Antibiotic prophylaxis for term or near-term premature rupture of membranes: metaanalysis of randomized trials

Maternal and perinatal infectious morbidity in term prelabor rupture of membrane according to two induction of labor protocols

PURPOSE

The optimal labor-induction protocol in women with prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) is unknown. Whether the management of women with a previous cesarean delivery (CD) with PROM is different remains controversial. We investigated maternal and perinatal outcomes according to two induction protocols of 24 h vs. 12 h.

METHODS

In July 2021, our protocol of induction of labor in term-PROM was extended from 12 h to 24 h post-PROM. We compared obstetrical and neonatal outcomes before and after the change. A subgroup analysis of women with previous CD was performed. Results were compared using a univariate analysis. A multivariable model was described to predict neonatal intensive care unit admission (NICU) and clinical chorioamnionitis.

RESULTS

The 24 h and 12 h ROM-to-induction protocol groups included 962 and 802 women, respectively. In the 24 h group, a higher proportion of women labored spontaneously (p < 0.001), the rate of chorioamnionitis was higher (p = 0.017), and the CD rate was similar. Admission to the NICU (p = 0.012), antibiotic administration (p = 0.003), and respiratory distress (p = 0.002) were also greater in the 24 h induction group. Among women with a history of CD (n = 143), the need for oxytocin (p = 0.003) and delivery by CD (p = 0.016) were lower in the 24 vs. 12 h group.

CONCLUSION

Our results advocate shared decision-making in the expectant management of term-PROM. Women should be informed of the lower chance for induction and the higher risk of infections and neonatal complications with a 24-h induction approach. Longer expectant management in women with a previous CD resulted in significantly lower induction and CD rates.

Differences in maternal-newborn ABO blood groups and risk of serious infant infection

BACKGROUND

During pregnancy, various maternal IgG antibodies are transferred to the developing fetus, some of which may protect the newborn against infection. If a mother and her fetus have different A, B or O (ABO) blood groups, then transferred maternal antibodies may plausibly protect the infant against infection.

AIM

To determine if maternal-newborn ABO blood group incongruence vs. congruence is associated with a lower risk of serious infection in the infant.

DESIGN

Retrospective population-based cohort.

METHODS

We used linked patient-level datasets for all singleton hospital livebirths from 2008 to 2022 in Ontario, Canada, with known maternal and newborn ABO blood groups. We used a dichotomous exposure state, either ABO blood group congruent (N = 114 507) or incongruent (N = 43 074). The main outcome of interest was the risk of serious infant infection within 27 days, and from 28 to 365 days, after birth. Cox proportional hazard models generated hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals, and were adjusted for maternal age, world region of origin, residential income quintile and gestational age at birth.

RESULTS

Relative to maternal-newborn congruency, incongruent ABO blood group was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80-0.97) for serious neonatal infection within 27 days of birth, and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90-0.96) for serious infection between 28 and 365 days after birth.

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal-newborn ABO incongruence may be associated with a lower relative risk of a serious infant infection within 27 days, and from 28 to 365 days, after birth.

Timing of antibiotic prophylaxis in term prelabor rupture of membranes: A retrospective cohort study using propensity-score matching

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether earlier administration of antibiotic prophylaxis after prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term would decrease the incidence of maternal and neonatal infections.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study comparing women with term PROM who were initiated antibiotic prophylaxis within or after 6 h, and within or after 12 h from PROM to delivery during January 2019 to December 2021. Women with term PROM receiving cephalosporin and without contraindications to vaginal delivery or confirmed or suspected infection were included in the study. The primary outcome was puerperal infection, which refers to the reproductive tract infection occurring within 42 days of delivery. The type of pharmacoeconomic evaluation was selected based on the results of compared effectiveness between the early group and the late group. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was used to adjust confounding. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were used to verify the robustness of results.

RESULTS

We enrolled 5353 women with term PROM, including 4331 initiated with antibiotic within 6 h, 1022 after 6 h, 5077 within 12 h, and 276 after 12 h. After PSM, no significant difference was observed in the baseline characteristics of the groups. There was no statistical difference between antibiotic use within 6 h and after 6 h, or within 12 h and after 12 h, in puerperal infection (4.6% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.826; 2.9% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.471, respectively), total maternal infection, neonatal sepsis, and total neonatal infection. Cost-minimization analysis showed there was no significant difference between antibiotic use within 6 h and after 6 h, or within 12 h and after 12 h, in direct medical costs.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that there was no statistical difference in the efficacy and economy of antibiotic prophylaxis used within 6-12 h after rupture of membranes versus after 6-12 h in women with term PROM.

