Neonatal mortality in the United States is related to location of birth (hospital versus home) rather than the type of birth attendant

Why do women choose home births

In recent years, the US has seen a significant rise in the rate of planned home births, with a 60 % increase from 2016 to 2023, reaching a total of 46,918. This trend positions the US as the leading developed country in terms of home birth prevalence. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) suggests stringent criteria for selecting candidates for home births, but these guidelines have not been adopted by home birth midwives leading to poor outcomes including increased rates of neonatal morbidity and mortality. This paper explores the motivations behind choosing home births in the US despite the known risks. Studies highlight factors such as the desire for a more natural birth experience, previous negative hospital experiences, and the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on perceptions of hospital safety. We provide new insights into why women choose home births by incorporating insights from Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman's theories on decision-making, suggesting that cognitive biases may significantly influence these decisions. Kahneman's work provides a framework for understanding how biases and heuristics can lead to the underestimation of risks and overemphasis on personal birth experiences. We also provide recommendations ("nudges according to Richard Thaler") to help ensure women have access to clear, balanced information about home births. The development of this publication was assisted by OpenAI's ChatGPT-4, which facilitated the synthesis of literature, interpretation of data, and manuscript drafting. This collaboration underscores the potential of integrating advanced computational tools in academic research, enhancing the efficiency and depth of our analyses.

Use of a SimBox, a Video-Augmented, Newborn Resuscitation Simulation for Prehospital Providers to Measure Clinical Performance and Educational Experience

OBJECTIVES

Few studies have described the current clinical practices, adherence to guidelines, and outcomes of newborn resuscitations attended by emergency medical services (EMS). SimBox, a novel, video-augmented simulation, was used to describe the adherence of prehospital providers to Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines, to measure satisfaction with the simulation intervention, and to describe the self-reported improvement in knowledge, skills, and attitudes after the simulation.

METHODS

A prospective observational cohort study of EMS providers was designed and conducted using SimBox, an open-access simulation platform, and facilitated by EMS educators. Clinical performance measures were collected using a five-item checklist. Simulation satisfaction measures were collected through net promoter scores. Learners' demographics, and self-reported knowledge, skills, and attitudes were measured using a retrospective survey of 25 questions.

RESULTS

In total, 33 facilitator and 55 learner surveys were collected across Connecticut, Colorado, and Alaska between July 2021 and September 2022. At least one deviation from clinical guidelines occurred in 22/30 (73.3%) of the sessions, with 10/30 (33.3%) teams inappropriately performing chest compressions, 5/31 (16.1%) teams not warming, drying, stimulating, and suctioning the newborn, and 7/31 (22.6%) teams not performing positive pressure ventilation correctly. Lastly, 10/30 (33.3%) teams administered an incorrect dose of dextrose-containing fluids. Very high levels of satisfaction were reported with net promoter scores of 97 and 82 out of 100 for the facilitator and learner surveys, respectively. Finally, all 55/55 (100%) of the learners strongly or somewhat agreed that the simulation improved their knowledge, teamwork, communication, and psychomotor skills.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of prehospital providers, clinical management decisions during a newborn resuscitation simulation often deviated from the gold-standard, newborn resuscitation guidelines. Free, online, open-access simulation resources like SimBox can be used to identify and measure practice deviations from standardized resuscitation protocols in the prehospital setting.

Risk of orofacial clefts in relation to maternal body mass index, diabetes and hypertension

BACKGROUND

To investigate if maternal body mass index, diabetes and hypertension are associated with orofacial clefts.

METHODS

Case-control study. Information from 53,188 live births with and without orofacial cleft registered at USA Vital Statistics Natality Birth Data between 2017 and 2021. Case group consisted of all affected live births diagnosed with orofacial clefts (13,297 cases). Comparison group consisted of 39,891 live births without clefts or any other congenital malformation. Information about orofacial cleft cases were compared with the comparison group. The unadjusted and adjusted Odds Ratios were estimated to evaluate the strength of association between mother's pre-pregnancy body mass index, maternal diabetes and hypertension and orofacial cleft occurrence, assuming a p value < 0.05 and 95% confidence intervals (95% C.I.) for statistically significant differences.

