1
|
Al Riyami N, Al Salmiyah M, Khan D, Al Riyami I. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Operative Vaginal Deliveries at a Single Tertiary Center. Oman Med J 2021; 36:e263. [PMID: 34113459 PMCID: PMC8167419 DOI: 10.5001/omj.2021.61] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Our study sought to assess the maternal and neonatal outcomes of operative vaginal deliveries (OVDs) at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH). We assessed the proportion of OVDs along with the proportion of maternal and neonatal outcomes of kiwi OmniCup vacuum, metal cup vacuum, and forceps deliveries. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department at SQUH from June 2015 to March 2018. The hospital information system was utilized to obtain records of all women who delivered at SQUH by vacuum or forceps during the study period. We collected data on maternal demographics, maternal and neonatal outcomes, and total number of deliveries. Results During the study period, 3.8% of deliveries were OVDs. The most common instrument used was the Kiwi OmniCup vacuum device. No significant difference was found between the type of tears and instrument used except perineal tears (p = 0.003), which was seen more in the vacuum group, particularly Kiwi OmniCup. Neonatal birth weight (p = 0.046) was significantly higher in the metallic vacuum cup group. Thirty-one neonates (6.6%) were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit, and most were born using Kiwi OmniCup vacuum (67.7%). Conclusions OVD is an ideal alternative to cesarean section with fewer maternal and neonatal complications in women who cannot deliver spontaneously if performed by a well-trained obstetrician.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nihal Al Riyami
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman
| | - Manar Al Salmiyah
- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman
| | - Durdana Khan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sultan Qaboos University Hospitan, Muscat, Oman
| | - Intisar Al Riyami
- Pharmacy Department, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dall’Asta A, Angeli L, Masturzo B, Volpe N, Schera GBL, Di Pasquo E, Girlando F, Attini R, Menato G, Frusca T, Ghi T. Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 221:642.e1-642.e13. [PMID: 31589867 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Revised: 09/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A limited number of studies have addressed the role of intrapartum ultrasound in the prediction of the mode of delivery in women with prolonged second stage of labor. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to evaluate the role of transabdominal and transperineal sonographic findings in the prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery among nulliparous women with prolonged second stage of labor. STUDY DESIGN This was a 2-center prospective study conducted at 2 tertiary maternity units. Nulliparous women with a prolonged active second stage of labor, as defined by active pushing lasting more than 120 minutes, were eligible for inclusion. Transabdominal ultrasound to evaluate the fetal head position and transperineal ultrasound for the measurement of the midline angle, the head-perineum distance, and the head-symphysis distance were performed in between uterine contractions and maternal pushes. At transperineal ultrasound the angle of progression was measured at rest and at the peak of maternal pushing effort. The delta angle of progression was defined as the difference between the angle of progression measured during active pushing at the peak of maternal effort and the angle of progression at rest. The sonographic findings of women who had spontaneous vaginal delivery vs those who required obstetric intervention, either vacuum extraction or cesarean delivery, were evaluated and compared. RESULTS Overall, 109 were women included. Spontaneous vaginal delivery and obstetric intervention were recorded in 40 (36.7%) and 69 (63.3%) patients, respectively. Spontaneous vaginal delivery was associated with a higher rate of occiput anterior position (90% vs 53.2%, P < .0001), lower head-perineum distance and head-symphysis distance (33.2 ± 7.8 mm vs 40.1 ± 9.5 mm, P = .001, and 13.1 ± 4.6 mm vs 19.5 ± 8.4 mm, P < .001, respectively), narrower midline angle (29.6° ± 15.3° vs 54.2° ± 23.6°, P < .001) and wider angle of progression at the acme of the pushing effort (153.3° ± 19.8° vs 141.8° ± 25.7°, P = .02) and delta-angle of progression (17.3° ± 12.9° vs 12.5° ± 11.0°, P = .04). At logistic regression analysis, only the midline angle and the head-symphysis distance proved to be independent predictors of spontaneous vaginal delivery. More specifically, the area under the curve for the prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery was 0.80, 95% confidence interval (0.69-0.92), P < .001, and 0.74, 95% confidence interval (0.65-0.83), P = .002, for the midline angle and for the head-symphysis distance, respectively. CONCLUSION Transabdominal and transperineal intrapartum ultrasound parameters can predict the likelihood of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with prolonged second stage of labor.