Effect of maternal age and body mass index on induction of labor with oral misoprostol for premature rupture of membrane at term: A retrospective cross-sectional study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of maternal age and body mass index (BMI) on induction of labor with oral misoprostol for premature rupture of membrane (PROM) at term. We have conducted retrospective cross-sectional study, including only term (37 weeks or more of gestation) PROM in healthy nulliparous women with a negative vaginal-rectal swab for group B streptococcus, a single cephalic fetus with normal birthweight, and uneventful pregnancy that were induced after 24 h from PROM. Ninety-one patients were included. According to the multivariate logistic regression, age and BMI odds ratio (OR) for induction success were 0.795 and 0.857, respectively. The study population was divided into two groups based on age (<35 and ≥35 years) and obesity (BMI <30 and ≥30). Older women reported a higher induction failure rate (p < 0.001); longer time to cervical dilation of 6 cm (p = 0.03) and delivery (p < 0.001). Obese women reported a higher induction failure rate (p = 0.01); number of misoprostol doses (p = 0.03), longer time of induction (p = 0.03) to cervical dilatation of 6 cm (p < 0.001), and delivery (p < 0.001); and higher cesarean section (p = 0.012) and episiotomy rate (p = 0.007). In conclusion, maternal age and BMI are two of the main factors that influence oral misoprostol efficacy and affect the failure of induction rate in term PROM.

Vaginal Birth at Term - Part 2. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/083, December 2020)

Purpose This guideline aims to summarize the current state of knowledge about vaginal birth at term. The guideline focuses on definitions of the physiological stages of labor as well as differentiating between various pathological developments and conditions. It also assesses the need for intervention and the options to avoid interventions. The second part of this guideline presents recommendations and statements on care during the dilation and expulsion stages as well as during the placental/postnatal stage. Methods The German recommendations largely reproduce the recommendations of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) CG190 guideline "Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies". Other international guidelines were also consulted in individual cases when compiling this guideline. In addition, a systematic search and analysis of the literature was carried out using PICO questions where necessary, and other systematic reviews and individual studies were taken into account. For easier comprehension, the assessment tools of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) were used to evaluate the quality of additionally consulted studies. Otherwise, the GRADE system was used for the NICE guideline, and the evidence reports of the IQWiG were used to evaluate the quality of the evidence. Recommendations Recommendations and statements were formulated based on identified evidence and/or a structured consensus.

Developing a Core Outcome Set for the Evaluation of Antibiotic Use in Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: A Systematic Review and Semi-Structured Interview

Background: Prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) is associated with maternal and neonatal infections. Although guidelines suggest prophylactic antibiotics for pregnant women with PROM, the optimal antibiotic regimen remains controversial. Synthesizing the data from different studies is challenging due to variations in reported outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to form the initial list of outcomes for the core outcome set (COS) that evaluates antibiotic use in PROM by identifying all existing outcomes and patients' views. Methods: Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and VIP databases. We also screened the references of the included studies as a supplementary search. We extracted basic information from the articles and the outcomes. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data, extracted the outcomes, and grouped them into domains. Then, semi-structured interviews based on the potential factors collected by the systematic review were conducted at West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University. Pregnant women who met the diagnostic criteria for PROM were enrolled. Participants reported their concerns about the outcomes. Two researchers identified the pregnant women's concerns. Results: A total of 90 studies were enrolled in this systematic review. The median outcomes in the included studies was 7 (1-31), and 109 different unique outcomes were identified. Pre-term PROM (PPROM) had 97 outcomes, and term PROM (TPROM) had 70 outcomes. The classification and order of the core outcome domains of PPROM and TPROM were consistent. The physiological domain was the most common for PPROM and TPROM outcomes. Furthermore, 35.1 and 57.1% outcomes were only reported once in PPROM and TPROM studies, respectively. Thirty pregnant women participated in the semi-structured interviews; 10 outcomes were extracted after normalized, and the outcomes were reported in the systematic review. However, studies rarely reported pregnant women's concerns. Conclusion: There was considerable inconsistency in outcomes selection and reporting in studies about antibiotics in PROM. An initial core outcomes set for antibiotics in PROM was formed.

Prelabor rupture of membranes at term: A possible hematological triage in addition to vagino-rectal beta-hemolytic streptococcus screening for early labor induction

Introduction

A potential complication of term prelabor rupture of membranes (term PROM) is chorioamnionitis with an increased burden on neonatal outcomes of chronic lung disease and cerebral palsy. The purpose of the study was to analyze the efficacy of a standing clinical protocol designed to identify women with term PROM at low risk for chorioamnionitis, who may benefit from expectant management, and those at a higher risk for chorioamnionitis, who may benefit from early induction.

Material and methods

This retrospective study enrolled all consecutive singleton pregnant women with term PROM. Subjects included women with at least one of the following factors: white blood cell count ≥ 15×100/μL, C-reactive protein ≥ 1.5 mg/dL, or positive vaginal swab for beta-hemolytic streptococcus. These women comprised the high risk (HR) group and underwent immediate induction of labor by the administration of intravaginal dinoprostone. Women with none of the above factors and those with a low risk for chorioamnionitis waited for up to 24 hours for spontaneous onset of labor and comprised the low-risk (LR) group.

