Predicting the difficulty of operative vaginal delivery by ultrasound measurement of fetal head station

Intrapartum Ultrasound Guidance to Make Safer Any Obstetric Intervention: Fetal Head Rotation, Assisted Vaginal Birth, Breech Delivery of the Second Twin

Intrapartum ultrasound (US) is more reliable than clinical assessment in determining parameters of crucial importance to optimize the management of labor including the position and station of the presenting part. Evidence from the literature supports the role of intrapartum US in predicting the outcome of labor in women diagnosed with slow progress during the first and second stage of labor, and randomized data have demonstrated that transabdominal US is far more accurate than digital examination in assessing fetal position before performing an instrumental delivery. Intrapartum US has also been shown to outperform the clinical skills in predicting the outcome and improving the technique of instrumental vaginal delivery. On this basis, some guidelines recommend intrapartum US to ascertain occiput position before performing an instrumental delivery. Manual rotation of occiput posterior position (MROP) and assisted breech delivery of the second twin are other obstetric interventions that can be performed during the second stage of labor with the support of intrapartum US. In this review article we summarize the existing evidence on the role of intrapartum US in assisting different types of obstetric intervention with the aim to improve their safety.

Impact of body mass index on sonographic measurement of head perineum distance before operative vaginal delivery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on sonographic measurement of head perineum distance (HPD) before operative vaginal delivery (OVD).

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study (Lille, France) conducted from March 1, 2019 to October 31, 2020 including all singleton and OVD. HPD measurement was systematically performed without and with compression on the perineum soft tissues. The level of station was defined by vaginal examination and three maternal BMI groups were defined (normal BMI [<24.9 kg/m2] vs overweight [25-29.9 kg/m2] vs obese [≥30 kg/m2]). HPD measures were compared between BMI groups and compression, in distinct level of station, using a two-factor analysis of variance including BMI groups, the compression, and the interaction term BMI group compression.

RESULTS

A total of 775 women were included: 488 with normal BMI, 181 overweight patients and 106 obese patients. The measurement of HPD before OVD without and with compression on the soft tissues was significantly different between the BMI groups only in the lower part, particularly between normal BMI and obese patients (mean difference (95% CI): 6.6 mm (4.0 to 9.2) without compression; 3.8 (1.1 to 6.4) with compression).

CONCLUSION

The values of HPD without and with compression on the soft tissues on the maternal perineum were different according to the maternal BMI concerning lower part station. Thus, it seems important to define thresholds of HPD measures corresponding to each head station levels according to maternal BMI.

The OdonAssist inflatable device for assisted vaginal birth-the ASSIST II study (United Kingdom)

BACKGROUND

Decreasing rates of assisted vaginal birth have been paralleled with increasing rates of cesarean deliveries over the last 40 years. The OdonAssist is a novel device for assisted vaginal birth. Iterative changes to clinical parameters, device design, and technique have been made to improve device efficacy and usability.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine if the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the OdonAssist device were sufficient to justify conducting a future randomized controlled trial.

STUDY DESIGN

An open-label nonrandomized study of 104 participants having a clinically indicated assisted vaginal birth using the OdonAssist was undertaken at Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom. Data were also collected from participants who consented to participate in the study but for whom trained OdonAssist operators were not available, providing a nested cohort. The primary clinical outcome was the proportion of births successfully expedited with the OdonAssist. Secondary outcomes included clinical, patient-reported, operator-reported, device and health care utilization. Neonatal outcome data were reviewed at day 28, and maternal outcomes were investigated up to day 90. Given that the number of successful OdonAssist births was ≥61 out of 104, the hypothesis of a poor rate of 50% was rejected in favor of a good rate of ≥65%.

RESULTS

Between August 2019 and June 2021, 941 (64%) of the 1471 approached, eligible participants consented to participate. Of these, 104 received the OdonAssist intervention. Birth was assisted in all cephalic vertex fetal positions, at all stations ≥1 cm below the ischial spines (with or without regional analgesia). The OdonAssist was effective in 69 of the 104 (66%) cases, consistent with the hypothesis of a good efficacy rate. There were no serious device-related maternal or neonatal adverse reactions, and there were no serious adverse device effects. Only 4% of neonatal soft tissue bruising in the successful OdonAssist group was considered device-related, as opposed to 20% and 23% in the unsuccessful OdonAssist group and the nested cohort, respectively. Participants reported high birth perception scores. All practitioners found the device use to be straightforward.

CONCLUSION

Recruitment to an interventional study of a new device for assisted vaginal birth is feasible; 64% of eligible participants were willing to participate. The success rate of the OdonAssist was comparable to that of the Kiwi OmniCup when introduced in the same unit in 2002, meeting the threshold for a randomized controlled trial to compare the OdonAssist with current standard practice. There were no disadvantages of study participation in terms of maternal and neonatal outcomes. There were potential advantages of using the OdonAssist, particularly reduced neonatal soft tissue injury. The same application technique is used for all fetal positions, with all operators deeming the device straightforward to use. This study provides important data to inform future study design.

Descent of the presenting part assessed with ultrasound

Fetal head descent can be expressed as fetal station and engagement. Station is traditionally based on clinical vaginal examination of the distal part of the fetal skull and related to the level of the ischial spines. Engagement is based on a transabdominal examination of the proximal part of the fetal head above the pelvic inlet. Clinical examinations are subjective, and objective measurements of descent are warranted. Ultrasound is a feasible diagnostic tool in labor, and fetal lie, station, position, presentation, and attitude can be examined. This review presents an overview of fetal descent examined with ultrasound. Ultrasound was first introduced for examining fetal descent in 1977. The distance from the sacral tip to the fetal skull was measured with A-mode ultrasound, but more convenient transperineal methods have since been published. Of those, progression distance, angle of progression, and head-symphysis distance are examined in the sagittal plane, using the inferior part of the symphysis pubis as reference point. Head-perineum distance is measured in the frontal plane (transverse transperineal scan) as the shortest distance from perineum to the fetal skull, representing the remaining part of the birth canal for the fetus to pass. At high stations, the fetal head is directed downward, followed with a horizontal and then an upward direction when the fetus descends in the birth canal and deflexes the head. Head descent may be assessed transabdominally with ultrasound and measured as the suprapubic descent angle. Many observational studies have shown that fetal descent assessed with ultrasound can predict labor outcome before induction of labor, as an admission test, and during the first and second stage of labor. Labor progress can also be examined longitudinally. The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology recommends using ultrasound in women with prolonged or arrested first or second stage of labor, when malpositions or malpresentations are suspected, and before an operative vaginal delivery. One single ultrasound parameter cannot tell for sure whether an instrumental delivery is going to be successful. Information about station and position is a prerequisite, but head direction, presentation, and attitude also should be considered.

