Identification of factors associated with delayed treatment of obstetric hypertensive emergencies

Moving the needle: Quality improvement strategies to achieve guideline-concordant care of obstetric patients with severe hypertension

OBJECTIVES

To improve timely treatment and follow-up of birthing individuals with severe hypertension.

STUDY DESIGN

A quality improvement (QI) initiative was implemented at an academic tertiary care center in the United States of America for individuals with obstetric hypertensive emergencies. Statistical process control charts were utilized to track process measures and interventions tested through plan-do-study-act cycles. Measures were disaggregated by race and ethnicity to identify and improve disparities.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Treatment of hypertensive events within 60 min, receipt of blood pressure (BP) device at discharge and completed postpartum follow-up BP check within 7 days of discharge.

RESULTS

All process measures showed statistically significant improvements. The primary process measure, timely treatment of hypertensive emergencies, improved from 29 % to 76 %. Receipt of BP device improved from 37 % to 91 % and follow-up BP checks from 58 % to 81 %. No racial or ethnic disparities were noted at baseline or after interventions. Readmission rates within 6 weeks of delivery increased from 2.3 % to 6.1 % for the cohort with no severe morbidity or mortality events after discharge. Strategies associated with improvement included project launch with establishment of the "why," telehealth, simulation, a video display of quality metrics on the birthing unit, promoting BP cuff access, and automated orders.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive QI initiative provides novel improvement strategies for the management of individuals with severe hypertensive disorders of pregnancy for the timely treatment of severe BP, attainment of home BP devices, and follow-up after discharge. Quality improvement methodology is practical and essential for achieving guideline-concordant care.

Identifying Targets to Improve the Management of Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy and Postpartum

OBJECTIVES

To 1) define quality indicators for severe hypertension (sustained systolic blood pressure [BP] ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥110 mm Hg) management, 2) describe care gaps, and 3) identify process issues in severe hypertension management at our tertiary care centre.

METHODS

Pregnant and postpartum individuals diagnosed with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy from 2018 to 2019 were identified. A retrospective cohort of patients with severe hypertension was constructed, and data were collected through chart review. Severe hypertension management was assessed according to defined quality indicators. Clinical characteristics were compared between participants with and without time-to-target BP within 60 minutes. Process issues were examined for each severe hypertension occurrence.

RESULTS

Of 608 participants with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, 90 (15%) experienced severe hypertension. Median time-to-target BP was 76 minutes (interquartile range 47-123 minutes), and target BP (<155/105 mm Hg) was achieved within 60 minutes in 31/90 (34%) participants. Appropriate antihypertensives for severe hypertension were used in 55/90 (61%), and time-to-treatment initiation was within 30 minutes in 42/54 (78%). Chronic hypertension and oral labetalol use were associated with delays in achieving target BP. Process issues related to severe hypertension management included inappropriate treatment (n=35/90; 39%), failure to recognize severe hypertension as an emergency (n=21/90; 23%), and delayed treatment initiation (n=12/54; 22%).

CONCLUSION

We defined quality indicators for severe hypertension management. Time-to-target BP within 60 minutes was achieved in a minority of patients, and chronic hypertension was associated with delayed severe hypertension resolution. Process issues in severe hypertension management were described.

Use of continuous infusion of nicardipine to control persistent postpartum hypertension: A retrospective study

To evaluate the effect of continuous infusion of nicardipine on the management of uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) during postpartum period. This retrospective study included 209 women diagnosed in hospital with hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and had uncontrolled BP after delivery between January 2018 to December 2020 Uncontrolled BP was defined as persistent elevation of systolic BP ≥ 160 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥ 110 mm Hg. Patients were divided into 2 groups: nicardipine (N = 53; continuous nicardipine infusion and additional bolus of labetalol or hydralazine) and control (N = 156; consecutive bolus of labetalol or hydralazine). BP data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U and χ2 tests by dividing the time interval of 4 hours by the delivery time. The highest BP trends showed that the mean values of both systolic and diastolic BP immediately before delivery were higher in the nicardipine group than in the control. After 8 to 12 hours following delivery, both systolic and diastolic BP were lower in the nicardipine group than in the control. Subsequently, 16 to 20 hours after delivery, both systolic and diastolic BP were significantly lower in the nicardipine group than in the control (137/80 vs 141/84 mm Hg). Initially, the proportions of uncontrolled BP in the nicardipine group were higher than those in the control; however, it then became lower at all time intervals 8 hours after delivery. The proportions of patients who received additional antihypertensive agents and the median cumulative dosages were lower in the nicardipine group than in the control. Continuous infusion of nicardipine can help manage uncontrolled BP during the postpartum period.

