1
|
Mappa I, Masturzo B, Carbone IF, Kiener A, Maruotti GM, Pintucci A, Suprani A, Visentin S, Ghi T, Rizzo G. A national survey on current practice of ultrasound in labor ward. J Perinat Med 2024; 52:509-514. [PMID: 38651816 DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2024-0057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Use of ultrasonography has been suggested as an accurate adjunct to clinical evaluation of fetal position and station during labor. There are no available reports concerning its actual use in delivery wards. The aim of this survey was to evaluate the current practice regarding the use of ultrasonography during labor. METHODS A questionnaire was sent to members of the Italian Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology employed in delivery wards. The qFeuestionnaire was made up of 22 questions evaluating participant characteristics and the current use of ultrasound in labor in their hospital of employment. The answers were grouped according to participant characteristics. RESULTS A total of 200 participants replied. Ultrasound was considered useful before an operative vaginal delivery by 59.6 % of respondents, while 51.8 and 52.5 % considered it useful in the management of prolonged first and second stages of labor, respectively. The major indication for ultrasound use during labor was the assessment of fetal occiput position. The major difficulties in its application were the perceived lack of training and the complexity of the ultrasound equipment use. Participants that reported fewer difficulties were those employed in hospitals with a higher number of deliveries or having delivery units with more years of experience using ultrasound in labor, or those who had attended specific training courses. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that, despite the reported evidence of a higher accuracy of ultrasound compared to clinical evaluation in assessing fetal position and station, its use is still limited, even amongst maternal-fetal medicine practitioners specialized in ultrasonography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilenia Mappa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 9318 Fondazione Policlinico di Tor Vergata, University of Rome Tor Vergata , Rome, Italy
| | - Bianca Masturzo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale di Biella, Biella, Italy
| | - Ilma Floriana Carbone
- Unit of Obstetrics, Department of Woman, Child and Neonate, 9339 Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico , Milan, Italy
| | - Ariane Kiener
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, 9370 University of Parma , Parma, Italy
| | | | - Armando Pintucci
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ASST di Monza, Desio, Italy
| | - Alice Suprani
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Forlì-Cesena, Cesena, Italy
| | - Silvia Visentin
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, 9308 University of Padua , Padova, Italy
| | - Tullio Ghi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, 9370 University of Parma , Parma, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Rizzo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 9318 Fondazione Policlinico di Tor Vergata, University of Rome Tor Vergata , Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jennewein L, Heemann R, Hoock SC, Hentrich AE, Eichbaum C, Feidicker S, Louwen F. Sonographic examination at the beginning of the second stage of labor predicts birth outcome in vaginally intended breech deliveries: a blinded prospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2024; 309:1333-1340. [PMID: 36961567 PMCID: PMC10894138 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07011-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In order to spread competence in vaginal breech deliveries, it is necessary to develop new and easily applicable tools for birth progression and safety evaluation. Ultrasound is a useful and ubiquitously available tool with already documented value for birth progression observation. In deliveries out of breech presentation, an established ultrasound examination is missing. We determined the descent of the fetal buttocks in relation to the maternal pelvic inlet using intrapartum ultrasound. We evaluated these results in comparison to the clinical vaginal examination with the aim to establish an easily applicable method for birth outcome prediction. Therefore, we analyzed the predictive value of our examinations on birth outcome parameters, such as cesarean section rate, as well as fetal and maternal outcome parameters. METHODS We performed a prospective blinded study on 106 mothers with vaginally intended breech delivery. At beginning of stage two in labor, the descent of the fetal buttocks into the mother's pelvic inlet was detected with transabdominal ultrasound and vaginal examination by different observers. PRIMARY OUTCOME VARIABLE Cesarean section rate. Secondary outcome variables: rate of manual assistance in vaginal deliveries, birth duration, 5' APGAR score, umbilical arterial pH, maternal blood loss, and perineal injury. For non-parametric values, Wilcoxon's χ2 test was performed. In order to analyze the