RESULTS

Mother's pre-pregnancy body mass index, maternal diabetes and maternal hypertension are conditions associated with an increased risk of orofacial cleft development in the child (OR = 1.08, p = 0.004, 95% C.I. = 1.024-1.149; OR = 1.32, 95%, p = 0.000, 95% C.I. = 1.202-1.444; and OR = 1.35, p = 0.000, 95% C.I. = 1.239-1.484; respectively). Maternal ethnicity, sex of infant, and cigarette smoking pregnancy remained as covariates after adjustments in all logistic regression models.

CONCLUSION

Due to the increased prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and hypertension, and also to their association with congenital malformations, such as clefts, it is recommended that mothers planning to become pregnant to follow healthy habits, maintain healthy weight, and be screened for possible diabetes or hypertension prior to conception and early in pregnancy.

Association between receiving information on obstetric complications and institutional delivery: An analysis of the demographic and health survey of Peru, 2019

Objective

To evaluate the association between receiving information on obstetric complications and institutional delivery in Peruvian women in 2019.

Methods

We conducted a secondary analysis of the 2019 Peruvian Demographic and Family Health Survey (ENDES) database. The dependent variable was the type of delivery (institutional or non-institutional). The exposure variable was self-reporting of having received information on obstetric complications during prenatal care. The association of interest was evaluated using binary logistic regression models, obtaining crude odds ratios (cOR) and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with their respective 95 % confidence intervals (95%CI). Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

We included a total of 14,835 women in the analysis. Of the total, 14,088 (94.1 %) reported having received information on pregnancy complications. Also, 13,883 (92.5 %) had an institutional delivery in their last pregnancy. The adjusted model showed that women who reported knowing the complications that can occur in pregnancy had a higher probability of presenting an institutional delivery (aOR = 1.47; 95%CI: 1.04-2.08).

Conclusions

Receiving information about pregnancy complications was found to be associated with a higher probability of institutional delivery. Ensuring the provision of information to the pregnant woman about pregnancy complications can be a useful strategy to increase institutional delivery.

Freebirth, the only option for women who do not fit into common practice- A Swedish national interview study

OBJECTIVE

To explore women's experience of freebirth, as giving birth without the presence of a skilled healthcare professional such as a midwife.

METHODS

Online semi-structured interviews with nine multiparous women in Sweden. A qualitative experiential approach, as described by Burnard, was followed for data analysis.

RESULTS

The five main categories explored were: (i) previous negative experiences of hospital care as a reason for freebirth; (ii) receiving support for the decision of freebirth was crucial; (iii) longing for individual midwifery-assisted home-birthing support; (iv) to give birth in peace and in self-control, in the safe home environment; and (v) helpful support during labor and birth was appreciated.

CONCLUSIONS

The women in the study had a powerful and positive experience of freebirth, but individual midwifery birthing support was also requested. Easily available and respectful midwifery support should be offered to all childbearing women.

Determinants of Neonatal Mortality in the United States

Introduction Despite a notable reduction in infant mortality over recent decades, the United States, with a rate of 5.8 deaths per 1,000 live births, still ranks unfavorably compared to other developed countries. This improvement appears inadequate when contrasted with the country's healthcare spending, the highest among developed nations. A significant proportion of this infant mortality rate can be attributed to neonatal fatalities. Objective The present study aimed to determine the risk factors associated with neonatal deaths in the United States. Method Using the United States Vital Statistics records, we conducted a retrospective study on childbirths between 2015 and 2019 to identify risk factors for neonatal mortality. Our final multivariate analysis included maternal parameters like age, insurance type, education level, cesarean section rate, pregnancy inductions and augmentations, weight gain during pregnancy, birth weight, number of prenatal visits, pre-existing conditions like chronic hypertension and prediabetes, and pregnancy complications like gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). These variables were incorporated to enhance our model's sensitivity and specificity. Result There were 51,174 neonatal mortalities. Mothers with augmentation of labor had a 25% reduction in neonatal mortalities (NM) (OR=0.75; 95% CI 0.72-0.79), while labor induction was associated with a 31% reduction in NM (OR=0.69; 95% CI 0.66-0.72). Women above 40 years had a 29% increase in NM rate (OR=1.29;95% CI 1.15-1.44). Women without prenatal care have a 22% increase in the risk of NM (OR=1.22; 95% CI 1.14-1.30). The present model has a 60.7% sensitivity and a 99.9% specificity. Conclusion In the present study, significant interventions such as labor induction, augmentation, and prenatal care were associated with improved neonatal outcomes. These findings could serve as an algorithm for improving neonatal outcomes in the United States.