Race/ethnicity differences in response to acute antihypertensive treatment of peripartum severe hypertension

BACKGROUND

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy increase maternal morbidity, mortality, and long-term risk for cardiovascular disease. The rising incidence of chronic hypertension and preeclampsia disproportionately affects people of color. There is a paucity of published data examining differences in the effectiveness of acute antihypertensive agents between pregnant patients of different races/ethnicities. We aimed to determine if the effectiveness of acute antihypertensive agents for peripartum severe hypertension differs by race/ethnicity.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients with severe peripartum hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mm Hg confirmed within 15 min) to determine whether the effectiveness of blood pressure control using nationally recommended medications (hydralazine, labetalol, nifedipine) differed by race/ethnicity. The primary outcome was reduction and maintenance of blood pressure to target ranges (140-150/90-100 mm Hg or below) for ≥4 h in each race/ethnicity group. Statistical tests included χ², Fisher's exact, analysis of variance, and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 729 patients receiving treatment for severe peripartum hypertension, all medications were effective (overall 86.4% efficacy) at controlling blood pressure. Labetalol was the most effective medication in White patients (93.0 vs. 74.7% for nifedipine and 86.5% for hydralazine, p < .001). No overall differences in medication effectiveness were found in Black, Asian, or LatinX patients. Black and Asian patients were more likely to experience >1 hypertensive episode [51.0 and 49.0%, respectively vs. 35.4% (White) and 40.0% (LatinX), p = .008].

CONCLUSION

Currently recommended therapies for severe peripartum hypertension are effective in controlling blood pressure for ≥4 h in patients of all race/ethnic groups. Labetalol was the most effective medication in White patients with no overall differences in medication effectiveness in Black, Asian, or LatinX patients.

Nonadherence to treatment protocol for severe hypertension in pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are one of the leading causes of maternal mortality and severe morbidity. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends treatment of persistent severe hypertension because this has been shown to improve overall outcomes. Treatment remains inconsistent and may be influenced by patient-level sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify which factors are associated with nonadherence to an institutional protocol for the treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of patients who had persistent severe hypertension (≥2 systolic blood pressures ≥160 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressures >110 mm Hg between 15 and 60 minutes apart) during their delivery hospitalization in 3 hospitals within an integrated health system from February 1, 2018 to March 1, 2020. Adherence to an institutional protocol was defined as receiving antihypertensive medication within 1 hour of a second severe blood pressure measurement. Demographic information, medical comorbidities, and delivery hospitalization characteristics were compared between women who received treatment based on institutional protocol and those who did not. Patient zone improvement plan codes were linked to neighborhood-level data from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey to extract socioeconomic characteristics. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate factors associated with delayed treatment while adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Of the 996 patients included, 449 (45%) received treatment within 60 minutes and 547 (55%) did not. Having an elevated, nonsevere range blood pressure (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.79) or a severe range blood pressure (adjusted odds ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.38) on admission, persistent severe hypertension ≥1 hour before or after delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.45), and chronic hypertension (adjusted odds ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.93) were associated with timely treatment. Hospital site (adjusted odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-3.28) and increasing gestational age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.21) were associated with nonadherence to treatment protocol. A subanalysis evaluating treatment in 344 (35%) patients who had a nonelevated blood pressure on admission showed that White race, persistent severe hypertension within 1 hour of delivery, increasing gestational age, body mass index, twin gestation, preferred language other than English or Spanish, and a higher neighborhood unemployment rate were associated with nonadherence to treatment protocol.

CONCLUSION

Several factors were associated with nonadherence to an institutional protocol for treatment of persistent severe hypertension. Provider bias may impact whether treatment is executed or not. Awareness of these risk factors may improve timely administration of antihypertensive medication in pregnant and postpartum patients.