The sonopartogram

The assessment of labor progress from digital vaginal examination has remained largely unchanged for at least a century, despite the current major advances in maternal and perinatal care. Although inconsistently reproducible, the findings from digital vaginal examination are customarily plotted manually on a partogram, which is composed of a graphical representation of labor, together with maternal and fetal observations. The partogram has been developed to aid recognition of failure to labor progress and guide management-specific obstetrical intervention. In the last decade, the use of ultrasound in the delivery room has increased with the advent of more powerful, portable ultrasound machines that have become more readily available for use. Although ultrasound in intrapartum practice is predominantly used for acute management, an ultrasound-based partogram, a sonopartogram, might represent an objective tool for the graphical representation of labor. Demonstrating greater accuracy for fetal head position and more objectivity in the assessment of fetal head station, it could be considered complementary to traditional clinical assessment. The development of the sonopartogram concept would require further undertaking of serial measurements. Advocates of ultrasound will concede that its use has yet to demonstrate a difference in obstetrical and neonatal morbidity in the context of the management of labor and delivery. Taking a step beyond the descriptive graphical representation of labor progress is the question of whether a specific combination of clinical and demographic parameters might be used to inform knowledge of labor outcomes. Intrapartum cesarean deliveries and deliveries assisted by forceps and vacuum are all associated with a heightened risk of maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes. Although these outcomes cannot be precisely predicted, many known risk factors exist. Malposition and high station of the fetal head, short maternal stature, and other factors, such as caput succedaneum, are all implicated in operative delivery; however, the contribution of individual parameters based on clinical and ultrasound assessments has not been quantified. Individualized risk prediction models, including maternal characteristics and ultrasound findings, are increasingly used in women's health-for example, in preeclampsia or trisomy screening. Similarly, intrapartum cesarean delivery models have been developed with good prognostic ability in specifically selected populations. For intrapartum ultrasound to be of prognostic value, robust, externally validated prediction models for labor outcome would inform delivery management and allow shared decision-making with parents.

Intrapartum ultrasound use in clinical practice as a predictor of delivery mode during prolonged second stage of labor

PURPOSE

To determine the validity of intrapartum ultrasound (IPUS), and particularly the angle of progression (AOP), in predicting delivery mode when measured in real-life clinical practice among women with protracted second stages of labor.

METHODS

Using electronic medical records, nulliparous women with a second stage of labor of ≥ 3 h ("prolonged") and a documented AOP measurement during the second stage were identified. The ability of a single AOP measurement in "prolonged" second stage to predict a vaginal delivery (VD) was assessed. Fetal head descent, measured by AOP change/h (calculated from serial measurements), was compared between women who delivered vaginally and those who had a cesarean delivery (CD) for arrest of descent.

RESULTS

Of the 191 women who met the inclusion criteria, 62 (32.5%) delivered spontaneously, 96 (50.2%) had a vacuum extraction (VE) and 33 (17.3%) had a CD. The mean AOP was wider among women who had VD (spontaneous or VE) compared to those who had CD (153° ± 19 vs. 133° ± 17, p < 0.001). Wider AOPs were associated with higher rates of VD and an AOP ≥ 127° was associated with a VD rate of 88.6% (148/167). Among the 87 women who had more than one AOP measurement, the mean AOP change per hour was higher in the VD group than in the CD group (15.1° ± 11.4° vs. 6.2° ± 6.3°, p <  0.001).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-assessed fetal head station in nulliparous women with a protracted second stage of labor can be an accurate and objective additive tool in predicting the mode and interval time to delivery in real-life clinical practice.

Head-to-perineum distance measured transperineally as a predictor of failed midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery

BACKGROUND

During the second stage of labor, in case of a need for a fetal extraction at midcavity, the choice of attempting the procedure between operative vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery is difficult. Moreover, guidelines on this subject are not clear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify antenatal and intrapartum parameters associated with a failed midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery and its association with maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study conducted at a tertiary maternity hospital in France from January 2010 to December 2020. Women with singleton pregnancies under epidural analgesia with nonanomalous cephalic presenting fetuses and gestational ages at ≥37 weeks of gestation, who were submitted to midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery, were included. Following the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists definition, midcavity was defined as the presenting part of the fetus (ie, the fetal head) found at stations 0 and +1. For research purposes, all patients were submitted to transperineal ultrasound to evaluate the head-to-perineum distance, however, this measurement did not affect the decision to perform a midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery. The primary outcome of the study was failed midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery leading to cesarean delivery or the use of a different instrument to achieve vaginal delivery.

RESULTS

Overall, 951 cases of midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery were included in this study. Failed midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery occurred in 242 patients (25.4%). Factors independently associated with failed midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery included maternal height (adjusted odds ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-0.99; P=.002), duration of the active phase of the first stage of labor (adjusted odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.17; P<.001), nonocciput anterior fetal head position (adjusted odds ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.04; P=.02), z score of the head-to-perineum distance (adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.43; P=.01), and birthweight of >4000 g (adjusted odds ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-3.26; P=.003). Women submitted to a failed midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery were more likely to have a major postpartum hemorrhage (7.1% vs 2.0%; P<.001), whereas neonates were more likely to have an umbilical artery pH of <7.1 (30.5% vs 19.8%; P=.001), be admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (9.6% vs 4.7%; P=.005), and have a severe caput succedaneum (14.9% vs 0.7%; P<.001). Subgroup analysis on all patients with a fetal head station of 0 found that the head-to-perineum distance was the only independent variable associated with failed midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-2.12; P<.001). The area under the receiving operating characteristic curve of the head-to-perineum distance in this subgroup population was 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.73; P<.001), and the optimal cutoff point of the head-to-perineum distance measurement discriminating between failed and successful midcavity vacuum-assisted deliveries was 55 mm. It was associated with a 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.95) sensitivity, 0.19 (95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.25) specificity, 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.42) positive predictive value, and 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.90) negative predictive value.

CONCLUSION

Study data showed that a high fetal head station, measured using the head-to-perineum distance, and a nonocciput anterior position of the fetal head are independently associated with failed midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery. The result supported the systematic assessment of the sonographic head station and position before performing a midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery.

Assessment of labor progress by ultrasound vs manual examination: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Assessment of labor progress via digital examination is considered the standard of care in most delivery rooms. However, this method can be stressful, painful, and imprecise, and multiple examinations increase the risk for chorioamnionitis. Intrapartum ultrasound was found to be an objective, noninvasive tool to monitor labor progression.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether, among nulliparous women, the use of intrapartum ultrasound can reduce the rate of intrapartum fever by reducing the number of digital examinations.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial in term nulliparas admitted with prelabor rupture of membranes, induction of labor, or in latent phase of labor with a cervical dilation of <4 cm. Women were randomized into 1 of the following 2 arms: (1) labor progress assessed by ultrasound, avoiding digital examinations as much as possible; and (2) control group in which labor progression was assessed according to the regular protocol. Before the study, all labor ward physicians underwent training in intrapartum ultrasound.