Results

Of the 884 consecutive patients recruited, 65 fulfilled the criteria for HR chorioamnionitis and underwent immediate induction, while 819 were admitted for expectant management. Chorioamnionitis and Cesarean section rates were not significantly different between the HR and LR groups. However, the prevalence of maternal fever (7.7% vs. 2.9%; p = 0.04) and meconium-stained amniotic fluid was significantly higher in the HR group than in LR group (6.1% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.04). This study found an overall incidence of 4.2% for chorioamnionitis, 10.9% for Cesarean section, 0.5% for umbilical artery blood pH < 7.10, and 1.9% for admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. Furthermore, no confirmed cases of neonatal sepsis were encountered.

Conclusions

A clinical protocol designed to manage, by immediate induction, only those women with term PROM who presented with High Risk factors for infection/inflammation achieved similar maternal and perinatal outcomes between such women and women without any risks who received expectant management. This reduced the need for universal induction of term PROM patients, thereby reducing the incidence of maternal and fetal complications without increasing the rate of Cesarean sections.

Vaginal streptococcus B colonization is not associated with increased infectious morbidity in labor induction

INTRODUCTION

Labor induction rates are increasing and, in Finland today, one of three labors is induced. Group B streptococcus (GBS) is a bacterium found in 10%-30% of pregnant women and it can be transmitted to the neonate during vaginal delivery. Although GBS is rarely harmful in the general population, it is the leading cause of severe neonatal infections such as sepsis, pneumonia, and meningitis. In addition, GBS can cause maternal morbidity. Labor induction in GBS-positive women has not yet been investigated but concerns of infectious morbidity associated with balloon catheters have been raised.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A historical cohort study of 1959 women undergoing labor induction by balloon catheter in Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2017. Women with viable singleton term pregnancy in cephalic presentation, unfavorable cervix (Bishop score <6), and intact amniotic membranes were included. GBS was screened by rapid qualitative in vitro test (XPert^® GBS) from vaginal and perineal culture upon admission for labor induction. All women testing positive received prophylactic antibiotics.

RESULTS

Of the women, 469 (23.9%) were GBS-positive. The rate of maternal intrapartum infection was 7.4%, being lower in the GBS-positive group compared with the GBS-negative group (4.7% vs 8.3%; p = 0.01). The rate of maternal postpartum infection was 3.9%, and the rate of neonatal infection was 3.3%, both being similar between the groups. Also, no difference in the rates of other adverse neonatal outcomes was seen. No GBS sepses occurred in the study. In multivariable logistic regression, rupture of membranes to delivery interval ≥12 hours was associated with maternal intrapartum and postpartum infection, as well as neonatal infection. Other risk factors for maternal intrapartum infection were GBS-negativity, nulliparity, prolonged pregnancy (≥41 weeks), and Bishop score <3 at the start of induction. Cesarean section was associated with postpartum endometritis, while nulliparity, gestational diabetes, and maternal intrapartum infection were associated with neonatal infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity, labor induction with balloon catheter appears safe in women colonized with GBS when prophylactic antibiotics are administered at the onset of labor or at membrane rupture.

[Normal childbirth: physiologic labor support and medical procedures. Guidelines of the French National Authority for Health (HAS) with the collaboration of the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF) and the French College of Midwives (CNSF) - - When and how to take medical action during labor?]

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this chapter is to provide recommendations for good practice regarding drug and technical interventions that may be considered during normal delivery.

METHODS

These recommendations were established by an expert consensus based on an analysis of the scientific literature and the French and international recommendations available on the subject.

RESULTS

Interventions during latent phase of the first stage of labor (up to 5-6cm) must be performed according to the fetal and maternal contraction tolerance (consensus agreement). In the active phase (from 5-6cm to full dilatation), dilation speed under 1cm/4h between 5 and 7cm or under 1cm/2h beyond 7cm is considered abnormal, it is then recommended to propose: an amniotomy if the membranes are intact and administration of oxytocin if membranes are already ruptured and uterine contractions are considered insufficient (consensus agreement). Intravenous (IV) antibiotic prophylaxis (at least four hours before birth) is recommended during labor in women at risk for group B streptococcal (GBS) maternofetal infection (GBS vaginal portage or GBS bacteriuria during pregnancy or history of maternofetal GBS infection) (grade B). In case of rupture of membranes after 37weeks of gestation without spontaneous labor, it is recommended: if the patient has GBS, to begin antibiotic prophylaxis immediately (consensus agreement); if delivery did not occur after 12hours, to start antibiotic prophylaxis (grade A), to set up dedicated patient monitoring (consensus agreement), to screen for an infection (at least a full blood count, a vaginal sample and a dipstick test) (consensus agreement). It is recommended not to start expulsive efforts as soon as a complete dilation is identified but to let the fetal presentation go down (grade A). The administration of oxytocin is recommended if the patient does not feel inclined to push and the presentation has not reached low-pelvic station after two hours of complete dilation in case of insufficient uterine activity (AE). There is no argument for recommending a push technique over another (grade B). It is recommended to inform the gynecologist-obstetrician in case of non-progression of the fetus after two hours of complete dilation with sufficient uterine activity (AE). Prophylactic administration of oxytocin at 5 or 10 IU is recommended to prevent postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery (grade A). Administration could be performed intravenously (slow injection over about a minute) or intramuscularly (AE). In case of placental retention, manual removal of the placenta is recommended (grade A). In absence of bleeding, it must be performed after 30mins after birth, without exceeding 60mins (AE).