predictive value of our examination, lack-of-fit analysis was conducted. Reliability evaluation of the sonographic examination was done with a matched-pair analysis. RESULTS Women with positive intrapartum ultrasound breech engagement sign (+ IPUBES) had a significantly lower rate of cesarean section in comparison with those with negative IPUBES (5/67; 7.5% vs. 18/39; 46.2%; p < 0.0001). The area under the ROC curve for the prediction of CS for negative IPUBES was 0.765 with a sensitivity of 78.3% and a specificity of 74.7%. Sonographic examination showed an excellent reliability in a matched-pair analysis comparing vaginal and sonographic examinations with a mean difference of 0.012 (SD ± 0.027, 95% CI - 0.014 to 0.065). Mean birth duration was significantly longer in deliveries with negative IPUBES (533 min vs. 440 min; p = 0.0011). Fetal and maternal outcome parameters were not significantly different between deliveries with positive and negative IPUBES. CONCLUSIONS Sonographic evaluation of the fetal descent in relation to the mother's pelvic inlet screens reliably for emergency cesarean section. This newly presented method for birth progression observation might be a powerful tool for distribution of expertise in vaginal breech delivery and is able to give reference for clinical vaginal examination by obstetricians in training. TRAIL REGISTRY Clinical trial. Date of registration: 13.03.2019; Date of initial participant enrollment: 20.03.2019; DRKS00016885; https://www.drks.de ; German clinical trials register.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Jennewein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Ricarda Heemann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Samira Catharina Hoock
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Anna Elisabeth Hentrich
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Christine Eichbaum
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Susanne Feidicker
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Frank Louwen
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mottet N, Hotton E, Eckman-Lacroix A, Bourtembourg A, Metz JP, Cot S, Poitrey E, Delhomme L, Languerrand E, Nallet C, Lallemant M, Draycott T, Riethmuller D. Safety and efficacy of the OdonAssist inflatable device for assisted vaginal birth: the BESANCON ASSIST study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 230:S947-S958. [PMID: 38462265 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The first feasibility study of the OdonAssist inflatable device for use in clinically indicated assisted vaginal birth reported a success rate of 48% with no significant safety concerns. Additional studies exploring the device performance in other clinical settings are warranted before definitive conclusions can be drawn about its safety and efficacy in current practice. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of the OdonAssist before conducting a randomized controlled trial. STUDY DESIGN This was an open-label, nonrandomized study of 104 women with a clinically indicated assisted vaginal birth using the OdonAssist at the Besancon University Hospital, France. Data, including those of a nested cohort group of women who had an assisted vaginal birth using vacuum or spatulas because a trained OdonAssist device operator was not available at the time of delivery, were collected. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of successful assisted vaginal births using the OdonAssist. Neonatal outcome data were reviewed at days 1 and 28, and maternal outcomes were investigated up to day 90. RESULTS Between December 2019 and May 2021, 2191 pregnant women were approached, and 83% (1636/1973) of them consented to participate in the study. Among them, 10.7% (176/1636) required an assisted vaginal birth owing to a vertex presentation at +1 and below. The OdonAssist was used in 59% of births (104/176), and 41.1% (72/176) of the participants were included in the nested cohort group. The rate of successful assisted vaginal births using the OdonAssist was 88.5% (92/104). No emergency cesarean deliveries were performed in the OdonAssist group. There were no serious adverse maternal or neonatal reactions related to the use of the device. The rate of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears with the OdonAssist was 3.8% (4/104). The maternal perception ratings of the birth experience with the OdonAssist (collected on days 1, 7, and 28 using a 15-point scale) were high. In addition, the operators reported a positive perception of the device, with ease of use across the different steps of the procedure. One single technique was used for all vertex fetal head positions. CONCLUSION The OdonAssist is a safe and effective alternative to other current devices for assisted vaginal births. The high acceptance rate (83%) among pregnant women and the high rate of successful assisted vaginal births using the OdonAssist confirm the feasibility of a future randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pôle Mère-Femme, University Hospital of Besancon, University of Franche-Comte, Besançon, France; Nanomedicine Lab, Imagery and Therapeutics, University of Franche-Comte, Besancon, France.
