interpreted with cautions given the limited number of cases considered by this study.