Referring survivors of endometrial cancer and complex atypical hyperplasia to bariatric specialists: a prospective cohort study

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for weight management: A review for the gynecologic oncologist

The use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) has experienced rapid growth amidst the obesity epidemic in the United States. While originally developed for glucose control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, the scope of these agents now extends to encompass weight loss and cardiovascular risk reduction. GLP-1RAs have the potential to induce significant weight loss, in combination with lifestyle modifications, among adults who are overweight or obese. Furthermore, these agents demonstrate efficacy in ameliorating hyperglycemia, enhancing insulin sensitivity, regulating blood pressure, improving cardiometabolic parameters, mitigating kidney dysfunction, and potentially reducing the risk of several obesity-related cancers. Drug-related toxicity is primarily gastrointestinal and active management can prevent drug discontinuation. Obesity is associated both with an increased incidence of malignancy but also with decreased survival. More research is needed to evaluate the potential use of GLP-1RA to modify the endocrine function of adipocytes, regulate the chronic inflammatory state associated with obesity, and prospective applications in oncology. These agents can impact patients with gynecologic malignancies both through their direct mechanism of action as well as potential drug toxicity.

High prevalence of dysfunctional uterine bleeding in candidates for metabolic/bariatric surgery: increased endometrial cancer risk?

BACKGROUND

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the strongest obesity-associated malignancy and the fastest-growing cancer in young women. Early identification of EC and other endometrial pathology (malignant and nonmalignant) in women with severe obesity may improve treatment options and uterine preservation. Screening for endometrial pathology using abnormal or postmenopausal uterine bleeding (APUB) as a surrogate in women pursuing metabolic/bariatric surgery may be clinically beneficial, but data supporting this effort are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and institute a screening program for APUB as a surrogate for endometrial pathology in bariatric surgery candidates.

SETTING

Two, academic metabolic/bariatric surgery programs in Louisiana, United States.

METHODS

The Modified SAMANTA is a 10-item questionnaire that was implemented to identify patients with APUB, specifically combining tools designed to identify anovulatory/postmenopausal and heavy menstrual bleeding. Demographic (age, race), body mass index, and questionnaire data were analyzed with respect to positive screening using data from March 2021 through May 2023.

RESULTS

Of 1371 eligible women presenting for surgical evaluation, 664 (48.4%) positive screens were identified and referred for gynecologic evaluation to rule out endometrial hyperplasia/cancer or other endometrial pathology. The likelihood of positive screening for APUB was associated with increasing BMI (P = .001) and Black/African American race (P = .003), as well as increasing SAMANTA score (P < .001). In contrast, risk of positive screening was negatively associated with increasing age (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Women presenting for metabolic/bariatric surgery have a high prevalence of APUB and, given this dysfunctional bleeding and concurrent obesity, are at greater risk for underlying EC. Potential risk factors for APUB, given their associations with screening positive, include increased body mass index, younger age, and Black/African American race. Standardized screening with appropriate gynecologic referral should be a routine part of the overall evaluation for women with severe obesity.

Role of Bariatric Surgery in Patients With Endometrial Cancer: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Objective

The standard surgery for endometrial cancer can be deferred in some situations, including morbid obesity, comorbidities, and the patient's desire for fertility. One of the options to improve patients' circumstances is bariatric surgery.

Case report

This study presented two patients with stage IA, grade I endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma. Both patients had morbid obesity and had comorbidities. In case 1, because of fertility preservation, and in case 2, because of severe comorbidities, hormone therapy was started, followed by bariatric surgery after counseling patients. Both patients had acceptable changes in body mass index during follow-up, so cancer surgery through laparoscopy was done. Both patients did not need adjuvant therapy; months after cancer surgery, there is no recurrence, and their body mass index is also decreasing.

Conclusion

Bariatric surgery can improve outcomes in patients with morbid obesity who suffer endometrial cancer.