Prevalence and management of severe intrapartum hypertension in patients with preeclampsia at an urban tertiary care medical center

OBJECTIVES

Data on management of severe intrapartum hypertension is lacking. The aim of this study is to explore the proportion of timely interventions in severe, persistent intrapartum hypertension treatment by exploring the prevalence and management of intrapartum hypertension trends.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective case-control study of pregnant women who delivered at the University of Chicago between January 2015 and March 2017. Patients with severe preeclampsia who underwent labor (either induced or spontaneous) were stratified into two groups: severe intrapartum hypertension and no severe intrapartum hypertension.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Type of treatment and timing to treatment of severe hypertensive episodes were explored as well as prevalence of maternal adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients with severe preeclampsia in labor were identified. In patients with persistent severe intrapartum hypertension (n = 52), 15 (28.9%) received treatment. Patients experiencing greater than three episodes of blood pressure elevation were more likely to receive treatment as compared to those with fewer episodes. There was no significant difference in severe maternal morbidity (SMM) between those treated within 60 min compared to those untreated or treated after 60 min (16.7% vs 27.5%; p = 0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

Management protocols of intrapartum hypertensive episodes are variable or not universally implemented. Inadequately treated episodes of severe intrapartum hypertension trend towards higher rates of SMM.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: A quality metric for evaluating timely treatment of severe hypertension

Severe hypertension in pregnancy is a medical emergency. Although expeditious treatment within 30 to 60 minutes is recommended to reduce the risk of maternal death or severe morbidity, treatment is often delayed by >1 hour. In this statement, we propose a quality metric that facilities can use to track their rates of timely treatment of severe hypertension. We encourage facilities to adopt this metric so that future reports from different facilities will be based on a uniform definition of timely treatment.

The assessment of blood pressure in pregnant women: pitfalls and novel approaches

Accurate assessment of blood pressure is fundamental to the provision of safe obstetrical care. It is simple, cost effective, and life-saving. Treatments for preeclampsia, including antihypertensive drugs, magnesium sulfate, and delivery, are available in many settings. However, the instigation of appropriate treatment relies on prompt and accurate recognition of hypertension. There are a number of different techniques for blood pressure assessment, including the auscultatory method, automated oscillometric devices, home blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory monitoring, and invasive monitoring. The auscultatory method with a mercury sphygmomanometer and the use of Korotkoff sounds was previously recommended as the gold standard technique. Mercury sphygmomanometers have been withdrawn owing to safety concerns and replaced with aneroid devices, but these are particularly prone to calibration errors and regular calibration is imperative to ensure accuracy. Automated oscillometric devices are straightforward to use, but the physiological changes in healthy pregnancy and pathologic changes in preeclampsia may affect the accuracy of a device and monitors must be validated. Validation protocols classify pregnant women as a "special population," and protocols must include 15 women in each category of normotensive pregnancy, hypertensive pregnancy, and preeclampsia. In addition to a scarcity of devices validated for pregnancy and preeclampsia, other pitfalls that cause inaccuracy include the lack of training and poor technique. Blood pressure assessment can be affected by maternal position, inappropriate cuff size, conversation, caffeine, smoking, and irregular heart rate. For home blood pressure monitoring, appropriate instruction should be given on how to use the device. The classification of hypertension and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy has recently been revised. These are classified as preeclampsia, transient gestational hypertension, gestational hypertension, white-coat hypertension, masked hypertension, chronic hypertension, and chronic hypertension with superimposed preeclampsia. Blood pressure varies across gestation and by ethnicity, but gestation-specific thresholds have not been adopted. Hypertension is defined as a sustained systolic blood pressure of ≥140 mm Hg or a sustained diastolic blood pressure of ≥90 mm Hg. In some guidelines, the threshold of diagnosis depends on the setting in which blood pressure measurement is taken, with a threshold of 140/90 mm Hg in a healthcare setting, 135/85 mm Hg at home, or a 24-hour average blood pressure on ambulatory monitoring of >126/76 mm Hg. Some differences exist among organizations with respect to the criteria for the diagnosis of preeclampsia and the correct threshold for intervention and target blood pressure once treatment has been instigated. Home blood pressure monitoring is currently a focus for research. Novel technologies, including early warning devices (such as the CRADLE Vital Signs Alert device) and telemedicine, may provide strategies that prompt earlier recognition of abnormal blood pressure and therefore improve management. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on methods to assess blood pressure in pregnancy and appropriate technique to optimize accuracy. The importance of accurate blood pressure assessment is emphasized with a discussion of preeclampsia prediction and treatment of severe hypertension. Classification of hypertensive disorders and thresholds for treatment will be discussed, including novel developments in the field.

