Self-administered vaginal lidocaine gel for pain management with intrauterine device insertion: a blinded, randomized controlled trial

Avaliação da dor e seus fatores associados durante a inserção do dispositivo intrauterino na Atenção Primária à Saúde

Introdução: A inserção do dispositivo intrauterino é uma competência esperada para o médico generalista. No entanto, esse método encontra muitas barreiras ao ser inserido nas unidades básica de saúde, como a falta de treinamento dos profissionais e o medo que as mulheres têm de sentir dor. Objetivo: Avaliar a intensidade da dor durante o procedimento de inserção do dispositivo intrauterino realizado por médicos generalistas em unidades básicas de saúde na região metropolitana de João Pessoa e sua associação com fatores sociodemográficos, aspectos clínicos da mulher e formação médica. Métodos: Estudo transversal e descritivo, com dados coletados em 16 unidades básicas de saúde nos municípios de Conde, Caaporã, João Pessoa e Sapé, no intervalo de março a outubro de 2019. A coleta de dados foi realizada por entrevista individual com questionário estruturado, e a dor foi graduada pela escala visual analógica. Os dados foram analisados utilizando-se os testes de Mann-Whitney e χ². Resultados: Participaram do estudo 139 mulheres com idade mínima de 14 e máxima de 47 anos, cuja média de dor foi de 5,5 para aquelas que estavam menstruadas e de 4,6 para as que não estavam. A dor leve esteve presente em 20,1%, a dor moderada em 38% e dor intensa em 31,7%. Histerometria acima de 7 cm, histórico de uso de anti-inflamatórios na menstruação e de dismenorreia estiveram mais presentes em quem referiu dor intensa (p<0,001). Quanto à qualificação do médico que insere o dispositivo intrauterino, não houve significância estatística na correlação de dor intensa com o fato de ele ser residente (p=0,268), com o tempo de formatura (p=0,080) nem com a dificuldade técnica encontrada (p=0,065). Conclusões: A dor foi considerada pela maioria das mulheres como moderada, sendo uma oferta e um procedimento viável de ser ensinado e inserido na Atenção Primária à Saúde.

Dysmenorrhoea as a risk factor for pain with intrauterine device insertion

BACKGROUND

Understanding predictors of pain with gynaecological procedures may facilitate individualised counselling and pain management. We aimed to study the effect of dysmenorrhoea on intrauterine device (IUD) insertion pain.

METHODS

This was a planned secondary analysis of a randomised trial evaluating self-administered lidocaine gel versus placebo for IUD insertion pain. We included those participants who reported menses in the past 3 months. We assessed dysmenorrhoea (in the past 3 months) and procedural pain using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS). We categorised dysmenorrhoea as none/mild (<40 mm), moderate (40-69 mm) or severe (≥70 mm). We assessed participant pain scores at speculum insertion, tenaculum placement, IUD insertion, and overall. We compared median procedural pain scores by dysmenorrhoea group with three-way and post hoc pairwise analyses.

RESULTS

We analysed 188 participants. Demographic characteristics were similar among the three dysmenorrhoea groups. Pairwise comparisons revealed higher median procedural pain scores in the severe dysmenorrhoea group compared with the none/mild dysmenorrhoea group at speculum insertion (25 mm vs 8 mm; p=0.007), tenaculum placement (51 mm vs 31 mm; p=0.04) and IUD insertion (74 mm vs 61 mm; p=0.04). Overall pain did not differ among the three groups (p=0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with severe dysmenorrhoea experienced increased pain with all aspects of IUD insertion, including speculum and tenaculum placement, compared with those with only mild or no dysmenorrhoea. Clinicians may consider this finding when providing individualised counselling and pain management for patients undergoing IUD insertion and other gynaecological procedures. Larger studies are needed to validate the effect of dysmenorrhoea severity on pain throughout IUD insertion.

Effect of early skin-to-skin contact after vaginal delivery on pain during perineal wound suturing: A randomized controlled trial

AIM

To evaluate whether early skin-to-skin contact at the end of the second stage of labor could relieve perineal wound suture pain.

METHODS

From March 2020 to November 2020, a total of 241 parturients with full-term single fetuses delivered through the vagina and who underwent episiotomy suture (n = 120) or perineal laceration repair (n = 121) in our hospital were included in the study. Parturients were categorized according to whether they received episiotomy suture or perineal laceration repair. They were randomized into an early skin contact group and a traditional neonatal care group. The primary outcome was pain, which was quantified by the Numerical Rating Scale, Visual Analog Scale, Verbal Rating Scale, Faces Pain Scale-Revised. The secondary outcomes were healing of the perineal wound, the maternal cooperation rate and operation time. The confounding factors of severe pain were analyzed.

RESULTS

Early skin-to-skin contact alleviated the pain of perineal laceration repair and episiotomy suture, shortened the operation time of episiotomy suture and improved the cooperation rate of parturients receiving suture. It had no effect on perineal wound healing, operation time, or the cooperation rate of perineal laceration repair. In addition to the operation and early skin contact, the occurrence of high-grade pain was also associated with prepregnancy body mass index, group B streptococcus (GBS) positive, and academic degree.