RESULTS

A total of 90 women were randomized to the ultrasound group and 92 were randomized to the control group. When compared with the control group, the ultrasound group had significantly lower rates of intrapartum fever (11.1% vs 26.1%; P=.01), clinical chorioamnionitis (3.3% vs 16.5%; P>.01), and histologic chorioamnionitis (2.2% vs 9.8%; P=.03). The median number of digital examinations was significantly lower in the ultrasound group (5; interquartile range, 4-6) than in the control group (8; interquartile range, 6-10; P<.01). The median number of digital examinations per hour in the ultrasound group was significantly lower than in the control group (0.2 vs 0.4; P<.01). The induction rates, time from admission to delivery, mode of delivery, Apgar score at 5 minutes, and neonatal intensive care unit admission rates did not differ significantly between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of intrapartum ultrasound lessens the total number of digital examinations needed to be performed during labor and, consequently, the incidence of intrapartum fever and chorioamnionitis are reduced. No adverse effects on labor progression and short-term maternal or neonatal outcomes were noted.

Can Intrapartum Ultrasonography Improve the Placement of the Vacuum Cup in Operative Vaginal Deliveries?

Although the fetal head position has traditionally been evaluated by digital examination (DE), it has a failure rate ranging between 20 and 70%; hence, intrapartum transabdominal ultrasonography (TUS) has become relevant. We aimed to evaluate the utility of the TUS to identify the fetal head positions in vacuum-assisted deliveries. We performed a prospective observational study including 101 pregnant patients in active labor who required a vacuum-assisted delivery. The fetal head position was assessed by a DE and a TUS prior to vacuum cup placement. After delivery, the optimal vacuum cup placement was evaluated as the distance between the chignon and the flexion point ≤2 cm. The general concordance rate between the DE and TUS was 72.2%, with the poorest concordance rate for occiput posterior positions at 46.1%. In five cases (4.9%), it was not possible to determine the fetal head position through the DE. The correlation was higher in low and medium planes, with 77% and 68.1% concordance rates, respectively, while it was lower in high planes (60%). In 90.1% of cases, the vacuum cup placement was optimal. Our findings show that intrapartum transabdominal ultrasonography is a useful technique to identify the fetal head position allowing optimal placement of the vacuum cup necessary for correct vacuum-assisted delivery.

Ultrasound in labor: clinical practice guideline and recommendation by the WAPM-World Association of Perinatal Medicine and the PMF-Perinatal Medicine Foundation

This recommendation document follows the mission of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine in collaboration with the Perinatal Medicine Foundation. We aim to bring together groups and individuals throughout the world for standardization to implement the ultrasound evaluation in labor ward and improve the clinical management of labor. Ultrasound in labor can be performed using a transabdominal or a transperineal approach depending upon which parameters are being assessed. During transabdominal imaging, fetal anatomy, presentation, liquor volume, and placental localization can be determined. The transperineal images depict images of the fetal head in which calculations to determine a proposed fetal head station can be made.

Sonographic knowledge of occiput position to decrease failed operative vaginal delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of sonographic assessment of fetal occiput position before operative vaginal delivery to decrease the number of failed operative vaginal deliveries.

DATA SOURCES

The search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, ClinicalTrial.gov, Ovid, and Cochrane Library as electronic databases from the inception of each database to April 2021. No restrictions for language or geographic location were applied.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Selection criteria included randomized controlled trails of pregnant women randomized to either sonographic or clinical digital diagnosis of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor before operative vaginal delivery.

METHODS

The primary outcome was failed operative vaginal delivery, defined as a failed fetal operative vaginal delivery (vacuum or forceps) extraction requiring a cesarean delivery or forceps after failed vacuum. The summary measures were reported as relative risks or as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals using the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird. An I² (Higgins I²) >0% was used to identify heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 4 randomized controlled trials including 1007 women with singleton, term, cephalic fetuses randomized to either the sonographic (n=484) or clinical digital (n=523) diagnosis of occiput position during the second stage of labor before operative vaginal delivery were included. Before operative vaginal delivery, fetal occiput position was diagnosed as anterior in 63.5% of the sonographic diagnosis group vs 69.5% in the clinical digital diagnosis group (P=.04). There was no significant difference in the rate of failed operative vaginal deliveries between the sonographic and clinical diagnosis of occiput position groups (9.9% vs 8.2%; relative risk, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.68). Women randomized to sonographic diagnosis of occiput position had a significantly lower rate of occiput position discordance between the evaluation before operative vaginal delivery and the at birth evaluation when compared with those randomized to the clinical diagnosis group (2.3% vs 17.7%; relative risk, 0.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.74; P=.02). There were no significant differences in any of the other secondary obstetrical and perinatal outcomes assessed.

CONCLUSION

Sonographic knowledge of occiput position before operative vaginal delivery does not seem to have an effect on the incidence of failed operative vaginal deliveries despite better sonographic accuracy in the occiput position diagnosis when compared with clinical assessment. Future studies should evaluate how a more accurate sonographic diagnosis of occiput position or other parameters can lead to a safer and more effective operative vaginal delivery technique.

Is sonographic measurement of head-perineum distance useful to predict obstetrical anal sphincter injury in case of vacuum delivery?

OBJECTIVE

Determine if head-perineum distance (HPD) measurement before vacuum extraction (VE) was predictive of an obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) occurrence.

METHODS

Retrospective, bicentric (Lille and Poissy, France) cohort study conducted from January 2019 to June 2020. All VE in singleton pregnancies of ≥34 weeks were included. HPD measurement was performed without compression of the tissues before each VE. The judgment criterion was the occurrence of an OASIS.

RESULTS

Of 12 568 deliveries, VE was performed in 1093 (8.6%). Among these 1093 women undergoing VE, 675 (61.7%) with HPD measurement were included. OASIS was found in 6.5% of women (n = 44; 95% CI 4.5-8.7). HPD was not associated with OASIS (38.5 ± 12.6 mm in women with OASIS vs 37.4 ± 12.0 mm in women without; adjusted OR [aOR] per 5 mm increase = 0.92; 95% CI 0.79-1.06). Increased HPD was associated with higher risk of sequential extraction (aOR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.06-1.32), extraction duration >10 min (aOR = 1.12; 95% CI 1.02-1.23) and shoulder dystocia (aOR = 1.20; 95% CI 1.03-1.40).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-measured head-perineum distance does not predict the occurrence of obstetric anal sphincter injury during a VE. The interest of HPD is more about predicting the success or difficulty of VE rather its specific complications.

