1
|
Liu AHC, Shah T, Wu H, Lieman HJ, Singh M, Pollack SE, Jindal SK. Trophectoderm biopsy is associated with lower risks of moderate to extreme prematurity and low birthweights: a national registry cohort study of singleton livebirths from frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024:S0002-9378(24)00749-X. [PMID: 39029546 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trophectoderm biopsy has become the mainstay assisted reproductive technique performed for preimplantation genetic testing, accounting for 43.8% of embryo transfer cycles in the United States in 2019 alone. Despite its prevalence, data on the obstetric and perinatal outcomes post-trophectoderm biopsy remains sparse and mixed. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to examine the risks of adverse perinatal outcomes in birthweights and prematurity after transfers of the vitrified-thawed blastocyst with trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective observational cohort study of 45,712 singleton livebirths resulting from autologous vitrified-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles with or without trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing, reported by participating member clinics to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology national registry between 2014 and 2017. Adverse perinatal outcomes of preterm births and low birthweights were analyzed. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to control for covariates. Comparing the trophectoderm biopsy (n=21,584) and no trophectoderm biopsy (n=24,128) groups, adjusted odds ratios were calculated for the outcomes of small-for-gestational-age, large-for-gestational-age, low birthweight <2500 g, very low birthweight <1500 g, extremely low birthweight <1000 g, late preterm births <37 weeks, moderate preterm births <34 weeks, and extremely preterm births <28 weeks. RESULTS Women in the trophectoderm biopsy group were older and more likely to have prior pregnancies, deliveries, and a history of spontaneous abortions. Tobacco use, diminished ovarian reserve, and recurrent pregnancy loss were also more prevalent in the trophectoderm biopsy group. Trophectoderm biopsy was not associated with small-for-gestational-age (adjusted odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.12; P=.72) or large-for-gestational-age newborns (adjusted odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.22; P=.09). Risks of preterm births <37 weeks gestation were similar between the biopsy and nonbiopsy groups (adjusted odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.02; P=.11). Trophectoderm biopsy was associated with a significantly lower risk of low birthweight <2500 g (adjusted odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.92; P<.001), very low birthweight <1500 g (adjusted odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.83; P<.001), extremely low birthweight <1000 g (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.74; P<.001), moderate preterm birth <34 weeks (adjusted odds ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.91; P=.003), and extreme preterm birth <28 weeks (adjusted odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.92; P=.02). CONCLUSION Trophectoderm biopsy is not associated with increased risks of small-for-gestational-age, large-for-gestational-age, or late preterm birth. Risks of low birthweight, very low birthweight, and extremely low birthweight from moderate and extreme preterm births are lower after trophectoderm biopsy, possibly by selecting against confined placental mosaicism or inducing placental epigenetic changes, the mechanisms of which warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Hui-Chia Liu
- Montefiore's Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Health, Hartsdale, NY; Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
| | | | - Haotian Wu
- Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, NY
| | - Harry J Lieman
- Montefiore's Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Health, Hartsdale, NY; Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Manvinder Singh
- Montefiore's Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Health, Hartsdale, NY; Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | | | - Sangita Kathleen Jindal
- Montefiore's Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Health, Hartsdale, NY; Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Petch S, Crosby D. Updates in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2024:102526. [PMID: 38945758 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2024.102526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2024] [Revised: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) involves taking a biopsy of an early embryo created through in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Genetic testing is performed on the biopsy, in order to select which embryo to transfer. PGT began as an experimental procedure in the 1990s, but is now an integral part of assisted human reproduction (AHR). PGT allows for embryo selection which can reduce the risk of transmission of inherited disease and may reduce the chance of implantation failure and pregnancy loss. This is a rapidly evolving area, which raises important ethical issues. This review article aims to give a brief history of PGT, an overview of the current evidence in PGT along with highlighting exciting areas of research to advance this technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Petch
- Merrion Fertility Clinic, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; University College, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - David Crosby