Alternate Birth Strategies

Community birth is defined as birth that occurs outside the hospital setting. Birthing in a birth center can be safe for certain patient populations. Home birth can also be safe in well-selected patient with a well-established transfer infrastructure should an emergency occur. Unfortunately, many areas of the United States and the world do not have this infrastructure, limiting access to safe community birth. Immersion during labor has been associated with decreased need for epidural and pain medication. Delivery should not occur in water due to concerns for infection and cord avulsion. Umbilical cord non-severance (also called lotus birth) and placentophagy should be counseled against due to well-documented risks without clear benefit. Birth plans and options should be regularly discussed during pregnancy visits.

Challenges and lessons learned birthing during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review

Background and Aims

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the healthcare system facilitated a change in policies to redress the consequences of increased demand and fear of disease transmission. Restrictive measures throughout the healthcare system limiting access to accompanying partners of birthing people in addition to fears of contracting COVID-19, an increasing number of birthing people chose to have an out-of-hospital birth. Out-of-hospital births are not prevalent in the United States. However, in recent years the percentage of out-of-hospital births has been steadily increasing. COVID-19 was a novel virus imposing a unique birthing situation for millions of women, complicated by lack of integration and varied policies in the U.S.

Methods

To better understand the challenges of birthing people during the pandemic a scoping review was conducted to explore the literature during the first wave of the pandemic related to out-of-hospital births. The approach for this review made use of the methodology manual published by the Joanna Briggs Institute for scoping reviews. All manner of publications (i.e. peer-reviewed published articles, grey articles, conference proceedings, webinars, editorials, and textbook chapters) were included in the review.

Results

Articles retrieved from the database search yielded sixty-three articles, after duplicate removal forty-six records were available for screening. Articles were further excluded using the PRISMA process, yielding thirty-one remaining records. From the thirty-one records twelve themes emerged, which were collapsed into four meta-themes.

Conclusion

These meta-themes focused on (a) advocacy, (b) homebirth infrastructure, (c) support networks, and (d) uncertainty during the pandemic. COVID-19 has accelerated this movement to birthing at home and thought must be given to how the healthcare system is going to support and integrate this mode of birthing.

The exciting potential for ChatGPT in obstetrics and gynecology

Natural language processing-the branch of artificial intelligence concerned with the interaction between computers and human language-has advanced markedly in recent years with the introduction of sophisticated deep-learning models. Improved performance in natural language processing tasks, such as text and speech processing, have fueled impressive demonstrations of these models' capabilities. Perhaps no demonstration has been more impactful to date than the introduction of the publicly available online chatbot ChatGPT in November 2022 by OpenAI, which is based on a natural language processing model known as a Generative Pretrained Transformer. Through a series of questions posed by the authors about obstetrics and gynecology to ChatGPT as prompts, we evaluated the model's ability to handle clinical-related queries. Its answers demonstrated that in its current form, ChatGPT can be valuable for users who want preliminary information about virtually any topic in the field. Because its educational role is still being defined, we must recognize its limitations. Although answers were generally eloquent, informed, and lacked a significant degree of mistakes or misinformation, we also observed evidence of its weaknesses. A significant drawback is that the data on which the model has been trained are apparently not readily updated. The specific model that was assessed here, seems to not reliably (if at all) source data from after 2021. Users of ChatGPT who expect data to be more up to date need to be aware of this drawback. An inability to cite sources or to truly understand what the user is asking suggests that it has the capability to mislead. Responsible use of models like ChatGPT will be important for ensuring that they work to help but not harm users seeking information on obstetrics and gynecology.