Collapse
|
3
|
Vahanian SA, Hoffman MK, Ananth CV, Croft DJ, Duzyj C, Fuchs KM, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Kinzler WL, Plante LA, Ranzini AC, Rosen TJ, Skupski DW, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. Term cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk for preterm delivery in the subsequent pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 221:61.e1-61.e7. [PMID: 30802437 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2018] [Revised: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior studies have reported an increased risk for preterm delivery following a term cesarean delivery. However, these studies did not adjust for high-risk conditions related to the first cesarean delivery and are known to recur. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to determine whether there is an association between term cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy and subsequent spontaneous or indicated preterm delivery. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study of women with the first 2 consecutive singleton deliveries (2007-2014) identified through a linked pregnancy database at a single institution. Women with a first pregnancy that resulted in cesarean delivery at term were compared with women whose first pregnancy resulted in a vaginal delivery at term. Exclusion criteria were known to recur medical or obstetrical complications during the first pregnancy. A propensity score analysis was performed by matching women who underwent a cesarean delivery with those who underwent a vaginal delivery in the first pregnancy. The association between cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy and preterm delivery in the second pregnancy in this matched set was examined using conditional logistic regression. The primary outcome was overall preterm delivery <37 weeks in the second pregnancy. Secondary outcomes included type of preterm delivery (spontaneous vs indicated), late preterm delivery (34-36 6/7 weeks), early preterm delivery (<34 weeks), and small-for-gestational-age birth. RESULTS Of a total of 6456 linked pregnancies, 2284 deliveries were matched; 1142 were preceded by cesarean delivery and 1142 were preceded by vaginal delivery. The main indications for cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy were dystocia in 703 (61.5%), nonreassuring fetal status in 222 (19.4%), breech presentation in 100 (8.8%), and other in 84 (7.4%). The mean (SD) gestational ages at delivery for the second pregnancy was 38.8 (1.8) and 38.9 (1.7) weeks, respectively, for prior cesarean delivery and vaginal delivery. The risks of preterm delivery in the second pregnancy among women with a previous cesarean and vaginal delivery were 6.0% and 5.2%, respectively (adjusted odds ratio, 1.46, 95% confidence interval, [CI] 0.77-2.76). In an analysis stratified by the type of preterm delivery in the second pregnancy, no associations were seen between cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy and spontaneous preterm delivery (4.6% vs 3.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.40, 95% confidence interval, 0.59-3.32) or indicated preterm delivery (1.6% vs 1.4%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.21, 95% confidence interval, 0.60-2.46). Similarly, no significant differences were found in late preterm delivery (4.6% vs 4.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.13, 95% confidence interval, 0.55-2.29), early preterm delivery (1.6% vs 1.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.25, 95% confidence interval, 0.59-2.67), or neonates with birthweight less than the fifth percentile for gestational age (3.6% vs 2.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.26, 95% confidence interval, 0.52-3.06). CONCLUSION After robust adjustment for confounders through a propensity score analysis related to the indication for the first cesarean delivery at term, cesarean delivery is not associated with an increase in preterm delivery, spontaneous or indicated, in the subsequent pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sevan A Vahanian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Winthrop Hospital, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY.
| | - Matthew K Hoffman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Hospital, Delaware, DE
| | - Cande V Ananth
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers University Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, NJ; Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers Roberts Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ
| | - Damien J Croft
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christina Duzyj
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers University Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Karin M Fuchs
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Wendy L Kinzler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Winthrop Hospital, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY
| | - Lauren A Plante
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Angela C Ranzini
- Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ; MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Todd J Rosen
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers University Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Daniel W Skupski
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York-Presbyterian Queens/Weill Cornell Medicine, Flushing, NY
| | - John C Smulian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL
| | - Anthony M Vintzileos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Winthrop Hospital, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY
| |
Collapse
|