- Merrion Fertility Clinic, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; University College, Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mao D, Xu J, Sun L. Impact of trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing on obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 230:199-212.e5. [PMID: 37595823 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate whether trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing is associated with an increased risk of adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes compared with conventional in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection without preimplantation genetic testing. DATA SOURCES Entries between January 1990 and August 2022 were searched using MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Publications comparing the outcomes of pregnancies after preimplantation genetic testing using trophectoderm biopsy and in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection were included. Only human studies with a cohort or case-control design or randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion. METHODS The study selection process was performed independently by 2 investigators. The quality of the observational studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool version 2 was used to grade the level of bias in randomized controlled trials. The pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated using a random-effects model when substantial heterogeneity occurred (indicated by I2 of >50% and P<.1). Otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used. RESULTS This meta-analysis included 13 studies involving 11,469 live births after preimplantation genetic testing treatment with trophectoderm biopsy before embryo transfer and 20,438 live births after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection only. The odds ratio of preterm delivery was higher in the trophectoderm-biopsied group than in the routine in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection group (pooled odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.21); however, the difference did not exist after sensitivity analysis (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.11). The risk of low birthweight did not increase among the biopsied pregnancies (pooled odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.20). No marked difference was observed in the risk of other obstetrical or neonatal outcomes between the biopsy and control groups. Furthermore, no difference was noted in the perinatal outcomes between trophectoderm-biopsied and nonbiopsied groups in the subgroup analyses by intracytoplasmic sperm injection, frozen-thawed transfer, or single embryo transfer. CONCLUSION Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing treatment did not alter the risk of obstetrical or neonatal outcomes compared with conventional in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection without preimplantation genetic testing. However, this study was limited by the large observational evidence base, and more randomized controlled trials are needed to further confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di Mao
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian Xu
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Ling Sun
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ginod P, Dahan MH. Polygenic embryo screening: are there potential maternal and fetal harms? Reprod Biomed Online 2023; 47:103327. [PMID: 37820464 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
Polygenic embryo screening (PES) and its derivate the Embryo Health Score (EHS) have generated interest in both infertile and fertile populations due to their potential ability to select embryos with a reduced risk of disease and improved long-term health outcomes. Concerns have been raised regarding the potential harms of IVF itself, including possible epigenetic changes that may affect the health of the offspring in late adulthood, which are not fully captured in the EHS calculation. Knowledge of the potential impacts of the trophectoderm biopsy, which is a key component of the PES procedure, on the offsprings' health is limited by the heterogeneity of the population characteristics used in the published studies. Nonetheless, the literature suggests a possible increased risk of preterm delivery, birth defects and pre-eclampsia after trophectoderm biopsy. Overall, the risks of PES for prenatal and postnatal health remain uncertain, and further research is needed. Counselling patients regarding these risks before considering PES is important, to provide an understanding of the risks and benefits. This review aims to highlight some of these issues, the need for continued investigation in this area, and the importance of informed decision-making in the context of PES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Perrine Ginod
- MUHC Reproductive Centre, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada; CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique et Assistance Médicale à la Procréation, Dijon, France
| | - Michael H Dahan
- MUHC Reproductive Centre, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Belva F, Kondowe F, De Vos A, Keymolen K, Buysse A, Hes F, Berckmoes V, Verdyck P, Verpoest W, De Rycke M. Cleavage-stage or blastocyst-stage embryo biopsy has no impact on growth and health in children up to 2 years of age. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2023; 21:87. [PMID: 37737174 PMCID: PMC10515414 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-023-01140-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies show conflicting results on neonatal outcomes following embryo biopsy for PGT, primarily due to small sample sizes and/or heterogeneity in the timing of embryo biopsy (day 3; EBD3 or day 5/6; EBD5) and type of embryo transfer. Even fewer data exist on the impact on children's health beyond the neonatal period. This study aimed to explore outcomes in children born after EBD3 or EBD5 followed by fresh (FRESH) or frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET). METHODS This single-centre cohort study compared birth data of 630 children after EBD3, of 222 EBD5 and of 1532 after non-biopsied embryo transfers performed between 2014 and 2018. Follow-up data on growth were available for 426, 131 and 662 children, respectively. RESULTS Embryo biopsy, either at EBD3 or EBD5 in FET and FRESH cycles did not negatively affect anthropometry at birth, infancy or childhood compared to outcomes in non-biopsied FET and FRESH cycles. While there was no adverse effect of the timing of embryo biopsy (EBD3 versus EBD5), children born after EBD3 followed by FET had larger sizes at birth, but not thereafter, than children born after EBD3 followed by FRESH. Reassuringly, weight and height gain, proportions of major congenital malformations, developmental problems, hospital admissions and surgical interventions were similar between comparison groups. CONCLUSION Our study indicated that neither EBD3 nor EBD5 followed by FRESH or FET had a negative impact on anthropometry and on health outcomes up to 2 years of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Belva
