Inadequacy and underreporting of study subjects' race and ethnicity in federally funded pelvic floor research

Reporting Minority Race and Ethnicity in Cardiovascular and Thoracic Journals

INTRODUCTION

Currently, there is no mandatory standard for reporting race and ethnicity in medical journals, presenting significant barriers to studying disparities in medical outcomes. We seek to investigate whether greater recent awareness of diversity and inclusion reflects in reporting of race and ethnicity by peer-reviewed cardiothoracic articles.

METHODS

Pubmed was queried for clinical outcomes articles published from January 2017 to June 2023 in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, and CHEST Journal. Basic science, translational studies, and international studies were excluded. SAS Studio was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

817 papers were reviewed, 378 reported race/ethnicity with 354 (93%) reporting White, 267 (71%) reporting Black, 128 (34%) reporting Hispanic, and 119 (31%) reporting Asian. Over 8-y, there were no statistically significant changes in percent of articles that included White (odds ratio 0.808 95% confidence interval [0.624-1.047], P = 0.1068), Black (1.125 [0.984-1.288], P = 0.0857), or Asian (1.096 [0.960-1.250], P = 0.1751) groups. Hispanics were more likely to be reported in recent years (1.147 [1.006-1.307], P = 0.0397). Subset analysis was performed on cardiac (n = 157) and thoracic articles (n = 157) with no significant trends for race reporting in these subsets.

CONCLUSIONS

Minorities remain underrepresented in reported patient populations in peer-reviewed cardiothoracic journals. Future efforts should prioritize accurately representing these populations in the literature. Inaccurate data and exclusion of minority populations can contribute to disparities observed in overall outcomes.

Pelvic Floor Disorders in Black Women: Prevalence, Clinical Care, and a Strategic Agenda to Prioritize Care

Pelvic floor disorders are a group of common conditions affecting women of all racial and ethnic groups. These disorders are undertreated in all women, but this is especially magnified in Black people who have been historically marginalized in the United States. This article seeks to highlight the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in Black women, evaluate the clinical care they receive, examine barriers they face to equitable care, and present a strategic agenda to prioritize the care of Black women with pelvic floor disorders.

Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment selection patterns among Asian American patients with pelvic floor disorders: a matched cohort study

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The objective was to determine if Asian racial identity was associated with the selection of surgical versus nonsurgical treatments for pelvic floor disorders (PFDs). Secondarily, we aimed to determine if there were other demographic or clinical characteristics associated with treatment selection patterns.

METHODS

This was a retrospective matched cohort study that examined new patient visits (NPVs) of Asian patients at an academic urogynecology practice in Chicago, IL, USA. We included NPVs with primary diagnoses of anal incontinence, mixed urinary incontinence, stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, or pelvic organ prolapse. We identified Asian patients with self-identified racial identity recorded in the electronic medical records. Every Asian patient was age matched to white patients in a 1:3 ratio. The primary outcome was surgical versus nonsurgical treatment selection for their primary PFD diagnosis. Comparison of demographic and clinical variables between the two groups and multivariate logistic regression models were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 53 Asian patients and 159 white patients were included in this analysis. Asian patients were less likely to be English speaking (92% vs 100%, p=0.004), endorse history of anxiety (17% vs 43%, p<0.001), and report history of any pelvic surgery (15% vs 34%, p=0.009) than white patients. When controlling for race, age, history of anxiety, depression, prior pelvic surgery, sexual activity, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory, Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory, and Urinary Distress Inventory scores, Asian racial identity (adjusted odds ratio 0.36 [95% CI 0.14-0.85]) was independently associated with decreased likelihood of choosing surgical treatments for PFDs.

CONCLUSIONS

Asian patients with PFDs were less likely than white patients to undergo surgical treatment for their PFDs despite similar demographic and clinical characteristics.

Race and ethnicity reporting in endometrial cancer literature

OBJECTIVES

There is evidence that there are differences in survival outcomes among patients with endometrial cancer of different ethnic groups. We aimed to assess the quantity and quality of race/ethnicity reporting in the literature on endometrial cancer published from January 2020 to December 2020.

METHODS

In this systematic review, electronic searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Sciences, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were performed for all articles published in 2020. A total of 3330 articles were reviewed, of which 949 (35%) peer-reviewed human-based articles focusing on endometrial cancer were included. Non-research-focused articles, review articles, meta-analyses, case reports, and non-human studies were excluded. We analyzed the proportion of studies reporting race/ethnicity and assessed the quality of reporting with regard to the adherence to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations. We evaluated the influence of study characteristics on race/ethnicity reporting and compared articles published in journals which adhere to the ICMJE recommendations against those that did not explicitly state that they did.