| | - Emily Hotton
- Women and Children's Research Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom; Translational Health Science, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Astrid Eckman-Lacroix
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pôle Mère-Femme, University Hospital of Besancon, University of Franche-Comte, Besançon, France
| | - Aude Bourtembourg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pôle Mère-Femme, University Hospital of Besancon, University of Franche-Comte, Besançon, France
| | - Jean Patrick Metz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pôle Mère-Femme, University Hospital of Besancon, University of Franche-Comte, Besançon, France
| | - Sophie Cot
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pôle Mère-Femme, University Hospital of Besancon, University of Franche-Comte, Besançon, France; Department of Midwifery Science, University of Franche-Comte, Besancon, France
| | - Emilie Poitrey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pôle Mère-Femme, University Hospital of Besancon, University of Franche-Comte, Besançon, France; Department of Midwifery Science, University of Franche-Comte, Besancon, France
| | - Léa Delhomme
- Pediatric Intensive Care, Neonatology and Pediatric Emergencies Departments, CHU Besancon, Besancon, France, Translational Health Science, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Eric Languerrand
- Translational Health Science, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Camille Nallet
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pôle Mère-Femme, University Hospital of Besancon, University of Franche-Comte, Besançon, France
| | - Marine Lallemant
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pôle Mère-Femme, University Hospital of Besancon, University of Franche-Comte, Besançon, France
| | - Tim Draycott
- Translational Health Science, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Didier Riethmuller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Besancon, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Usman S, Hanidu A, Kovalenko M, Hassan WA, Lees C. The sonopartogram. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023; 228:S997-S1016. [PMID: 37164504 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
The assessment of labor progress from digital vaginal examination has remained largely unchanged for at least a century, despite the current major advances in maternal and perinatal care. Although inconsistently reproducible, the findings from digital vaginal examination are customarily plotted manually on a partogram, which is composed of a graphical representation of labor, together with maternal and fetal observations. The partogram has been developed to aid recognition of failure to labor progress and guide management-specific obstetrical intervention. In the last decade, the use of ultrasound in the delivery room has increased with the advent of more powerful, portable ultrasound machines that have become more readily available for use. Although ultrasound in intrapartum practice is predominantly used for acute management, an ultrasound-based partogram, a sonopartogram, might represent an objective tool for the graphical representation of labor. Demonstrating greater accuracy for fetal head position and more objectivity in the assessment of fetal head station, it could be considered complementary to traditional clinical assessment. The development of the sonopartogram concept would require further undertaking of serial measurements. Advocates of ultrasound will concede that its use has yet to demonstrate a difference in obstetrical and neonatal morbidity in the context of the management of labor and delivery. Taking a step beyond the descriptive graphical representation of labor progress is the question of whether a specific combination of clinical and demographic parameters might be used to inform knowledge of labor outcomes. Intrapartum cesarean deliveries and deliveries assisted by forceps and vacuum are all associated with a heightened risk of maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes. Although these outcomes cannot be precisely predicted, many known risk factors exist. Malposition and high station of the fetal head, short maternal stature, and other factors, such as caput succedaneum, are all implicated in operative delivery; however, the contribution of individual parameters based on clinical and ultrasound assessments has not been quantified. Individualized risk prediction models, including maternal characteristics and ultrasound findings, are increasingly used in women's health-for example, in preeclampsia or trisomy screening. Similarly, intrapartum cesarean delivery models have been developed with good prognostic ability in specifically selected populations. For intrapartum ultrasound to be of prognostic value, robust, externally validated prediction models for labor outcome would inform delivery management and allow shared decision-making with parents.
Collapse
|
5
|
Rizzo G, Ghi T, Henrich W, Tutschek B, Kamel R, Lees CC, Mappa I, Kovalenko M, Lau W, Eggebo T, Achiron R, Sen C. Ultrasound in labor: clinical practice guideline and recommendation by the WAPM-World Association of Perinatal Medicine and the PMF-Perinatal Medicine Foundation. J Perinat Med 2022; 50:1007-1029. [PMID: 35618672 DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2022-0160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
This recommendation document follows the mission of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine in collaboration with the Perinatal Medicine Foundation. We aim to bring together groups and individuals throughout the world for standardization to implement the ultrasound evaluation in labor ward and improve the clinical management of labor. Ultrasound in labor can be performed using a transabdominal or a transperineal approach depending upon which parameters are being assessed. During transabdominal imaging, fetal anatomy, presentation, liquor volume, and placental localization can be determined. The transperineal images depict images of the fetal head in which calculations to determine a proposed fetal head station can be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Rizzo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Tullio Ghi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
- UOC Ostetricia e Ginecologia Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy
- Della Scuola di Specializzazione in Ostetricia e Ginecologia Presidente del CdS Ostetricia, Parma, Italy
| | - Wolfgang Henrich
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Berlin, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Boris Tutschek
- Specialist in Gynecology and Obstetrics FMH, Focus Obstetrics and Feto-Maternal Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Rasha Kamel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal medicine unit, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Christoph C Lees
- Imperial College London and Head of Fetal Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Development & Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ilenia Mappa
- Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Unità Operativa di Medicina Materno Fetale Ospedale Cristo Re Roma, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Wailam Lau
- Department of O&G, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Torbjorn Eggebo
- National center for fetal medicine, St.Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Reuven Achiron
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ultrasound unit, Tel-Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Cihat Sen
- Perinatal Medicine Foundation, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Perinatal Medicine, Memorial BAH Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Perinatal Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ghi T, Dall'Asta A. Sonographic evaluation of the fetal head position and attitude during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022:S0002-9378(22)00449-5. [PMID: 37278991 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 06/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Fetal malpresentation, malposition, and asynclitism are among the most common determinants of a protracted active phase of labor, arrest of dilatation during the first stage, and arrest of descent in the second stage. The diagnosis of these conditions is traditionally based on vaginal examination, which is subjective and poorly reproducible. Intrapartum sonography has been demonstrated to yield higher accuracy than vaginal examination in characterizing fetal malposition, and some guidelines endorse its use for the verification of the occiput position before performing an instrumental delivery. It is also useful for the objective diagnosis of the malpresentation or asynclitism of the fetal head. According to our experience, the sonographic assessment of the head position in labor is simple to perform also for clinicians with basic ultrasound skills, whereas the assessment of malpresentation and asynclitism warrants a higher level of expertise. When clinically appropriate, the fetal occiput position can be easily ascertained using transabdominal sonography combining the axial and the sagittal planes. With the transducer positioned on the maternal suprapubic region, the fetal head can be visualized, and landmarks including the fetal orbits, the midline, and the occiput itself with the cerebellum and the cervical spine (depending on the type of fetal position) can be demonstrated below the probe. Sinciput, brow, and face represent the 3 "classical" variants of cephalic malpresentation and are characterized by a progressively increasing degree of deflexion from vertex presentation. Transabdominal sonography has been recently suggested for the objective assessment of the fetal head attitude when a cephalic malpresentation is clinically suspected. Fetal attitude can be evaluated on the sagittal plane with either a subjective or an objective approach. Two different sonographic parameters such as the occiput-spine angle and the chin-chest angle have been recently described to quantify the degree of flexion in fetuses in non-occiput-posterior or occiput-posterior position, respectively. Finally, although clinical examination still represents the mainstay of diagnosis of asynclitism, the use of intrapartum sonography has been shown to confirm the digital findings. The sonographic diagnosis of asynclitism can be achieved in expert hands using a combination of transabdominal and transperineal sonography. At suprapubic sonography on the axial plane only, 1 orbit can be visualized (squint sign) while the sagittal suture appears anteriorly (posterior asynclitism) or posteriorly (anterior asynclitism) displaced. Eventually the transperineal approach does not allow the visualization of the cerebral midline on the axial plane if the probe is perpendicular to the fourchette. In this expert review we summarize the indications, technique, and clinical role of intrapartum sonographic evaluation of fetal head position and attitude.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tullio Ghi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
| | - Andrea Dall'Asta
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bertholdt C, Morel O, Zuily S, Ambroise-Grandjean G. Manual rotation of occiput posterior or transverse positions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226:781-793. [PMID: 34800396 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this systematic review was to assess the association between spontaneous vaginal delivery and manual rotation during labor for occiput posterior or transverse positions. Our secondary objective was to assess maternal and neonatal outcomes. DATA SOURCES An electronic search of PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials covered the period from January 2000 to September 2021, without language restrictions. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA The eligibility criteria included all randomized trials with singleton pregnancies at ≥37 weeks of gestation comparing the manual rotation groups with the control groups. The primary outcome was the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery. Additional secondary outcomes were rate of occiput posterior position at delivery, operative vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, obstetrical anal sphincter injury, prolonged second stage of labor, shoulder dystocia, neonatal acidosis, and phototherapy. Subgroup analyses were performed according to types of position (occiput posterior or occiput transverse), techniques used (whole-hand or digital rotation), and parity (nulliparous or parous). METHODS The quality of each study was evaluated with the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, known as RoB 2. The meta-analysis used random-effects models depending on their heterogeneity, and risks ratios were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS Here, 7 of 384 studies met the inclusion criteria and were selected. They included 1402 women: 704 in the manual rotation groups and 698 in the control groups. Manual rotation was associated with a higher rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery: 64.9% vs 59.5% (risk ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.16; P=.005; 95% prediction interval, 0.90-1.32). This association was no longer significant after stratification by parity or technique used. Manual rotation was associated with spontaneous vaginal delivery only for the occiput posterior position (risk ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.15). Furthermore, it was associated with a reduction in occiput posterior or transverse positions at delivery (risk ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.87) and episiotomies (risk ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.98). The groups did not differ significantly for cesarean deliveries, operative vaginal deliveries, or neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION Manual rotation increased the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery.
Collapse
|