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Clinical Sciences, Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Centre for Medical Genetics, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Fiskani Kondowe
- Centre for Biostatistics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Anick De Vos
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Clinical Sciences, Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Brussels IVF Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kathelijn Keymolen
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Clinical Sciences, Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Centre for Medical Genetics, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Andrea Buysse
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Clinical Sciences, Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Centre for Medical Genetics, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Frederik Hes
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Clinical Sciences, Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Centre for Medical Genetics, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Veerle Berckmoes
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Clinical Sciences, Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Centre for Medical Genetics, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pieter Verdyck
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Clinical Sciences, Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Centre for Medical Genetics, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Willem Verpoest
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Clinical Sciences, Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Brussels IVF Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Martine De Rycke
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Clinical Sciences, Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Centre for Medical Genetics, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Carusi DA, Gopal D, Cabral HJ, Racowsky C, Stern JE. A risk factor profile for placenta accreta spectrum in pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technology. F S Rep 2023; 4:279-285. [PMID: 37719100 PMCID: PMC10504550 DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2023.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To identify independent risk factors for placenta accreta spectrum among pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technology. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Tertiary hospital. Patients Individuals who conceived with assisted reproductive technology and reached 20 weeks' gestation or later from 2011 to 2017. Interventions Patient and cycle data was abstracted from hospital records and supplemented with state-level data. Poisson regression was used for multivariate analyses and reported as adjusted relative risks (aRR). Main Outcome Measures Clinical or histologic placenta accreta spectrum. Results Of 1,975 qualifying pregnancies, 44 (2.3%) met criteria for accreta spectrum at delivery. In the multivariate model, significant risk factors included low-lying placenta at delivery (aRR, 15.44; 95% CI 7.76-30.72), uterine factor infertility or prior uterine surgery (aRR, 4.68; 95% CI, 2.72-8.05), initial low-lying placentation that resolved (aRR, 3.83; 95% CI, 1.90-7.73), and use of frozen embryos (aRR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.66-5.48). When the fresh vs frozen variable was replaced with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, the final model did not change (aRR, 2.40 for unstimulated cycles, 95% CI, 1.32-4.38). With frozen transfers, the accreta rate was 16% when the endometrial thickness was < 6mm vs 3.8% with thicker endometrium (P=.02). Conclusions Among pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technology, accreta spectrum is associated with low placental implantation (even when resolved), uterine factor infertility and prior uterine surgery, and the use of frozen embryo transfer or unstimulated cycles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela A. Carusi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daksha Gopal
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Howard J. Cabral
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Catherine Racowsky
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hospital Foch, Suresnes, France (Present Address)
| | - Judy E. Stern
