Intrapartum ultrasound for assessment of cervical dilatation

Implementation of sonopartogram: multicenter feasibility study

OBJECTIVES

Well-established clinical practice for assessing progress in labor involves routine abdominal palpation and vaginal examination (VE). However, VE is subjective, poorly reproducible and painful for most women. In this study, our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of systematically integrating transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal position, parasagittal angle of progression (psAOP), head-perineum distance (HPD) and sonographic cervical dilatation (SCD) to monitor the progress of labor in women undergoing induction of labor (IOL). We also aimed to determine if ultrasound can reduce women's pain during such examinations.

METHODS

Women were recruited as they presented for IOL in three maternity units. Ultrasound assessments were performed in 100 women between 37 + 0 and 41 + 6 weeks' gestation. A baseline combined transabdominal and transperineal scan was performed, including assessment of fetal biometry, umbilical artery and fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler, amniotic fluid index, fetal spine and occiput positions, psAOP, HPD, SCD and cervical length. Intrapartum scans were performed instead of VE, unless there was a clinical indication to perform a VE, according to protocol. Participants were asked to indicate their level of pain by verbally giving a pain score between 0 and 10 (with 0 representing no pain) during assessment. Repeated measures data were analyzed using mixed-effect models to identify significant factors that affected the relationship between psAOP, HPD, SCD and mode of delivery.

RESULTS

A total of 100 women were included in the study. Of these, 20% delivered by Cesarean section, 65% vaginally and 15% by instrumental delivery. There were no adverse fetal or maternal outcomes. A total of 223 intrapartum ultrasound scans were performed in 87 participants (13 women delivered before intrapartum ultrasound was performed), with a median of two scans per participant (interquartile range (IQR), 1-3). Of these, 76 women underwent a total of 151 VEs with a median of one VE per participant (IQR, 0-2), with no significant difference between vaginal- or Cesarean-delivery groups. After excluding those with epidural anesthesia during examination, the median pain score for intrapartum scans was 0 (IQR, 0-1) and for VE it was 3 (IQR, 0-6). Cesarean delivery was significantly associated with a slower rate of change in psAOP, HPD and SCD.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound assessment can be used to assess progress in labor and can reduce the level of pain experienced during examination. Ultrasound assessment may be able to replace some transabdominal and vaginal examinations during labor. © 2024 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

New insights on labor progression: a systematic review

The past 20 years witnessed an invigoration of research on labor progression and a change of thinking regarding normal labor. New evidence is emerging, and more advanced statistical methods are applied to labor progression analyses. Given the wide variations in the onset of active labor and the pattern of labor progression, there is an emerging consensus that the definition of abnormal labor may not be related to an idealized or average labor curve. Alternative approaches to guide labor management have been proposed; for example, using an upper limit of a distribution of labor duration to define abnormally slow labor. Nonetheless, the methods of labor assessment are still primitive and subject to error; more objective measures and more advanced instruments are needed to identify the onset of active labor, monitor labor progression, and define when labor duration is associated with maternal/child risk. Cervical dilation alone may be insufficient to define active labor, and incorporating more physical and biochemical measures may improve accuracy of diagnosing active labor onset and progression. Because the association between duration of labor and perinatal outcomes is rather complex and influenced by various underlying and iatrogenic conditions, future research must carefully explore how to integrate statistical cut-points with clinical outcomes to reach a practical definition of labor abnormalities. Finally, research regarding the complex labor process may benefit from new approaches, such as machine learning technologies and artificial intelligence to improve the predictability of successful vaginal delivery with normal perinatal outcomes.

