Effect of gabapentin on hyperemesis gravidarum: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

The Safety of Alcohol Pharmacotherapies in Pregnancy: A Scoping Review of Human and Animal Research

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Alcohol pharmacotherapies pose unknown teratogenic risks in pregnancy and are therefore recommended to be avoided. This limits treatment options for pregnant individuals with alcohol use disorders (AUD). The information on the safety of these medications during pregnancy is uncertain, prompting a scoping review. The objective of this review was to investigate available information on the safety of alcohol pharmacotherapies in pregnancy.

METHODS

Studies published between January 1990 and July 2023 were identified through searches in BIOSIS, Embase, PsycINFO and MEDLINE databases, using terms related to pregnancy and alcohol pharmacotherapies. The alcohol pharmacotherapies investigated were naltrexone, acamprosate, disulfiram, nalmefene, baclofen, gabapentin and topiramate. Studies were screened by two independent reviewers. Covidence software facilitated the management, screening and extraction of studies.

RESULTS

A total of 105 studies were included in the review (naltrexone: 21, acamprosate: 4, disulfiram: 3, baclofen: 3, nalmefene: 0, topiramate: 55, gabapentin: 32) with some studies investigating multiple medications. Studies investigating naltrexone's safety in pregnancy focussed on opioid use disorders, with limited evidence regarding its safety in the context of AUD. Despite concerns about higher rates of some pregnancy complications, studies generally indicate naltrexone as a safer option compared with opioid agonists or alcohol during pregnancy. Acamprosate was not clearly associated with adverse effects of exposure in pregnancy, with two pre-clinical studies suggesting potential neuroprotective properties. Disulfiram has a high risk of congenital anomalies when used in pregnancy, believed to be due to its mechanism of action. Prenatal topiramate has also been associated with an increased risk of congenital anomalies, particularly oral clefts. There were mixed results concerning the safety of prenatal gabapentin and little to no literature investigating the safety of baclofen or nalmefene during pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient research on the safety of alcohol pharmacotherapies in pregnancy. Despite this, given alcohol's teratogenic effects, naltrexone could be considered to help maintain abstinence in pregnant individuals with AUD, particularly when psychosocial treatments have failed.

Risk Factors for Infusions, Emergency Room Visits and Hospitalizations for Hyperemesis Gravidarum: New Data and Literature Review

Purpose

Few factors have been identified that increase the risk of visits (hospital emergency room or inpatient stays) due to hyperemesis gravidarum (HG). The purpose of this study is to understand trends in HG management and identify variables increasing visit frequency so that strategies may be developed to reduce hospital utilization.

Study Design

An online survey was posted on the Hyperemesis Education and Research Foundation website and social media between June 2022 and May 2023. Participants had previous or current severe pregnancy nausea and vomiting. Respondents were asked about themselves and their HG experience, including weight loss, medications, infusion care, and visit frequency. Odds ratios, p-values, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated via MedCalc to analyze the significance of each factor, and Spearman rank correlations were analyzed via SPSS for associations of ondansetron usage with visits and weight loss. Microsoft Excel and SPSS were used to calculate treatment and visit frequencies.

Results

Survey data from 1220 respondents who reported a current or prior pregnancy with HG were included in this study. Respondents were primarily White, from the US, and had at least one visit due to HG. Participants with a visit were significantly more likely to be a person of color (POC), unable to work, have no children, and lose over 15 pounds (6.8 kg). Those who took medications as prescribed had fewer visits. No medication combination or dose was found to be significantly more effective in preventing weight loss or repeat hospital visits.

Conclusion

Risk factors predicting visits included POC, not having children, being too sick to work, and having extreme weight loss. Utilization of medication and nutritional therapies is inconsistent and inadequate in this population, which may increase visit frequency.

Inpatient Management of Hyperemesis Gravidarum

Hyperemesis gravidarum has a reported incidence of approximately 0.3-3% of pregnancies. Without treatment, refractory hyperemesis gravidarum can result in dehydration, electrolyte deficiencies, and severe nutritional deficiencies, resulting in significant maternal morbidity. The overall goals of inpatient management of refractory hyperemesis gravidarum are the resumption of oral intake to an adequate level to maintain hydration and nutrition, including the ability to tolerate oral pharmacotherapy. Patients initially are stabilized with rehydration and electrolyte repletion. There are numerous pharmacotherapeutics available that can be administered intravenously to control symptoms when oral intake is not an option. However, despite maximizing typical antiemetics, there will be cases refractory to these medications, and alternative pharmacotherapeutics and nutrition-support modalities must be considered. Mirtazapine, olanzapine, corticosteroids, and gabapentin are examples of alternative pharmacotherapeutics, and enteral and parenteral nutrition are alternative therapies that can be used when oral intake is not tolerated for prolonged time periods with ongoing weight loss. In refractory cases of hyperemesis gravidarum, the risks and benefits of these alternative forms of management must be considered, along with the risks of undertreated hyperemesis gravidarum and the overall effect of hyperemesis gravidarum on patients' quality of life.

The efficacy and safety of acupuncture and moxibustion for the management of nausea and vomiting in pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Nausea and vomiting, which cause considerable multifaceted effects, are commonly experience in early pregnancy. Various therapeutic strategies are employed, including both conventional agents and complementary medicine. However, the effectiveness of complementary medicine remains controversial. The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate efficacy and safety of acupuncture and moxibustion in pregnant women.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search using electronic databases such as PubMed, Embase, ISI Web, Medline, Cochrane, clinicaltrial.gov, and several Chinese databases. A total of 21 randomized controlled trials were included in this study for quantitative analysis. Forest plots were utilized to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture and moxibustion. Egger's test was employed to assess publication bias.