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ji H, Zhang MQ, Zhou Q, Zhang S, Dong L, Li XL, Zhao C, Ding H, Ling XF. Trophectoderm biopsy is associated with adverse obstetric outcomes rather than neonatal outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:141. [PMID: 36870973 PMCID: PMC9985221 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05466-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the wide application of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) with trophectoderm (TE) biopsy, the safety of PGT has always been a concern. Since TE subsequently forms the placenta, it is speculated that the removal of these cells was associated with adverse obstetrical or neonatal outcomes after single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (FBT). Previous studies report contradictory findings with respect to TE biopsy and obstetric and neonatal outcomes. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 720 patients with singleton pregnancies from single FBT cycles who delivered at the same university-affiliated hospital between January 2019 and March 2022. The cohorts were divided into two groups: the PGT group (blastocysts with TE biopsy, n = 223) and the control group (blastocysts without biopsy, n = 497). The PGT group was matched with the control group by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis at a ratio of 1:2. The enrolled sample sizes in the two groups were 215 and 385, respectively. RESULTS Patient demographic characteristics were comparable between the groups after PSM except for the proportion of recurrent pregnancy loss, which was significantly higher in the PGT cohort (31.2 vs. 4.2%, P < 0.001). Patients in the PGT group had significantly higher rates of gestational hypertension (6.0 vs. 2.6%, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18-7.18, P = 0.020) and abnormal umbilical cord (13.0 vs. 7.8%, aOR 1.94, 95% CI 1.08-3.48, P = 0.026). However, the occurrence of premature rupture of membranes (PROM) (12.1 vs. 19.7%, aOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35-0.99, P = 0.047) was significantly lower in biopsied blastocysts than in unbiopsied embryos. There were no significant differences in regard to other obstetric and neonatal outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Trophectoderm biopsy is a safe approach, as the neonatal outcomes from biopsied and unbiopsied embryos were comparable. Furthermore, PGT is associated with higher risks of gestational hypertension and abnormal umbilical cord but may have a protective effect on PROM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Ji
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Mian-Qiu Zhang
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Qiao Zhou
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Song Zhang
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Li Dong
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiu-Ling Li
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Chun Zhao
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Hui Ding
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Nanjing, China.
| | - Xiu-Feng Ling
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Nanjing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alteri A, Cermisoni GC, Pozzoni M, Gaeta G, Cavoretto PI, Viganò P. Obstetric, neonatal, and child health outcomes following embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing. Hum Reprod Update 2023; 29:291-306. [PMID: 36655536 PMCID: PMC10152168 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmad001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) of embryos developed in vitro requires a biopsy for obtaining cellular samples for the analysis. Signs of cell injury have been described in association with this procedure. Thus, the consequences of the biopsy on obstetric and neonatal outcomes have been the subject of some quantitative analyses, although the reliability of data pooling may be limited by important issues in the various reports. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE The present review identifies evidence for whether pregnancies conceived after embryo biopsy are associated with a higher risk of adverse obstetric, neonatal, and long-term outcomes. Available evidence has been summarized considering manipulation at various stages of embryo development. SEARCH METHODS We used the scoping review methodology. Searches of article databases were performed with keywords pertaining to the embryo biopsy technique and obstetric, neonatal, and postnatal outcomes. Studies in which embryos were biopsied at different stages (i.e. both at the cleavage and blastocyst stages) were excluded. We included data on fresh and frozen embryo transfers. The final sample of 31 documents was subjected to qualitative thematic analysis. OUTCOMES Sound evidence is lacking to fully address the issues on the potential obstetric, neonatal or long-term consequences of embryo biopsy. For polar body biopsy, the literature is too scant to draw any conclusion. Some data, although limited and controversial, suggest a possible association of embryo biopsy at the cleavage stage with an increased risk of low birthweight and small for gestational age neonates compared to babies derived from non-biopsied embryos. An increase in preterm deliveries and birth defects in cases of trophectoderm biopsy was suggested. For both biopsy methods (at the cleavage and blastocyst stages), an increased risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was found. However, these findings may be explained by confounders such as other embryo manipulation procedures or by intrinsic patient or population characteristics. WIDER IMPLICATIONS Since there is inadequate evidence to assess obstetric, neonatal, and long-term health outcomes following embryo biopsy, an invasive PGT strategy should be developed with a cautious approach. A non-invasive approach, based on the analysis of embryo cell-free DNA, needs to be pursued to overcome the potential limitations of embryo biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Alteri
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Mirko Pozzoni
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Gerarda Gaeta
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Ivo Cavoretto
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Viganò
- Infertility Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