Umbilical cord prolapse: revisiting its definition and management

Umbilical cord prolapse is an unpredictable obstetrical emergency with an incidence ranging from 1 to 6 per 1000 pregnancies. It is associated with high perinatal mortality, ranging from 23% to 27% in low-income countries to 6% to 10% in high-income countries. In this review, we specifically addressed 3 issues. First, its definition is not consistent in the current literature, and "occult cord prolapse" is a misnomer because the cord is still above the cervix. We proposed that cord prolapse, cord presentation, and compound cord presentation should be classified according to the positional relationship among the cord, the fetal presenting part, and the cervix. All of them may occur with either ruptured or intact membranes. The fetal risk is highest in cord prolapse, followed by cord presentation, and lastly by compound cord presentation, which replaces the misnomer "occult cord prolapse." Second, the mainstay of treatment of cord prolapse is urgent delivery, which means cesarean delivery in most cases, unless vaginal delivery is imminent. The urgency depends on the fetal heart rate pattern, which can be bradycardia, recurrent decelerations, or normal. It is most urgent in cases with bradycardia, because a recent study showed that cord arterial pH declines significantly with the bradycardia-to-delivery interval at a rate of 0.009 per minute (95% confident interval, 0.0003-0.0180), and this may indicate an irreversible pathology such as vasospasm or persistent cord compression. However, cord arterial pH does not correlate with either deceleration-to-delivery interval or decision-to-delivery interval, indicating that intermittent cord compression causing decelerations is reversible and less risk. Third, while cesarean delivery is being arranged, different maneuvers should be adopted to relieve cord compression by elevating the fetal presenting part and to prevent further cord prolapse beyond the vagina. A recent study showed that the knee-chest position provides the greatest elevation effect, followed by filling of the maternal urinary bladder with 500 mL of fluid, and then the Trendelenburg position (15°) and other maneuvers. However, each maneuver has its own advantages and limitations; thus, they should be applied wisely and with great caution, depending on the actual clinical situation. Therefore, we have proposed an algorithm to guide this acute management.

Transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head elevation by maneuvers used for managing umbilical cord prolapse

OBJECTIVE

To assess objectively the degree of fetal head elevation achieved by different maneuvers commonly used for managing umbilical cord prolapse.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of pregnant women at term before elective Cesarean delivery. A baseline assessment of fetal head station was performed with the woman in the supine position, using transperineal ultrasound for measuring the parasagittal angle of progression (psAOP), head-symphysis distance (HSD) and head-perineum distance (HPD). The ultrasonographic measurements of fetal head station were repeated during different maneuvers, including elevation of the maternal buttocks using a wedge, knee-chest position, Trendelenburg position with a 15° tilt and filling the maternal urinary bladder with 100 mL, 300 mL and 500 mL of normal saline. The measurements obtained during the maneuvers were compared with the baseline measurements.

RESULTS

Twenty pregnant women scheduled for elective Cesarean section at term were included in the study. When compared with baseline (median psAOP, 103.6°), the knee-chest position gave the strongest elevation effect, with the greatest reduction in psAOP (psAOP, 80.7°; P < 0.001), followed by filling the bladder with 500 mL (psAOP, 89.9°; P < 0.001) and 300 mL (psAOP, 94.4°; P < 0.001) of normal saline. Filling the maternal bladder with 100 mL of normal saline (psAOP, 96.1°; P = 0.001), the Trendelenburg position (psAOP, 96.8°; P = 0.014) and elevating the maternal buttocks (psAOP, 98.3°; P = 0.033) gave modest elevation effects. Similar findings were reported for HSD and HPD. The fetal head elevation effects of the knee-chest position, Trendelenburg position and elevation of the maternal buttocks were independent of the initial fetal head station, but that of bladder filling was greater when the initial head station was low.

CONCLUSIONS

To elevate the fetal presenting part, the knee-chest position provides the best effect, followed by filling the maternal urinary bladder with 500 mL then 300 mL of fluid, respectively. Filling the bladder with 100 mL of fluid, the Trendelenburg position and elevation of the maternal buttocks have modest effects. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

The role of the angle of progression in the prediction of the outcome of occiput posterior position in the second stage of labor

BACKGROUND

Occiput posterior position is the most frequent cephalic malposition, and its persistence at delivery is associated with a higher risk of maternal and perinatal morbidity. Diagnosis and management of occiput posterior position remain a clinical challenge. This is partly caused by our inability to predict fetuses who will spontaneously rotate into occiput anterior from those who will have persistent occiput posterior position. The angle of progression, measured with transperineal ultrasound, represents a reliable tool for the evaluation of fetal head station during labor. The relationship between the persistence of occiput posterior position and fetal head station in the second stage of labor has not been previously assessed.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the role of fetal head station, as measured by the angle of progression, in the prediction of persistent occiput posterior position and the mode of delivery in the second stage of labor.

STUDY DESIGN

We recruited a nonconsecutive series of women with posterior occiput position diagnosed by transabdominal ultrasound in the second stage of labor. For each woman, a transperineal ultrasound was performed to measure the angle of progression at rest. We compared the angle of progression between women who delivered fetuses in occiput anterior position and those with persistent occiput posterior position at delivery. Receiver operating characteristics curves were performed to evaluate the accuracy of the angle of progression in the prediction of persistent occiput posterior position. Finally, we performed a multivariate logistic regression to determine independent predictors of persistent occiput posterior position.

RESULTS

Overall, 63 women were included in the analysis. Among these, 39 women (62%) delivered in occiput anterior position, whereas 24 (38%) delivered in occiput posterior position (persistent occiput posterior position). The angle of progression was significantly narrower in the persistent occiput posterior position group than in women who delivered fetuses in occiput anterior position (118.3°±12.2° vs 127.5°±10.5°; P=.003). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.731 (95% confidence interval, 0.594-0.869) with an estimated best cutoff range of 121.5° (sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 67%). On logistic regression analysis, the angle of progression was found to be independently associated with persistence of occiput posterior position (odds ratio, 0.942; 95% confidence interval, 0.889-0.998; P=.04). Finally, women who underwent cesarean delivery had significantly narrower angle of progression than women who had a vaginal delivery (113.5°±8.1 vs 128.0°±10.7; P<.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the prediction of cesarean delivery was 0.866 (95% confidence interval, 0.761-0.972). At multivariable logistic regression analysis including the angle of progression, parity, and gestational age at delivery, the angle of progression was found to be the only independent predictor associated with cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 0.849; 95% confidence interval, 0.775-0.0930; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

In fetuses with occiput posterior at the beginning of the second stage of labor, narrower values of the angle of progression are associated with higher rates of persistent occiput posterior position at delivery and a higher risk of cesarean delivery.

