Absent nasal bone

Prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with absent/hypoplastic nasal bone in second-trimester using chromosomal microarray analysis

BACKGROUND

Pathogenic copy number variants (pCNVs) are associated with fetal ultrasound anomalies, which can be efficiently identified through chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). The primary objective of the present study was to enhance understanding of the genotype-phenotype correlation in fetuses exhibiting absent or hypoplastic nasal bones using CMA.

METHODS

Enrolled in the present study were 94 cases of fetuses with absent/hypoplastic nasal bone, which were divided into an isolated absent/hypoplastic nasal bone group (n = 49) and a non-isolated group (n = 45). All pregnant women enrolled in the study underwent karyotype analysis and CMA to assess chromosomal abnormalities in the fetuses.

RESULTS

Karyotype analysis and CMA detection were successfully performed in all cases. The results of karyotype and CMA indicate the presence of 11 cases of chromosome aneuploidy, with trisomy 21 being the most prevalent among them. A small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) detected by karyotype analysis was further interpreted as a pCNV by CMA. Additionally, CMA detection elicited three cases of pCNVs, despite normal findings in their karyotype analysis results. Among them, one case of Roche translocation was identified to be a UPD in chromosome 15 with a low proportion of trisomy 15. Further, a significant difference in the detection rate of pCNVs was observed between non-isolated and isolated absent/hypoplastic nasal bone (24.44% vs. 8.16%, p < .05).

CONCLUSION

The present study enhances the utility of CMA in diagnosing the etiology of absent or hypoplastic nasal bone in fetuses. Further, isolated cases of absent or hypoplastic nasal bone strongly suggest the presence of chromosomal abnormalities, necessitating genetic evaluation through CMA.

Absent or hypoplastic nasal bone: What to tell the prospective parents?

BACKGROUND

Absent or hypoplastic nasal bone (AHNB) on first or second-trimester ultrasonography (USG) is an important soft marker of Down syndrome. However, due to its varied incidence in euploid and aneuploid fetuses, there is always a dilemma of whether to go for invasive fetal testing for isolated AHNB. This study aims to assess outcomes specifically within the context of Indian ethnicity women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective observational study. All patients who reported with AHNB in the first- or second-trimester USG were included. Genetic counseling was done, and noninvasive and invasive testing was offered. Chromosomal anomalies were meticulously recorded, and pregnancy was monitored.

RESULTS

The incidence of AHNB in our study was 1.16% (47/4051). Out of 47 women with AHNB, the isolated condition was seen in 32 (0.78%) cases, while AHNB with structural anomalies was seen in nine cases (0.22%). Thirty-nine women opted for invasive testing. Six out of 47 had aneuploidy (12.7%), while two euploid cases (4.25%) developed nonimmune hydrops. The prevalence of Down syndrome in fetuses with AHNB was 8.5% (4/47) and 0.42% (17/4004) in fetuses with nasal bone present. This difference was statistically significant (p = .001).

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that isolated AHNB cases should be followed by a comprehensive anomaly scan rather than immediately recommending invasive testing. However, invasive testing is required when AHNB is associated with other soft markers or abnormalities. As chromosomal microarray is more sensitive than standard karyotype in detecting chromosomal aberrations, it should be chosen over karyotype.

Evaluation of chromosomal abnormalities and copy number variations in fetuses with ultrasonic soft markers

Background

Some ultrasonic soft markers can be found during ultrasound examination. However, the etiology of the fetuses with ultrasonic soft markers is still unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the genetic etiology and clinical value of chromosomal abnormalities and copy number variations (CNVs) in fetuses with ultrasonic soft markers.

Methods

Among 1131 fetuses, 729 had single ultrasonic soft marker, 322 had two ultrasonic soft markers, and 80 had three or more ultrasonic soft markers. All fetuses underwent conventional karyotyping, followed by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array analysis.

Results

Among 1131 fetuses with ultrasonic soft markers, 46 had chromosomal abnormalities. In addition to the 46 fetuses with chromosomal abnormalities consistent with the results of the karyotyping analysis, the SNP array identified additional 6.1% (69/1131) abnormal CNVs. The rate of abnormal CNVs in fetuses with ultrasonic soft marker, two ultrasonic soft markers, three or more ultrasonic soft markers were 6.2%, 6.2%, and 5.0%, respectively. No significant difference was found in the rate of abnormal CNVs among the groups.

Conclusions

Genetic abnormalities affect obstetrical outcomes. The SNP array can fully complement conventional karyotyping in fetuses with ultrasonic soft markers, improve detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities, and affect pregnancy outcomes.

First-trimester absent nasal bone: is it a predictive factor for pathogenic CNVs in the low-risk population?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of first-trimester absent nasal bone (NB) and genetic abnormalities at G-banding karyotype and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) according to the nuchal translucency (NT) thickness.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of fetuses that underwent the first-trimester scan for the combined test at 11⁺⁰ to 13⁺⁶ weeks' gestation. Invasive test with G-banding karyotype and/or CMA was performed based on the result of the combined test or if fetal defects were detected or for patient's choice, after genetic counseling. All cases with absent NB in the first and second trimester underwent a detailed anomaly scan with echocardiography in the second trimester, had a longitudinal ultrasound, and postnatal follow-up up to at least 1 year.

RESULTS

Between 2013 and 2018, 7228 women underwent the first-trimester scan at 11⁺⁰ to 13⁺⁶ weeks. Overall prevalence of absent NB was 1.3% (96/7228). Of those, in 86 pregnancies (1.2%), the absence of NB was confirmed also in the second trimester: 0.58% (40/6909) in the group with NT <95th centile; 6%(14/233) in the group with NT between 95 and 99th centile; and 37.2% (32/86) in the group with NT >99th centile, respectively. CMA pathogenic variants were found only in the group with NT >99th centile with a diagnostic yield of 9.4%. Fetuses with absent NB and NT between 95 and 99th centile had in 57% (8/14) a major chromosomal anomaly, while in the NT <95 centile group, there were 5% (2/40) of chromosomal abnormalities (one inherited from the father).

CONCLUSION

In the first trimester, the risk for genetic syndromes detectable by CMA is related mainly to the NT thickness rather than to the absence of NB per se. In fetuses with absent NB and NT >99th centile, CMA should be performed after karyotype analysis, while for NT between 95 and 99th centile, a karyotype should be proposed as first-line procedure. Data provided by our study may be helpful in counseling women/couples when an absent NB is identified in the first trimester.