CONCLUSION

These recommendations define indications and methods for drug and technical interventions during a normal delivery to prevent poor obstetrical outcomes.

Active Versus Expectant Management for Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes at 34-36 Weeks of Gestation and the Associated Adverse Perinatal Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

 To compare the type of management (active versus expectant) for preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) between 34 and 36 + 6 weeks of gestation and the associated adverse perinatal outcomes in 2 tertiary hospitals in the southeast of Brazil.

METHODS

 In the present retrospective cohort study, data were obtained by reviewing the medical records of patients admitted to two tertiary centers with different protocols for PPROM management. The participants were divided into two groups based on PPROM management: group I (active) and group II (expectant). For statistical analysis, the Student t-test, the chi-squared test, and binary logistic regression were used.

RESULTS

 Of the 118 participants included, 78 underwent active (group I) and 40 expectant management (group II). Compared with group II, group I had significantly lower mean amniotic fluid index (5.5 versus 11.3 cm, p = 0.002), polymerase chain reaction at admission (1.5 versus 5.2 mg/dl, p = 0.002), time of prophylactic antibiotics (5.4 versus 18.4 hours, p < 0.001), latency time (20.9 versus 33.6 hours, p = 0.001), and gestational age at delivery (36.5 versus 37.2 weeks, p = 0.025). There were no significant associations between the groups and the presence of adverse perinatal outcomes. Gestational age at diagnosis was the only significant predictor of adverse composite outcome (x2 [1] = 3.1, p = 0.0001, R2 Nagelkerke = 0.138).

CONCLUSION

 There was no association between active versus expectant management in pregnant women with PPROM between 34 and 36 + 6 weeks of gestation and adverse perinatal outcomes.

Timing of induction for term prelabor rupture of membranes and intravenous antibiotics

BACKGROUND

Induction of labor usually within 24 hours is recommended for term prelabor rupture of membranes. It is still unclear when within the 24 hours induction of labor for term prelabor rupture of membranes should be initiated. Antibiotic prophylaxis for group B Streptococcus is usually recommended for prolonged prelabor rupture of membranes.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to evaluate whether induction of labor at ≤6 hours from prelabor rupture of membranes with intravenous oxytocin in singleton pregnancies at ≥37 weeks' gestation without regular uterine contractions reduces the administration of intravenous antibiotic agents.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study including all women with prelabor rupture of membranes at ≥37 weeks' gestation and without regular uterine contractions in which labor was induced using intravenous oxytocin. Women were divided into 2 groups according to the timing of induction (≤6 hours vs >6 hours after prelabor rupture of membranes).

RESULTS

A total of 166 women with term prelabor rupture of membranes were included, 53 of whom (31.9%) were induced within 6 hours of prelabor rupture of membranes and 113 (68.1%) were induced after 6 hours. There were no differences in demographic characteristics and risk factors for term prelabor rupture of membranes between the 2 groups. Women who underwent induction of labor at ≤6 hours were significantly less exposed to intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis compared with women induced at >6 hours (36% vs 80.5%, respectively; odds ratio, 0.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.28). Furthermore, for women induced within 6 hours after prelabor rupture of membranes, the chances of delivering at <12 or <24 hours were increased, nonreassuring cardiotocogram significantly less common, and hospital stay significantly shorter. No differences were found in regard to neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Induction of labor at ≤6 hours with intravenous oxytocin after term prelabor rupture of membranes is significantly associated with lesser use of antibiotic agents, shorter latency to delivery, lower incidence of nonreassuring cardiotocogram, and shorter hospital stay than induction of labor at >6 hours after prelabor rupture of membranes.

Evidence-based labor management: first stage of labor (part 3)

There are several interventions during the first stage of labor that have been studied. Vaginal disinfection with chlorhexidine cannot be recommended. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended for group B streptococcus-positive women. Antibiotic therapy can be considered in women with term prelabor rupture of membranes whose latency is expected to be >12 hours. Aromatherapy with essential oils through inhalation or back massage can be considered. Immersion in water can be considered. Oral restriction of fluid or solid food is not recommended. In the setting of oral restriction, intravenous fluid containing dextrose at a rate of 250 mL/h is recommended. Upright positions and ambulation are recommended in women without regional anesthesia, and women with regional anesthesia can adopt whatever position they find most comfortable and choose to ambulate or not ambulate. Continuous bladder catheterization cannot be recommended. There is no recommended frequency of cervical examinations or sweeping of membranes. The use of a partogram cannot be recommended as a routine intervention. Routine use of the peanut ball cannot be recommended. Antispasmodic agents cannot be recommended. Routine amniotomy alone in normally progressing spontaneous first stage of labor cannot be recommended. Oxytocin augmentation is recommended to shorten the time to delivery for women making slow progress in spontaneous labor, and higher doses of oxytocin can be considered. Early intervention with oxytocin and amniotomy for the prevention and treatment of dysfunctional or slow labor is recommended. Routine use of intrauterine pressure catheter and ultrasound cannot be recommended. Cesarean delivery for arrest should not be performed unless labor has arrested for a minimum of 4 hours with adequate uterine activity or 6 hours with inadequate uterine activity in a woman with rupture of membranes, adequate oxytocin, and ≥6 cm cervical dilation.

[Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Initial Management]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate safety of home care, clinical and biological initial examination and effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotic in preventing maternal and neonatal infectious complications in women with term prelabor rupture of membranes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MedLine database, the Cochrane Library and the recommendations from the French and foreign obstetrical societies or colleges have been consulted.

RESULTS

In case of expectant management and low rate of antibiotic prophylaxis coverage, home care compared to hospitalization could be associated with an increase in neonatal infections (LE3), especially when colonized with Group B Streptococcus (GBS) (LE3). Home care is therefore not recommended (Grade C). Studies investigating the initial clinical-biological examination are sparse. The initial examination should search for signs of intra-uterine infection. Repeated digital examination before and during labor is associated with an increased risk of intra-uterine infection (LE3). It is therefore recommended to limit the number of digital examinations before and during labor (Grade C). A GBS-positive vaginal swab is strongly associated with the risk of intra-uterine and neonatal infection (LE3) independently of the type management (induction vs. expectant management) and the mode of induction (oxytocin or prostaglandin) (LE3). When the GBS-positive vaginal swab has not been performed between 34 and 38 weeks, it is recommended to perform it on admission (Professional consensus). The diagnostic performance of the CRP and white blood cell count for the prediction of neonatal infection is low (LE3). If these tests are used, the negative predictive value of the CRP should be preferred (Professional consensus). In case of term prelabor rupture of membranes after 12hours, prophylactic antibiotics could reduce the rate of intra-uterine infection without reducing the risk of neonatal infection (LE3). Their use in term prelabor rupture of membranes after 12hours is therefore recommended (Grade C). When prophylactic antibiotics are indicated, intravenous beta-lactamine is the preferred option (Grade C).

CONCLUSION

Overall, the current data on initial management of term prelabor rupture of membranes are of low evidence level.

Short-Term Postoperative Outcomes between 4% Icodextrin Solution and Hyaluronic Acid- Carboxymethyl Cellulose Membrane during Emergency Cesarean Section

Emergency cesarean sections are associated with more postoperative complications than with elective cesarean sections. Seprafilm and Adept are commonly used adhesion reduction devices and have been applied in abdominal or pelvic surgery for a long time. This study focuses on comparing the short-term postoperative outcomes of emergency cesarean sections between two groups. We performed a retrospective study that included all patients who received emergency caesarean sections from the same surgeon at MacKay Memorial Hospital between August 2014 and November 2017, We analyzed the overall cases and conducted a subgroup analysis of cases with contaminated or dirty/infected wounds in regard to the rates of surgical-site infection (SSI), bandemia, delayed flatus passage, and length of hospital stay. The two groups were similar with respect to the rates of SSI, bandemia, and length of hospital stay. However, Seprafilm was associated with higher risk of delayed flatus passage over 48 h (OR: 2.67, 95% CI = 2.16-7.64, p = 0.001). It also needs less time for recovery of the digestive system and less medical management postoperatively. In cases of contaminated or dirty/infected wounds, Adept user also had significantly lower rates (10.3% vs. 32%, p = 0.048, OR: 4.12, CI = 1.09-15.61) of postcesarean metritis.

Intrapartum antibiotics for prolonged rupture of membranes at term to prevent Group B Streptococcal sepsis

The timely administration of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) to eligible pregnant mothers reduces the risk of early onset Group B Streptococcus (GBS) neonatal sepsis. The incidence of neonatal GBS sepsis is increasing, in spite of national guidelines for its prevention. This retrospective cohort study was undertaken to assess the incidence of culture-proven GBS sepsis before and after a change of practice on intrapartum management of GBS sepsis in babies born at Sunderland Royal Hospital between January 1 2008 and December 31 2017. The data regarding the risk factors, the intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis and the outcomes of the babies were collected. Twenty-nine cases were identified and presented in two epochs-before and after changing guidelines for intrapartum management. There was a statistically significant reduction in early onset sepsis rates and no difference in late-onset sepsis rates. The prolonged rupture of membranes is a significant risk factor at any gestation. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? Appropriate intrapartum administration of antibiotics in mothers reduces 80% of early-onset GBS infections. In the United Kingdom, IAP is given based on risk factors, which fail to accurately identify and treat the woman who harbours GBS in the birth canal in labour and the incidence of GBS neonatal sepsis is increasing. The national guideline on the prevention of GBS sepsis is not consistent and is open to interpretation. What do the results of this study add? This study highlights prolonged rupture of membranes as a significant risk factor at any gestation and there were missed opportunities to prevent GBS sepsis in term babies with the prolonged rupture of membranes. This study also highlights that it is possible to reduce the neonatal GBS sepsis burden by adhering to guidelines and administering timely intrapartum antibiotics. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The timely administration of IAP to all eligible women is possible if the national guidelines are consistent and interpreted correctly. Our national guideline on the prolonged rupture of membranes at term is not clear and is interpreted differently. If IAP is provided in all those with risk factors irrespective of gestation, this would involve additional costs to the NHS; but in the long term, it will benefit as it reduces morbidity.

