Prenatal antidepressant use and the implication of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy

Anesthesia for cesarean delivery and subsequent depression: A nationwide retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Postpartum depression is a major psychiatric disorder associated with maternal suicide and child developmental disturbances. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether general anesthesia for cesarean delivery is associated with a higher rate of new-onset depression after delivery than neuraxial anesthesia.

METHODS

This is a nationwide retrospective cohort study using data retrieved from the National Health Insurance Research Database between 2014 and 2018. Women who had cesarean delivery under general or neuraxial anesthesia were enrolled. After 1:4 propensity score matching, there were 4544 and 18,176 women under the general and neuraxial anesthesia groups, respectively. The primary outcome was new-onset depression diagnosed after delivery in a time-to-event analysis setting.

RESULTS

After propensity-score matching, the rate of new-onset depression diagnosed within 1 year was 1.10 % (50/4488) and 0.86 % (157/18176) after cesarean delivery under general and neuraxial anesthesia, respectively. For depression diagnosed within 90 days of delivery, significant difference between the two groups was noted (0.51 % vs. 0.30 %, P = 0.031). In the time-to-event analysis with Cox regression model, women who delivered under general anesthesia were associated with significantly higher risk of postpartum depression within 90 days (Hazard ratio [HR], 1.71; 95 % CI, 1.05-2.79) compared with those under neuraxial anesthesia.

LIMITATIONS

The observational design only allows asserting association, rather than establishing causality between exposure and outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Women who underwent cesarean delivery under general anesthesia had a higher risk of subsequent depression within 90 days than those under neuraxial anesthesia. Early screening for depressive disorders might facilitate timely management.

Uses of antiseizure medication among pregnant women with epilepsy and risk of adverse obstetric outcomes: A group-based trajectory analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to examine the association between different patterns of antiseizure medication (ASM) use during pregnancy and adverse obstetric outcomes (preterm birth, low birth weight [LBW], and small for gestational age [SGA]).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used the Birth Certificate Application and National Health Insurance data in Taiwan (January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2018). We retrieved weekly ASM among pregnant women with epilepsy who were prepregnancy chronic users and used group-based trajectory modeling to identify distinct patterns of use. Logistic regressions were adopted to examine the association between patterns of ASM use and risk of preterm birth, LBW, and SGA. In addition, we revealed postnatal ASM utilization pattern among these prepregnancy chronic users as an exploratory study.

RESULTS

Of 2175 pregnant women with epilepsy, we identified four patterns of ASM use during pregnancy: frequent and continuous (64.87%), frequent but discontinuous (7.08%), intermittent (19.72%), and intermittent and discontinuous users (8.32%). Compared to frequent and continuous users, the adjusted odds ratios for preterm birth in frequent but discontinuous, intermittent, and intermittent and discontinuous users were .83 (95% confidence interval [CI] = .47-1.48), .71 (95% CI = .47-1.05), and .88 (95% CI = .52-1.49), respectively. Similar results were observed for LBW and SGA. In the exploratory study, we found that most of our study subjects maintained the same patterns before and after delivery.

SIGNIFICANCE

After considering duration and timing of exposure, our study did not find an association between four distinct patterns of ASM use and adverse obstetric outcomes among women with epilepsy. The findings suggested that optimal seizure control could be received for pregnant women with epilepsy after evaluating the risks and benefits.

Risks associated with antidepressants in patients with hypertension during pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

In a cohort of pregnant women using antihypertensive drugs, we compared exposure to antidepressants versus no exposure and the possible association with birth weight, APGAR scores, NICU admission, and maternal admission to an obstetrical intensive care unit (OHC). It was hypothesized that pregnant women with hypertensive disorders using antidepressants are at greater risk of complications.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study in a general teaching hospital in Zwolle, in the Middle-Northern part of The Netherlands. Finally, 58 pregnancies in the exposed group and 273 pregnancies in the reference group met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. We compared the neonate's birthweight between the exposed to antidepressants group and the reference group as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the APGAR score at 1 and 5 min and obstetric high care (OHC) admission of the mother and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission of the child.

RESULTS

We found no differences in birth weight in neonates of mothers with hypertensive disorders and whether or not to use antidepressants. Besides a possible higher risk of admission to an OHC in women with hypertension-complicated pregnancies using antidepressants, we found no other maternal or neonatal risks in this population.

CONCLUSION

We found no additional maternal or neonatal risks of using antidepressants prescribed to women with hypertension disorders during pregnancy.

Depression and antidepressant treatment in the development of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: Results from a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are associated with longer term cardiovascular risk. Understanding if depression or antidepressant use in pregnancy is associated with HDP is important in identifying those potentially vulnerable to poorer health in later life. This study examines if depression and antidepressants are associated with HDP.

METHODS

In all, 815 pregnant women were recruited within an Australian pregnancy cohort study at less than 20 weeks of pregnancy, all undertook the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, and were assigned to four groups for this paper: those with unmedicated depression meeting criteria for current depression (n = 97), those taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in early pregnancy (n = 101), those taking serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors in early pregnancy (n = 31), and those without depression or taking antidepressant medication (control; n = 586). Women were then assessed again following birth. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were diagnosed according to the Society of Obstetric Medicine in Australia and New Zealand Guidelines.

RESULTS

Use of serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) (adjusted risk ratio = 9.10, 95% confidence interval = [3.82, 21.67]) and unmedicated depression (adjusted risk ratio = 3.11, 95% confidence interval = [1.32, 7.35]) were independently associated with significantly higher risk for developing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy compared to controls. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) use did not confer any increased risk. Higher doses of SNRIs, but not selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, were associated with significantly higher risk for developing HDP (adjusted risk ratio = 4.83, 95% confidence interval = [1.50, 15.58]).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that those with depression in pregnancy and/or on an serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor should have closer surveillance for the development of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. These findings support treatment of depression in pregnancy, however, also the consideration of class of antidepressant.