The impact of birth settings on pregnancy outcomes in the United States

In the United States, 98.3% of patients give birth in hospitals, 1.1% give birth at home, and 0.5% give birth in freestanding birth centers. This review investigated the impact of birth settings on birth outcomes in the United States. Presently, there are insufficient data to evaluate levels of maternal mortality and severe morbidity according to place of birth. Out-of-hospital births are associated with fewer interventions such as episiotomies, epidural anesthesia, operative deliveries, and cesarean deliveries. When compared with hospital births, there are increased rates of avoidable adverse perinatal outcomes in out-of-hospital births in the United States, both for those with and without risk factors. In one recent study, the neonatal mortality rates were significantly elevated for all planned home births: 13.66 per 10,000 live births (242/177,156; odds ratio, 4.19; 95% confidence interval, 3.62-4.84; P<.0001) vs 3.27 per 10,000 live births for in-hospital Certified Nurse-Midwife-attended births (745/2,280,044; odds ratio, 1). These differences increased further when patients were stratified by recognized risk factors such as breech presentation, multiple gestations, nulliparity, advanced maternal age, and postterm pregnancy. Causes of the increased perinatal morbidity and mortality include deliveries of patients with increased risks, absence of standardized criteria to exclude high-risk deliveries, and that most midwives attending out-of-hospital births in the United States do not meet the gold standard for midwifery regulation, the International Confederation of Midwives' Global Standards for Midwifery Education. As part of the informed consent process, pregnant patients interested in out-of-hospital births should be informed of its increased perinatal risks. Hospital births should be supported for all patients, especially those with increased risks.

Perinatal outcomes for rural obstetric patients and neonates in rural-located and metropolitan-located hospitals

OBJECTIVE

To compare rural obstetric patient and neonate characteristics and outcomes by birth location.

METHODS

Retrospective observational cohort study of rural residents' hospital births from California, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina. Hospitals in rural counties were rural-located, those in metropolitan counties with ≥10% of obstetric patients from rural communities were rural-serving, metropolitan-located, others were non-rural-serving, metropolitan-located. Any adverse obstetric patient or neonatal outcomes were assessed with logistic regression accounting for patient characteristics, state, year, and hospital.

RESULTS

Of 466,896 rural patient births, 64.3% occurred in rural-located, 22.5% in rural-serving, metropolitan-located, and 13.1% in non-rural-serving, metropolitan-located hospitals. The odds of any adverse outcome increased in rural-serving (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.10-1.46) and non-rural-serving (aOR 1.35, 95% CI 1.18-1.55) metropolitan-located hospitals.

CONCLUSION

One-third of rural obstetric patients received care in metropolitan-located hospitals. These patients have higher comorbidity rates and higher odds of adverse outcomes likely reflecting referral for higher baseline illness severity.

Trend and causes of maternal death, stillbirth and neonatal death over seven decades in Hong Kong

BACKGROUND

Reducing maternal and perinatal mortality is a global objective. Hong Kong is a city with low maternal and perinatal mortality but little is known about the trend and causes of these deaths in this high-income city. We analyzed the maternal death, stillbirth and neonatal death since 1946 in Hong Kong.

METHODS

Data were extracted from vital statistics, based on the number of registered deaths and births, provided by the Department of Health, the Government of the HKSAR. The annual change rate of mortality was evaluated by regression analysis. Contextual factors were collected to assess the association with mortality.

FINDINGS

Between 1946 and 2017, the stillbirth rate (per 1,000 total births) reduced from 21·5 to 2·4; early and late neonatal deaths (per 1,000 live births) reduced from 14·1 and 18·1 to 0·7 and 0·4 in 2017, respectively. The maternal mortality ratio (per 100,000 live births) declined from 125 to 1·8.The causes of maternal and perinatal deaths were available since 1981 and 1980 respectively. The leading causes of death were thromboembolism (37·0%) and obstetric haemorrhage (30·4%) for maternal death; congenital problem (30·1%) and prematurity (29·0%) for neonatal death. No data on causes of stillbirth were available. No specific shift of pattern was observed in the causes of maternal and neonatal death with time. There were no cases of maternal death due to sepsis and only 2 cases (2·2%) of maternal deaths due to indirect cause.

INTERPRETATION

The maternal and perinatal death have reduced significantly in Hong Kong and maintained at the lowest level globally. Indirect maternal death and sepsis were unusual causes of maternal deaths. Use of ICD-PM stillbirth classification, setting up a maternal death confidential enquiry and adding pregnancy checkbox could be the next step to identify and categorize hidden burden.