Effects of progestogens in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes

Different strategies have been adopted for prevention of spontaneous preterm birth, including use of progestogens. So far, five randomized trials have been published evaluating the efficacy of progestogens in women with PPROM, including a total of 425 participants. All the five trials enrolled pregnant women with singleton pregnancies randomized between 20 and 34 weeks of gestation. In four trials women were randomized to either weekly intramuscular 250 mg 17α-hydroxyprogesterone-caproate or placebo, while Mirzaei et al. was a three arms trials in which women received weekly intramuscular 250 mg 17α-hydroxyprogesterone-caproate, or rectal progesterone 400 mg daily, or no treatment. In all the trials, latency antibiotics were used, and tocolysis was used permitted for first 48 hours at discretion of attending physician. Recently a meta-analysis including the five trials has been published. They found that when compared to placebo weekly intramuscular 250 mg 17α-hydroxyprogesterone-caproate did not alter the latency period to delivery in singleton gestations with PPROM. Additionally, there was no difference in gestational age at delivery between groups or in mode of delivery. No significant differences were reported in maternal or neonatal outcomes, with latency not significantly altered in sensitivity analyses. So far, no trials have been published evaluating natural vaginal progesterone in women with PPROM.

Intraamniotic Infection and the Term Neonate

Intraamniotic infection (IAI) may occur when the amniotic membranes are ruptured >18 hours prior to birth. The term neonate is at risk for early onset sepsis. This article describes the pathophysiology of IAI and the role of the mother-baby nurse during the anticipated birth and the ongoing assessment of the neonate.

32-week premature rupture of membranes caused by oropharyngeal microbiota

Introduction. Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) usually has a multifactorial etiology that is often unknown, although the most frequently reported cause is infection by group B Streptococcus. Therefore, the etiology of PPROM, although probably infectious, remains unknown in most cases. This case describes a PPROM caused by infection from oropharyngeal microbiota.

Case presentation. We report the case of a 26-yr-old pregnant woman. The gestational age was 32 weeks+5 days. Examinations in the emergency department revealed the release of clear amniotic fluid and a closed multiparous cervix with a length of 22 mm. Endocervical culture evidenced the growth of Staphylococcus aureus, serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis and Haemophilus influenzae.

Conclusion. Preventive antibiotic therapy should consider: opportunistic infections by normal genital microbiota, infections due to sexual activity, opportunist microorganisms derived from oral sex, and the hematogenous spread of oral bacteria.

Interventions for treating hyperemesis gravidarum: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

While nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy are very common, affecting approximately 80% of the pregnancies, hyperemesis gravidarum is a severe form affecting 0.3-1.0% of the pregnancies. Although hyperemesis gravidarum is rarely a source of mortality, it is a significant source of morbidity. It is one of the most common indications for hospitalization in pregnancy. Beyond the maternal and fetal consequences of malnutrition, the severity of hyperemesis symptoms causes a major psychosocial burden leading to depression, anxiety, and even pregnancy termination. The aim of this meta-analysis was to examine all randomized controlled trials of interventions specifically for hyperemesis gravidarum and evaluate them based on both subjective and objective measures of efficacy, maternal and fetal/neonatal safety, and economic costs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Randomized controlled trials were identified by searching electronic databases. We included all randomized controlled trials for the treatment of hyperemesis gravidarum. The primary outcome was intervention efficacy as defined by severity, reduction, or cessation in nausea/vomiting; number of episodes of emesis; and days of hospital admission. Secondary outcomes included other measures of intervention efficacy, adverse maternal/fetal/neonatal outcomes, quality of life measures, and economic costs.