Intrapartum ultrasound and the choice between assisted vaginal and cesarean delivery

Inaccurate assessment of the fetal head position and station might increase the risk for difficult or failed assisted vaginal delivery. Compared with digital vaginal examination, an ultrasound examination is objective and more accurate. The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology has issued practical guidelines on intrapartum ultrasound in 2018 and recommended that an ultrasound assessment should be conducted when there is suspected delay or arrest of the first or second stage of labor or before considering assisted vaginal delivery. Fetal head position is assessed transabdominally by identifying the fetal occiput, orbit, or midline cerebral echo. Studies have shown that ultrasound assessment improved the correct diagnosis of fetal head position and accuracy of instrument placement, however, it did not reduce morbidity. Studies on ultrasound assessment of asynclitism are limited but show promising results. Fetal head station is assessed transperineally in the midsagittal or axial plane. Of the various ultrasound parameters, angle of progression and head-perineum distance are the most widely studied and found to be highly correlated with the clinical fetal head station. An angle of progression of 120° correlates with a clinical head station of 0 and is an important landmark for engagement of successful vaginal delivery, whereas an angle of progression of 145° correlates with a clinical head station of ≥+2 and has been associated with successful assisted vaginal delivery. In contrast, a head perineum distance of ≥40 mm has been associated with an increased risk for difficult assisted vaginal delivery. A "head-up" direction of descent assessed transperineally in sagittal plane is also a favorable factor for successful vaginal delivery. Current evidence seems to suggest that a prediction model with >1 sonographic parameter performed better than a model that only used 1 parameter. We suggest that an algorithm model incorporating both clinical and sonographic parameters would be useful in guiding clinicians on their decision for assisted vaginal delivery.

Fetal descent in nulliparous women assessed by ultrasound: a longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound measurements offer objective and reproducible methods to measure the fetal head station. Before these methods can be applied to assess labor progression, the fetal head descent needs to be evaluated longitudinally in well-defined populations and compared with the existing data derived from clinical examinations.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to use ultrasound measurements to describe the fetal head descent longitudinally as labor progressed through the active phase in nulliparous women with spontaneous onset of labor.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single center, prospective cohort study at the Landspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland, from January 2016 to April 2018. Nulliparous women with a single fetus in cephalic presentation and spontaneous labor onset at a gestational age of ≥37 weeks, were eligible. Participant inclusion occurred during admission for women with an established active phase of labor or at the start of the active phase for women admitted during the latent phase. The active phase was defined as an effaced cervix dilated to at least 4 cm in women with regular contractions. According to the clinical protocol, vaginal examinations were done at entry and subsequently throughout labor, paired each time with a transperineal ultrasound examination by a separate examiner, with both examiners being blinded to the other's results. The measurements used to assess the fetal head station were the head-perineum distance and angle of progression. Cervical dilatation was examined clinically.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 99 women. The labor patterns for the head-perineum distance, angle of progression, and cervical dilatation differentiated the participants into 75 with spontaneous deliveries, 16 with instrumental vaginal deliveries, and 8 cesarean deliveries. At the inclusion stage, the cervix was dilated 4 cm in 26 of the women, 5 cm in 30 of the women, and ≥6 cm in 43 women. One cesarean and 1 ventouse delivery were performed for fetal distress, whereas the remaining cesarean deliveries were conducted because of a failure to progress. The total number of examinations conducted throughout the study was 345, with an average of 3.6 per woman. The ultrasound-measured fetal head station both at the first and last examination were associated with the delivery mode and remaining time of labor. In spontaneous deliveries, rapid head descent started around 4 hours before birth, the descent being more gradual in instrumental deliveries and absent in cesarean deliveries. A head-perineum distance of 30 mm and angle of progression of 125° separately predicted delivery within 3.0 hours (95% confidence interval, 2.5-3.8 hours and 2.4-3.7 hours, respectively) in women delivering vaginally. Although the head-perineum distance and angle of progression are independent methods, both methods gave similar mirror image patterns. The fetal head station at the first examination was highest for the fetuses in occiput posterior position, but the pattern of rapid descent was similar for all initial positions in spontaneously delivering women. Oxytocin augmentation was used in 41% of women; in these labors a slower descent was noted. Descent was only slightly slower in the 62% of women who received epidural analgesia. A nonlinear relationship was observed between the fetal head station and dilatation.

CONCLUSION

We have established the ultrasound-measured descent patterns for nulliparous women in spontaneous labor. The patterns resemble previously published patterns based on clinical vaginal examinations. The ultrasound-measured fetal head station was associated with the delivery mode and remaining time of labor.

Ultrasound before operative vaginal delivery: why and how

Safe management of the second stage of labor is important. Wait for spontaneous delivery, operative vaginal deliveries and second stage cesarean sections are all options when prolonged second stage occurs. The important question is which option to choose. Fetal head station and fetal head position are used to decide mode of delivery; this has traditionally been decided by performing a digital vaginal examination. Studies have shown that theses clinical examinations of both fetal head station and position are unreliable and that ultrasound might be better option. The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) published in 2018 guidelines on intrapartum ultrasound and recommends that ultrasound is performed for ascertainment of fetal head position and station before considering or performing an instrumental vaginal delivery for slow progress or arrested labor in the second stage. The determination of the fetal head position, fetal head station and the movement of the fetal head can easily be determined with the help of ultrasound and can help the clinicians in making the right decision on how to proceed when prolonged second stage of labor is diagnosed.

Intrapartum ultrasound at the initiation of the active second stage of labor predicts spontaneous vaginal delivery

BACKGROUND

Longer duration of active pushing during labor is associated with a higher rate of operative delivery and an increased risk of maternal and neonatal complications. Although immediate pushing at complete dilatation is associated with lower rates of chorioamnionitis and postpartum hemorrhage, it is also associated with a longer duration of pushing.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate whether fetal head station and position, as assessed by ultrasound at the beginning of the pushing process, can predict the mode of delivery and duration of pushing in nulliparous women.

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective observational study included nulliparous women with neuraxial analgesia and complete cervical dilatation. The following sonographic parameters were assessed just before the beginning of the pushing process, at rest, and while pushing during contraction: head position, angle of progression, head-perineum distance, and head-symphysis distance. The change between rest and pushing was designated as delta angle of progression, delta head-perineum distance, and delta head-symphysis distance. The sonographic measurements and fetal head station assessed by vaginal examination were compared between women who had a spontaneous vaginal delivery to those who underwent an operative delivery, and between those who pushed for more or less than 1 hour.