FUNDING

Nil.

Neonatal outcomes of births in freestanding birth centers and hospitals in the United States, 2016-2019

BACKGROUND

Births in freestanding birth centers have more than doubled between 2007 and 2019. Although birthing centers, which are defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists as ". . . freestanding facilities that are not hospitals," are being promoted as offering women fewer interventions than hospitals, there are limited recent data available on neonatal outcomes in these settings.

OBJECTIVE

To compare several important measures of neonatal safety between 2 United States birth settings and birth attendants: deliveries in freestanding birth centers and hospital deliveries by midwives and physicians.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study using the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, and Division of Vital Statistics natality online database for the years 2016 to 2019. All term, singleton, low-risk births were eligible for inclusion. The study outcomes were several neonatal outcomes including neonatal death, neonatal seizures, 5-minute Apgar scores of <4 and <7, and neonatal death in nulliparous and in multiparous women. Outcomes were compared between the following 3 groups: births in freestanding birth centers, in-hospital births by a physician, and in-hospital births by a midwife. The prevalence of each neonatal outcome among the different groups was compared using Pearson chi-squared test, with the in-hospital midwife births being the reference group. Multivariate logistic regression models were performed to account for several potential confounding factors such as maternal prepregnancy body mass index, maternal weight gain, parity, gestational weeks, and neonatal birthweight and calculated as adjusted odds ratio.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 9,894,978 births; 8,689,467 births (87.82%) were in-hospital births by MDs and DOs, 1,131,398 (11.43%) were in-hospital births by midwives, and 74,113 (0.75%) were births in freestanding birth centers. Freestanding birth center deliveries were less likely to be to non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic, less likely to women with public insurance, less likely to be women with their first pregnancy, and more likely to be women with advanced education and to have pregnancies at ≥40 weeks' gestation. Births in freestanding birth center had a 4-fold increase in neonatal deaths (3.64 vs 0.95 per 10,000 births: adjusted odds ratio, 4.00; 95% confidence interval, 2.62-6.1), a more than 7-fold increase in neonatal deaths for nulliparous patients (6.8 vs 0.92 per 10,000 births: adjusted odds ratio, 7.7; 95% confidence interval, 4.42-13.76), a more than 2-fold increase in neonatal seizures (3.91 vs 1.94 per 10,000 births: adjusted odds ratio, 2.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-3.22), and a more than 7-fold increase of a 5-minute Apgar score of <4 (194.84 vs 28.5 per 10,000 births: adjusted odds ratio, 7.46; 95% confidence interval, 7-7.95). Compared with hospital midwife deliveries, hospital physician deliveries had significantly higher adverse neonatal outcomes (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Births in United States freestanding birth centers are associated with an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes such as neonatal deaths, seizures, and low 5-minute Apgar scores. Therefore, when counseling women about the location of birth, it should be conveyed that births in freestanding birth centers are not among the safest birth settings for neonates compared with hospital births attended by either midwives or physicians.

Utilization and Comparative Effectiveness of Uterine Artery Embolization vs. Hysterectomy for Severe Postpartum Hemorrhage: A National Inpatient Sample Study

PURPOSE

To assess if uterine artery embolization conferred a lower risk of mortality or prolonged hospital stay compared to hysterectomy in severe post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) and to analyze if geographical or clinical determinants affected which therapy was received.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This National Inpatient Sample study from 2005-2017 included all patients with live-birth deliveries. Severe PPH was defined as those requiring transfusion, hysterectomy, or uterine artery embolization (UAE). Propensity score weighting adjusted demographic, maternal, and delivery risk factors were used to assess mortality and prolonged hospital stay.

RESULTS

Of 9.8 million identified live births, PPH occurred in 31.0 per 1,000. The most common intervention for PPH was transfusion (116.4 per 1,000 cases of PPH). Hysterectomy was used more frequently than UAE (20.4 vs 12.9 per 1,000). The following factors predicted hysterectomy would be used more commonly than UAE: previous cesarean delivery, breech fetal position, placenta previa, transient hypertension of pregnancy without pre-eclampsia, pre-existing hypertension without pre-eclampsia, pre-existing hypertension with pre-eclampsia, unspecified maternal hypertension, and gestational diabetes (all p<0.001). Delivery risk factors associated with greater utilization of hysterectomy over UAE included post-dates pregnancy, premature rupture of membranes, cervical laceration, forceps vaginal delivery, and shock (all p<0.001). There was no difference in mortality between hysterectomy and UAE. After balancing demographic, maternal, and delivery risk factors, the odds of prolonged hospital stay were 0.38 times lower with UAE than hysterectomy (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Despite similar mortality and shorter hospital stays, UAE is used far less than hysterectomy in the management of severe PPH.