Barriers to and facilitators of a healthy lifestyle for patients with gynecological cancer: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative research with healthcare providers and patients

The prevalence of an unhealthy lifestyle among patients with gynecological cancer is high and associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality. Although lifestyle changes have the potential to improve outcomes, lifestyle counseling is not routinely integrated into standard care. This review explores research on the barriers to and facilitators of both the promotion of healthy lifestyles by healthcare providers (HCPs) and healthy lifestyle changes by patients with gynecological cancer. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to deductively code the identified factors for a comprehensive understanding of the barriers and facilitators. A search across five databases yielded a total of 12,687 unique studies, of which 43 were included in the review. Of these 43, 39 included gynecological cancer patients and only 6 included HCPs. Among the barriers identified for HCPs, most studies evaluated barriers regarding weight loss counseling. Limited knowledge, reluctance to address weight loss, skepticism about the benefits, and workload concerns were commonly reported barriers for HCPs. HCPs will benefit from education and training in lifestyle counseling, including effective communication skills like motivational interviewing. Gynecological cancer patients lacked tools, support, knowledge, and faced mental health issues, environmental constraints, and physical limitations. The review emphasizes the importance of addressing these barriers and utilizing identified facilitators, such as social support, to promote and support healthy lifestyle behaviors on the part of patients and their promotion by HCPs. Future research should focus not only on patients but also on supporting HCPs and implementing necessary changes in current practices.

Management of Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia: ACOG Clinical Consensus No. 5

SUMMARY

Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) or atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) often is a precursor lesion to adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Hysterectomy is the definitive treatment for EIN-AEH. When a conservative (fertility-sparing) approach to the management of EIN-AEH is under consideration, it is important to attempt to exclude the presence of endometrial cancer to avoid potential undertreatment of an unknown malignancy in those who have been already diagnosed with EIN-AEH. Given the high risk of progression to cancer, those who do not have surgery require progestin therapy (oral, intrauterine, or combined) and close surveillance. Although data are conflicting and limited, studies have demonstrated that treatment with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device results in a higher regression rate when compared with treatment with oral progestins alone. Limited data suggest that cyclic progestational agents have lower regression rates when compared with continuous oral therapy. After initial conservative treatment for EIN-AEH, early detection of disease persistence, progression, or recurrence requires careful follow-up. Gynecologists and other clinicians should counsel patients that lifestyle modification resulting in weight loss and glycemic control can improve overall health and may decrease the risk of EIN-AEH and endometrial cancer.

Endometrial cancer patients understanding and interest in weight loss surgery

OBJECTIVE

Obesity is a risk factor for endometrial hyperplasia (EH), endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN), and early type 1 endometrial cancer (EC) in 70%-90% of patients and is often a significant contributor to overall morbidity and mortality due to comorbidities. In 2011, bariatric surgery (BS) with lifestyle modification was identified as an intervention for reduction in overall mortality as well as risk for gynecologic cancers (Tsui et al., 2021). Our aim was to assess awareness of obesity as a risk factor and understanding of BS in an underinsured obese patient population with EC or EH.

METHOD

This IRB-approved survey was distributed to patients with type I EC or EH within the past 5 years and a BMI >30. Questions addressed demographics, health habits, cancer and obesity awareness, as well as benefits and concerns about undergoing BS. Information was provided about dietary requirements after BS, and then interest in BS was surveyed.

RESULTS

61.2% of surveyed patients were interested in bariatric surgery for weight loss after receiving education about the procedure. Interest in bariatric surgery was correlated with higher BMI, higher ideal and comfortable weight loss in pounds and higher estimated weight loss that could be obtained with bariatric surgery. Additionally, patients who were interested in BS had better understanding of the risks of obesity with cancer overall.

CONCLUSION

Obese patients with history of EC/EIN/EH are aware of hazards associated with excess weight and understand the relationship between EC/EIN/EH diagnosis and obesity, and overall are very interested in BS as a modality to improve their health.

Acceptability of bariatric surgery in people with endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

In young individuals with obesity, infertility, and endometrial cancer, significant, sustained weight loss through bariatric surgery may result in a durable oncologic and reproductive response. However, it is not known whether bariatric surgery is acceptable to this patient population. We performed a qualitative study to understand the acceptability of bariatric surgery in young individuals with obesity and endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia.