The sonopartogram

The assessment of labor progress from digital vaginal examination has remained largely unchanged for at least a century, despite the current major advances in maternal and perinatal care. Although inconsistently reproducible, the findings from digital vaginal examination are customarily plotted manually on a partogram, which is composed of a graphical representation of labor, together with maternal and fetal observations. The partogram has been developed to aid recognition of failure to labor progress and guide management-specific obstetrical intervention. In the last decade, the use of ultrasound in the delivery room has increased with the advent of more powerful, portable ultrasound machines that have become more readily available for use. Although ultrasound in intrapartum practice is predominantly used for acute management, an ultrasound-based partogram, a sonopartogram, might represent an objective tool for the graphical representation of labor. Demonstrating greater accuracy for fetal head position and more objectivity in the assessment of fetal head station, it could be considered complementary to traditional clinical assessment. The development of the sonopartogram concept would require further undertaking of serial measurements. Advocates of ultrasound will concede that its use has yet to demonstrate a difference in obstetrical and neonatal morbidity in the context of the management of labor and delivery. Taking a step beyond the descriptive graphical representation of labor progress is the question of whether a specific combination of clinical and demographic parameters might be used to inform knowledge of labor outcomes. Intrapartum cesarean deliveries and deliveries assisted by forceps and vacuum are all associated with a heightened risk of maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes. Although these outcomes cannot be precisely predicted, many known risk factors exist. Malposition and high station of the fetal head, short maternal stature, and other factors, such as caput succedaneum, are all implicated in operative delivery; however, the contribution of individual parameters based on clinical and ultrasound assessments has not been quantified. Individualized risk prediction models, including maternal characteristics and ultrasound findings, are increasingly used in women's health-for example, in preeclampsia or trisomy screening. Similarly, intrapartum cesarean delivery models have been developed with good prognostic ability in specifically selected populations. For intrapartum ultrasound to be of prognostic value, robust, externally validated prediction models for labor outcome would inform delivery management and allow shared decision-making with parents.

Improving the interpretation of electronic fetal monitoring: the fetal reserve index

Electronic fetal monitoring, particularly in the form of cardiotocography, forms the centerpiece of labor management. Initially successfully designed for stillbirth prevention, there was hope to also include prediction and prevention of fetal acidosis and its sequelae. With the routine use of electronic fetal monitoring, the cesarean delivery rate increased from <5% in the 1970s to >30% at present. Most at-risk cases produced healthy babies, resulting in part from considerable confusion as to the differences between diagnostic and screening tests. Electronic fetal monitoring is clearly a screening test. Multiple attempts have aimed at enhancing its ability to accurately distinguish babies at risk of in utero injury from those who are not and to do this in a timely manner so that appropriate intervention can be performed. Even key electronic fetal monitoring opinion leaders admit that this goal has yet to be achieved. Our group has developed a modified approach called the "Fetal Reserve Index" that contextualizes the findings of electronic fetal monitoring by formally including the presence of maternal, fetal, and obstetrical risk factors and increased uterine contraction frequencies and breaking up the tracing into 4 quantifiable components (heart rate, variability, decelerations, and accelerations). The result is a quantitative 8-point metric, with each variable being weighted equally in version 1.0. In multiple previously published refereed papers, we have shown that in head-to-head studies comparing the fetal reserve index with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' fetal heart rate categories, the fetal reserve index more accurately identifies babies born with cerebral palsy and could also reduce the rates of emergency cesarean delivery and vaginal operative deliveries. We found that the fetal reserve index scores and fetal pH and base excess actually begin to fall earlier in the first stage of labor than was commonly appreciated, and the fetal reserve index provides a good surrogate for pH and base excess values. Finally, the last fetal reserve index score before delivery combined with early analysis of neonatal heart rate and acid/base balance shows that the period of risk for neonatal neurologic impairment can continue for the first 30 minutes of life and requires much closer neonatal observation than is currently being done.

Incremental risk of clinical chorioamnionitis associated with cervical examination

BACKGROUND

Clinical chorioamnionitis is associated with significant maternal and neonatal morbidity, yet there is no clear evidence on the association between cervical examinations and infection.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the association between the number of cervical examinations performed during term labor management and the risk of clinical chorioamnionitis.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study of term (≥37 weeks of gestation), singleton pregnancies who labored at our tertiary care center from 2014 to 2018. The primary outcome of clinical chorioamnionitis was defined as maternal intrapartum fever (single oral temperature of >39°C or 38°C-38.9°C for 30 minutes) and 1 or more of the following: maternal leukocytosis, purulent cervical drainage, or fetal tachycardia. The primary exposure was the number of digital cervical exams documented in the medical record. Log-binomial regression was used to model the effect of cervical examinations on the risk of clinical chorioamnionitis while adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 20,029 individuals met the inclusion criteria and 1028 (5%) patients experienced clinical chorioamnionitis. The number of cervical exams was associated with increased risk of developing infection after adjusting for potential confounders. Individuals with ≥8 cervical exams had 1.7 times the risk of developing clinical chorioamnionitis compared with those with 1 to 3 exams. Prolonged rupture time, nulliparity, Black race, Medicaid insurance, higher gestational age, and higher body mass index were associated with increased risk of clinical chorioamnionitis, whereas smoking and group B Streptococcus colonization were associated with a lower risk.

CONCLUSION

Our study found that the number of cervical exams performed during labor is an independent risk factor for developing clinical chorioamnionitis. Unnecessary cervical exams should be avoided during labor management at term.