PGT pregnancies have a similar risk for post-partum complications as naturally conceived pregnancies. Reprod Biomed Online 2023; 46:189-195. [PMID: 36335017 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION Do preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) pregnancies have higher post-partum complications compared with naturally conceived pregnancies? DESIGN Retrospective cohort study conducted in 2008-2020 at the Shaare Zedek Medical Center (SZMC), including all patients aged 18-45 years old who conceived following PGT with a singleton live birth >24 weeks. Data were collected from computerized hospital databases and patient files. There were two control groups: (i) pregnancies following IVF-ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection); (ii) four neighbourhood controls for each case delivery (two women delivered before and two after) of women with naturally conceived pregnancies. RESULTS Overall, 120 PGT, 779 IVF-ICSI and 3507 naturally conceived deliveries were included. Demographic variables were similar apart from slightly higher age in the PGT (P = 0.003) and ICSI (P = 0.002) groups (31.07 ± 4.38 PGT, 31.66 ± 5.03 ICSI, 28.77 ± 5.72 naturally conceived). Composite post-partum placental-related complications (manual lysis of placenta, revision of uterine cavity, haemoglobin drop ≥3 g/dl, post-partum haemorrhage, need for blood transfusion) were more prevalent in both the PGT and IVF-ICSI groups as opposed to naturally conceived (20.0% versus 18.9% versus 10.3%, respectively, P < 0.001, P = 0.007). In a multivariate regression model PGT was not found to be independently associated with composite post-partum placental-related complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-2.15), while IVF-ICSI pregnancies had increased risk (aOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.20-1.97) compared with natural conception. No difference was found between fresh and frozen cycles or between day 3 and day 5 embryo transfer. CONCLUSIONS PGT pregnancies have a comparable risk of post-partum placental-related complications to naturally conceived pregnancies, unlike IVF-ICSI pregnancies. It is possible that infertility itself is the main mediator for post-partum complications in IVF-ICSI pregnancies.
Collapse
|
10
|
Carusi DA, Gopal D, Cabral HJ, Bormann CL, Racowsky C, Stern JE. A unique placenta previa risk factor profile for pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 2022; 118:894-903. [PMID: 36175207 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To define specific risk factors for placenta previa in pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART). DESIGN Retrospective cohort. SETTING Fertility centers and inpatient obstetric units in Massachusetts. PATIENT(S) Patients conceiving with ART and delivering at 20 weeks gestation or later between 2011 and 2017 in Massachusetts. INTERVENTION(S) Patient demographic and medical factors and specific components of their cycles. Data were obtained by linking vital records of the State of Massachusetts to reproductive clinic data obtained from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System, and then supplementing this information with laboratory and obstetric data from 2 large academic hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Associations were tested between multiple cycle- and patient-related factors and placenta previa or low-lying placenta at delivery. After testing for confounders, multivariate models were adjusted for maternal age, history of prior cesarean delivery and birth plurality, and are reported as adjusted relative risks (aRR). RESULT(S) We included 18,939 pregnancies, with 553 (2.9%) having placenta previa at delivery. Advanced maternal age (aRR, 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.48), endometriosis, (aRR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.71-2.86), and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (aRR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.12-1.59) were associated with placenta previa, whereas multiple births (aRR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48-0.81) and a history of polycystic ovary syndrome or ovulation disorders (aRR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46-0.75) had negative associations. The endometriosis association was strong in nulliparas and the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation association was strong in parous patients in a stratified analysis. No association was seen with prior history of cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION(S) Patients conceiving with ART do not have the typical previa risk factors of prior cesarean delivery and multiple gestations, whereas endometriosis and fresh embryo transfers contributed moderate risk. The embryo transfer process itself may affect previa development in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela A Carusi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Daksha Gopal
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Howard J Cabral
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Charles L Bormann
- Massachusetts General Hospital Fertility Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Catherine Racowsky
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hospital Foch, Suresnes, France
| | - Judy E Stern
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Llácer J, Díaz N, Serrano E, Álvarez E, Castillo J, Ortiz J, Ten J, Bernabeu A, Bernabeu R. Vitrification does not affect birth weight. Lessons from the oocyte donation model. Reprod Biomed Online 2022; 45:355-363. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
12
|
Preimplantation genetic testing and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: Is the risk real? Fertil Steril 2022; 117:571-572. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
13
|