STUDY DESIGN

All participants were of reproductive age with body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35 and grade 1 endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore participant perception of their weight, fertility, and the possibility of bariatric surgery as part of the treatment strategy for their endometrial cancer/atypical hyperplasia. Thematic saturation was reached after 14 interviews.

RESULTS

Fourteen participants with a median age of 34 years (range 27-38) and BMI of 42 (33-64) were interviewed. Participants were reluctant to accept bariatric surgery as a treatment option due to 1) lack of knowledge about the procedure, 2) stigma attached to bariatric surgery, and 3) fear of the risks associated with bariatric surgery. Their perception towards their weight, fertility, and cancer diagnosis was characterized by concepts of 'helplessness', 'isolation', 'frustration', and 'guilt'. We observed a significant gap in participant understanding of the complex interplay between their cancer, infertility, and obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

More support and resources are required, with patient-oriented counseling focused on the implication of their weight on their cancer diagnosis and fertility, before presenting bariatric surgery as a treatment option.

The role of bariatric and metabolic surgery in the development, diagnosis, and treatment of endometrial cancer

The obesity pandemic continues to contribute to a worsening burden of disease worldwide. The link between obesity and diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer has been well established, yet most patients living with obesity remain untreated or undertreated. Metabolic and bariatric surgery is the most effective and durable treatment for obesity, is safe, and may have a protective benefit with respect to cancer incidence. In this review, an overview of the link between obesity, metabolic surgery, and cancer is discussed with emphasis on indications for endometrial cancer, the malignancy most strongly associated with obesity. Considerable evidence from retrospective and prospective cohort studies supports a decreased risk of endometrial cancer in patients with obesity who undergo bariatric surgery compared with nonsurgical controls. Survivors of endometrial cancer are at increased risk of poor health outcomes associated with obesity, and women with endometrial cancer are more likely to die of cardiovascular disease and other obesity-related illnesses than of the malignancy itself. Recent advances in anticancer drug therapies have targeted pathways that may also be therapeutically altered with metabolic surgery. Metabolic surgery has significant potential to enter the treatment paradigm for endometrial cancer, and gynecologic oncologist visits present an opportunity to identify patients who may benefit the most.

Barriers to care for women with low-grade endometrial cancer and morbid obesity: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

Obesity is a major risk factor for low-grade endometrial cancer. The surgical management of patients with obesity is challenging, and they may face unique barriers to accessing care. We completed a qualitative study to understand the experiences of low-grade endometrial cancer patients with morbid obesity, from symptom onset to diagnosis to surgery.

DESIGN

Semi-structured interviews were performed with endometrial cancer patients with morbid obesity (body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m²) referred for primary surgery. Transcribed interviews were coded line-by-line and analysed using an interpretive descriptive approach that drew on labelling theory to understand patients' experiences. Thematic sufficiency was confirmed after 15 interviews.

SETTING

Two tertiary care centres in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifteen endometrial cancer patients with a median age of 61 years (range: 50-74) and a median BMI of 50 kg/m² (range: 44-70) were interviewed.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis identified that (1) both patients and providers lack knowledge on endometrial cancer and its presenting symptoms and risk factors; (2) patients with morbid obesity are subject to stigma and poor communication in the healthcare system and (3, 4) although clinical, administrative, financial, geographic and facility-related barriers exist, quality care for patients with morbid obesity is an achievable goal.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved education on the prevention and identification of endometrial cancer is needed for both patients and providers. Delivery of cancer care to patients with morbid obesity may be improved through provider awareness of the impact of weight stigma and establishing streamlined care pathways at centres equipped to manage surgical complexity.