RESULTS

Of the 197 women included in this study, 166 (84.3%) had a spontaneous vaginal delivery, 31 (15.7%) had an operative delivery, 23 (11.6%) had a vacuum delivery, and 8 (4.0%) had a cesarean delivery. Spontaneous vaginal delivery and shorter duration of pushing (less than an hour) were significantly more common with a nonocciput posterior position (10.6% vs 47.3%; P<.005), a wider angle of progression, a shorter head-perineum distance and head-symphysis distance (both during rest and while pushing), and a lower fetal head station as assessed by digital vaginal examination. However, a logistic regression model revealed that only the angle of progression at rest and the delta angle of progression were independently associated with a spontaneous vaginal delivery with an area under the curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.87; P<.0001) and 0.75 (95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.79; P<.0001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound performed at the beginning of the active second stage of labor can assist in predicting the mode of delivery and duration of pushing and perform better than the traditional digital examination, with the angle of progression at rest and delta angle of progression being the best predictors.

Automatic measurement of head-perineum distance during intrapartum ultrasound: description of the technique and preliminary results

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of a new ultrasound technique for the automatic assessment of the head-perineum distance (HPD) during childbirth.

METHODS

HPD was measured on a total of 40 acquisition sessions in 30 laboring women both automatically by an innovative algorithm and manually by trained sonographers, assumed as gold standard.

RESULTS

A significant correlation was found between manual and automatic measurements (Intra-CC = 0.994). High values of the coefficient of determination (r²=0.98) and low residual errors: RMSE = 2.01 mm (4.9%) were found.

CONCLUSION

The automatic algorithm for the assessment of the HPD represents a reliable technique.

Feasibility, Reliability, and Agreement of Transperineal Ultrasound Measurement: Results from a Longitudinal Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility, reliability, and agreement of serial transperineal ultrasound (TPU) assessment of fetal head station (parasagittal angle of progression [psAOP], head-perineum distance [HPD], and head-symphysis distance [HSD]) and sonographic cervical dilatation (SCD), compared to fetal head station and cervical dilatation determined by vaginal examination, respectively.

METHODS

This was a prospective longitudinal study in singleton pregnancies undergoing induction of labor at term. Paired assessment of fetal head station and cervical dilatation by vaginal examination, with TPU assessment of psAOP, HPD, HSD, and SCD was made serially. Feasibility, correlation, reliability, and agreement were determined.

RESULTS

1,139 paired measurements among 326 women were included. psAOP and HPD were achievable in all assessments. HSD was not achievable in 3.4% (11/326) due to high fetal head station. Fetal head station by vaginal examination was positively correlated with psAOP (rho = 0.70) but negatively correlated with HPD (rho = -0.57) and HSD (rho = -0.52). The feasibility to measure SCD reduced as cervical dilatation increased. Cervical dilatation and SCD were positively correlated (rho = 0.96) with strong agreement (concordant correlation coefficient = 0.925).

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements of psAOP and HPD are feasible and correlate significantly with fetal head station by vaginal examination. Measurement of HSD is not feasible when fetal head station is high. Measurement of SCD is feasible, but it is more difficult in the advanced stage of labor. The correlation, reliability, and agreement between SCD and cervical dilatation by vaginal examination are high.

Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound

BACKGROUND

A limited number of studies have addressed the role of intrapartum ultrasound in the prediction of the mode of delivery in women with prolonged second stage of labor.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to evaluate the role of transabdominal and transperineal sonographic findings in the prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery among nulliparous women with prolonged second stage of labor.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a 2-center prospective study conducted at 2 tertiary maternity units. Nulliparous women with a prolonged active second stage of labor, as defined by active pushing lasting more than 120 minutes, were eligible for inclusion. Transabdominal ultrasound to evaluate the fetal head position and transperineal ultrasound for the measurement of the midline angle, the head-perineum distance, and the head-symphysis distance were performed in between uterine contractions and maternal pushes. At transperineal ultrasound the angle of progression was measured at rest and at the peak of maternal pushing effort. The delta angle of progression was defined as the difference between the angle of progression measured during active pushing at the peak of maternal effort and the angle of progression at rest. The sonographic findings of women who had spontaneous vaginal delivery vs those who required obstetric intervention, either vacuum extraction or cesarean delivery, were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

Overall, 109 were women included. Spontaneous vaginal delivery and obstetric intervention were recorded in 40 (36.7%) and 69 (63.3%) patients, respectively. Spontaneous vaginal delivery was associated with a higher rate of occiput anterior position (90% vs 53.2%, P < .0001), lower head-perineum distance and head-symphysis distance (33.2 ± 7.8 mm vs 40.1 ± 9.5 mm, P = .001, and 13.1 ± 4.6 mm vs 19.5 ± 8.4 mm, P < .001, respectively), narrower midline angle (29.6° ± 15.3° vs 54.2° ± 23.6°, P < .001) and wider angle of progression at the acme of the pushing effort (153.3° ± 19.8° vs 141.8° ± 25.7°, P = .02) and delta-angle of progression (17.3° ± 12.9° vs 12.5° ± 11.0°, P = .04). At logistic regression analysis, only the midline angle and the head-symphysis distance proved to be independent predictors of spontaneous vaginal delivery. More specifically, the area under the curve for the prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery was 0.80, 95% confidence interval (0.69-0.92), P < .001, and 0.74, 95% confidence interval (0.65-0.83), P = .002, for the midline angle and for the head-symphysis distance, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Transabdominal and transperineal intrapartum ultrasound parameters can predict the likelihood of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with prolonged second stage of labor.

Complications of operative vaginal delivery and provider volume and experience

Objective: To evaluate associations between operative vaginal delivery complications and provider experience (operative vaginal delivery volume and time since residency).Methods: We included all operative vaginal deliveries between 2008 and 2014 at a tertiary care teaching hospital, stratified into forceps-assisted and vacuum-assisted deliveries. Complications included severe perineal lacerations (3rd and 4th degree) and neonatal injuries (subgaleal/subdural/cerebral hemorrhage, facial nerve injury, and scalp injury), which were identified by International Classification Diagnosis-9 codes. Providers were categorized by operative vaginal delivery volume (mean annual forceps- or vacuum-assisted deliveries over the study interval) and time since residency. Regression analyses were used to compare complication rates by provider volume and time since residency, adjusting for potential confounders, using 0-1 deliveries per year and <5 years since residency as reference groups.Results: Nine hundred and thirty-four forceps and 1074 vacuums occurred. For forceps-assisted deliveries, severe perineal injury was decreased among providers with >10 forceps per year (aOR 0.50 [95%CI 0.30-0.81]) and at 15-19 years (aOR 0.45 [95% CI 0.22-0.94], and ≥25 years (aOR 0.45 [0.27-0.73]) since residency. There were no associations with neonatal injuries. Among vacuum-assisted deliveries, severe perineal injury decreased at ≥25 years since residency (aOR 0.35 [95%CI 0.17-0.74], with no association with provider volume. Neonatal injury decreased at 5-9 years (aOR 0.53 [95%CI 0.30-0.93]), and 15-19 years since residency (aOR 0.53 [95%CI 0.29-0.97]), due to differences in scalp injuries. Neonatal injuries other than scalp injury were rare.Conclusion: Severe perineal lacerations decreased with increasing operative vaginal delivery experience, primarily among forceps-assisted vaginal delivery. Providers >5 years since residency may have lower scalp injury with vacuums, but this cohort was largely underpowered for neonatal injury.

Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of labor dystocia generally is determined by the deviation of labor progress, which is assessed by the use of a partogram. Recently, intrapartum transperineal ultrasound for the assessment of fetal head descent has been introduced to assess labor progress in the first stage of labor in a more objective and noninvasive way.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine the differences in labor progress by the use of serial transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head descent between women having vaginal and cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective longitudinal study performed in 315 women with singleton pregnancy who were undergoing labor induction at term between December 2016 and December 2017. Paired assessment of cervical dilation and fetal head station by vaginal examination and transperineal ultrasonographic assessment of parasagittal angle of progression and head-perineum distance were made serially after the commencement of labor induction. According to the hospital protocol, assessment was performed every 24 hours and 4 hours, respectively, during latent and active phases of labor. The researchers and the clinical team were blinded to each other's findings. The repeated measures data were analyzed by mixed effect models. To determine the effect of mode of delivery on the association between parasagittal angle of progression and head-perineum distance against fetal head station and cervical dilation, the significance of the interaction term between each mode of delivery and fetal head station or cervical dilation was determined, which accounted for parity and obesity. Area under receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the performance of serial intrapartum sonography in predicting women with cesarean delivery because of failure to progress.

RESULTS

The total number of paired vaginal examination and ultrasound assessments was 1198, with a median of 3 per woman. The median assessment-to-assessment interval was 4.6 hours (interquartile range, 4.3-5.1 hours). Women who achieved vaginal delivery (n=261) had steeper slopes of parasagittal angle of progression and head-perineum distance against fetal head station and cervical dilation than those who achieved cesarean delivery (n=54). Objectively, an additional decrease of 5.11 and 1.37 degrees in parasagittal angle of progression was observed for an unit increase in fetal head station and cervical dilation, respectively, in women who required cesarean delivery (P<.01; P=.01), compared with women who achieved vaginal delivery, after taking account of repeated measures from individuals and confounding factors. The respective additional increases in head-perineum distance for a unit increase in fetal head station and cervical dilation were 0.27 cm (P<.01) and 0.12 cm (P<.01). A combination of maternal characteristics with the temporal changes of parasagittal angle of progression for an unit increase in fetal head station achieved an area under receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.94), with sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 80%, for the prediction of women who required cesarean delivery because of failure to progress.

CONCLUSION

The differences in labor progress between vaginal and cesarean delivery have been illustrated objectively by serial intrapartum transperineal ultrasonographic assessment of fetal head descent. This tool is potentially predictive of women who will require cesarean delivery because of failure to progress.

Factors that affect ultrasound-determined labor progress in women undergoing induction of labor

BACKGROUND

The traditional approach to the assessment of labor progress is by digital vaginal examination; however, it is subjective and imprecise. Recent studies have investigated the role of transperineal ultrasonographic assessment of fetal head descent by measuring the angle of progression and head-perineum distance.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate factors that affected labor progress, which were defined by the transperineal ultrasonographic parameters, in women who achieved vaginal delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective longitudinal study performed in 315 women with singleton pregnancy who underwent labor induction at term between December 2016 and December 2017. Paired assessment of cervical dilation and fetal head station by vaginal examination and transperineal ultrasonographic assessment of fetal head descent (parasagittal angle of progression and head-perineum distance) were made serially after the commencement of labor induction until full cervical dilation. The researchers were blinded to the findings of the clinical team's vaginal examination and vice versa. The repeated measure data were analyzed by mixed effect models to identify the significant factors (age ≥35 years, obesity, parity, methods of labor induction, and epidural anesthesia) that affected the relationship between parasagittal angle of progression and head-perineum distance against fetal head station and cervical dilation.

RESULTS

The total number of paired vaginal examination and transperineal ultrasonographic assessments among the 261 women (82.9%) with vaginal delivery was 945, with a median of 3 per woman. The median assessment-to-assessment interval was 4.6 hours (interquartile range, 4.3-5.2). Multiparity and mechanical methods of labor induction were associated with a faster rate of fetal head descent, which was determined by head-perineum distance against fetal head station, than nulliparity and the use of a slow-release vaginal pessary, respectively. An additional increase of 0.10 cm in head-perineum distance was observed, for an unit increase in fetal head station in nulliparous women (P=.03) and women who had a slow-release vaginal pessary (P=.02), compared with multiparous women and those who had mechanical methods for labor induction. The use of epidural anesthesia was associated with a slower rate of fetal head descent, which was determined by both parasagittal angle of progression and head-perineum distance, against fetal head station. An additional decrease of 3.66 degrees in parasagittal angle of progression (P=.04) and an additional increase in 0.33 cm in head-perineum distance (P≤.001) were observed for a unit increase in fetal head station in women with the use of epidural anesthesia, compared with those without. Obese women had higher head-perineum distance overall, compared with normal weight women; at different cross-sections of time periods, obesity appeared to be associated with a slower rate of change between head-perineum distance and cervical dilation. Advanced maternal age did not affect transperineal ultrasound-determined labor progress (P>.05).

CONCLUSION

Parity, methods of labor induction, the use of epidural anesthesia, and obesity affect labor progress, which has been illustrated objectively by serial transperineal ultrasonographic assessment of fetal head descent.

Ultrasound Assessment of Foetal Head-Perineum Distance Prior to Induction of Labour as a Predictor of Successful Vaginal Delivery

Background

In modern obstetrical practice, incidence of induction of labour is on rise for varied maternal and foetal indications. Ultrasound can help obstetricians in counselling patients before induction of labour and explain the probability of successful induction.

Objectives

To study the role of foetal head-perineum distance in predicting successful vaginal delivery and to correlate with other parameters such as cervical length and Bishop score.

Design

This study is a prospective case-control study in a tertiary care teaching hospital.

Population

There were 250 term patients between 37 and 40+ weeks with singleton cephalic presentation with no contraindications for vaginal delivery.

Methods

Prior to induction of labour, transperineal ultrasound was performed to measure foetal head-perineum distance. Simultaneously, cervical length was performed using transvaginal ultrasound probe. Bishop score was determined at the same time by clinical examination.

Main Outcome Measures

Outcome of induction was considered successful when it resulted in vaginal delivery. It was considered to be a failure if patient did not get into active phase of labour or an operative intervention had to be performed because of non-progress of labour in active phase of labour. Cases were excluded if caesarean delivery had to be performed in the event of foetal distress.

Results

It was observed that as the transperineal foetal head-perineum distance decreased, the rate of vaginal delivery increased. Similarly, when foetal head-perineum distance increased, the rate of caesarean delivery increased. At a cut-off ≤ 5.5 cm, foetal head-perineum distance had a maximum predictability (sensitivity 97%, specificity 88.1%).