Decidualization resistance in the origin of preeclampsia

Preeclampsia is a major obstetrical complication with short- and long-term life-threatening consequences for both mother and child. Shallow cytotrophoblast invasion through the uterine decidua into the spiral arteries is implicated in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia, although the cause of deficient arterial invasion remains unknown. Research that is focused on the "soil"-the maternal decidua-highlights the importance of this poorly understood but influential uterine layer. Decidualization of endometrial cells regulates embryo invasion, which is essential for spiral artery remodeling and establishing the maternal-fetal interface. Exploration of the association between impaired decidualization and preeclampsia revealed suboptimal endometrial maturation and uterine natural killer cells present in the decidua before preeclampsia development. Furthermore, decidualization defects in the endometrium of women with severe preeclampsia, characterized by impaired cytotrophoblast invasion, were detected at the time of delivery and persisted 5 years after the affected pregnancy. Recently, a maternal deficiency of annexin A2 expression was found to influence aberrant decidualization and shallow cytotrophoblast invasion, suggesting that decidualization resistance, which is a defective endometrial cell differentiation during the menstrual cycle, could underlie shallow trophoblast invasion and the poor establishment of the maternal-fetal interface. Based on these findings, the transcriptional signature in the endometrium that promotes decidualization deficiency could be detected before (or after) conception. This would serve to identify women at risk of developing severe preeclampsia and aid the development of therapies focused on improving decidualization, perhaps also preventing severe preeclampsia. Here, we discuss decidualization deficiency as a contributor to the pathogenesis of pregnancy disorders with particular attention to severe preeclampsia. We also review current diagnostic strategies and discuss future directions in diagnostic methods based on decidualization.

Factors associated with anti-seizure medication utilization for eclamptic seizures: 1995-2015

OBJECTIVE

We sought to ascertain the drivers of the use of anti-seizure medications (ASMs) other than magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) in seizure management in a cohort of pregnant and postpartum women with eclamptic seizure.

METHODS

Cases of seizure activity attributed to eclampsia from 1995-2015 at 2 large urban academic medical centers were identified and reviewed by a neurologist and an obstetrician. Analyses focused on patterns of ASM utilization among women according to timing, recurrence, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, and specialty consultation with additional sub-analysis focusing on recurrent seizures only.

RESULTS

93 cases of eclampsia were identified. 100% of subjects received MgSO4. 52% of women received an ASM in addition to MgSO4. Subjects with seizures occurring post-partum, with >1 seizure, or who had a formal neurology consult were more likely to receive an ASM in addition (risk ratio [RR] 3.05 [95% confidence interval [CI] [1.30-7.11], RR 3.01 [95% CI 1.29-7.02], and RR 6.29 [2.37, 16.71] respectively). Postpartum recurrent seizures or those receiving a neurology consult were also more likely to be treated with ASMs compared to recurrent or comanaged seizures occurring before delivery (RR 1.55 [1.02, 2.37] and 1.65 [1.02, 2.69]).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective cohort, patients with atypical seizure presentation (e.g., postpartum and/or recurrent) and women who were comanaged with a neurologist were more likely to receive an ASM other than MgSO4.

Prevalence and risk factors of labor-onset hypertension: A multicenter study in Japan

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prevalence and risk factors of labor-onset hypertension (LOH), defined as hypertension first detected during labor among women without hypertension prior to admission for labor.

STUDY DESIGN

In this multicenter retrospective study, clinical data of women who delivered vaginally at term between 2012 and 2018 were collected from 12 primary maternity care units. Blood pressure was measured at five time points from admission to 2 h postpartum in a total of 30,129 normotensive women at the last prenatal check-up. LOH was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) of ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of ≥ 90 mmHg during the first to fourth stages of labor.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Multivariate regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the risk factors of LOH and severe LOH (SBP of ≥ 160 mmHg or DBP of ≥ 110 mmHg).

RESULTS

Among the 30,129 women, 8,565 (28.4%) presented with LOH and 734 (2.4%) with severe LOH. The prevalence of LOH was the highest at the second stage of labor (21.7%) and decreased rapidly after delivery. The independent risk factors of LOH were maternal age of ≥ 35 years, pre-pregnancy body mass index of ≥ 25 kg/m², and pregnancy weight gain of ≥ 15 kg.

CONCLUSION

LOH is common, with approximately one in four women experiencing LOH during labor and early postpartum. Meanwhile, severe LOH occurred in 2.4% of the pregnancies. Closer blood pressure monitoring during labor may enable obstetric caregivers to recognize LOH in a timely manner and reduce maternal adverse outcomes, such as eclampsia and stroke.

Factors associated with appropriate treatment of acute-onset severe obstetrical hypertension

BACKGROUND

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that pregnant patients receive expeditious treatment with first-line antihypertensive agents within 1 hour of confirmed severe hypertension to reduce the risk for maternal stroke. However, it is unknown how often this guideline is followed and what factors influence a patient's likelihood of receiving guideline-concordant care.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify factors associated with receiving guideline-concordant treatment for an obstetrical hypertensive emergency.