CONCLUSION

Early skin-to-skin contact at the end of the second stage of labor can alleviate pain and improve the delivery experience of vaginal delivery.

Comparison of Intrauterine Device Insertion-Related Pain and Ease of Procedure at Different Times During Menstruation

Objective

Fear of pain during the copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) insertion may lead patients to reject this highly effective birth control method. The aim of this study was to investigate the pain scores associated with IUD insertion and the ease of procedure at different times during menstruation.

Method

In this prospective cohort trial, eligible women received IUD at three-time segments of menstruation: Group I, at 0.5 to 0.69-time segment (n=53); Group II, at 0.7 to 0.89-time segment (n=67); and Group III, at 0.9 to 1-time segment (n=72). The time segments during menstruation were calculated for each participant by dividing the menstrual cycle day of IUD insertion to total number of menses days. The score of pain experienced at different steps of IUD insertion during and five min. after the procedure measured by Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (WBS) and the ease of insertion were compared among groups.

Results

There were significant differences in age (p=0.011) and time since the last delivery (p=0.017). After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the mean WBS score and the ease of insertion were not statistically significant among groups, respectively (p=0.664 and p=0.149). The most painful step was observed as uterine sounding (median, 4 [interquartile range {IQR}, 2]). No significant correlation was observed between WBS scores, the ease of insertion, and main characteristics of the participants.

Conclusion

The most painful step of IUD insertion was observed as uterine sounding. IUD insertion-related pain and the ease of procedure do not appear to be different at any time in the second half of menstruation.

10% lidocaine spray for pain control during intrauterine device insertion: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Various medications have been investigated for their efficacy in pain reduction during intrauterine device (IUD) insertion, but there is currently no standard recommendation. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of 10% lidocaine spray in reducing pain during copper-containing intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) insertion.

METHODS

This study was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Reproductive-age women were randomised at a 1:1 ratio into 10% lidocaine spray or placebo spray group. A 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pain during several steps of the IUD insertion procedure, and after the procedure.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-four women were included and 62 women were randomised in each group. Baseline characteristics between groups were similar. The 10% lidocaine spray group demonstrated significantly lower median VAS immediately after IUD insertion than the placebo group (2.95 (IQR=1.00-5.63) vs 5.00 (IQR=3.35-7.00), respectively; p=0.002). Similarly, women receiving 10% lidocaine spray reported significantly lower median VAS than those receiving placebo during tenaculum use and uterine sounding. The maximum median VAS occurred immediately after Cu-IUD insertion. The proportion of women who reported VAS≥4 during uterine sounding and after IUD placement was significantly lower in the 10% lidocaine group than in the placebo group (p<0.05). Median change in VAS from baseline to IUD placement was significantly different between 10% lidocaine spray group and placebo group (1.85 (IQR=0.08-4.03) vs 3.6 (IQR=2.40-5.80), respectively; p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

10% lidocaine spray was found to be an effective local anaesthetic method for reducing pain during insertion of Cu-IUD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03870711.

Self-administrated vaginal 2% lidocaine in-situ gel for pain relief during copper intrauterine device insertion in women with previous caesarean delivery only: a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the analgesic effect of self-administered vaginal 2% lidocaine in-situ gel in pain relief during copper intrauterine device (IUD) insertion in women with previous caesarean delivery only.

METHODS

A Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03166111) included reproductive-aged women who previously delivered only by caesarean section (CS) requesting Copper IUD insertion. Eligible women were recruited and randomised (1:1) to lidocaine in-situ gel vs. placebo. Each woman was supplied by a syringe filled with five ml lidocaine or placebo in-situ gel to be self-administered vaginally ten minutes before insertion. The primary outcome was the difference in pain scores during IUD placement using a 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

RESULTS

The final analysis included 216 women (n = 108 in each arm). Women in the Lidocaine in situ gel group were more likely to report statistically significant lower pain scores during vulsellum application, uterine sound placement, and during IUD placement [Mean difference (95%CI) = 2.04 (1.66-2.42), 2.62 (2.20-3.04), and 2.57 (2.12-3.01), respectively, p = 0.0001]. A significantly lower IUD insertion score indicating easier insertion was reported in the lidocaine group (p = 0.004). Similarly, the duration of IUD insertion was significantly shorter in the lidocaine group (p = 0.008). There was a higher level of satisfaction in the lidocaine group (5.92 vs. 3.34) in the placebo group (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Self-administered vaginal lidocaine in-situ gel 10 min before copper IUD insertion is effective in pain reduction in women with previous caesarean delivery only.

Verbal analgesia is as good as oral tramadol prior to intrauterine device (IUD) insertion, among nulliparous women: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare two pain management strategies: oral tramadol or a verbal analgesia technique during insertion of an intrauterine device (IUD) among nulliparous women.