Using quality improvement to increase the awareness of obesity among endometrial cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To increase discussion about obesity and endometrial cancer and referrals to weight loss clinic in patients with newly diagnosed low-risk endometrial cancer.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team used a quality improvement methodology to increase patient awareness about obesity and endometrial cancer. Target population included patients <80 years old with a body mass index ≥30 kg/m² who underwent surgery at our institution and had a final diagnosis of complex hyperplasia or stage I, grade 1-2 endometrioid endometrial cancer. A toolkit was developed for the intervention. Clinical characteristics, discussion about obesity, and referrals to a weight loss clinic were abstracted for a historic and intervention cohort. Data for the two cohorts were compared using chi-square, Fisher's exact test, and t-test.

RESULTS

54 patients from the historic cohort and 53 from the intervention cohort met inclusion criteria. Clinical characteristics were balanced between the groups. Discussion about obesity increased from 11.1% (6/54) to 79.2% (42/53) after implementing the toolkit (p<0.001). Referrals to the weight loss clinic also increased from 3.7% (2/54) to 26.4% (14/53) after implementing the toolkit (p=0.001), but in both groups only 50% of those referred actually attended the weight loss clinic. No clinical characteristics were identified as associated with being more likely to have documented conversations or referrals.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary quality-improvement project can be used to increase discussion about obesity and referral to a weight loss clinic in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer. Increasing patient awareness of the connection between obesity and endometrial cancer may have implications on the long-term health of endometrial cancer survivors.

Addressing the Role of Obesity in Endometrial Cancer Risk, Prevention, and Treatment

In sharp contrast to many other cancer types, the incidence and mortality of endometrial cancer continue to grow. This unfortunate trend is, in no small part, a result of the worldwide obesity epidemic. More than half of endometrial cancers are currently attributable to obesity, which is recognized as an independent risk factor for this disease. In this review, we identify the molecular mechanisms by which obesity and adipose tissue contribute to the pathogenesis of endometrial cancer. We further discuss the impact of obesity on the clinical management of the disease and examine the development of rational behavioral and pharmaceutical interventions aimed at reducing endometrial cancer risk, improving cancer outcomes, and preserving fertility in an increasingly younger population of patients with endometrial cancer.

The obese endometrial cancer patient: how do we effectively improve morbidity and mortality in this patient population?

The relationship between obesity, metabolic syndrome, and endometrial cancer has been established and accepted for decades. However, despite this understanding, endometrial cancer patients continue to die of their obesity-related comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Furthermore, studies show that gynecologic oncologists, general obstetrician/gynecologists, and bariatric specialists do not appropriately address obesity as a risk factor for cancer and also do not provide appropriate counseling on weight loss and lifestyle modification during screening, diagnosis, and follow-up for endometrial cancer. Given the increasing numbers of obese women both in the United States as well as globally, it is imperative that this risk be addressed and mitigated during patient interactions. Therefore, this article reviews the literature on obesity, metabolic syndrome, and endometrial cancer, as well as the literature on causes of death in endometrial cancer patients. Given the increased cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, we provide a number of methods to address obesity as a risk factor for cancer during patient visits. These methods include self-directed diet and exercise, supervised diet and exercise programs, medical management with insulin-sensitizing agents and statins, as well as bariatric surgery in extreme cases. Furthermore, we also encourage collaboration between general obstetrician/gynecologists, gynecologic oncologists, and bariatric specialists in the care of obese endometrial cancer patients to ensure that they not only survive their diagnosis, but also go on to live long, healthy lives.

Obesity Education Strategies for Cancer Prevention in Women's Health

Obesity is the cause of up to one-third of all cancers affecting women today, most notably endometrial, colon and breast cancer. Women's health providers are poised to advise women on obesity's link to cancer development, but often lack resources or training to provide appropriate counseling. Here, we review obesity's role in increasing the risk of several common reproductive system conditions faced by women, including polycystic ovarian syndrome, infertility, gynecologic surgical complications, and pregnancy complications. These events can be used as teachable moments to help frame the discussion of weight management and promote cancer prevention. We also review national guidelines and existing tangible weight-loss strategies that can be employed within the outpatient women's health setting to help women achieve weight loss goals and affect cancer prevention.