RESULTS

Twenty-five trials (2052 women) met the inclusion criteria but the majority of 18 different comparisons described in the review include data from single studies with small numbers of participants. Selected comparisons reported below: No primary outcome data were available when acupuncture was compared with placebo. There was insufficient evidence to identify clear differences between acupuncture and metoclopramide in a study with 81 participants regarding reduction/cessation in nausea or vomiting (risk ratio (RR) 1.40, 95% CI 0.79-2.49 and RR 1.51, 95% CI 0.92-2.48, respectively). Midwife-led outpatient care was associated with fewer hours of hospital admission than routine inpatient admission (mean difference (MD) - 33.20, 95% CI -46.91 to -19.49) with no difference in pregnancy-unique quantification of emesis and nausea (PUQE) score, decision to terminate the pregnancy, miscarriage, small-for-gestational age infants, or time off work when compared with routine care. Women taking vitamin B6 had a slightly longer hospital stay compared with placebo (MD 0.80 days, 95% CI 0.08-1.52). There was insufficient evidence to demonstrate a difference in other outcomes including mean number of episodes of emesis (MD 0.50, 95% CI -0.40-1.40) or side effects. A comparison between metoclopramide and ondansetron identified no clear difference in the severity of nausea or vomiting (MD 1.70, 95% CI -0.15-3.55, and MD -0.10, 95% CI -1.63-1.43; one study, 83 women, respectively). However, more women taking metoclopramide complained of drowsiness and dry mouth (RR 2.40, 95% CI 1.23-4.69, and RR 2.38, 95% CI 1.10-5.11, respectively). There were no clear differences between groups for other side effects. In a single study with 146 participants comparing metoclopramide with promethazine, more women taking promethazine reported drowsiness, dizziness, and dystonia (risk ratio (RR) 0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.87, RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.34-0.69, and RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.90, respectively). There were no clear differences between groups for other important outcomes including quality of life and other side effects. In a single trial with 30 women, those receiving ondansetron had no difference in duration of hospital admission compared to those receiving promethazine (mean difference (MD) 0.00, 95% CI -1.39-1.39), although there was increased sedation with promethazine (RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.00-0.94). Regarding corticosteroids, in a study with 110 participants there was no difference in days of hospital admission compared to placebo (MD -0.30, 95% CI -0.70-0.10), but there was a decreased readmission rate (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.94; 4 studies, 269 women). For hydrocortisone compared with metoclopramide, no data were available for primary outcomes and there was no difference in the readmission rate (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.00-1.28; one study, 40 women). In a study with 80 women, compared to promethazine, those receiving prednisolone had increased nausea at 48 h (RR 2.00, 95% CI 1.08-3.72), but not at 17 days (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.58-1.15). There was no clear difference in the number of episodes of emesis or subjective improvement in nausea/vomiting.

CONCLUSIONS

While there were a wide range of interventions studied, both pharmaceutical and otherwise, there were a limited number of placebo controlled trials. In comparing the efficacy of the commonly used antiemetics, metoclopramide, ondansetron, and promethazine, the results of this review do not support the clear superiority of one over the other in symptomatic relief. Other factors such as side effect profile medication safety and healthcare costs should also be considered when selecting an intervention.

Incidence of fever in labor and risk of neonatal sepsis

BACKGROUND

The current recommendation regarding the management of a term newborn delivered of a mother with an intrapartum fever or a diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis is that the neonate should have baseline laboratory work drawn along with blood cultures and be universally treated with antibiotics until culture results return. These guidelines report that the rate of intrapartum fever is about 3%; however, a few large studies suggest that the rate is higher at about 7%.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to prospectively evaluate the rate of fever during labor in a large number of deliveries and determine the rate of early-onset neonatal sepsis in newborns delivered from mothers with an intrapartum fever compared with newborns delivered from mothers without intrapartum fever.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort study of all temperatures obtained in women in labor from Jan. 1, 2011, through June 30, 2014. Every patient with a fever of ≥38°C at ≥36 weeks' gestation was evaluated for gestational age, parity, spontaneous or induced labor, group B streptococcus status, regional anesthesia, mode of delivery, treatment with intrapartum antibiotics, and whether a clinical diagnosis of chorioamnionitis was made by the managing physician. Neonates were assessed for blood culture results, neonatal intensive care unit admission, length of stay, and any major newborn complications. Statistical analysis involved χ², Fisher exact, and Student t test.

RESULTS

A total of 412 patients (6.8%; 95% confidence interval, 6.2-7.5%) developed a fever in 6057 deliveries at ≥36 weeks' gestation. No cases of maternal sepsis occurred. Of the 417 newborns (5 sets of twins), only 1 (0.24%; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-1.3%) developed early-onset neonatal sepsis with a positive blood culture for Escherichia coli. There were 4 cases (0.07%; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.18%) of early-onset neonatal sepsis in the 5697 newborns (52 sets of twins) delivered from mothers who were not febrile and this difference was not significant (P = .3). The positive blood cultures in these 4 neonates were 3 group B streptococcus and 1 Enterococcus. The overall rate of early-onset neonatal sepsis in this population of newborns delivered at ≥36 weeks' gestation was 0.82/1000 deliveries.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of an intrapartum fever of ≥38°C in pregnancies at ≥36 weeks' gestation is common at 6.8% and this is consistent with the findings of a few other large retrospective studies. The rate of an intrapartum fever occurs in approximately 1 in 15 women in labor. The risk of neonatal sepsis in newborns delivered of mothers with intrapartum fever or a diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis is low at 0.24%, a rate that is <1 in 400. The recommendation for universal laboratory work, cultures, and antibiotic treatment pending culture results for this newborn population needs further examination.

Premature rupture of the membranes at term: time to reevaluate the management

PURPOSE

To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in induced vs. expectant management of term PROM.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with term PROM. A total of 325 were enrolled: 213 managed expectantly and 112 induced at admission and matched according to gestational age. Expectant management group patients were allowed to defer labour induction up to 48 h. Primary outcome measures were maternal or foetal signs of infection (chorioamnionitis, early neonatal sepsis or postpartum endometritis) and prolonged maternal hospitalization. Secondary outcome was caesarean delivery rate.