Perinatal outcomes of singleton live births after preimplantation genetic testing during single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles: a propensity score-matched study. Fertil Steril 2022; 117:562-570. [PMID: 35120744 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether singleton pregnancy achieved after preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is associated with a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes than in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) singleton pregnancy. DESIGN A retrospective cohort study. SETTING A university-affiliated fertility center. PATIENT(S) This cohort study included singleton live births resulting from PGT (n = 232) and IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies (n = 2,829) with single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer. Multiple baseline covariates were used for propensity score matching, yielding 214 PGT singleton pregnancies matched to 617 IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies. INTERVENTION(S) Trophectoderm biopsy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) The primary outcome was gestational hypertension, and various clinical perinatal secondary outcomes related to maternal and neonatal health were measured. RESULT(S) Compared with IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancy, PGT singleton pregnancy was associated with a significantly higher risk of gestational hypertension (adjusted odds ratio, 2.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.32, 5.05). In the matched sample, the risk of gestational hypertension remained higher with PGT singleton pregnancy (odds ratio, 2.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.04, 5.22) than with IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancy. No statistical differences were noted in any other measured outcomes between the groups. CONCLUSION(S) The perinatal outcomes of PGT and IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies were similar except for the observed potentially higher risk of gestational hypertension with PGT singleton pregnancy. However, because the data on PGT singleton pregnancies are limited, this conclusion warrants further investigation.
Collapse
|
14
|
Li Y, Wen Q, Liao J, Ma S, Zhang S, Gu Y, Tang Y, Luo K, Yang X, Lu GX, Lin G, Gong F. Trophectoderm Biopsy Differentially Influences the Level of Serum β-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin With Different Embryonic Trophectoderm Scores in Early Pregnancy From 7847 Single-Blastocyst Transfer Cycles. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:794720. [PMID: 35250858 PMCID: PMC8894721 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.794720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether trophectoderm (TE) biopsy differentially influence the level of serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) with different TE-scored blastocysts transferred in early pregnancy. METHODS This retrospective cohort study contained 7847 single-blastocyst transfer cycles executed between January 2019 and June 2020, including 2657 preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles and 5190 in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. All cycles were classified into biopsy and control groups, and further stratified based on the TE morphological scores into three subgroups: grades A, B, and C for TE scores, respectively. Intra-group and inter-group analyses were performed on serum β-hCG levels on the 12th day after blastocyst transfer (HCG12), and obstetric and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS For cycles with a live birth, in grade A TE score subgroups, the HCG12 level did not exhibit statistical significance between the control and biopsy groups after adjustment (769 mIU/mL vs. 753 mIU/mL, P=0.631). In contrast, in grade B and C TE score subgroups, the control group showed a significantly higher level of HCG12 relative to the biopsy group (690 mIU/mL vs. 649 mIU/mL, P=0.001; 586 mIU/mL vs. 509 mIU/mL, P<0.001, respectively). We observed no statistically significant differences in obvious adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes between the same TE-score subgroups of the biopsy group and control group. CONCLUSIONS While blastocysts with higher TE grades produced higher serum β-hCG levels in early pregnancy, TE biopsy might exert a negative impact on serum β-hCG levels by blastocysts with a grade-B TE score and below. TE biopsy did not increase the risk for adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Li
- Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Quan Wen
- Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jingnan Liao
- Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Shujuan Ma
- Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Shuoping Zhang
- Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yifan Gu
- Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yi Tang
- Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Keli Luo
- Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiaoyi Yang
- Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Guang-Xiu Lu
- Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Ge Lin
- Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Fei Gong
- Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
- *Correspondence: Fei Gong,
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Li S, Ma S, Zhao J, Hu J, Li H, Zhu Y, Jiang W, Cui L, Yan J, Chen ZJ. Non-Assisted Hatching Trophectoderm Biopsy Does Not Increase The Risks of Most Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcome and May Be More Practical for Busy Clinics: Evidence From China. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:819963. [PMID: 35250875 PMCID: PMC8892202 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.819963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was conducted in order to investigate whether non-assisted hatching trophectoderm (TE) biopsy increases the risks of adverse perinatal outcomes in livebirths following elective single cryopreserved-thawed blastocyst transfer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 5,412 cycles from 4,908 women who achieved singleton livebirths between 2013 and 2019 were included in this retrospective cohort study. All embryos in this study were fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and cryopreserved through vitrification. The main intervention is to open the zona pellucida (ZP) of day 5/6 blastocyst immediately for biopsy without pre-assisted hatching. The main outcome measures are the common maternal and neonatal outcomes, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), abnormal placentation, abnormalities in umbilical cord and amniotic fluid, preterm birth, cesarean section, low birth weight, postpartum hemorrhage, and prolonged hospital stay (both mothers and infants). The generalized estimation equation (GEE) was used to control the effects of repeated measurements. The non-conditional logistic regression model was used to examine the associations between embryo biopsy status and each adverse perinatal event. Given that the selection bias and changes in learning curve might affect the results, we selected 1,086 similar (matching tolerance = 0.01) cycles from the ICSI group via propensity score matching (PSM) for second comparisons and adjustment (conditional logistic regression). RESULTS After adjusting for confounders, we confirmed that the non-assisted hatching protocol did not increase the risks of most adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Despite this, there were increased risks of GDM (aOR: 1.522, 95% CI: 1.141-2.031) and umbilical cord abnormalities (aOR: 11.539, 95% CI: 1.199-111.067) in the biopsy group. In the second comparisons after PSM, GDM incidence in the biopsy group was still higher (7.26% vs. 5.16%, P = 0.042), yet all measurement outcomes were equally likely to occur in both groups after the second adjustment. CONCLUSIONS The non-assisted hatching TE biopsy does not increase the risks of most adverse perinatal outcomes. However, there is a higher GDM incidence in the biopsy group, and this association warrants further study. Considering its safety and simplicity, the non-assisted hatching protocol has the potential to become the preferred option for TE biopsy, especially in busy clinics and IVF laboratories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuo Li
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Shuiying Ma
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Jialin Zhao
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Jingmei Hu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Hongchang Li
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Yueting Zhu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Wenjie Jiang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Linlin Cui
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- *Correspondence: Junhao Yan, ; Linlin Cui,
| | - Junhao Yan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- *Correspondence: Junhao Yan, ; Linlin Cui,
| | - Zi-Jiang Chen
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory for Assisted Reproduction and Reproductive Genetics, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hao Y, Long X, Kong F, Chen L, Chi H, Zhu X, Kuo Y, Zhu Y, Jia J, Yan L, Li R, Liu P, Wang Y, Qiao J. Maternal and neonatal outcomes following blastocyst biopsy for PGT in single vitrified-warmed embryo transfer cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2021; 44:151-162. [PMID: 34866000 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION Does blastocyst biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) increase the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes? STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study of 5097 single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles from January 2016 to December 2018, with 2061 cycles in the biopsied group and 3036 cycles in the unbiopsied group enrolled in the analyses. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS The live birth rate in the biopsied group (41.1%) was significantly higher than that in the unbiopsied group (35.6%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.54, P = 0.012) after adjusting for maternal age, maternal body mass index, gravidity, parity, infertility diagnosis, timing of blastocyst transfer, blastocyst quality, regimen of endometrial preparation, endometrial thickness before transfer and treatment year. The rates of total pregnancy loss (25.4% versus 32.2%, aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52-0.91, P = 0.008) and early miscarriage (12.1% versus 17.3%, aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.83, P = 0.004) were significantly lower in the biopsied group than in the unbiopsied group. No significant differences were found in sex ratio or the risks of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, diabetes in pregnancy, placenta previa, preterm premature rupture of membranes, low birthweight, very low birthweight, macrosomia, small for gestational age, large for gestational age or birth defects between the two groups. When the subgroup analyses were conducted based on different types of PGT, similar patterns were found for all types. CONCLUSION Blastocyst biopsy might not increase the risks of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in the short term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongxiu Hao
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Xiaoyu Long
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Fei Kong
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Lixue Chen
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Hongbin Chi
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Xiaohui Zhu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Ying Kuo
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Yiru Zhu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Jialin Jia
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Liying Yan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Rong Li
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Ping Liu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Yuanyuan Wang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China.
| | - Jie Qiao
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China.
| |
Collapse
|