STUDY DESIGN

We present a case-control study of all pregnant and postpartum patients who had persistent severe hypertension (≥2 systolic blood pressures ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mm Hg, or both within 1 hour of each other) during their delivery hospitalization at a tertiary hospital from October 1, 2013, to August 31, 2020. Data were extracted from the hospital electronic medical records using standard definitions and billing and diagnosis codes. We defined receipt of the recommended treatment as administration of a first-line antihypertensive agent (intravenous labetalol, intravenous hydralazine, or immediate-release oral nifedipine) within 60 minutes of the first or second severe-range blood pressure measurement during their delivery hospitalization. Delayed treatment was defined as the administration of a first-line agent >60 minutes after the second elevated blood pressure measurement. Patients were considered untreated if a first-line agent was never administered. Maternal sociodemographic, clinical and pregnancy factors, and time and day of the week of the hypertensive emergency were compared among patients who received the recommended treatment, those who received delayed treatment, and those who were untreated. Bivariate analyses were performed, and multinomial and multivariable logistic regression models were used to adjust for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Of the 39,918 deliveries in the cohort, 1987 (5.0%) were complicated by severe, persistent obstetrical hypertension. Of these patients, 532 (26.8%) received the recommended treatment, 356 (17.9%) received delayed treatment, and 1099 (55.3%) did not receive any first-line antihypertensive therapy. The multinomial regression models that were used to compare these 3 groups indicated that patients who received the recommended treatment were more likely to be Black (adjusted odds ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-2.51), Hispanic (adjusted odds ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-2.52), or pregnant and at <37 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratio, 6.65; 95% confidence interval, 5.08-8.72). Treatment was less likely if the severe obstetrical hypertension emergency occurred overnight (7:00 PM to 6:59 AM) (adjusted odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.97) or during the postpartum period (adjusted odds ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.86).

CONCLUSION

Approximately half of obstetrical patients with at least 2 documented severely elevated blood pressure measurements did not receive the recommended antihypertensive treatment. Of those who did receive treatment, about 40% had delayed treatment. Black and Hispanic race and preterm gestation were associated with an increased likelihood of receiving the recommended treatment when compared with White race and term pregnancies. Patients whose severe obstetrical hypertension emergency occurred overnight and those who were postpartum were less likely to receive any first-line antihypertensive treatment. Overall, patients without sociodemographic and clinical risk factors for severe obstetrical hypertension or other pregnancy complications were less likely to be treated. However, treatment improved significantly over time with the implementation of targeted quality measures and specific institutional policies based on the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' latest severe obstetrical hypertension management guidelines.

Semiautonomous Treatment Algorithm for the Management of Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether implementation of a semiautonomous treatment algorithm was associated with improved compliance with American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines for rapid administration of antihypertensive therapy in the setting of sustained severe hypertension.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of admitted pregnant and postpartum patients treated for severe hypertension between January 2017 and March 2020. The semiautonomous treatment algorithm, which included vital sign monitoring, blood pressure thresholds for diagnosis of severe hypertension, and automated order sets for recommended first-line antihypertensive therapy were implemented between May 2018 and March 2019. The primary outcomes were the administration of antihypertensive therapy within 15, 30 and 60 minutes of diagnosis of severe hypertension. Comparisons were made between the preimplementation, during implementation, and postimplementation groups using χ2. Analysis was limited to the first episode of severe hypertension treated. Statistical significance was defined as P<.05.

RESULTS

In total, there were 959 obstetric patients treated for severe hypertension, with 373 (38.9%) treated preimplementation, 334 (34.8%) during implementation, and 252 (26.2%) after implementation. Treatment of severe hypertension within 15 minutes was 36.5% preimplementation, 45.8% during implementation, and 55.6% postimplementation (P=.001). Treatment within 30 minutes was 65.9% in the preimplementation group, 77.8% during implementation, and 79.0% in the postimplementation group (P=.004). There was no difference in percentage of patients treated within 60 minutes (86.3% before, 87.7% during and 92.9% after implementation, P=.12).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a semiautonomous treatment algorithm for severe hypertension was associated with a higher percentage of pregnant and postpartum patients receiving the first dose of antihypertensive therapy within 15 and 30 minutes. Implementation of similar algorithms for this and other obstetric indications may decrease time to appropriate therapy and help improve care equity.