RESULTS

Of the 949 (28.5%) included articles, 166 (17.5%) reported race/ethnicity of patients, with low quality of reporting. The reporting rate of race/ethnicity was similar when comparing articles from ICMJE and non-ICMJE journals (62 (20.4%) vs 104 (16.1%); p=0.11), prospective versus retrospective studies (53 (22.7%) vs 113 (15.8%); p=0.02), and national versus international studies (147 (17.5%) vs 19 (17.4%); p=0.99). Studies performed in the WHO region of Americas were significantly more consistent in reporting race compared with other regions (119 (44.7%) vs 23 (6.8%) European, 2 (7.4%) Eastern Mediterranean, 21 (7.1%) Western Pacific, 0 (0%) South-East Asia; p<0.001). Female corresponding authors were significantly more consistent in reporting race than male authors (94 (22.5%) vs 72 (13.6%); p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Human-based articles focusing on endometrial cancer have a low frequency and quality of race/ethnicity reporting, even in journals claiming to follow ICMJE recommendations.

Differences in Anorectal Manometry Values Among Women With Fecal Incontinence in a Racially, Ethnically, and Socioeconomically Diverse Population

IMPORTANCE

Anorectal manometry (ARM) is a valuable diagnostic and therapeutic tool that can both aid in identifying mechanisms contributing to fecal incontinence (FI) and inform management strategies. Consensus on standard reference range values has not been established, and women of varying racial and ethnic backgrounds are not well-represented in the current literature.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare ARM values between women of different racial and ethnic groups with FI.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of women with FI who underwent ARM at a tertiary health system in an urban underserved community between 2016 and 2021. Demographic information and ARM values were collected from the medical record. Socioeconomic status (SES) was represented by the percent of the population living below the poverty line according to zip code using U.S. census data. Anorectal manometry values were compared between racial and ethnic groups, and multivariable logistic regression was conducted to control for patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight women were included in the analysis: 33% Hispanic, 22% Black, and 45% White. Hispanic and Black women had higher body mass index and higher rates of diabetes and loose stools and were of significantly lower SES compared with White women. Black and Hispanic women had significantly lower thresholds for volume at first sensation and higher mean anal squeeze pressure. Differences were maintained after controlling for body mass index, diabetes, SES, and diarrhea (P = 0.03 and P = 0.01, respectively). Other ARM values were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Racial and ethnic differences in ARM values among women with FI exist. Further studies are needed to determine whether these differences have an impact on symptom severity, treatment selection and outcomes, and patient satisfaction.

Barriers to Urogynecologic Care for Racial and Ethnic Minority Women: A Qualitative Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE

Studies have sought to evaluate factors that have perpetuated disparities in health care, including urogynecologic care. However, there remains a lack of understanding of barriers to care specific to racial/ethnic minority populations.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to report identified barriers to urogynecologic care (eg, care for symptoms/diagnoses of urinary incontinence [UI], accidental bowel leakage [ABL], and pelvic organ prolapse [POP]) for underrepresented racial and ethnic minority (URM) women in the United States.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a systematic search for studies through 5 electronic bibliographic databases. Inclusion criteria for eligible studies included the following: (1) studies reporting barriers to care for those with urogynecologic symptoms/diagnoses, (2) publication date year 2000 or later. Exclusion criteria included study cohorts with children, exclusively non-U.S. populations, cohorts without URM participants, and studies without qualitative research methodology. Study methodology, characteristics, as well as barriers and facilitators to urogynecologic care were captured using a thematic synthesis approach.

RESULTS

There were 360 studies identified. Twelve studies met criteria: 6 had study populations with UI, 3 with POP, 2 on UI and/or POP, and 1 on ABL. There were 7 focus group studies (total 44 groups, n = 330), 4 interview studies (total 160 interviews, n = 160), and 1 had both (10 interviews, 6 groups, n = 39). Most studies reported on patient-associated barriers (n = 10/12) and physician/provider-associated barriers (n = 10/12), whereas only half reported system-associated barriers (n = 6/12).

CONCLUSION

Identified barriers to urogynecologic care for URM populations were examined. Findings likely do not fully reflect barriers to urogynecologic care for URM populations. Comprehensive evaluation of social determinants of health and systemic racism within studies is needed to understand the unique barriers present for racially/ethnically diverse populations.

Evidence-Informed, Interdisciplinary, Multidimensional Action Plan to Advance Overactive Bladder Research and Treatment Initiatives: Directives From State-of-the-Science Conference on Overactive Bladder and Cognitive Impairment

ABSTRACT

This article outlines an evidence-informed, interdisciplinary, multidimensional, comprehensive action plan for the American Urogynecologic Society to improve care of women with overactive bladder (OAB) while minimizing treatment-related adverse events, including cognitive impairment. It is a "call to action" to advance basic, translational, and clinical research and summarizes initiatives developed at the State-of-the-Science Conference on OAB and Cognitive Impairment to (1) develop framework for a new OAB treatment approach in women, (2) define research gaps and future research priorities, (3) champion health equity and diversity considerations in OAB treatment, (4) foster community and promote education to remove stigma surrounding OAB and urinary incontinence, and (5) elevate visibility and impact of OAB, by creating partnerships through education and engagement with health care professionals, industry, private and public payers, funding agencies, and policymakers.