Let complete numbers speak for themselves

The authors describe the challenges they encountered, having attempted to retrospectively complete a home birth outcome data set for New York State. In addition, they provide a compelling argument for a midwifery data collective that would bring together health record data for all midwife-attended births nationwide, regardless of setting.

Hospital Geographic Location and Unexpected Complications in term Newborns in Florida

INTRODUCTION

Birth trauma rates in term of neonates is a quality measure used by the Joint Commission. In the United States birth trauma rates occurs at a rate of 37 per 1000 live births and are on the decline. However, this decline has been significantly lower among term neonates born in rural facilities. There is a critical lack of evidence toward the influence geographical risk factors has on birth trauma rates for neonatal patients. We sought to measure rural community and hospital characteristics associated with birth trauma.

METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal study design was used to examine inpatient medical discharge data across 103 hospitals of neonates at birth from 2013 to 2018. Discharge data was linked to the American Hospital Association annual survey. We used a multi-level mixed effect model to investigate the relationship between individual and hospital-level attributes associated with increased risk of birth trauma among neonatal patients.

RESULTS

We found that rural hospitals were 3.99 times (p < 0.001) more likely to experience higher birth trauma than urban hospitals. Medium sized hospitals were 2.11 times (p < 0.001) more likely to experience higher birth trauma. Hospitals who indicate having a safety culture were more likely (p < 0.05) to have high rates of birth trauma.

DISCUSSION

Neonates born at rural hospitals, were more likely to experience a birth-related injury. Policy strategies focusing on improving health care quality in rural areas are critical to mitigating this increased risk of birth trauma. Further research is required to assess how physician characteristics may impact birth trauma rates.

Professionally responsible advocacy for women and children first during the COVID-19 pandemic: guidance from World Association of Perinatal Medicine and International Academy of Perinatal Medicine

The goal of perinatal medicine is to provide professionally responsible clinical management of the conditions and diagnoses of pregnant, fetal, and neonatal patients. The New York Declaration of the International Academy of Perinatal Medicine, "Women and children First - or Last?" was directed toward the ethical challenges of perinatal medicine in middle-income and low-income countries. The global COVID-19 pandemic presents common ethical challenges in all countries, independent of their national wealth. In this paper the World Association of Perinatal Medicine provides ethics-based guidance for professionally responsible advocacy for women and children first during the COVID-19 pandemic. We first present an ethical framework that explains ethical reasoning, clinically relevant ethical principles and professional virtues, and decision making with pregnant patients and parents. We then apply this ethical framework to evidence-based treatment and its improvement, planned home birth, ring-fencing obstetric services, attendance of spouse or partner at birth, and the responsible management of organizational resources. Perinatal physicians should focus on the mission of perinatal medicine to put women and children first and frame-shifting when necessary to put the lives and health of the population of patients served by a hospital first.

Home Birth in the Era of COVID-19: Counseling and Preparation for Pregnant Persons Living with HIV

With the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the United States, a majority of states have instituted "shelter-in-place" policies effectively quarantining individuals-including pregnant persons-in their homes. Given the concern for COVID-19 acquisition in health care settings, pregnant persons with high-risk pregnancies-such as persons living with HIV (PLHIV)-are increasingly investigating the option of a home birth. Although we strongly recommend hospital birth for PLHIV, we discuss our experience and recommendations for counseling and preparation of pregnant PLHIV who may be considering home birth or at risk for unintentional home birth due to the pandemic. We also discuss issues associated with implementing a risk mitigation strategy involving high-risk births occurring at home during a pandemic. KEY POINTS: · Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has increased interest in home birth.. · Women living with HIV are pursuing home birth.. · Safe planning is paramount for women living with HIV desiring home birth, despite recommending against the practice..