STUDY DESIGN

In this randomized, controlled trial, 54 nulliparous women undergoing insertion of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (IUD), from December 2015 to December 2018 were randomized to receive oral tramadol for analgesia or verbal analgesia prior to IUD insertion. Demographic data, clinical symptoms, visual analogue scale (VAS) and complications were reviewed from patient records.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the two groups regarding gravidity, age, smoking or body mass index. No significant differences were detected between the groups regarding the procedure, including ease of insertion (p = .415), number of insertion attempts (p = .514) and complications during the insertion (p = .150). Mean pain level by VAS was 4.5 ± 1.6 (range 2-8) for the tramadol group and 4.8 ± 2.4 (0-10) for the verbal analgesia group (p = .610). There was no spontaneous ejection of the IUD in either group, and no endometritis or discomfort that resulted in IUD removal.

CONCLUSION

There was no benefit in using oral tramadol for analgesia prior to IUD insertion among nulliparous women. Verbal analgesia can be a suitable technique for this process and clinicians should become more familiar with its use.

Influence of delayed umbilical cord clamping on pain during suture of perineal tears: A randomised controlled study

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated whether the delayed umbilical cord clamping can influence the pain during suturing perineal tears.

DESIGN

This randomised controlled study applied the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement.

METHODS

The sample comprised 288 pregnant women who gave birth through vaginal delivery in our hospital from November 2019 to December 2019. They were randomly divided into 2 groups-early umbilical cord clamping (n = 147) and delayed umbilical cord clamping (n = 141)-without severe pregnancy complications. There was no intrauterine infection, neonatal asphyxia or premature birth in the 288 newborns. The pain scores of the Numerical Rating Scale, Visual Analogue Scale, Verbal Rating Scale and Faces Pain Scale-Revised were used as indicators to evaluate the mothers' pain. The Mann-Whitney U test was used, and the statistical significance was set to p < .05.

RESULT

All indicators suggest that perineal suture pain of delayed umbilical cord clamping was lower than that of the control group. For the experience group, the perception of pain for the mothers who received analgesia was less than that for those who did not. For the control group, the Verbal Rating Scale suggests a statistical difference in suturing pain between acceptable and unacceptable labour analgesia. The degree of cooperation of the experience group was higher than that of the control group, but labour analgesia did not affect cooperation degree in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Delayed umbilical cord clamping can alleviate maternal pain when suturing perineal tears and improve the delivery experience. Labour analgesia can enhance the pain relief effect. Trial registration was performed on www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR1900026797).

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

As a part of perinatal nursing, delayed umbilical cord clamping can help alleviate the pain of perineal suture and improve the experience of parturient. The method is simple and can be used as a routine nursing operation.

Predictors of severe pain during insertion of the levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system among nulligravid women

OBJECTIVE

To identify sociodemographic and clinical variables associated with severe pain with levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system (IUS) placement among nulligravid women.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a secondary analysis of a randomized trial that evaluated intracervical anesthesia before IUS insertion. We assessed factors associated with severe pain (visual analog scale pain score ≥7) immediately after insertion using bivariate and multiple regression analyses.

RESULTS

Overall, 137/300 (45.7%) subjects reported severe pain. In multiple regression analysis, only intracervical anesthesia [RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37-0.80] and a history of dysmenorrhea [RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.08-1.72)] were associated with severe pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Among nulligravid women, a history of dysmenorrhea increases, and intracervical block decreases severe pain during levonorgestrel IUS insertion.

IMPLICATIONS

Dysmenorrhea increases the risk of severe pain at levonorgestrel intrauterine system insertion, while receiving an intracervical lidocaine block decreases this risk. This information can be useful for counseling women prior to device placement and for selecting candidates who may particularly benefit from interventions to reduce pain.

Interventions for the prevention of pain associated with the placement of intrauterine contraceptives: An updated review

A 2013 review found no evidence to support the routine use of pain relief for intrauterine contraceptive (IUC) placement; however, fear of pain with placement continues to be a barrier to use for some women. This narrative review set out to identify (1) new evidence that may support routine use of pain management strategies for IUC placement; (2) procedure‐related approaches that may have a positive impact on the pain experience; and (3) factors that may help healthcare professionals identify women at increased risk of pain with IUC placement. A literature search of the PubMed and Cochrane library databases revealed 550 citations, from which we identified 43 new and pertinent studies for review. Thirteen randomized clinical trials, published since 2012, described reductions in placement‐related pain with administration of oral and local analgesia (oral ketorolac, local analgesia with different lidocaine formulations) and cervical priming when compared with placebo or controls. Four studies suggested that ultrasound guidance, balloon dilation, and a modified placement device may help to minimize the pain experienced with IUC placement. Eight publications suggested that previous cesarean delivery, timing of insertion relative to menstruation, dysmenorrhea, expected pain, baseline anxiety, and size of insertion tube may affect the pain experienced with IUC placement. Oral and local analgesia and cervical priming can be effective in minimizing IUC placement‐related pain when compared with placebo, but routine use remains subject for debate. Predictive factors may help healthcare professionals to identify women at risk of experiencing pain. Targeted use of effective strategies in these women may be a useful approach while research continues in this area.