Health inequities within the field of urogynecology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize some of the most recent evidence on disparities in the prevalence, treatment and outcomes of pelvic floor disorders (PFDs), and to address potential interventions to dismantle these inequities.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is a paucity of data on the prevalence and treatment of PFDs in racial minority women. The existing studies are limited and poor quality. These studies suggest that racial and ethnic minorities may be at a higher risk of PFDs, however the epidemiologic data regarding prevalence varies by disorder and at times are conflicting. Nevertheless, the data on treatment and complications is clear. Racial and ethnic minorities are less likely to receive gold-standard treatment and are more likely to experience treatment related complications.

SUMMARY

We discuss the lack of racially inclusive research that perpetuates ongoing health inequities.

Underrepresentation in Pelvic Floor Disorder Patient-Reported Outcomes: Whose Outcomes Are We Measuring?

IMPORTANCE

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments measure the patient's perspective. It is unclear whether commonly used PRO measures were tested in populations that had racial and ethnic distributions comparable with those reported in U.S. census data.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the proportion of non-White race and Hispanic ethnicity participants with their expected proportion based on U.S. census data for PRO instruments with U.S.-based validation studies.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective review of PRO measures considered by the Pelvic Floors Disorders Consortium Working Group on Patient-Reported Outcomes in their 2020 consensus publication. Study and participant information were abstracted from PRO validation studies. Racial and ethnic representation in U.S.-based studies were compared with U.S. census data. The primary outcome was the representation quotient of reported races and ethnicities, calculated as the reported percentage of the study population identifying with a race and/or ethnicity divided by the proportion of the U.S. population identifying with that race and/or ethnicity when the study was published.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies with 21,080 total participants were included. Race was reported in 17 of 45 studies (37.8%), and ethnicity was reported in 7 of 45 (15.6%). Most studies did not specify how race and ethnicity information was collected. For U.S.-based studies, the representation quotient of White participants from 1995 to 2019 was 1.15. Indigenous American/Native American/American Indian/Alaska Natives had the lowest representation quotient (0.22). Reporting of ethnicity increased over time (P = 0.001), although there was no significant change in the reporting of race or the representation of various races and ethnicities (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Non-White and Hispanic patients may be underrepresented in U.S.-based validation studies for PRO instruments in pelvic floor disorders.

Health disparities and access to advanced therapy for overactive bladder

AIMS

Refractory overactive bladder (OAB) is among the most common reasons for referral to specialists in voiding dysfunction. Significant racial and ethnic disparities exist in prevalence, severity, and management of OAB, presenting care barriers for marginalized patients. We aim to explicate these disparities and explore the factors that led to their existence and persistence. We will additionally offer suggestions to mitigate such disparities and approach equitable care for our patients.

METHODS

This is a narrative review of pertinent articles related to health disparities in OAB. Articles on OAB prevalence stratified by race and ethnicity, and variations in treatment patterns for patients of marginalized backgrounds were identified from the PubMed database. We also included a review of evidence from governmental and historical sources to provide sociocultural context.

RESULTS

Patients from marginalized backgrounds are underrepresented in OAB literature. There appear to be differences in symptom severity and prevalence based on race. OAB severity seems closely entwined with social determinants of health. Patients from marginalized populations experience numerous care barriers impeding the treatment of OAB. Finally, White patients are more likely to receive advanced management for OAB.

CONCLUSIONS

Numerous health disparities exist in the diagnosis and management of OAB. This review is grounded in societal context: health injustice in the United States ultimately stems from systemic racism. Improving our understanding of care disparities and the systems that allow them to persist will bring us closer to equity and allow our patients from marginalized backgrounds to obtain the evidence-based care they deserve.

The American Urogynecologic Society Action Plan on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Developed by the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Task Force

ABSTRACT

The American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS) identified diversity, equity, and inclusion as the cornerstone of excellence in governance and operations. Although efforts to increase diversity of our membership have been ongoing for years, there had not previously been an adequate investment to ensure an inclusive climate that emphasizes equity across our volunteers and programs. In June 2020, the AUGS President, Dr Shawn Menefee, and Board of Directors called for a Presidential Task Force on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion to study the current state of our society and make recommendations for future directions. The charge was intentionally broad. In review of the literature, there was little to inform the best means to proceed aside from administering climate surveys to gauge the current culture of inclusion and bias. The task force believed that the challenge was not only to describe the problem but also to articulate solutions. We ultimately moved to rewrite the Diversity and Inclusion and Code of Conduct Statements and develop an Action Plan that would accelerate the efforts of AUGS to foster inclusion and improve equity through the existing governance structure. In this document, we describe how the task force was organized and conducted the work to develop strategies that were aligned with the AUGS mission: "As the leader in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery, AUGS drives excellence in care for women through education, research, advocacy, and interdisciplinary collaboration."