Conclusion

Transperineal foetal head-distance measured by ultrasound can be used as an important tool to predict vaginal delivery before induction of labour.

A simple model to predict the complicated operative vaginal deliveries using vacuum or forceps

BACKGROUND

Complicated operative vaginal deliveries are associated with high neonatal morbidity and maternal trauma, especially if the procedure is unsuccessful and a cesarean delivery is needed. The decision to perform an operative vaginal delivery has traditionally been based on a subjective assessment by digital vaginal examination combined with the clinical expertise of the obstetrician. Currently there is no method for objectively quantifying the likelihood of successful delivery. Intrapartum ultrasound has been introduced in clinical practice to help predict the progression and final method of delivery.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare predictive models for identifying complicated operative vaginal deliveries (vacuum or forceps) based on intrapartum transperineal ultrasound in nulliparous women.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a prospective cohort study in nulliparous women at term with singleton pregnancies and full dilatation who underwent intrapartum transperineal ultrasound evaluation prior to operative vaginal delivery. Managing obstetricians were blinded to the ultrasound data. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound (angle of progression, progression distance, and midline angle) was performed immediately before instrument application, both at rest and concurrently with pushing. Intrapartum evaluation of fetal biometric parameters (estimated fetal weight, head circumference, and biparietal diameter) was also carried out. An operative vaginal delivery was classified as complicated when 1 or more of the following complications occurred: ≥3 tractions needed; third- to fourth-degree perineal tear; severe bleeding during episiotomy repair (decrease of ≥2.5 g/dL in the hemoglobin level); or significant traumatic neonatal lesion (subdural-intracerebral hemorrhage, epicranial subaponeurotic hemorrhage, skeletal injuries, injuries to spine and spinal cord, or peripheral and cranial nerve injuries). Six predictive models were evaluated (information available in Table 2).

RESULTS

We recruited 84 nulliparous patients, of whom 5 were excluded because of the difficulty of adequately evaluating the biparietal diameter and head circumference. A total of 79 nulliparous patients were studied (47 vacuum deliveries, 32 forceps deliveries) with 13 cases in the occiput-posterior position. We identified 31 cases of complicated operative vaginal deliveries (19 vacuum deliveries and 12 forceps deliveries). No differences were identified in obstetric, neonatal, or intrapartum characteristics between the 2 study groups (operative uncomplicated vaginal delivery vs operative complicated vaginal delivery), with the following exceptions: estimated fetal weight (3243 ± 425 g vs 3565 ± 330 g; P = .001), biparietal diameter (93.2 ± 2.1 vs 95.2 ± 2.3 mm; P = .001), head circumference (336 ± 12 vs 348 ± 6.4 mm; P = .001), sex (female 62.5% vs 29.0%; P = .010), newborn weight (3258 ± 472 g vs 3499 ± 383 g; P = .027), and number of tractions (median, interquartile range) (1 [1-2] vs 4 [3-5]; P < .0005). To predict complicated operative deliveries, all 6 of the studied models presented an area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve between 0.863 and 0.876 (95% confidence intervals, 0.775-0.950 and 0.790-0.963; P < .0005). The results of the study met the criteria of interpretability and parsimony (simplicity), allowing us to identify a binary logistic regression model based on the angle of progression and head circumference; this model has an area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve of 0.876 (95% confidence interval, 0.790-0.963; P < .0005) and a calibration slope B of 0.984 (95% confidence interval, 0.0.726-1.243; P < .0005).

CONCLUSION

The combination of the angle of progression and the head circumference can predict 87% of complicated operative vaginal deliveries and can be performed in the delivery room.

ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound

The purpose of these Guidelines is to review the published techniques of ultrasound in labor and their practical applications, to summarize the level of evidence regarding the use of ultrasound in labor and to provide guidance to practitioners on when ultrasound in labor is clinically indicated and how the sonographic findings may affect labor management. We do not imply or suggest that ultrasound in labor is a necessary standard of care.

Assessment of fetal head engagement with transperineal ultrasound: Searching for the cutoff level

PURPOSE

Engagement of the fetal head is a determinant element when deciding on operative vaginal delivery. In routine practice, engagement is a clinical diagnosis based on transvaginal digital examination. Transperineal ultrasound might provide complementary information useful for measuring the fetal head-perineum distance (HPD). The purpose of this work was to determine the cutoff HPD distinguishing engagement from non-engagement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center prospective study approved by the institutional review board was conducted between December 25, 2012 and August 31, 2015 in 411 nulliparous women; 20 did not provide informed consent and were excluded; analysis concerned 391 patients. Clinical diagnosis - engagement or non-engagement depending on results of the transvaginal digital examination (Farabeuf's and Demelin's signs) - was compared with the ultrasound HPD measurement.

RESULTS

The clinical diagnosis was non-engagement at complete dilatation in 96 patients (24.6%). The cutoff HPD distinguishing between engagement and non-engagement was 57mm (AUC 83.5% [95%CI 79.3-87.8]), with 75.0% [65.5-82.6] sensitivity, 75.9% [70.7-80.5] specificity, 50.3% [42.2-58.4] positive predictive value, and 90.3% [86.0-93.4] negative predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, the HPD cutoff distinguishing between engagement and non-engagement was 57mm. Below this cutoff level, the head should be considered engaged, beyond non-engaged. Nevertheless, the pertinence of this cutoff level is hampered by the imprecision of the gold standard used for the clinical diagnosis (transvaginal digital examination). In case of doubt, we recommend, in addition to considering the obstetrical setting, to combine transperineal ultrasound with transvaginal digital examination to avoid deleterious failure of operative vaginal delivery.

The use of intrapartum ultrasound to diagnose malpositions and cephalic malpresentations

Fetal malpositions and cephalic malpresentations are well-recognized causes of failure to progress in labor. They frequently require operative delivery, and are associated with an increased probability of fetal and maternal complications. Traditional obstetrics emphasizes the role of digital examinations, but recent studies demonstrated that this approach is inaccurate and intrapartum ultrasound is far more precise. The objective of this review is to summarize the current body of literature and provide recommendations to identify malpositions and cephalic malpresentations with ultrasound. We propose a systematic approach consisting of a combination of transabdominal and transperineal scans and describe the findings that allow an accurate diagnosis of normal and abnormal position, flexion, and synclitism of the fetal head. The management of malpositions and cephalic malpresentation is currently a matter of debate, and individualized depending on the general clinical picture and expertise of the provider. Intrapartum sonography allows a precise diagnosis and therefore offers the best opportunity to design prospective studies with the aim of establishing evidence-based treatment. The article is accompanied by a video that demonstrates the sonographic technique and findings.