RESULTS

All group characteristics were comparable except that expectant management included more nulliparous women. Women managed expectantly had a higher rate of prolonged hospitalization [15 (7 %) vs. 2 (1.8 %); P = 0.043] as an indication of maternal complications, compared to induction management. They also had a higher rate of caesarean delivery [34 (16.4 %) vs. 8 (7.1 %), respectively; P = 0.024]. Adjustment for parity did not change the results. Early neonatal outcomes were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Expectant management increases the likelihood of caesarean delivery and prolonged maternal hospitalization. This should be considered when advising patients with term PROM regarding labour induction.

Ending preventable maternal and newborn deaths due to infection

Over 300,000 maternal deaths occur each year, 11% of which are thought to be due to infectious causes, and approximately one million newborns die within the first week of life annually due to infectious causes. Infections in pregnancy may result in a variety of adverse obstetrical outcomes, including preterm delivery, pre-labor rupture of membranes, stillbirth, spontaneous abortion, congenital infection, and anomalies. This paper reviews the burden of disease due to key infections and their contribution to maternal, perinatal, and newborn morbidity and mortality, as well as key interventions to prevent maternal and newborn deaths related to these infections. Research needs include more accurate clinical and microbiologic surveillance systems, validated risk stratification strategies, better point-of-care testing, and identification of promising vaccine strategies.

A new anti-microbial combination prolongs the latency period, reduces acute histologic chorioamnionitis as well as funisitis, and improves neonatal outcomes in preterm PROM

OBJECTIVE

Antibiotic administration is a standard practice in preterm premature rupture of membranes (PROM). Specific anti-microbial agents often include ampicillin and/or erythromycin. Anaerobes and genital mycoplasmas are frequently involved in preterm PROM, but are not adequately covered by antibiotics routinely used in clinical practice. Our objective was to compare outcomes of PROM treated with standard antibiotic administration versus a new combination more effective against these bacteria.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study compared perinatal outcomes in 314 patients with PROM <34 weeks receiving anti-microbial regimen 1 (ampicillin and/or cephalosporins; n = 195, 1993-2003) versus regimen 2 (ceftriaxone, clarithromycin and metronidazole; n = 119, 2003-2012). Intra-amniotic infection/inflammation was assessed by positive amniotic fluid culture and/or an elevated amniotic fluid MMP-8 concentration (>23 ng/mL).

RESULTS

(1) Patients treated with regimen 2 had a longer median antibiotic-to-delivery interval than those with regimen 1 [median (interquartile range) 23 d (10-51 d) versus 12 d (5-52 d), p < 0.01]; (2) patients who received regimen 2 had lower rates of acute histologic chorioamnionitis (50.5% versus 66.7%, p < 0.05) and funisitis (13.9% versus 42.9%, p < 0.001) than those who had received regimen 1; (3) the rates of intra-ventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and cerebral palsy (CP) were significantly lower in patients allocated to regimen 2 than regimen 1 (IVH: 2.1% versus 19.0%, p < 0.001 and CP: 0% versus 5.7%, p < 0.05); and (4) subgroup analysis showed that regimen 2 improved perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation, but not in those without intra-amniotic infection/inflammation (after adjusting for gestational age and antenatal corticosteroid administration).

CONCLUSION

A new antibiotic combination consisting of ceftriaxone, clarithromycin, and metronidazole prolonged the latency period, reduced acute histologic chorioamnionitis/funisitis, and improved neonatal outcomes in patients with preterm PROM. These findings suggest that the combination of anti-microbial agents (ceftriaxone, clarithromycin, and metronidazole) may improve perinatal outcome in preterm PROM.

Global emergency medicine: a review of the literature from 2014

OBJECTIVES

The Global Emergency Medicine Literature Review (GEMLR) conducts an annual search of peer-reviewed and gray literature relevant to global emergency medicine (EM) to identify, review, and disseminate the most important new research in this field to a worldwide audience of academics and clinical practitioners.

METHODS

This year 6,376 articles written in six languages were identified by our search. These articles were distributed among 20 reviewers for initial screening based on their relevance to the field of global EM. An additional two reviewers searched the gray literature. A total of 477 articles were deemed appropriate by at least one reviewer and approved by the editor for formal scoring of overall quality and importance.

RESULTS

Of the 477 articles that met our predetermined inclusion criteria, 63% were categorized as emergency care in resource-limited settings, 13% as EM development, and 23% as disaster and humanitarian response. Twenty-five articles received scores of 17.5 or higher and were selected for formal summary and critique. Inter-rater reliability for two reviewers using our scoring system was good, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.657 (95% confidence interval = 0.589 to 0.713). Studies and reviews focusing on infectious diseases, trauma, and the diagnosis and treatment of diseases common in resource-limited settings represented the majority of articles selected for final review.

CONCLUSIONS

In 2014, there were fewer total articles, but a slightly higher absolute number of articles screening in for formal scoring, when compared to the 2013 review. The number of EM development articles decreased, while the number of disaster and humanitarian response articles increased. As in prior years, the majority of articles focused on infectious diseases and trauma.