Results

The pooled analysis revealed that the acupuncture/moxibustion group was more effective than control group in alleviating nausea and vomiting in early pregnant women (RR: 0.28; 95%CI: 0.21, 0.37). Similar results were observed when comparing the acupuncture group to traditional herbs (RR: 0.08; 95 % CI: 0.01, 0.60), conventional therapy (RR: 0.15; 95 % CI: 0.04, 0.57), and the blank control group (RR: 0.33; 95 % CI: 0.22, 0.51). Moxibustion also exhibited the ability to alleviate nausea and vomiting compared with the blank control group (RR: 0.21; 95 % CI: 0.08, 0.52). As for safety, there were no significant differences in severe adverse events between the acupuncture group and the control group (RR: 0.77; 95%CI: 0.52, 1.14), the blank control group (RR: 0.61; 95%CI: 0.34, 1.10), the sham acupuncture group (RR: 1.05; 95%CI: 0.63, 1.73), or the conventional therapy group (RR: 0.32; 95%CI: 0.06, 1.55).

Conclusion

Acupuncture and moxibustion might be effective for the management of nausea and vomiting in early pregnant women. Moreover, acupuncture might be a relatively safe treatment for pregnancy.

Systematic evidence map of evidence addressing the top 10 priority research questions for hyperemesis gravidarum

OBJECTIVE

Knowledge gaps regarding hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) are substantial. We aimed to systematically identify and map recent evidence addressing the top 10 priority questions for HG, as published in 2021 in a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.

DESIGN

Systematic evidence map.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE on 12 January 2021 and CINAHL on 22 February 2021 with search terms hyperemesis gravidarum, pernicious vomiting in pregnancy and their synonyms. Results were limited to 2009 onwards. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts to assess whether the studies addressed a top 10 priority questions for HG. Differences were discussed until consensus was reached. Publications were allocated to one or more top 10 research questions. Study design was noted, as was patient or public involvement. Two reviewers extracted data synchronously and both cross-checked 10%. Extracted data were imported into EPPI-Reviewer software to create an evidence map.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The number and design of studies in the search yield, displayed per the published 10 priority questions.

RESULTS

Searches returned 4338 results for screening; 406 publications were included in the evidence map. 136 publications addressed multiple questions. Numerous studies address the immediate and long-term outcomes or possible markers for HG (question 8 and 9, respectively 164 and 82 studies). Very few studies seek a possible cure for HG (question 1, 8 studies), preventative treatment (question 4, 2 studies) or how to achieve nutritional requirements of pregnancy (question 10, 17 studies). Case reports/series were most numerous with 125 (30.7%) included. Few qualitative studies (9, 2.2%) were identified. 25 (6.1%) systematic reviews addressed eight questions, or aspects of them. 31 (7.6%) studies included patient involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

There are significant gaps and overlap in the current HG literature addressing priority questions. Researchers and funders should direct their efforts at addressing the gaps in the top 10 questions.

Uptake of antiepileptic drugs in forskolin-induced differentiated BeWo cells: Alteration of gabapentin transport

Previous studies have indicated that the expression levels of several transporters are altered during placental trophoblast differentiation. However, changes in the transport activities of therapeutic agents during differentiation must be comprehensively characterised. Antiepileptic drugs, including gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), topiramate, and levetiracetam, are increasingly prescribed during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to elucidate differences in the uptake of antiepileptic drugs during the differentiation process.Human placental choriocarcinoma BeWo cells were used as trophoblast models. For differentiation into syncytiotrophoblast-like cells, cells were treated with forskolin.The uptake of GBP and LTG was lower in differentiated BeWo cells than in undifferentiated cells. In particular, the maximum uptake rate of GBP transport was decreased in differentiated BeWo cells. Furthermore, GBP transport was trans-stimulated by the amino acids His and Met. We investigated the profiles of amino acids in undifferentiated and differentiated BeWo cells. Supplementation with His and Met, which demonstrated trans-stimulatory effects on GBP uptake, restored GBP uptake in differentiated cells. The findings of this study suggest that drug transport in BeWo cells can be altered before and after differentiation, and that the altered GBP uptake could be mediated by the intracellular amino acid status.

Emerging Progress in Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy and Hyperemesis Gravidarum: Challenges and Opportunities

Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) is a common condition that affects up to 70% of pregnant women. Hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) is considered the serious form of NVP, which is reported in 0.3–10.8% of pregnant women. NVP has a relatively benign course, but HG can be linked with some poor maternal, fetal, and offspring outcomes. The exact causes of NVP and HG are unknown, but various factors have been hypothesized to be associated with pathogenesis. With the advance of precision medicine and molecular biology, some genetic factors such as growth/differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) have become therapeutic targets. In our review, we summarize the historical hypotheses of the pathogenesis of NVP and HG including hormonal factors, Helicobacter pylori, gastrointestinal dysmotility, placenta-related factors, psychosocial factors, and new factors identified by genetics. We also highlight some approaches to the management of NVP and HG, including pharmacological treatment, complementary treatment, and some supporting treatments. Looking to the future, progress in understanding NVP and HG may reduce the adverse outcomes and improve the maternal quality of life during pregnancy.